Nunez, Amberly L.

Context.— Ensuring equitable laboratory patient care within diverse populations is a priority. The cytopathology laboratory has an important role in providing gender-inclusive care, particularly with regard to screening and prevention of human papillomavirus–related carcinoma, for individuals who are transgender, gender nonbinary, intersex, and with same-gender sexual orientation. Providing equitable care necessitates an understanding of gender-inclusive processes within the cytopathology laboratory. Many barriers to implementation exist and include sociocultural, legal, ethical, and financial hurdles. Objective.— To review the current literature regarding gender-inclusive care within a multi-institutional setting and identify challenges and opportunities for future growth in cytopathology. Specific areas of focus include appropriate terminology in laboratory information systems and requisitions, and variables affecting Papanicolaou test interpretation, human papillomavirus testing, and anal Papanicolaou test screening. Data Sources.— Primary literature was searched within the areas highlighted throughout the article. Multi-institutional experiences from the authors, in addition to editorials and expert opinion, were used. Conclusions.— The cytopathology laboratory has an important role in providing care that is inclusive and accurate for all patients. Gaps in care exist and further work is needed to address these disparities. This review attempts to increase awareness, educate, and share our own multi-institutional experiences, and calls for improvements in cytopathology to optimize quality in gender-inclusive patient care.

BACKGROUNDFine‐needle aspiration of the thyroid is a common procedure, with an established role in reducing unnecessary thyroid surgery and identifying neoplasms and malignancies.METHODSThe study evaluated 1558 responses in the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) Non‐GYN Assessment program of aspirates of thyroid neoplasms and malignancies and placed them into the following groups: group A (target or correct interpretation), group B (incorrect interpretation as a benign thyroid nodule), group C (incorrect interpretation malignant aspirate as thyroid neoplasm), and group D (malignant diagnosis with incorrect interpretation). In clinical practice, responses in groups A, C, and D would lead to surgical excision, whereas responses in group B would not.RESULTSOf a total of 1558 responses, 78.5% of the responses were in group A, 8.5% in group B, 3.75% in group C, and 9.25% in group D. By individual diagnosis, the group rates were 86.5%, 0%, 11%, and 2.5% for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma; 83%, 5.5%, 4.25%, and 7.25% for papillary thyroid carcinoma; 79%, 7%, 6%, and 8% for medullary thyroid carcinoma; 83.5% 6.75%, 0%, and 9.75% for Hürthle cell neoplasm; and 61%, 22%, 0%, and 17% for follicular neoplasm in groups A, B, C, and D respectively.CONCLUSIONSFine‐needle aspiration was effective in diagnosing thyroid neoplasms and malignancies and in separating thyroid nodules into surgical and nonsurgical categories. Data from a large group of cytology professionals showed good performance; however, there is room for improvement, especially in making specific diagnoses. In particular, follicular neoplasm and follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma were challenging diagnoses for participants. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2014;122:745–750. © 2014 The Authors. Cancer Cytopathology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society.