Qureshi, Athar M.

BACKGROUND: The Harmony transcatheter pulmonary valve (TPV) is designed to treat severe pulmonary regurgitation in the native or surgically repaired right ventricular (RV) outflow tract. Early outcomes after TPV replacement with the Harmony valve have been positive, but longer-term data are limited. METHODS: The study included patients who received a commercially available TPV22 or TPV25 device as part of the nonrandomized, prospective Native Outflow Tract Early Feasibility Study, Harmony Pivotal Trial, and Continued Access Study. Patients completed at least 3 years of follow-up, and outcomes to 5 years were reported when available. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were catheterized, and 86 were successfully implanted with a Harmony TPV. Median duration of follow-up was 5 (range 0–6) years in the TPV22 group and 3 (1–4) years in the TPV25 group. At 3 years, all patients with a TPV22 and 96% of those with a TPV25 had ≤mild pulmonary regurgitation. By magnetic resonance imaging, significant improvements from preimplant to 2 years were observed in RV end-diastolic volume index, RV to left ventricular end-diastolic volume ratio, and effective RV stroke volume (all P <0.001). SF-36 quality-of-life scores improved after Harmony implantation and were sustained over 3 years. Early cases of ventricular tachycardia resolved, and there were no new arrhythmias. Adverse events up to 5 years included 3 deaths unrelated to the device or procedure, 2 cases of endocarditis that were treated (1 medically, 1 transcatheter debulking of a vegetation) and resolved, 6 patients with RV outflow tract obstruction or thrombosis resulting in valve-in valve procedures, and 1 major stent fracture resulting in surgical explant. CONCLUSIONS: At 3 to 5 years, Harmony TPV replacement resulted in sustained valve competence, beneficial cardiac remodeling, and improved quality of life. Continued monitoring is needed to assess long-term outcomes and valve performance. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01762124; NCT02979587.

AbstractBackgroundTranscatheter tricuspid valve‐in‐valve (ViV) replacement has yielded good hemodynamic outcomes in the treatment of dysfunctional bioprosthetic valves (BPVs). Intentional fracture of certain rigid BPV frames, if feasible, allows a larger implanted valve when compared with implant into an unfractured BPV. There remains limited data on the feasibility of tricuspid valve frame fracture.AimsEvaluate the feasibility of transcatheter tricuspid ViV replacement with fracture of the underlying BPV ring.MethodsAn international multicenter registry of tricuspid ViV replacement with intentional tricuspid valve frame fracture was created. Demographic data along with procedural characteristics, outcomes, and follow‐up data were collected. Comparison was made to the pre‐ and post‐ViV replacement with fracture of the tricuspid valve frame conditions.ResultsTen patients from six centers were included with a median age and weight of 29 years and 67.3 kg respectively. Tricuspid valve frame fracture was performed using a median balloon diameter 3 mm (IQR 3–5) larger than the true inner diameter (ID). The final ID was a mean of 1.5 mm (95% CI: 0.35, 2.64: p < 0.05), and median 1.1 mm (0.5, 2.1) larger than the reported true ID of the surgical BPV after ViV replacement. The mean tricuspid inflow gradient by echocardiogram decreased by 6.65 mmHg (95% CI: 4.14, 9.15: p < 0.001). All procedures were without complication, specifically there was no heart block, pericardial effusion, or right coronary disruption.ConclusionIntentional tricuspid valve frame fracture with tricuspid ViV replacement is feasible and can increase the valve orifice potentially reducing the risk of ViV patient prosthesis mismatch and is not associated with significant complications.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic selection for Harmony valve implant is determined with the aid of a screening report and perimeter plot (PP) that depicts the perimeter-derived radius along the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and projects device oversizing. The PP provides an estimation of suitability for implant, but its sensitivity as a screening method is unknown. This study was performed to describe anatomic features and outcomes in patients who underwent Harmony TPV25 implant despite a PP that predicted inadequate oversizing. METHODS: We reviewed RVOT anatomic features and measurements in patients who underwent transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement with the Harmony TPV25 device despite a PP that predicted inadequate oversizing. RESULTS: This study included 22 patients. There were no unsuccessful implants or adverse valve-related events. Anatomic features varied, but all patients fit into 1 of 3 anatomic types characterized by differences in RVOT dimensions. Type 1 patients (n=9) had a long RVOT with a choke point and a wide main pulmonary artery. Type 2 patients (n=6) had a short RVOT that was pyramidal in shape, with no choke point, and extensive main pulmonary artery lengthening/expansion during systole. Type 3 patients (n=7) had a short, bulbous main pulmonary artery with a choke point and an open pulmonary artery bifurcation. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement with the Harmony valve is feasible in some patients whose PP fit analysis predicts inadequate oversizing. All cases in this series fit into 1 of 3 anatomic patterns, which are not identified in the screening report. Implanters must review cases individually to assess the feasibility of the implant.