Jones, Thomas K.

BACKGROUND: The Harmony transcatheter pulmonary valve (TPV) is designed to treat severe pulmonary regurgitation in the native or surgically repaired right ventricular (RV) outflow tract. Early outcomes after TPV replacement with the Harmony valve have been positive, but longer-term data are limited. METHODS: The study included patients who received a commercially available TPV22 or TPV25 device as part of the nonrandomized, prospective Native Outflow Tract Early Feasibility Study, Harmony Pivotal Trial, and Continued Access Study. Patients completed at least 3 years of follow-up, and outcomes to 5 years were reported when available. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were catheterized, and 86 were successfully implanted with a Harmony TPV. Median duration of follow-up was 5 (range 0–6) years in the TPV22 group and 3 (1–4) years in the TPV25 group. At 3 years, all patients with a TPV22 and 96% of those with a TPV25 had ≤mild pulmonary regurgitation. By magnetic resonance imaging, significant improvements from preimplant to 2 years were observed in RV end-diastolic volume index, RV to left ventricular end-diastolic volume ratio, and effective RV stroke volume (all P <0.001). SF-36 quality-of-life scores improved after Harmony implantation and were sustained over 3 years. Early cases of ventricular tachycardia resolved, and there were no new arrhythmias. Adverse events up to 5 years included 3 deaths unrelated to the device or procedure, 2 cases of endocarditis that were treated (1 medically, 1 transcatheter debulking of a vegetation) and resolved, 6 patients with RV outflow tract obstruction or thrombosis resulting in valve-in valve procedures, and 1 major stent fracture resulting in surgical explant. CONCLUSIONS: At 3 to 5 years, Harmony TPV replacement resulted in sustained valve competence, beneficial cardiac remodeling, and improved quality of life. Continued monitoring is needed to assess long-term outcomes and valve performance. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01762124; NCT02979587.

AbstractObjectiveWe compared 5‐year outcomes of transcatheter pulmonary valve (TPV) replacement with the Melody TPV in the post‐approval study (PAS) and the investigational device exemption (IDE) trial.BackgroundAs a condition of approval of the Melody TPV after the IDE trial, the Food and Drug Administration required that a PAS be conducted to evaluate outcomes of TPV replacement in a “real‐world” environment. The 5‐year outcomes of the PAS have not been published, and the IDE and PAS trials have not been compared.MethodsThe cohorts comprised all patients catheterized and implanted at 5 IDE sites and 10 PAS sites. Differences in trial protocols were detailed. Time‐related outcomes and valve‐related adverse events were compared between the two trials with Kaplan–Meier curves and log‐rank testing.Results167 patients (median age, 19 years) were catheterized and 150 underwent TPV replacement in the IDE trial; 121 were catheterized (median age, 17 years) and 100 implanted in the PAS. Freedom from hemodynamic dysfunction (p = .61) or any reintervention (p = .74) over time did not differ between trials. Freedom from stent fracture (p = .003) and transcatheter reintervention (p = .010) were longer in PAS, whereas freedom from explant (p = .020) and TPV endocarditis (p = .007) were shorter. Clinically important adverse events (AEs) were reported in 14% of PAS and 7.2% of IDE patients (p = .056); the incidence of any particular event was low in both.ConclusionsHemodynamic and time‐related outcomes in the PAS and IDE trials were generally similar, confirming the effectiveness of the Melody TPV with real‐world providers. There were few significant complications and limited power to identify important differences in AEs. The lack of major differences in outcomes between the two studies questions the usefulness of mandated costly post‐approval studies as part of the regulatory process for Class III medical devices.

Abstract Background Interventional catheterization is central to the care of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD). Current standards for care provision and training in ACHD intervention are lacking. We sought to examine trends in current practice and training among interventionalists. Methods We analyzed the results of two separate international surveys in June 2016. One was sent to all active members from the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) who self‐identified Structural Heart Disease or Congenital Heart Disease as a practice area. The second survey was conducted through the Pediatric Interventional Early Career Society (PICES) aimed at pediatric and adult congenital interventionalists in their first seven years after training. The total survey sample sizes were 1,535 and 112, respectively. Results Response rates for the SCAI and PICES surveys were 15% (237/1,535) and 75% (84/112), respectively. Most respondents (74%) worked at institutions with pediatric and adult facilities in proximity (major medical centers). While 75% of SCAI respondents believed complex transcatheter procedures should be performed by ACHD‐trained interventionalists or multidisciplinary teams, only 32% reported such care is being provided at the present time. Most pediatric and adult cardiologists surveyed (73%) do not believe current interventional fellowships provide adequate training for proficiency in ACHD interventions. Conclusions ACHD management remains underdeveloped in relative terms, particularly in the United States. Significant gaps in interventional standards of practice and future training needs were recognized by this study. Our survey should serve as an impetus to establish training guidelines for physicians who seek to perform ACHD interventions.

Background— Off-label use of transcatheter aortic and pulmonary valve prostheses for tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation (TVIV) within dysfunctional surgical tricuspid valve (TV) bioprostheses has been described in small reports. Methods and Results— An international, multicenter registry was developed to collect data on TVIV cases. Patient-related factors, procedural details and outcomes, and follow-up data were analyzed. Valve-in-ring or heterotopic TV implantation procedures were not included. Data were collected on 156 patients with bioprosthetic TV dysfunction who underwent catheterization with planned TVIV. The median age was 40 years, and 71% of patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. Among 152 patients in whom TVIV was attempted with a Melody (n=94) or Sapien (n=58) valve, implantation was successful in 150, with few serious complications. After TVIV, both the TV inflow gradient and tricuspid regurgitation grade improved significantly. During follow-up (median, 13.3 months), 22 patients died, 5 within 30 days; all 22 patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, and 9 were hospitalized before TVIV. There were 10 TV reinterventions, and 3 other patients had significant recurrent TV dysfunction. At follow-up, 77% of patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II ( P <0.001 versus before TVIV). Outcomes did not differ according to surgical valve size or TVIV valve type. Conclusions— TVIV with commercially available transcatheter prostheses is technically and clinically successful in patients of various ages across a wide range of valve size. Although preimplantation clinical status was associated with outcome, many patients in New York Heart Association class III or IV at baseline improved. TVIV should be considered a viable option for treatment of failing TV bioprostheses.

Patients treated by pediatric interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons often have unmet medical device needs that pose a challenge to the current regulatory evaluation and approval process in the United States. In this report we review current US Food and Drug Administration regulatory processes, review some unique aspects of pediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery that pose challenges to these processes, and discuss possible alternate pathways to cardiac device evaluation and approval for children. Children deserve to benefit from new and refined cardiac devices and technology designed explicitly for their conditions.