Swisher, Elizabeth M.

Importance Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is an effective option to prevent ovarian cancer in high-risk individuals, but adverse effects from premature menopause are a barrier to uptake. Interval salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (ISDO) may be an effective alternative. Objective To evaluate the association of ISDO vs RRSO and sexual function and menopausal symptoms. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized (patient preference) clinical trial was performed among Women Choosing Surgical Prevention participants with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant conferring an increased risk for ovarian cancer. Patients from 9 US centers were enrolled from June 2, 2016, to October 28, 2020; chose ISDO or RRSO; and were followed up for 24 months. The analysis was performed on November 13, 2024. Interventions Participant-selected RRSO or ISDO. Main Outcomes and Measures Changes in sexual function and menopausal symptoms from baseline to 6, 12, and 24 months. Inverse probability weighting was applied to achieve covariate balance across groups. Results The analytic sample included 334 female participants (mean [95% CI] age at consent, 39.2 [38.7-.9.7] years) who underwent RRSO (n = 165) or ISDO (n = 169) and completed 6-month questionnaires. Significantly more participants experienced clinically meaningful worsening of sexual function at 6 months compared with baseline after RRSO vs ISDO (33.1% [39 of 118] vs 16.8% [17 of 101], respectively; odds ratio, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.20-3.35]) and at 12 months (39.2% [38 of 97] vs 18.3% [17 of 93], respectively; odds ratio, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.09-2.63]). This finding was no longer significant at 24 months. When restricted to the RRSO group who took hormone replacement therapy, there was no significant worsening of total sexual function scores or menopausal symptoms compared with baseline. No interval ovarian cancers were reported. Conclusions and Relevance This nonrandomized clinical trial comparing RRSO with ISDO found that ISDO was less likely to impair sexual function, which addresses an important barrier to surgical prevention in high-risk patients in premenopause. After RRSO, use of hormone replacement therapy mitigated menopausal symptoms and prevented decline in sexual function. More information is needed about the safety of ISDO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02760849

Clonal acquisition of multiple chromosomal abnormalities in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) is a hallmark of high-risk acute myeloid leukemias with complex karyotype (AML-CK). AML-CK is associated with TP53 mutations and chromosome 5q deletions (del5q); however, the drivers and clonal trajectories of aneuploid evolution in HSPCs remain unknown. We have developed a patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) model in which preleukemic HSPCs clonally evolve to distinct, highly aneuploid states following transient mitotic inhibition. By tracking chromosome evolution at single cell resolution, we show that TP53-mutant HSPCs with del5q, but not TP53­ mutation alone, evolved complex chromosomal changes. Clonal evolution was marked by stepwise acquisition of numerical and structural chromosome changes seen in AML-CK patients, with individual abnormalities conferring fitness advantage. iPSC-derived aneuploid HSPCs and primary AML-CK patient samples exhibited a conserved gene expression signature marked by upregulation of PTEN, cohesins, and anti-apoptotic factor BCL2, indicative of a shared aneuploid cell state in HSPCs. Clinical BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax eradicated BCL2-dependent aneuploid clones, with resistant clones undergoing a lineage switch to upregulate alternative BCL2 factors. In summary, we demonstrate that mutant TP53 and del5q drive chromosome evolution marked by stepwise acquisition of individual abnormalities. Moreover, aneuploid HSPCs exhibit a shared gene expression state which confers unique targetable therapeutic vulnerabilities in AML-CK.

PURPOSE We sought to characterize outcome associations of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in patients with ovarian cancer (OVCA) whose cancers contain homozygous loss (deletions) of homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway genes, an alteration class not uniformly reported on clinical testing and not susceptible to acquired resistance via secondary reversion mutations. METHODS This study used US-based deidentified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine OVCA Clinico-Genomic Database. Patients with advanced OVCA and genomic profiling by Foundation Medicine were assembled into cohorts evaluating PARPi monotherapy use, and separately, PARPi maintenance therapy use, with outcomes associated with HRR gene alterations: BRCA1 / 2 , PALB2 , RAD51B/C/D , BARD1 , and BRIP1 . RESULTS 1.5% (82/5,404) had HRR gene homozygous loss, with BRCA1 and BRCA2 loss being most common. Among all OVCAs with BRCA1/2 alterations, 7.5% (63/836) were homozygous losses. Most BRCA1 (34/38, 89%) and BRCA2 (18/25, 72%) homozygous losses were intragenic, with breakpoints not spanning entire gene. Maintenance cohort: 22 patients had HRR gene homozygous loss, with strongly improved progression-free survival (PFS) for PARPi versus no PARPi use (HR, 0.06, 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.37). Monotherapy cohort: patients without HRR alterations (n = 198), HRR mutations or rearrangements (n = 93), and HRR homozygous loss (n = 8) had median PFS of 4.9, 10.6, and 25.4 months, and median overall survival of 18.5, 22.5, and 51.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSION We observe durable PARPi effectiveness for patients with OVCA and HRR gene homozygous loss in routine practice. We demonstrate the importance of detecting and reporting homozygous loss in HRR genes, an aspect not standard to all sequencing assays.

Abstract Despite long-standing interest in combining topoisomerase I (TOP1) poisons with PARP inhibitors (PARPis), the mechanistic basis for the variable and often unpredictable response to this strategy remains unclear. Early preclinical studies suggested that PARP inhibition amplifies TOP1 poison-induced DNA damage, implying broad therapeutic potential; however, emerging translational and clinical data—particularly in ovarian cancer—indicate that synergy is context-dependent and governed by tumor-intrinsic features that have not been fully defined.Here we assessed determinants of response in five HR proficient ovarian cancer (OC) patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) previously treated with the SN-38 prodrug etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) in combination with the PARPi rucaparib (C. Nitschmann, Clin. Cancer Res. 22(2) Suppl. B50, 2016). Although all models were refractory to single-agent rucaparib, 50% exhibited enhancement of NKTR-102-induced tumor regression with the addition of rucaparib. Neither PARP1 abundance nor extent of rucaparib-mediated poly(ADP-ribose) suppression correlated with therapeutic benefit. Instead, sensitization was restricted to PDXs intrinsically responsive to NKTR-102 and was strongly associated with high levels of NKTR-102-induced TOP1-DNA covalent complexes. In further analysis, 2 of 3 resistant PDXs exhibited high levels of the ABC transporter ABCG2 despite lack of previous therapy, revealing a previously underappreciated mechanism of de novo resistance that limits effective TOP1 inhibitor activity independent of homologous recombination status. Notably, NKTR-102 response did not track with platinum/taxane sensitivity, highlighting the distinct molecular circuitry governing TOP1 poison susceptibility.Collectively, these findings demonstrate that rucaparib can potentiate NKTR-102-induced regression in tumors capable of forming abundant TOP1-DNA covalent complexes. This work identifies TOP1-DNA complex trapping and lack of ABCG2 expression as mechanistic predictors of benefit, providing an updated framework for selecting patients most likely to respond to TOP1 poison/PARPi combinations and challenging the long-standing assumption that PARP inhibition can universally resensitize tumors to TOP1 poisons. Citation Format: Annapoorna Venkatachalam, Caroline C. Nitschmann, Karen S. Flatten, Rachel Hurley, Xiaonan Hou, Cristina Correia, Paula A. Schenider, Krista Goergen, Matthew Maurer, Ethan P. Heinzen, Ann L. Oberg, S John Weroha, Paul Haluska, Scott H. Kaufmann, Elizabeth M. Swisher. TOP1-DNA protein complex as a predictive biomarker for NKTR-102/Rucaparib combination therapy in PARP-inhibitor resistant ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB364.

PURPOSE To compare mortality risk among long-term survivors of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) with that of the general US population and to examine how mortality and recurrence trends have evolved under changing treatment approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study including patients with histologically confirmed HGSOC treated at a single referral cancer center from 1991 to 2022. Mortality risk, expressed as standardized mortality ratios (SMRs, ratio of observed deaths in the study population to expected deaths in an age-matched US population), was assessed at diagnosis and yearly on patients without events (disease persistence, recurrence, or death from any cause). RESULTS A total of 2,074 consecutive patients were included. The median follow-up was 12.5 years (IQR, 11.7-13.8). Most patients were stage III (1,396, 69.2%), 1,299 (62.8%) underwent primary cytoreductive surgery, and 1,688 (87.4%) received platinum-taxane as first-line therapy. At diagnosis, the mortality rate was 7.40 times higher than that in the general population (95% CI, 7.04 to 7.77). By 7 event-free years, the 95% CI for the SMR included 1 for the first time, and at 10 years, the SMR was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.49), indicating no statistically significant excess mortality compared with the general population. In those event-free at 10 years, the 5-year cumulative incidence of ovarian cancer–related deaths (8.2% [95% CI, 4.2 to 16.0]) was comparable with that of non–ovarian cancer–related deaths (6.3% [95% CI, 2.9 to 13.8]). CONCLUSION In this cohort, mortality risk steadily declined for patients who remained event-free, approaching that of the general population by 7 years after diagnosis. These results emphasize the importance of individualized, long-term follow-up to address both recurrence risk and survivorship needs.

Abstract BRCA2 mutations contribute to the pathogenesis and treatment sensitivity of a subset of ovarian, breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. When these cancers become therapy resistant, secondary mutations that restore the BRCA2 open reading frame are found in half the cases, but other causes of resistance remain incompletely understood. Here, we identified translational readthrough of a premature termination codon (PTC) as a cause of resistance to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) and cisplatin in cells derived from the BRCA2-mutated ovarian cancer line PEO1 by PARPi selection. Despite persistence of the signature 4965C > G (p.Y1655X) BRCA2 mutation, low-level expression of full-length BRCA2 protein was detectable in these cells by immunoblotting and tandem mass spectrometry. Either BRCA2 knockdown or gene interruption 5′ or 3′ to the PTC restored treatment sensitivity, implicating BRCA2 in the resistance. Reporter assays demonstrated UAG-selective readthrough in the resistant clones but not parental cells. Moreover, custom searching of global proteomic data indicated readthrough of stop codons, particularly UAGs, in additional proteins in the resistant clones. Finally, multi-omic analysis identified multiple changes in the nonsense-mediated decay and termination machineries that favor readthrough. Accordingly, the present results identify PTC readthrough as a potential mechanism of drug resistance in cells with BRCA2 nonsense mutations.

Abstract Purpose: Our goal was to determine if the HRDefine biomarker combining methylation and mutation assessment of key homologous recombination repair genes identifies BRCA wildtype (BRCAwt) ovarian cancer (OC) with outcomes similar to BRCA mutated (BRCAm) OC within the context of a frontline PARP inhibitor trial for advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: We performed an exploratory biomarker analysis of blood and neoplastic samples from the VELIA trial, a phase 3 study evaluating the PARP inhibitor veliparib as frontline maintenance therapy in OC. We developed a highly sensitive droplet digital PCR assay for quantitative BRCA1 and RAD51C promoter methylation and assessed germline/somatic mutations using the BROCA next generation sequencing platform. Cases were grouped into: BRCAm, HRDefine positive (BRCAwt HRDefine+), and HRDefine negative (BRCAwt HRDefine-). Carcinomas were considered HRDefine+ if quantitative BRCA1 or RAD51C promoter methylation was >/= 60% or if a germline or somatic pathogenic variant (PV) was identified in the following non-BRCA HRR repair genes: RAD51C, RAD51D, PALB2, BARD1. For this analysis, the control group included the two study arms with placebo maintenance compared to the investigational arm of veliparib with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance (veliparib throughout group). HRDefine was compared to the Myriad genomic instability score (GIS) used as HRD assessment in the trial. Progression free survival (PFS) was compared using log rank tests. Results: Among 1140 VELIA participants, biomarker analysis could be performed for 487 cases. Of these, 255 (52%) were BRCAm, 60 (12%) were BRCAwt HRDefine+, and 172 (35%) were BRCAwt HRDefine-. BRCAwt HRDefine+ was driven by promoter methylation (57%), germline (40%), or somatic (3%) PVs. Median PFS (months, all arms combined) was 26 months (BRCAm), 27 months (BRCAwt HRDefine+), and 15 months (BRCAwt HRDefine-), with corresponding hazard ratios (HR) of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.39-0.65) and 0.50 (0.34-0.73) versus HRDefine-. All HRDefine+ molecular subgroups were associated with longer PFS, including RAD51C/D mutations (HR 0.44, 0.25-0.77) and promoter methylation (HR 0.60, 0.36-0.97). HRDefine positivity was significantly associated with improved PFS compared to HRDefine-/GIS low (n=60 vs n=111, median PFS 27 versus 14 months, HR 0.44, 0.30-0.65), while the HRDefine- cases with high GIS demonstrated a trend toward an intermediate PFS (n=56, median 18 months, HR 0.67, 0.45-1.01). When compared by treatment arm, median PFS was significantly longer in the veliparib throughout arm compared to control only for the BRCAm group (32 months vs 23 months, HR 0.61, 0.42-0.87), though the analysis was underpowered for the BRCAwt HRDefine+ sub-group (30 months vs 25 months, HR 0.79, 0.4-1.57). Conclusions: HRDefine identifies BRCAwt OC associated with a PFS that is like that of BRCAm cases and may improve stratification for PARP inhibitor therapy beyond current HRD assays. GIS may have some, albeit reduced, prognostic implication that is independent of HRDefine. Citation Format: Isabel V. Rodriguez, Marc Radke, Ronit Katz, Persephone Miller, Paula Ladd, Nithisha Khasnavis, Jennifer Ochoa, Melanie Dillon, Heather Lankes, Peter Ansell, Carol Aghajanian, Gini Fleming, Michael Birrer, Scott Kaufmann, Charles Leath, Kathleen Moore, Theresa Werner, Linda Van Le, Robert L. Coleman, Elizabeth M. Swisher. Application of HRDefine: a biomarker for identifying root causes of homologous recombination deficiency to a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of veliparib in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (VELIA/GOG-3005) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2025 Sep 19-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl):Abstract nr A044.

TPS4201 Background: Poorly differentiated, extrapulmonary NEC are rare cancers with median overall survival (OS) <1 year. Treatment is extrapolated from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with use of P (cisplatin or carboplatin) + E. More effective treatment regimens and predictive biomarkers are needed to improve outcomes. In SCLC, induction therapy with combination of P/E + PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab and maintenance atezolizumab improved OS (12.3 months vs 10.3 months; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54 – 0.91, P=0.007) vs P/E alone (1). No study to date has compared PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition during induction only vs during induction and maintenance therapy. In SCLC, distinct molecular subtypes can be identified by the presence of specific transcription factors (e.g., ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3) or an inflamed gene signature (SCLC-I), with SCLC-I pts more likely to benefit clinically from the addition of immunotherapy (2). In this study we plan to test the benefit of adding atezolizumab to induction P/E as well as the role of adding maintenance atezolizumab after induction P/E plus atezolizumab. We also plan to correlate tumor- and blood-based subtype biomarkers with response to therapy. Methods: Eligible pts ≥18 years old have evaluable, histologically confirmed extrapulmonary NEC, Zubrod PS ≤2, and are allowed to have up to 1 cycle of P/E prior to enrollment. P (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5, iv) on day 1, E 100 mg/m2 iv on days 1-3, and atezolizumab 1200 mg iv on day 1 of q21 day cycles. Pts are randomized to 1 of 3 arms: A) Induction P/E + atezolizumab -> maintenance atezolizumab B) Induction P/E + atezolizumab -> observation C) Induction P/E -> observation. The primary objective is to compare the overall survival (OS, from randomization) between arms in a fixed sequence: A vs C -> B vs C -> A vs B. Secondary objectives include comparing OS (from start of maintenance/observation), progression free survival, response rate, duration of response, and safety/tolerability across arms. Tumor and blood samples will be banked for future biomarker analyses, including immunohistochemistry of transcription factors on tissue and whole exome sequencing on tumor and circulating tumor DNA. With 189 pts (168 eligible), the study has 84% power to detect an improvement in 12-months OS from 35% to 57.5% (HR 0.53). This study was activated December 2021 with 3 pts enrolled over 1 year due to restricting enrollment of NEC of small cell histology only. The protocol was amended in January 2023 to broaden eligibility to all NEC subtypes (small cell, large cell, and undefined histology with Ki-67 ≥55%). As of January 2024, 35 patients have been enrolled. A protocol amendment is planned to remove the need for Ki-67 index for NEC of genitourinary origin to improve accrual. 1. Horn L, et al. N Engl J Med 2018. 2. Gay CM, et al. Cancer Cell 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT05058651 .

TPS3173 Background: ELU001, pasifolate exatecan, is an ultra-small nanoparticle drug conjugate, known as a CDC (~6 nm), designed to target and penetrate into solid tumors. Due to its size, ELU001 exhibits rapid renal elimination which is expected to reduce or eliminate the toxicities associated with many antibody drug conjugates. ELU001 has ~13 folic acid targeting moieties and ~21 cathepsin-B cleavable exatecan topoisomerase-1 inhibitor payloads covalently bound to short polyethylene glycol chains surrounding a silica core, the C’Dot. ELU001 binds to cancer cells expressing FRα and is internalized into the lysosome where it releases the exatecan payload. ELU001’s dose escalation study reported at ESMO Congress 2023 (1), examined weekly, bi-weekly (Q2W), and tri-weekly schedules over a range of doses in 42 patients. The study revealed that ELU001 could be administered safely and identified a dose level and schedule for the Expansion Studies described below. 22 of the patients with ovarian or endometrial cancers had >1 post-baseline scan(s), of these 2 had a PR and 19 had SD by RECIST v1.1 criteria. ELU001 demonstrated activity against tumors across a range of FRα expression levels, from low to high, retrospectively assessed using the VENTANA FOLR1 RxDx assay and the PS2+ scoring system. Methods: The current multicenter, Tumor Group Expansion open-label phase 1/2 clinical trial investigates ELU001 in patients with ovarian and endometrial cancers and is enrolling three cohorts; 1) ovarian cancer with high FRα expression, 2) ovarian cancer with moderate and low expression and 3) endometrial cancer with low to high expression with assessments based upon the PS2+ scoring system (high = ≥ 75%, moderate = ≥ 50% to < 75%, low = 25% to < 50%, negative = <25% of tumor cells with 2+ or 3+ staining intensity). An initial exploratory dose of 2.0 mg/m2 Q2W was employed in all three cohorts and a second dose of 1.7 mg/m2 Q2W will be studied in the ovarian cancer cohorts. Patients will ultimately be randomized to one of two or more doses to optimize dosing for registration. Primary endpoint: Objective Response Rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include DOR, PFS, TFST, PFS2, OS, adverse events, PK, and ADA assessments. Approximately 20 patients per tumor group will be recruited in the U.S. 1. Ann. Oncol. (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S458-S497. Clinical trial information: NCT05001282 .

AbstractPurposeThis paper reports the efficacy of the poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib alone and in combination with the antiangiogenesis agent cediranib compared with cediranib alone in patients with advanced endometrial cancer.MethodsThis was open‐label, randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03660826). Eligible patients had recurrent endometrial cancer, received at least one (<3) prior lines of chemotherapy, and were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), stratified by histology (serous vs. other) to receive cediranib alone (reference arm), olaparib, or olaparib and cediranib for 28‐day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression‐free survival in the intention‐to‐treat population. Homologous repair deficiency was explored using the BROCA‐GO sequencing panel.ResultsA total of 120 patients were enrolled and all were included in the intention‐to‐treat analysis. Median age was 66 (range, 41–86) years and 47 (39.2%) had serous histology. Median progression‐free survival for cediranib was 3.8 months compared with 2.0 months for olaparib (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.91‐2.3] p = .935) and 5.5 months for olaparib/cediranib (hazard ratio, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.43–1.14] p = .064). Four patients receiving the combination had a durable response lasting more than 20 months. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were hypertension in the cediranib (36%) and olaparib/cediranib (33%) arms, fatigue (20.5% olaparib/cediranib), and diarrhea (17.9% cediranib). The BROCA‐GO panel results were not associated with response.ConclusionThe combination of cediranib and olaparib demonstrated modest clinical efficacy; however, the primary end point of the study was not met. The combination was safe without unexpected toxicity.