Back to Authors

Atkinson, Hunter J.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 4

Abstract 1184: IHC-based prognostic sub-stratification of ovarian endometrioid carcinoma.
Taengwa, Gamaliel , Atkinson, Hunter J., McCauley, Bryan M. , Armasu, Sebastian M. , Wang, Chen, Doherty, Jennifer A., Goode, Ellen L. , Köebel, Martin, Atkinson, Hunter J., Doherty, Jennifer A. , Harris, Holly R. , Winham, Stacey J.

Cancer Research | April 3, 2026 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 7_Supplement | Pages: 1184-1184

10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-1184 Get It

Abstract Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) is the second most common histotype associated with the most favorable prognosis among ovarian carcinomas. Similar to endometrial carcinoma, OEC exhibit significant molecular diversity. We aimed to develop a practical immunohistochemical (IHC) prognosticator by integrating IHC biomarkers with clinical substage, and surgical outcomes. This multi-institutional study included participants with primary invasive OEC from the Alberta Cancer Registry (AOVT), Mayo Clinic, and Disease of the Ovary and their Evaluation Study (DOVE). Pathology review excluded misclassified high-grade serous and mesonephric carcinomas leaving 422 OEC cases (AOVT N=158; DOVE N=143; Mayo N=121) with available tumor biospecimens who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment. Clinical characteristics included age, stage, grade, residual disease and 5-year survival. Clinical risk group was defined by combining stage and residual disease: Low (FIGO stage IA/IB & no macroscopic disease), Intermediate (stage IC-II& no macroscopic disease), High (stage III/IV or macroscopic disease). Tissue microarrays were stained for TP53, PMS2, MSH6, PGR, and CTNNB1 using IHC and were scored by a single pathologist. Tumors were hierarchically categorized as TP53-abnormal (TP53abn)/PGR-loss, mismatch-repair deficient (MMRd, via PMS2 and MSH6), nuclear-CTNNB1 (nCTNNB1), or no-specific-immunohistochemical-profile (NSIP). Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was compared across clinical risk and biomarker groups using Cox regression, adjusted for age and site to generate hazard ratios (HR), and 5-year survival rates (5-YSR). High clinical risk group was associated with worse 5-year OS compared to low & intermediate risk (p<0.0001). Hierarchical IHC biomarker groups were also associated with 5-year OS, adjusted for age and study site (p<0.0001), with consistently worse survival for combined TP53abn/PGR-loss (n=17, HR=6.07, 95% CI 2.78-13.26), PGR-loss only (n=55, HR=4.17, 95% CI 2.19-7.94), TP53abn only (n=29, HR=2.04, 95% CI 0.85-4.90), and better survival for nuclear-CTNNB1 (n=146, HR=0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.65) compared to NSIP (n=132). Within the low-risk group, MMRd, nCTNNB1, or NSIP had greater than 97% 5-YSR, while OEC with TP53abn/PGR-loss or PR-loss only had less than 75% 5-YSR. Within the intermediate group, only nCTNNB1 exceeded a 5-YSR of greater than 97%. Within the high-risk group, 5YSR for nCTNNB1 OEC was 90.9%, compared to only 16.7% for TP53abn/PGR-loss. This IHC-based algorithm refines prognosis beyond clinical substage. It identifies low-risk patients with unfavorable prognosis (TP53abn/PGRloss, PGR loss only) who may benefit from adjuvant therapy, and also patients with favorable prognosis within the intermediate group for whom adjuvant therapy could be de-escalated. Further patient selection for chemo vs. hormone therapy in the high-risk group may be improved by biomarkers. Citation Format: Gamaliel Taengwa, Hunter J. Atkinson, Bryan M. McCauley, Sebastian M. Armasu, Chen Wang, Jennifer A. Doherty, Holly R. Harris, Ellen L. Goode, Martin Koebel, Stacey J. Winham. IHC-based prognostic sub-stratification of ovarian endometrioid carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1184.
Long-Term Survival in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Compared With the General US Population: A 30-Year Landmark Analysis
Vitis, Luigi Antonio De , Larson, Melissa C., Atkinson, Hunter J., Block, Matthew S. , CLIBY, W, Couch, Fergus J., Dowdy, Sean C., Glaser, Gretchen E., Goergen, Krista M., Goode, E., Gostout, Bobbie S., Hartmann, Lynn C., Heinzen, Ethan P. , Huang, Yajue, Jatoi, Aminah , Jones, Monica B., Karow, Katie J., Keeney, Gary L., Kumar, Amanika, Langstraat, Carrie L., Lee, Sun-Hee , Mariani, A., Ostby, Stuart A. , Peethambaram, Prema P. , Podratz, Karl C. , Shahi, Maryam , Sherman, M., Sommerfield, Marla Kay, Wall, Vonda M., Weroha, S. John, Hendrickson, Andrea E. Wahner , Maurer, Matthew J., Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie, Oberg, Ann L. , Cliby, William A. , Couch, Fergus J. , Larson, Melissa C. , Glaser, Gretchen , Couch, Fergus J. , De Vitis, Luigi A, Jones, Monica, Glaser, Gretchen , Larson, Melissa C , Cliby, William A , Atkinson, Hunter J., Dowdy, Sean C. , Hartmann, Lynn C. , Kumar, Amanika , Langstraat, Carrie , Sherman, Mark E. , Sommerfield, Marla-Kay, Swisher, Elizabeth M. , Wall, Vonda M., Maurer, Matthew J. , Kaufmann, Scott H. , Bakkum‐Gamez, Jamie N.

JCO Oncology Advances | March 20, 2026 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1200/oa-25-00142 Get It

PURPOSE To compare mortality risk among long-term survivors of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) with that of the general US population and to examine how mortality and recurrence trends have evolved under changing treatment approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study including patients with histologically confirmed HGSOC treated at a single referral cancer center from 1991 to 2022. Mortality risk, expressed as standardized mortality ratios (SMRs, ratio of observed deaths in the study population to expected deaths in an age-matched US population), was assessed at diagnosis and yearly on patients without events (disease persistence, recurrence, or death from any cause). RESULTS A total of 2,074 consecutive patients were included. The median follow-up was 12.5 years (IQR, 11.7-13.8). Most patients were stage III (1,396, 69.2%), 1,299 (62.8%) underwent primary cytoreductive surgery, and 1,688 (87.4%) received platinum-taxane as first-line therapy. At diagnosis, the mortality rate was 7.40 times higher than that in the general population (95% CI, 7.04 to 7.77). By 7 event-free years, the 95% CI for the SMR included 1 for the first time, and at 10 years, the SMR was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.49), indicating no statistically significant excess mortality compared with the general population. In those event-free at 10 years, the 5-year cumulative incidence of ovarian cancer–related deaths (8.2% [95% CI, 4.2 to 16.0]) was comparable with that of non–ovarian cancer–related deaths (6.3% [95% CI, 2.9 to 13.8]). CONCLUSION In this cohort, mortality risk steadily declined for patients who remained event-free, approaching that of the general population by 7 years after diagnosis. These results emphasize the importance of individualized, long-term follow-up to address both recurrence risk and survivorship needs.
Abstract LB331: Enhanced polygenic risk score for pancreatic cancer
Antwi, Samuel O. , Atkinson, Hunter J., Zhong, Jun, McKean, David , PanC4), Pancreatic Cancer Cohort & Case Control Consortia (PanScan and, Wolpin, Brian M. , Oberg, Ann L. , Antwi, Samuel O , Coombes, Brandon J. , Larson, Nicholas B. , Carlson, Erin E. , Rabe, Kari G. , Majumder, Shounak , PanC4), Pancreatic Cancer Cohort & Case Control Consortia (PanScan and, Stolzenberg‐Solomon, Rachael Z. , Klein, Alison P. , Ámundadóttir, Laufey T.

Cancer Research | April 25, 2025 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 8_Supplement_2 | Pages: LB331-LB331

10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-lb331 Get It

Abstract Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the U.S. mainly because of late-stage diagnosis. Heritable genetic information can improve risk stratification for individuals with moderate to high-risk of PDAC for targeted screening and early detection. We aimed to develop an enhanced polygenic risk score (PRS) for PDAC using a Bayesian approach, LDpred2, that reweights risk estimates attributed to millions of polymorphisms (SNPs) estimated from genome-wide association studies (GWASs). We then compared the performance of LDpred2 with the commonly used genetic risk score (GRS) approach that is based only on genome-wide significant SNPs. Methods: GWAS summary statistics were obtained from the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium and the Pancreatic Cancer Case Control Consortium for 9040 cases and 12496 controls and were used to compute weights for a GRS (17 SNPs) using a p-value threshold of 5e-8 and weights for an enhanced PRS (1.3 million SNPs) using LDpred2. These weights were then used to compute risk scores in an independent validation sample of 2616 cases and 45407 controls from the Mayo Clinic. We used logistic regression to test for associations of the GRS and PRS with PDAC risk, adjusting for age, sex, and the first 10 principal components of ancestry. Results: The validation sample was of mostly European ancestries (>95%). Cases were slightly older than controls (median age: 66 yrs. vs. 63 yrs.) and had a higher frequency of men than controls (57% vs. 42%). Comparisons between the GRS and the PRS are shown in Table 1. DeLong’s test comparing the AUCs between the two genetic scores showed the PRS significantly outperformed the GRS (AUC = 0.68 vs. 0.67; p = 7.6e-7). Conclusions: The LDpred2 PRS model that used a larger set of SNPs significantly improved prediction of PDAC. Comparing the top percentile of the PRS versus the rest showed that the PRS is a clinically significant risk score (OR > 3) for PDAC and could inform clinical decision making and genetic counseling of individuals identified as having a high risk of PDAC. Citation Format: Samuel O. Antwi, Brandon J. Coombes, Nicholas B. Larson, Erin E. Carlson, Kari G. Rabe, Hunter J. Atkinson, Shounak Majumder, Jun Zhong, David McKean, Pancreatic Cancer Cohort & Case Control Consortia (PanScan and PanC4), Brian M. Wolpin, Rachael Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon, Alison P. Klein, Laufey T. Amundadottir, Ann L. Oberg. Enhanced polygenic risk score for pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr LB331.
CHFR and Paclitaxel Sensitivity of Ovarian Cancer
Hendrickson, Andrea E. Wahner , Visscher, Daniel W., Hou, Xiaonan , Goergen, Krista M., Atkinson, Hunter J., Beito, Thomas G., Negron, Vivian , Lingle, Wilma L., Bruzek, Amy K., Hurley, Rachel M. , Wagner, Jill M., Flatten, Karen S., Peterson, Kevin L. , Schneider, Paula A., Kalli, Kimberly R., Oberg, Ann L. , Weroha, S. John , Oberg, Ann L , Larson, Melissa C. , Maurer, Matthew J. , Kaufmann, Scott H.

Cancers | November 30, 2021 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 6043

10.3390/cancers13236043 Get It

The poly(ADP-ribose) binding protein CHFR regulates cellular responses to mitotic stress. The deubiquitinase UBC13, which regulates CHFR levels, has been associated with better overall survival in paclitaxel-treated ovarian cancer. Despite the extensive use of taxanes in the treatment of ovarian cancer, little is known about expression of CHFR itself in this disease. In the present study, tissue microarrays containing ovarian carcinoma samples from 417 women who underwent initial surgical debulking were stained with anti-CHFR antibody and scored in a blinded fashion. CHFR levels, expressed as a modified H-score, were examined for association with histology, grade, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). In addition, patient-derived xenografts from 69 ovarian carcinoma patients were examined for CHFR expression and sensitivity to paclitaxel monotherapy. In clinical ovarian cancer specimens, CHFR expression was positively associated with serous histology (p = 0.0048), higher grade (p = 0.000014) and higher stage (p = 0.016). After correction for stage and debulking, there was no significant association between CHFR staining and overall survival (p = 0.62) or time to progression (p = 0.91) in patients with high grade serous cancers treated with platinum/taxane chemotherapy (N = 249). Likewise, no association between CHFR expression and paclitaxel sensitivity was observed in ovarian cancer PDXs treated with paclitaxel monotherapy. Accordingly, differences in CHFR expression are unlikely to play a major role in paclitaxel sensitivity of high grade serous ovarian cancer.