Block, Matthew S.

e21521 Background: Outcomes following tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy vary in real-world practice, and accessible predictors are needed to inform patient selection and timing of referral. We evaluated whether baseline disease burden, metastatic distribution, and treatment delivery factors are associated with outcomes following TIL therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic melanoma treated with TIL therapy across Mayo Clinic sites (N = 27 infused). Baseline disease burden was characterized using AJCC metastatic stage and organ-specific involvement. A composite high visceral burden variable was defined as the presence of M1d disease and/or liver metastases. Bridging therapy use prior to infusion was recorded. Post-infusion IL-2 exposure was categorized as low (0-2 doses) vs. high (3-6 doses). Best overall response (BOR) was summarized using RECIST-based standard criteria. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured from TIL infusion and estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods with univariable Cox regression. Results: Median age at infusion was 62.0 years; 59.3% were male. Melanoma subtypes included cutaneous (81.5%) and mucosal (18.5%). Bridging therapy was used in 48.1%. Baseline metastatic stage was M1a/M1b in 18.5%, M1c in 63.0%, and M1d in 18.5%. Median follow up was 8.3 months. BOR included complete response (18.5%), partial response (37.0%), stable disease (22.2%), and progressive disease (22.2%), yielding an objective response rate of 55.6% and disease control rate of 77.8%. Patients with high visceral disease burden experienced inferior OS vs. those without high visceral burden (median 5.2 vs 13.4 months; HR 4.77, 95% CI 1.22–18.63; p = 0.014). Bridging therapy was not associated with OS or PFS. Higher post-infusion IL-2 exposure (seen in 77.8% of patients) was associated with improved OS (median 9.0 vs 3.7 months; HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04–0.67, p = 0.005), likely reflecting early post-infusion clinical tolerance rather than a causal treatment effect. Median PFS for the cohort was 3.6 months and did not differ by IL-2 exposure ( p = 0.3), metastatic stage ( p = 0.8), bridging therapy ( p = 0.7), liver metastases ( p = 0.2), or LDH above upper limit of normal ( p = 0.1). Conclusions: The above findings are hypothesis generating and will support evaluation in larger cohort. In this real-world cohort of patients treated with TIL therapy, baseline visceral disease burden was strongly associated with survival outcomes, while bridging therapy did not compromise post-infusion efficacy among patients proceeding to infusion. Post-infusion IL-2 exposure correlated with OS and likely reflects early treatment tolerance. These readily available clinical features may inform patient counseling, referral timing, and sequencing decisions as TIL therapy enters broader clinical use.

9557 Background: High-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) is administered following tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, yet cardiotoxicity frequently limits dose delivery. The clinical significance of peri-dose troponin elevations during IL-2 remains poorly defined. We evaluated troponin kinetics during IL-2 dosing and their association with significant cardiac events and IL-2 interruption. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic melanoma treated with TIL therapy followed by inpatient high-dose IL-2 at Mayo Clinic Rochester (N = 24; 87 IL-2 doses). High-sensitivity troponin and ECGs were obtained before and after each IL-2 dose. Clinically significant cardiac events were defined as QTc prolongation > 480 ms, arrhythmias (excluding isolated sinus tachycardia), new ECG abnormalities, vasopressor requirement, or cardiology consultation. Dose-level outcomes included cardiac events and subsequent IL-2 dose interruption. Paired troponin changes were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank testing. Dose-level associations were evaluated using clustered logistic regression to account for repeated IL-2 doses within patients. Results: 24 patients received 87 IL-2 doses (median 3 [IQR 2 - 5]). Median age was 63 years (IQR 54 - 70), and 58% were male. Baseline troponin median was 11 ng/L (IQR 6 - 21); 38% had baseline troponin > 14 ng/L. Post-dose troponin exceeded 14 ng/L in 16/24 patients (67%) and 48/87 doses (52%). Median delta troponin was 0 ng/L (IQR −1 to 6; range −24 to 133), with post-dose levels higher than pre-dose values ( p = 0.02). Clinically significant cardiac events occurred in 33% of patients; no post-IL-2 reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction were observed. At the dose level, cardiac events occurred only when post-dose troponin exceeded 14 ng/L (15/48 [31%] vs 0/39 doses; p < 0.001). In clustered logistic regression, post-dose troponin ≥15 ng/L was independently associated with cardiac events (OR 9.6, 95% CI 1.5 - 60.6; p = 0.02) and subsequent IL-2 dose interruption (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.1 - 10.7; p = 0.04). When modeled continuously, each 1-unit increase in log-transformed post-dose troponin was associated with higher odds of cardiac events (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.6 - 6.7; p = 0.001) and IL-2 interruption (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6 - 4.9; p < 0.001). Baseline troponin correlated with peak post-dose troponin (ρ = 0.44, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Peri-dose troponin elevations are common during post-TIL high-dose IL-2; however, higher post-dose troponin independently identifies clinically significant cardiac toxicity and predicts IL-2 interruption after accounting for repeated dosing within patients. Baseline troponin modestly predicts peak elevations, supporting standardized, risk-stratified troponin monitoring and prospective evaluation of toxicity-adaptive IL-2 delivery strategies in TIL therapy.

9573 Background: Clinical Stage III (cSIII) melanoma patients are at high risk of recurrence following therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) and adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy based regimens have shown promising results in this setting, with pathological response being the best predictor of recurrence free survival (RFS) and distant metastases free survival (DMFS). T-cell Receptor (TCR) abundance and clonality are being explored as biomarkers. Methods: In the phase II NeoACTIVATE (NCT03554083) trial, patients were treated based on BRAF status with 12 weeks of neoadjuvant atezolizumab, vemurafenib and cobimetinib (Arm A, BRAF-mutated) or atezolizumab and cobimetinib (Arm B, BRAF wildtype), followed by TLND and 6 months adjuvant atezolizumab. TCR sequencing (n=23) was performed on the pretreatment involved lymph node (iLN) and on the same node, along with an adjacent uninvolved node (uiLN) after TLND. The fraction productive of T cells (fpTC) was defined as the percentage of in-frame TCR sequences (capable of encoding a functional expressed receptor protein) of all TCR sequences identified. Simpson Clonality Index (SCI) was used to measure relative abundance of specific clones, with a higher score indicating a more monoclonal repertoire. Comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Results: 30 patients were enrolled, 15 in each arm. 2 patients were not operated on, and one did not receive adjuvant treatment, leaving 27 patients for outcome analysis. 3-year RFS was 55.6% (95% CI 9.5%-77.8%), median of 62.2 months (95% CI 19-NR); DMFS was 64.3% (95% CI 48%-86.3%), median 62.2 months (95% CI 33.9-NR). The fpTC was higher in the pretreatment iLN for those without an RFS event (p=0.04) with a trend in the uiLN as well (p=0.06). Patients without a DMFS event had a higher fpTC in the uiLN (p=0.03) but not in the iLN. The SCI was significantly higher only in the post treatment iLN for patients without an RFS event (p=0.03) and was not significantly different when compared based on DMFS status. When performing pairwise comparisons of nodes based on recurrence status, we found that patients who did not suffer an RFS event had a significantly higher SCI in the post treatment iLN compared to the uiLN (p=0.02). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy for cSIII melanoma can lead to durable RFS. Higher pretreatment fpTC as well as higher post-treatment iLN TCR clonality were both associated with improved RFS. These data indicate that TCR repertoire characteristics within iLN and uiLN may reflect differential immune responses to neoadjuvant therapy and could inform future studies evaluating biomarkers to stratify risk of recurrence and allow personalization of therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03554083 . fpTC Simpson Clonality Index RFS event DMFS event RFS event DMFS event Pretreatment iLN 0.04 0.12 0.43 0.11 Posttreatment iLN 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.12 uiLN 0.06 0.03 0.79 0.48 Δ iLN (post-pre) 0.79 0.37 0.07 0.41 Δ posttreatment iLN – uiLN 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.08

9558 Background: Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus nivolumab 1 mg/kg (Ipi3+Nivo1) is the standard immunotherapy regimen for metastatic melanoma with brain metastases (MBM) but is associated with significant immune-related toxicity, particularly neurologic toxicity. Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg (Ipi1+Nivo3) has demonstrated improved tolerability in extracranial melanoma, though comparative data in MBM are limited. We compared efficacy and toxicity of these dosing strategies in a multisite real-world cohort. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with MBM treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab across three Mayo Clinic sites between 2016 and 2024. Patients were classified by induction dosing as Ipi1+Nivo3 or Ipi3+Nivo1. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Best overall response (BOR) and toxicity outcomes were summarized descriptively. Results: Among 147 patients (Ipi1+Nivo3 n=32; Ipi3+Nivo1 n=115), 144 were evaluable for survival. Median age was higher in the Ipi1+Nivo3 group (69.5 vs 66.0 years); males predominated in both groups (71.9% vs 61.7%), and the cohort was predominantly White (>96%). Most patients had ECOG 0–1 in both groups (84.4% in Ipi1+ Nivo3 and 90.4% in Ipi3+Nivo1). BRAF mutation status was balanced between regimens, with approximately half of patients harboring BRAF-mutant disease (51.6% vs 53.2%). Median OS was 18.5 months (95% CI, 5.7–54.7) with Ipi1+Nivo3 versus 10.6 months (95% CI, 6.5–19.1) with Ipi3+Nivo1 (log-rank p=0.25). Two-year OS was 45.9% and 35.0%, and five-year OS was 24.5% and 19.2%, respectively. Median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI, 1.8–10.9) versus 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.1–4.4) (log-rank p=0.16). BOR was available for 138 patients; objective response rates were 35.5% and 31.8%, respectively. 3–5 adverse events occurred in 24.1% of Ipi1+Nivo3 versus 30.5% of Ipi3+Nivo1 patients. Hospitalizations were less frequent (16.7% vs 36.1%), and neurologic adverse events occurred only with Ipi3+Nivo1 (11.9% vs 0%). Conclusions: In this multisite real-world MBM cohort, Ipi1+Nivo3 demonstrated comparable efficacy, numerically longer survival, and a more favorable toxicity profile compared with standard Ipi3+Nivo1. Notably, no neurologic toxicity was observed with the Ipi1+Nivo3 regimen. These findings support further prospective evaluation of lower dose ipilimumab strategies. Response and survival outcomes. Outcome Ipi1 + Nivo3 Ipi3 + Nivo1 Complete response (CR) 2 / 31 (6.5%) 8 / 107 (7.5%) Partial response (PR) 9 / 31 (29.0%) 26 / 107 (24.3%) Objective response rate (ORR = CR+PR) 11 / 31 (35.5%) 34 / 107 (31.8%) Disease control rate (DCR = CR+PR+SD) 18 / 31 (58.1%) 51 / 107 (47.7%) Median PFS, months (95% CI) 7.3 (1.8–10.9) 2.8 (2.1–4.4) 2-year PFS 27.6% 22.3% Median OS, months (95% CI) 18.5 (5.7–54.7) 10.6 (6.5–19.1) 2-year OS 45.9% 35.0% 5-year OS 24.5% 19.2%

9525 Background: Melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) is a novel target for radiopharmaceutical therapy and is highly expressed on melanoma tumor cells. VMT01 is an MC1R-targeted peptide. 203 Pb is used for patient selection via SPECT imaging. Peptide radiolabeling with 212 Pb delivers alpha-particle therapy. Here, we present data on the treatment of adult patients with MC1R-positive metastatic melanoma receiving [ 212 Pb]VMT01 either as a monotherapy or in combination with the programmed death-1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor, nivolumab. Methods: This is an ongoing phase I/IIa, first-in-human, prospective, multicenter, open-label, radioactive dose-finding and dose-expansion trial. The objectives are to investigate safety, pharmacokinetics, dosimetry, and efficacy. Participants receive up to 3 treatment cycles with either [ 212 Pb]VMT01 3 mCi, 5 mCi, or 1.5 mCi monotherapy, or combination therapy with [ 212 Pb]VMT01 (1.5 mCi) + nivolumab (480 mg, Q4W) or [ 212 Pb]VMT01 (3 mCi) + nivolumab. Participants are evaluated for any DLTs for the first 6 weeks after cycle 1. Efficacy is assessed by RECIST v1.1 criteria by the investigator. Results: As of 24 December 2025, 26 participants (53.8% male; median age: 68 years [range: 27-81]) with MC1R-positive metastatic melanoma were enrolled. The median prior systemic therapies was 4. All 26 enrolled participants received ≥1 dose of [²¹²Pb]VMT01. No DLTs were reported. All SAEs (including one grade 5 SAE) were attributed to disease progression. Most TEAEs were grade 1 (19.2%) and grade 2 (34.6%). Grade 3 TEAEs occurred in 8 participants (30.8%), 5 on monotherapy and 3 on combination therapy (3 mCi + nivolumab). Of the 22 evaluable participants, 1 PR, 9 SD, and 12 PD were reported. Four participants had progression-free survival of ≥6 months. Conclusions: [ 212 Pb]VMT01 as a monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab was generally safe and well-tolerated in 26 enrolled participants, with antitumor activity observed at the 3 mCi dose level. These data may be supplemented with a more complete follow-up at the time of the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT05655312 .

9535 Background: MUM carries a poor prognosis with few effective treatments, especially for HLA-A*02:01-negative pts. While a subset of MUM pts responds to immune checkpoint inhibitors, the comparative efficacy of IPI+PD1 versus PD1 monotherapy is unclear. This study compares objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety between these regimens in MUM. Methods: MUM pts treated with PD1 or IPI+PD1 at 15 major melanoma centres (from Australia, Europe, United States and Israel) were included. Demographics, patient and disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes were examined. Univariate and multivariate (MVA) analyses were performed to identify clinical predictors of response and survival. Results: Of 412 MUM pts treated, 150 (36%) had PD1 and 262 (64%) received PD1+IPI. Compared to the PD1 group, PD1+IPI-treated pts were younger (64 vs. 70 years; p<0.001), had higher rate of elevated LDH (44% vs. 31%; p=0.037), and more frequently had prior treatment with tebentafusp (6.5% vs. 1.3%; p=0.031). Median follow-up from commencement of PD1+/-IPI was 4.9 years (95% CI 4.7 – 6.1). ORR was higher in IPI+PD1 group (18%) vs. PD1 (9%) (p=0.008), particularly in males (p=0.009), patients with liver metastases (p=0.018) and with lung metastases (p=0.011), with elevated LDH (p=0.047) and with no prior treatment with tebentafusp (p=0.007). PFS and OS at 1 and 2 years were numerically higher with IPI+PD1 (1- and 2-year PFS: 23% and 15%; 1- and 2-year OS: 63% and 39%) vs. PD1 (1- and 2-year PFS: 17% and 11%; 1- and 2-year OS: 54% and 36%), but these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). On MVA, adjusting for predefined variables (age, gender, ECOG PS, LDH, presence/absence of liver/lung metastases, prior treatment with tebentafusp), IPI+PD1 was associated with higher ORR (OR 2.71, 1.30 – 6.05; p=0.01) but not with PFS or OS compared to PD1. Presence of liver metastases (ORR [OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13 - 0.64], PFS [HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.11 - 2.34], OS [HR 2.02; 95% CI 1.32 - 3.10]), ECOG PS≥2 (PFS [HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.07 - 3.10], OS [HR 2.24; 95% CI 1.25-4.01]), elevated LDH (PFS [HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.30 - 2.11], OS [HR 2.39; 95% CI 1.84-3.10]) and prior tebentafusp treatment (OS [HR 2.36; 95% CI 1.21-4.59]) were also independent predictors of response and/or survival. A higher percentage of pts experienced grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in the IPI+PD1 group compared to the PD1 group (34% vs 13%, p<0.0001). Most pts ceased treatment due to progression (234, 57%), and more pts stopped due to toxicity in the IPI+PD1 vs. PD1 group (25% vs. 9%, p<0.0001). Conclusions: In pts with MUM, IPI+PD1 demonstrated a higher ORR but did not improve survival compared with PD1 alone. IPI+PD1 was more toxic, leading to early treatment discontinuation in one-quarter of pts. These findings may help guide treatment selection in MUM.

ABSTRACT Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a liquid biopsy is an emerging tool used for diagnosis and disease monitoring, yet not all tumors shed DNA equally, thus currently limiting the clinical applicability of this tool. Our institution has developed and validated a droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (ddPCR) ctDNA test for BRAF V600 mutation. We collected data on all BRAF mutated melanoma patients tested with the ddPCR BRAF assay at our institution over the years 2018–2024 and correlated the test results with clinical and radiological baseline parameters, with a focus on Positron Emission Tomography‐Computed Tomography (PET‐CT) data, incorporating both location of lesions and volume of disease. Linear and logistic regression modelling was used to assess possible associations between the baseline parameters and the ctDNA results. We identified 71 BRAF mutated melanoma patients, of which 65 had active disease on imaging studies and 43 had PET‐CT data available for analysis. Multivariate modelling has shown that patients were more likely to have a positive ctDNA result if they had elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (OR = 9.9), had a higher number of lesions on imaging studies (> 10 lesions: OR = 11.3), and if they were younger than 65 (OR = 11.8), with an AUC of 0.84. The PET‐CT calculated total metabolic tumor volume correlated with the quantitative ctDNA result with a Pearson r factor of 0.49. In conclusion, ctDNA ddPCR BRAF testing is easily obtained and might be especially beneficial for patients diagnosed with a clinically aggressive disease, based on elevated LDH, higher PET‐CT metabolic tumor volume, and younger age.

Abstract Background: High-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) is administered after tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) infusion to promote in-vivo expansion and persistence, yet optimal dosing and the clinical significance of out-of-specification (OOS) TIL products remain unclear. We investigated the impact of number of infused IL-2 doses and manufacturing OOS status on outcomes in metastatic melanoma treated with commercial TIL therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients treated across three Mayo Clinic sites. Planned IL-2 was 600,000 IU/kg every 12 hours for ≤6 doses; actual dosing varied based on clinical tolerance. Patients were grouped as low (0-2) vs high (≥3) IL-2 doses. TIL products were classified as within-specification or OOS per commercial release criteria. Survival associations were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression. Results: In our 31-patient cohort, the median age was 59 years (range 17-77), 58% were male, and 84% had ECOG 0. At TIL infusion, M-stage distribution was M1a 6%, M1b 10%, M1c 61%, and M1d 23%. LDH was elevated above the upper limit of normal in 42%. The median number of IL-2 infusions was 4 (range 0-6); 58% of patients received ≥3 doses, while 2 patients (6%) received none. Out-of-specification (OOS) TIL products occurred in 6 patients (19%). Best responses included complete response (26%) and partial response (23%), for an overall response rate of 48% and a disease-control rate of 61% (CR + PR + SD). Among responders, the median duration of response was 84 days (95% CI 73-95). At data cutoff, the median follow-up was 253 days (95% CI 137-370). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities occurring &gt;14 days after TIL infusion were lymphopenia (39%), anemia (16%), and thrombocytopenia (10%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 99 days (95% CI 73-125) with 20 progression events, and median overall survival (OS) was 193 days (95% CI 32-354) with 13 deaths. Number of infused IL-2 doses was dependent on patients tolerability. Receiving ≥3 IL-2 doses was associated with improved overall survival (394 vs 101 days; p &lt; 0.001) and a trend toward longer progression-free survival (110 vs 59 days; p = 0.055). OOS products predicted inferior PFS (30 vs 110 days; p = 0.003) and showed a trend toward worse OS (120 vs 394 days; p = 0.079). In multivariate analysis, ≥3 IL-2 doses independently improved PFS (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06-0.69; p = 0.011) and OS (HR 0.09, 0.02-0.36; p = 0.001), while OOS status increased risk of progression (HR 8.10, 2.24-29.25; p = 0.001) and death (HR 6.16, 1.35-28.20; p = 0.019). Conclusions: Higher number of infused doses IL-2 and meeting commercial TIL release criteria were independently associated with improved outcomes. Citation Format: Mohamed A. Aboelatta, Jeffrey E. Johnson, Jabra G. Zarka, Matyáš Benada, James W. Jakub, Roxana S. Dronca, Ruqin Chen, Mahesh Seetharam, Deepti Behl, Svetomir N. Markovic, Lisa A. Kottschade, Heather N. Montane, Matthew S. Block, Anastasios Dimou, Robert R. McWilliams, Paula Gill, Yi Lin, Arkadiusz Z. Dudek. Impact of number of IL-2 infusions and product out of specification status on outcomes of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy for melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3706.

Abstract Background: Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) represent a biologically distinct and clinically aggressive subset of melanoma. Comprehensive molecular characterization focused on intracranial disease remains limited. We aimed to define the genomic landscape of MBM and compare these findings with public melanoma datasets. Methods: We retrospectively identified 166 patients with histologically confirmed MBM across Mayo Clinic tri-sites (2011-2025). Molecular testing was performed in 123 patients (74.1%). Comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS; ≥300-gene platforms including Tempus, FoundationOne, Caris, NeoGenomics, and MayoComplete Solid Tumor Panel) was available in 41 patients (24.7%). Intermediate-depth profiling using the MayoComplete Melanoma Panel (17 genes) was performed in 21 patients (12.7%), and a targeted 5-gene melanoma driver panel (BRAF, NRAS, KIT, GNAQ, GNA11) in 52 patients (31.3%). cfDNA-based NGS was available in 12 patients (7.2%). Genomic alterations were summarized and benchmarked against TCGA-SKCM and MSK-IMPACT datasets via cBioPortal. We considered assay heterogeneity, as Mayo panels varied in sequencing depth and CNV coverage, and hybrid-capture platforms often under-detect TERT promoter hotspots. Results: Patients had a median age of 67 years, and 63% were male. BRAF mutations occurred in 48.8% (BRAF V600E/K 41.6%; non-V600 7.2%). Additional MAPK alterations included NRAS (17.5%), KIT (5.4%), GNAQ (1.2%), and GNA11 (0.6%). In the comprehensive NGS subset, tumor-suppressor alterations included CDKN2A (17.5%), PTEN (7.8%), NF1 (9.0%), TP53 (8.4%), and TERT promoter mutations (22.9%). Median TMB was 11.55 mut/Mb (IQR 5.0-25.5). Co-alterations included BRAF+CDKN2A (7.2%), BRAF+PTEN (4.2%), NRAS+CDKN2A (4.2%), NRAS+PTEN (1.2%), and CDKN2A+PTEN (3.6%); overall, 18.1% harbored MAPK driver + tumor-suppressor co-alterations. Compared with TCGA and MSK cohorts, MBM showed similar MAPK driver frequencies but fewer MAPK + tumor-suppressor co-alterations and lower CDKN2A, PTEN, and TP53 disruption, alongside a more prevalent of TERT promoter mutations (22.9% vs 7% and 2.1%), which may partly reflect coverage differences. Conclusion: MBM exhibit a distinct genomic profile characterized by reduced tumor-suppressor loss, fewer MAPK-tumor-suppressor co-alterations, and higher prevalence of TERT promoter mutations. While assay heterogeneity limits direct cross-cohort comparisons, these patterns suggest potentially distinct biological features of intracranial melanoma and underscore the need for harmonized, MBM-specific molecular studies to guide therapeutic development. Citation Format: Dina Elantably, Joseph B. Parker, Jakob Hamilton, Ahmed Abdelhakeem, Oluwatayo Adeoye, Saivaishnavi Kamatham, Winston Tan, Arkadiusz Z. Dudek, Anastasios Dimou, Matthew S. Block, Robert McWilliams, Svetomir Markovic, Mahesh Seetharam, Roxana Dronca, Ruqin Chen. Genomic landscape of melanoma brain metastases: Real-world analysis and comparison with public melanoma cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2107.

Abstract Introduction. This study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) of nab-paclitaxel following the administration of the nano-immunoconjugate nab-paclitaxel-bevacizumab to patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma or gynecological cancers (NCT02020707). The core objective was to characterize the population mean drug concentration-time profile, understand the variability in drug concentrations and identify factors that explain differences in paclitaxel plasma clearance. Also, we sought to explore the impact of the nano-immunoconjugate formulation on paclitaxel clearance. Methods. Using Pumas AI - an advanced pharmacokinetic software program, integrating Machine Learning methods - a PopPK analysis was conducted using concentration-time data collected from 29 subjects, (681 concentration measurements). Patients received 75 - 175 mg/m2 (total dose, 160 - 360 mg). Data were fitted to a 2-compartment model based biphasic decline observed in plasma concentration following intravenous administration. A critical requirement for the model was the inclusion of saturable elimination to accurately describe the drug’s disposition. A comprehensive modeling workflow was implemented, starting with base models (mixed vs. non-linear clearance), followed by the sequential addition of covariates (Age, Sex, BSA, Tumor, Cycle). The Parsimony Principle was applied to select the most appropriate model. Results. Population estimates for paclitaxel clearance and volume of distribution were 41.7 L/hr and 312 L, respectively. The analysis found paclitaxel clearance higher when compared with published data for nab-paclitaxel alone (21.1 or 25 L/h/m2; Sparreboom et al, CCR 11:4136, 2005 and Ando et al, CCP 69:457, 2012). A covariate model incorporating BSA and Gender is the best. For every 2 m2 increase in BSA, linear clearance (CL) increases by 6.9%. Females have 16.6% lower CL than males, which successfully characterized systematic differences in PK between subgroups of subjects. Conclusion. The administration of nab-paclitaxel via the nano-immunoconjugate formulation led to increased clearance for paclitaxel consistent with known clearance mechanisms for therapeutic antibodies. The differences in drug clearance among patients were primarily attributable to covariates BSA and gender. These findings are crucial for identifying safe and effective dosing regimens and informing future clinical simulations. Citation Format: Mohd Beshr Chama, Matthew Stephen Block, Vera J. Suman, Joel M. Reid. Population pharmacokinetics of nab-paclitaxel following administration of a nano-immunoconjugate with bevacizumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 301.