Kavousi, Shahin

Background. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) for cancer treatment is limited by concerns of allograft rejection and uncertain oncologic efficacy. Methods. We conducted a single-center retrospective study of KTR with unresectable or metastatic malignancies treated between 2018 and 2025. The primary study cohort included 33 patients treated with ICI, whose outcomes were compared with 20 matched KTR treated with non-ICI systemic chemotherapy (SC). Results. KTR treated with ICI achieved an objective response rate of 36.4% (12/33) versus 30.0% (6/20) with SC, and a clinical benefit rate of 54.5% (18/33) versus 35.0% (7/20); neither difference was statistically significant (objective response rate P = 0.77; clinical benefit rate P = 0.27). Disease progression occurred in 81.8% of ICI-treated patients and 95.0% of SC-treated patients ( P = 0.23), and death because of cancer progression occurred in 63.6% and 75.0%, respectively ( P = 0.58). Median progression-free survival was 7.3 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-10.8 mo) in the ICI group versus 4.1 mo (95% CI, 2.8-6.3 mo) in the SC group (log-rank P = 0.156). Median overall survival was 15.1 mo (95% CI, 7.6-37.3 mo) with ICI versus 8.7 mo (95% CI, 4.9-14.8 mo) with SC (log-rank P = 0.079). Posttreatment allograft rejection occurred in 12.1% of ICI-treated patients and 0.0% of SC-treated patients ( P = 0.29), with irreversible graft loss in 3.0%. Grade ≥2 immune-related adverse events occurred in 12.1% of ICI-treated patients, and no treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions. ICI therapy was associated with a trend toward longer overall survival when compared with SC and with a low rate of rejection and allograft loss.

e21521 Background: Outcomes following tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy vary in real-world practice, and accessible predictors are needed to inform patient selection and timing of referral. We evaluated whether baseline disease burden, metastatic distribution, and treatment delivery factors are associated with outcomes following TIL therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic melanoma treated with TIL therapy across Mayo Clinic sites (N = 27 infused). Baseline disease burden was characterized using AJCC metastatic stage and organ-specific involvement. A composite high visceral burden variable was defined as the presence of M1d disease and/or liver metastases. Bridging therapy use prior to infusion was recorded. Post-infusion IL-2 exposure was categorized as low (0-2 doses) vs. high (3-6 doses). Best overall response (BOR) was summarized using RECIST-based standard criteria. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured from TIL infusion and estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods with univariable Cox regression. Results: Median age at infusion was 62.0 years; 59.3% were male. Melanoma subtypes included cutaneous (81.5%) and mucosal (18.5%). Bridging therapy was used in 48.1%. Baseline metastatic stage was M1a/M1b in 18.5%, M1c in 63.0%, and M1d in 18.5%. Median follow up was 8.3 months. BOR included complete response (18.5%), partial response (37.0%), stable disease (22.2%), and progressive disease (22.2%), yielding an objective response rate of 55.6% and disease control rate of 77.8%. Patients with high visceral disease burden experienced inferior OS vs. those without high visceral burden (median 5.2 vs 13.4 months; HR 4.77, 95% CI 1.22–18.63; p = 0.014). Bridging therapy was not associated with OS or PFS. Higher post-infusion IL-2 exposure (seen in 77.8% of patients) was associated with improved OS (median 9.0 vs 3.7 months; HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04–0.67, p = 0.005), likely reflecting early post-infusion clinical tolerance rather than a causal treatment effect. Median PFS for the cohort was 3.6 months and did not differ by IL-2 exposure ( p = 0.3), metastatic stage ( p = 0.8), bridging therapy ( p = 0.7), liver metastases ( p = 0.2), or LDH above upper limit of normal ( p = 0.1). Conclusions: The above findings are hypothesis generating and will support evaluation in larger cohort. In this real-world cohort of patients treated with TIL therapy, baseline visceral disease burden was strongly associated with survival outcomes, while bridging therapy did not compromise post-infusion efficacy among patients proceeding to infusion. Post-infusion IL-2 exposure correlated with OS and likely reflects early treatment tolerance. These readily available clinical features may inform patient counseling, referral timing, and sequencing decisions as TIL therapy enters broader clinical use.

9557 Background: High-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) is administered following tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, yet cardiotoxicity frequently limits dose delivery. The clinical significance of peri-dose troponin elevations during IL-2 remains poorly defined. We evaluated troponin kinetics during IL-2 dosing and their association with significant cardiac events and IL-2 interruption. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with metastatic melanoma treated with TIL therapy followed by inpatient high-dose IL-2 at Mayo Clinic Rochester (N = 24; 87 IL-2 doses). High-sensitivity troponin and ECGs were obtained before and after each IL-2 dose. Clinically significant cardiac events were defined as QTc prolongation > 480 ms, arrhythmias (excluding isolated sinus tachycardia), new ECG abnormalities, vasopressor requirement, or cardiology consultation. Dose-level outcomes included cardiac events and subsequent IL-2 dose interruption. Paired troponin changes were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank testing. Dose-level associations were evaluated using clustered logistic regression to account for repeated IL-2 doses within patients. Results: 24 patients received 87 IL-2 doses (median 3 [IQR 2 - 5]). Median age was 63 years (IQR 54 - 70), and 58% were male. Baseline troponin median was 11 ng/L (IQR 6 - 21); 38% had baseline troponin > 14 ng/L. Post-dose troponin exceeded 14 ng/L in 16/24 patients (67%) and 48/87 doses (52%). Median delta troponin was 0 ng/L (IQR −1 to 6; range −24 to 133), with post-dose levels higher than pre-dose values ( p = 0.02). Clinically significant cardiac events occurred in 33% of patients; no post-IL-2 reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction were observed. At the dose level, cardiac events occurred only when post-dose troponin exceeded 14 ng/L (15/48 [31%] vs 0/39 doses; p < 0.001). In clustered logistic regression, post-dose troponin ≥15 ng/L was independently associated with cardiac events (OR 9.6, 95% CI 1.5 - 60.6; p = 0.02) and subsequent IL-2 dose interruption (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.1 - 10.7; p = 0.04). When modeled continuously, each 1-unit increase in log-transformed post-dose troponin was associated with higher odds of cardiac events (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.6 - 6.7; p = 0.001) and IL-2 interruption (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6 - 4.9; p < 0.001). Baseline troponin correlated with peak post-dose troponin (ρ = 0.44, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Peri-dose troponin elevations are common during post-TIL high-dose IL-2; however, higher post-dose troponin independently identifies clinically significant cardiac toxicity and predicts IL-2 interruption after accounting for repeated dosing within patients. Baseline troponin modestly predicts peak elevations, supporting standardized, risk-stratified troponin monitoring and prospective evaluation of toxicity-adaptive IL-2 delivery strategies in TIL therapy.

Abstract Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have a markedly elevated risk of aggressive malignancies, yet the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in this population remains limited by concerns for allograft rejection and the absence of prospective evidence. We evaluated real-world antitumor activity, graft safety, and immunosuppression-related outcomes of ICI therapy in KTRs with advanced cancers. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 57 KTRs with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic malignancies treated between 2018-2025 at a single tertiary center. Thirty-three received ICIs and 24 received non-ICI systemic therapy. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival from diagnosis (OSd), overall survival from treatment initiation (OSt), acute allograft rejection, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Tumor response was assessed by RECIST v1.1. Results: ICI-treated patients achieved higher ORR (40.0% vs 26.1%) and CBR (60.0% vs 33.3%) compared with non-ICI therapy. Median OSd was 35.8 vs 23.3 months, and median PFS was 4.3 vs 3.5 months (both not statistically significant). Median OSt was significantly longer with ICIs (15.1 vs 7.9 months; p=0.012). Acute rejection occurred in 12.1% of ICI-treated patients (3% irreversible) versus 4.2% with systemic therapy; rejection events were heterogeneous in timing (3 weeks-14 months) and largely responsive to pulse-dose corticosteroids. IrAEs occurred in 27.3% of ICI patients, with grade ≥2 events in 12.1%, and no treatment-related deaths. In the cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) subgroup (n=33), ICI therapy produced an ORR of 47.4% and CBR of 63.2%, with trends toward improved survival relative to controls. Conclusions: ICIs produced clinically meaningful antitumor activity in KTRs, particularly in cSCC, with a manageable rate of allograft rejection under carefully tailored immunosuppression. Despite higher historical concerns, irreversible graft loss was uncommon. These findings support the feasibility of ICI therapy in selected transplant recipients and highlight the importance of immunosuppression strategy in balancing antitumor efficacy and graft safety. Prospective, biomarker-integrated studies are needed to define optimal immunosuppression during PD-1 blockade in this high-risk population. Citation Format: Ali Rezazadeh Roudkoli, Elena Barbir, Shahin Kavousi, Mohamed A. Aboelatta, Claudia-Denise Haivas, Byron H. Smith, Aleksandra Kukla, Arkadiusz Z. Dudek. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in kidney transplant recipients: Real-world outcomes of antitumor activity and graft rejection risk [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6544.