Barbir, Elena-Bianca

Background. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) for cancer treatment is limited by concerns of allograft rejection and uncertain oncologic efficacy. Methods. We conducted a single-center retrospective study of KTR with unresectable or metastatic malignancies treated between 2018 and 2025. The primary study cohort included 33 patients treated with ICI, whose outcomes were compared with 20 matched KTR treated with non-ICI systemic chemotherapy (SC). Results. KTR treated with ICI achieved an objective response rate of 36.4% (12/33) versus 30.0% (6/20) with SC, and a clinical benefit rate of 54.5% (18/33) versus 35.0% (7/20); neither difference was statistically significant (objective response rate P = 0.77; clinical benefit rate P = 0.27). Disease progression occurred in 81.8% of ICI-treated patients and 95.0% of SC-treated patients ( P = 0.23), and death because of cancer progression occurred in 63.6% and 75.0%, respectively ( P = 0.58). Median progression-free survival was 7.3 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-10.8 mo) in the ICI group versus 4.1 mo (95% CI, 2.8-6.3 mo) in the SC group (log-rank P = 0.156). Median overall survival was 15.1 mo (95% CI, 7.6-37.3 mo) with ICI versus 8.7 mo (95% CI, 4.9-14.8 mo) with SC (log-rank P = 0.079). Posttreatment allograft rejection occurred in 12.1% of ICI-treated patients and 0.0% of SC-treated patients ( P = 0.29), with irreversible graft loss in 3.0%. Grade ≥2 immune-related adverse events occurred in 12.1% of ICI-treated patients, and no treatment-related deaths were observed. Conclusions. ICI therapy was associated with a trend toward longer overall survival when compared with SC and with a low rate of rejection and allograft loss.

ABSTRACT An increasing number of cancer patients are benefiting from long term cancer-directed therapy with an ever-expanding arsenal of novel agents from monoclonal antibodies to small molecules and cellular therapies in addition to the mainstay cytotoxic chemotherapy. All these therapies are accompanied by a unique array of adverse events, which include kidney toxicity. In this context, the need for onco-nephrology expertise continues to grow. Oncologists and hematologists collaborate closely with onco-nephrologists to determine: (i) treatment options for special populations based on accurate assessment of patients’ glomerular filtration rate, (ii) supportive therapies for those whose treatment course is complicated by acute kidney injury, and (iii) pharmacologic strategies to continue or restart cancer therapy during kidney dysfunction. Here we outline 10 tips for common clinical scenarios in an outpatient onco-nephrology clinic.

ABSTRACT We report a case of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) in a 68-year-old male with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who developed acute kidney injury (AKI) shortly after starting teclistamab for RRMM. Despite stable renal function on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for SCC, proton pump inhibitors and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for 3 years, AKI only occurred post-teclistamab initiation. Biopsy-confirmed AIN with serum creatinine improved only after pulse-dose steroids. This case highlights a potential synergistic nephrotoxic effect of teclistamab and ICIs, warranting further investigation into teclistamab's renal safety.

ABSTRACT Over the last 13 years, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has grown remarkably, owing to their unprecedented anti-tumor efficacy in certain tumor groups. With increased use of ICIs, we are seeing immune-related adverse events (irAEs) more frequently. Renal irAEs, such as ICI-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI), are reported in 2%–5% of patients treated with ICIs, with acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) as the most common histopathologic lesion, though various forms of glomerulonephritis have also been reported. Modifiable risk factors for ICI-AKI include concurrent use of ATIN-associated drugs, like proton pump inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics, and dual ICI therapy with both Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Associated Protein 4 (CTLA-4) and Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 and its ligand (PD1/PDL-1) blockade. Kidney biopsies remain the diagnostic modality of choice, though several promising non-invasive biomarkers, which have not yet been broadly clinically validated have emerged. The treatment of ICI-AKI involves holding ICIs, discontinuation of ATIN-associated drugs and initiation of immunosuppression with corticosteroids as first-line therapy. With prompt treatment initiation, most patients achieve full or partial renal recovery, allowing for re-challenge with ICI. However, a subset of patients will require additional steroid-sparing therapies for corticosteroid-dependent or refractory ICI-AKI. Here we review developments in our understanding of the pathophysiology of ICI-AKI, the approach to diagnosis (with a focus on the emergence of novel diagnostic tools), prognostic factors and the current evidence for establishing treatment standards for ICI-AKI. As the evidence base remains largely retrospective, we identify questions that would benefit from future prospective studies in the diagnosis, management and prognostication of ICI-AKI.

Abstract Background and Aims Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits (PGNMID) has a poor renal prognosis and a high rate of recurrence after kidney transplantation, up to 90%, typically within the first-year post-transplant. Nearly 50% of patients lose their renal allograft within 3 years of recurrence. It has been suggested that pretreatment therapy (with B cell depleting or plasma-cell directed therapy) can help prevent recurrence or modulate the course of disease post-transplant. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of pretreatment therapy given within 6 months prior to kidney transplant on outcomes including PGNMID recurrence and all cause graft loss. Method Between 1996 and 2022, a total of 28 patients with biopsy-proven PGNMID as the cause of end stage kidney disease received a total of 31 kidney transplants. All patients had at least one year of follow-up data, for all but one patient this included surveillance kidney transplant biopsies completed at our center. Recurrence was defined histologically by immunofluorescence finding of monoclonal immunoglobulin deposits, independent of other histological or clinical parameters. The incidence of recurrence and all cause graft loss were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plots. Results Median age of patients at transplant was 57 years, 87% were white, 65% were male, 74% received living donor transplant, 59% received thymoglobulin induction, 81% received maintenance with tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone. Median follow up time was 80 months. A total of 9 patients received pretreatment within 6 months of transplant, 8 received Rituximab and one received Daratumumab. The pretreatment group was generally younger at transplant (53 years vs 57 years) and had a shorter median follow up time (65 months vs 96.5 months), but neither were statistically significant. Overall recurrence rate was 78% for pretreatment and 91% for control, though difference in time to recurrence was not statistically significant (Fig. 1). The difference in all cause graft loss between groups was not statistically significant, however, none in the pretreatment group had graft loss by 60 months (Fig. 2). One patient who received daratumumab had no recurrence by 1 year post-transplant. Conclusion In kidney transplant recipients with PGNMID, pretreatment (primarily with rituximab) may be modulating the post-transplant course of disease. Further studies are needed to determine the extent of this effect and if plasma-cell directed vs B-cell directed therapy may be superior.