Geiersbach, Katherine B.

Odontogenic myxoma (OM) is an uncommon, locally aggressive odontogenic neoplasm with characteristic histologic and clinico-radiographic features but with potential for histologic overlap with other odontogenic and non-odontogenic entities and a non-specific immunoprofile. Widespread loss of heterozygosity (LOH) has been recently described in rare cases of OM. The aim of this study was to determine whether widespread LOH represents a recurrent molecular signature that can be leveraged for clinical decision-making. Allele-specific copy number variation data from chromosomal microarray were generated from 7 OM, comprising a combined prospective and retrospective cohort. Four tumors arose in the mandible and 3 in the maxilla in patients ranging in age from 18 to 94 years (median: 44), with tumor size ranging from 2.2 to 13.0 cm. Variable amounts of fibrous stroma (odontogenic “fibromyxoma”) were present in 4/7 OM, and hypercellularity not typically appreciated in conventional OM was present in 3/7 cases. All OM (7/7) demonstrated widespread LOH, with 5 cases showing a near-haploid/low hypodiploid genomes (multiple monosomies) and 2 cases showing evidence of pseudo-hyperdiploidy due to probable endoreduplication. Both pseudo-hyperdiploid cases were ≥10 cm in size; 1 represented local recurrence. Chromosomes 1 to 3, 6, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 22 demonstrated LOH in ≥75% of cases (chromosomes 1 to 3, 6, and 9 in 100% of cases), while chromosomes 5, 12, 19, and 20 universally retained heterozygosity. Altogether, widespread LOH is a recurrent event in OM and a novel finding in odontogenic pathology, and allele-specific copy number variation analysis can serve as a diagnostic adjunct in challenging cases.

ABSTRACT Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a liquid biopsy is an emerging tool used for diagnosis and disease monitoring, yet not all tumors shed DNA equally, thus currently limiting the clinical applicability of this tool. Our institution has developed and validated a droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction (ddPCR) ctDNA test for BRAF V600 mutation. We collected data on all BRAF mutated melanoma patients tested with the ddPCR BRAF assay at our institution over the years 2018–2024 and correlated the test results with clinical and radiological baseline parameters, with a focus on Positron Emission Tomography‐Computed Tomography (PET‐CT) data, incorporating both location of lesions and volume of disease. Linear and logistic regression modelling was used to assess possible associations between the baseline parameters and the ctDNA results. We identified 71 BRAF mutated melanoma patients, of which 65 had active disease on imaging studies and 43 had PET‐CT data available for analysis. Multivariate modelling has shown that patients were more likely to have a positive ctDNA result if they had elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (OR = 9.9), had a higher number of lesions on imaging studies (> 10 lesions: OR = 11.3), and if they were younger than 65 (OR = 11.8), with an AUC of 0.84. The PET‐CT calculated total metabolic tumor volume correlated with the quantitative ctDNA result with a Pearson r factor of 0.49. In conclusion, ctDNA ddPCR BRAF testing is easily obtained and might be especially beneficial for patients diagnosed with a clinically aggressive disease, based on elevated LDH, higher PET‐CT metabolic tumor volume, and younger age.

The 6th edition of the WHO Classification of Breast Tumours introduces both major and minor changes based on recent advances in our understanding of breast biology, developments in diagnostic modalities, identification of specific molecular targets and new treatment regimens necessitating modifications to pathology reporting and tumour biomarker categorisation. This review summarises the main changes that strive towards a classification of global relevance. In invasive carcinoma, predictive factors increasingly inform modern breast cancer treatment. The 6th edition provides an update on HER2 reporting categories following the DESTINY‐Breast 04 and 06 trials. Terminologies used to classify invasive tumours are clarified, with the term ‘variant’ now reserved for molecular/genetic alterations. Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) with extracellular mucin is recognised as a new diagnostic entity with prognostic implications. The diagnosis of mucinous carcinoma (MC) is reserved for mucin secreting carcinomas with grade 1 or 2 morphology and a favourable biomarker profile. The diagnosis of malignant phyllodes tumours requires only four of the original five adverse histological criteria. Classification of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) is revised, recognising that the unified model, promoted in the 5th edition, is difficult to apply to the breast. New approaches to the classification of adenomyoepithelioma are discussed but the 5th edition system is broadly retained. A new section on ‘Small Diagnostic Samples’ outlines the merits of non‐operative biopsy diagnosis, the B coding system and the importance of multidisciplinary review. Changes to diagnostic practice and the emerging role of artificial intelligence, with advantages and challenges, are discussed in a new section on ‘Digital Pathology’.

Abstract Introduction: Clinical staging of multifocal non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is facilitated by comparative genomic analysis of separate tumor nodules, but the role of genome-wide copy number profiling for this purpose is uncertain. Methods: We analyzed single nucleotide variants (SNVs), gene fusions, small copy number variants (gene amplifications and homozygous deletions) (sCNVs), and large-scale copy number variants (lCNVs) in a retrospective cohort of 34 patients with >1 lung cancer nodule tested on a previously validated tumor-only 515-gene next generation sequencing (NGS) panel (MayoComplete Solid Tumor Panel). For patients with <2 shared SNVs, a Bayesian approach was formulated to calculate the probability of shared versus independent events occurring in different tumor nodules in the same patient. The prevalence of specific lCNVs in NSCLC was derived from an independent dataset of 100 NSCLC peers tested by the same panel, and the prevalence of SNVs, fusions, and sCNVs in NSCLC was derived from publicly available data. Alterations unique to different tumor nodules and suspected germline alterations were excluded from the Bayesian analysis. Results: There were 54 total comparisons for 34 patients. Eleven of the patients (32.4%) had >=2 shared SNVs along with one or more shared lCNVs also identified in each patient. Eight patients (23.5%) had no shared SNVs, gene fusions, sCNVs, or lCNVs. Using the Bayesian approach for the remaining fifteen (44.1%) patients with at least one shared alteration (SNVs, sCNVs, and lCNVs), the probability of clonal relatedness ranged from 73% for a shared whole arm or whole chromosome lCNV to >99% for tumors with two or more shared alterations including multiple or complex lCNVs and SNVs. Whole chromosome or whole arm lCNVs were sometimes shared between tumor nodules with different driver SNVs. Conclusions: Incorporating lCNVs into comparative genomic analysis provides additional evidence of clonal relatedness in a subset of multifocal NSCLCs. However, differences in bioinformatics pipelines for calling lCNVs, concerns over the imprecision of genome-wide copy number profiling, and uncertainty regarding the temporal relationship between lCNVs and carcinogenesis (including somatic events possibly related to “field cancerization”) create challenges for integrating lCNVs into comparative genomic analysis with standard clinical workflows for tumor-only NGS on paraffin embedded tissue sections. Our simplified approach mitigates some of the uncertainty introduced by incorporating lCNVs into clonality determination. Citation Format: Claire Teigen, Ying-Chun Lo, Sounak Gupta, Stephanie Smoley, Beth Pitel, Hussam Al Kateb, Gopi Sivasankaran, Benjamin Kipp, Ande Rumilla, Gang Zheng, Kevin Halling, Katherine Geiersbach, . A Bayesian framework for evaluating somatic copy number variants into comparative genomic analysis of multifocal non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5423.

Background/Objective: Although most melanocytic lesions are diagnosed as benign or malignant by histopathologic evaluation, with or without the aid of immunohistochemistry, diagnosis may remain uncertain in a minority of cases. Assessment of copy number abnormalities (CNAs) may provide sufficient additional evidence to favor either a benign or malignant diagnosis in both pediatric and adult cases and in melanocytic lesions of various subtypes, including Spitzoid, mucosal, and acral. CNAs are common in melanomas, while they are rare, with few exceptions, in benign lesions. Detection of CNAs by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromosomal microarray (CMA) has been well established for melanocytic lesions, with advantages and disadvantages for each. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the utility of CNA testing for the diagnosis of melanoma, across subtypes, when a lesion remains ambiguous after histopathologic and immunohistochemical assessment. In addition, the utility of CNAs to determine prognosis in established diagnoses of melanoma was also evaluated. Methods: The Cancer Genomics Consortium Working Group for Melanocytic Lesions reviewed published data from January 1998 through September 2022 of CNAs in melanocytic lesions detected by either FISH or CMA and conducted a meta-analysis of the findings. Results: Specific abnormalities common in primary cutaneous melanomas of various subtypes and uveal melanomas were enumerated. Differences in CNAs found in primary versus metastatic lesions were also determined, and published evidence for prognosis was summarized. Conclusions: The working group established evidence-based recommendations for the use of CNA testing for evaluation of ambiguous melanocytic lesions.

Abstract: Melanoma exhibits a broad spectrum of histopathologic variations, including rare forms with neural differentiation. Neurotropism in melanoma encompasses both perineural invasion and neural-like transformation, but the prognostic implications of these features remain uncertain. Although (peri)neural invasion is well documented, true neural differentiation in melanomas is exceedingly rare. In this study, we describe an unusual case of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma exhibiting extensive Wagner–Meissner-like bodies, a feature more commonly associated with benign neural tumors and nevi. In this case, histopathology revealed a dual-component lesion with a neurotized and an epithelioid melanocytic component, both showing PRAME expression and p16 loss. Chromosomal microarray identified heterozygous loss of 9p22.1p13.1 (including CDKN2A / CDKN2B ), and loss of 10q22.2q26.3 (including PTEN ), supporting malignancy. These findings suggest that in this case, Wagner–Meissner-like bodies likely represent neurotization rather than a benign or collision lesion, highlighting the need for integrated histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis in challenging melanocytic neoplasms.

Soft tissue aneurysmal bone cysts (STABCs) are rare neoplasms histopathologically identical to aneurysmal bone cysts. These benign lesions are characterized by thin, peripheral ossification and no skeletal continuity. STABC may be difficult to distinguish from myositis ossificans (MO) and malignant entities from imaging and fine needle aspiration, due to rarity and overlapping features. We present a case of a STABC occurring in the paraspinal cervical muscles. The imaging, histopathology, molecular analysis, and treatment are discussed. Four other published cases of STABC of the head and neck are reviewed.

AbstractAn 11‐year‐old female was referred from an outside institution after a diagnostic biopsy and subsequent excision of a progressively enlarging reddish‐brown nodule demonstrated features concerning for a balloon cell nevus with severe atypia versus a high‐grade melanocytoma. Upon review of the initial biopsy specimen and molecular data, we favored the diagnosis to be consistent with a high‐grade melanocytoma with balloon cell changes while considering the possibility of balloon cell melanoma due to concerning histopathologic and genetic abnormalities. In this case study, we discuss critical diagnostic considerations in this rare pediatric case and highlight important pathologic and clinical features of melanocytomas and balloon cell melanoma.

Abstract Objectives We investigated the impact of our laboratory’s reflex testing process for resolving ERBB2 (HER2) status on breast cancer samples that require additional workup after fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), per guideline recommendations published in 2018 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP). Methods In total, 500 breast cancer specimens with ERBB2 FISH results in groups 2 through 4 (all reported as immunohistochemistry [IHC] equivocal [2+] at external laboratories) were resubmitted for IHC testing in our laboratory. Per the ASCO/CAP guideline, FISH was rescored when internal IHC was also equivocal (2+), targeted to tumor areas demonstrating more intense IHC staining, if observed. Results Reflex IHC/FISH testing changed the final reported ERBB2 status in 185 of 500 (37.0%) samples. Result changes included discordant IHC (n = 4 score 0, n = 132 score 1+, and n = 16 score 3+) and discordant FISH (n = 33). Numerical differences in FISH scores were comparable for targeted vs nontargeted FISH rescoring (P = .086 for ERBB2 copy number; P = .49 for ERBB2 ratio). Two cases showed larger differences in FISH scores, suggesting heterogeneity. Conclusions Retesting of breast cancer samples with equivocal IHC frequently changes IHC results, but targeted reanalysis of borderline FISH results rarely identifies significant differences in ERBB2 copy number or ratio.