Brogi, Edi

The 6th edition of the WHO Classification of Breast Tumours introduces both major and minor changes based on recent advances in our understanding of breast biology, developments in diagnostic modalities, identification of specific molecular targets and new treatment regimens necessitating modifications to pathology reporting and tumour biomarker categorisation. This review summarises the main changes that strive towards a classification of global relevance. In invasive carcinoma, predictive factors increasingly inform modern breast cancer treatment. The 6th edition provides an update on HER2 reporting categories following the DESTINY‐Breast 04 and 06 trials. Terminologies used to classify invasive tumours are clarified, with the term ‘variant’ now reserved for molecular/genetic alterations. Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) with extracellular mucin is recognised as a new diagnostic entity with prognostic implications. The diagnosis of mucinous carcinoma (MC) is reserved for mucin secreting carcinomas with grade 1 or 2 morphology and a favourable biomarker profile. The diagnosis of malignant phyllodes tumours requires only four of the original five adverse histological criteria. Classification of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) is revised, recognising that the unified model, promoted in the 5th edition, is difficult to apply to the breast. New approaches to the classification of adenomyoepithelioma are discussed but the 5th edition system is broadly retained. A new section on ‘Small Diagnostic Samples’ outlines the merits of non‐operative biopsy diagnosis, the B coding system and the importance of multidisciplinary review. Changes to diagnostic practice and the emerging role of artificial intelligence, with advantages and challenges, are discussed in a new section on ‘Digital Pathology’.

PURPOSE The nodal burden of patients with residual isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (ypN0i+) is unknown, and axillary management is not standardized. We investigated rates of additional positive lymph nodes (LNs) at axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and oncologic outcomes in patients with ypN0i+ treated with and without ALND. METHODS The Oncoplastic Breast Consortium-05/ICARO cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06464341 ) retrospectively analyzed data from patients with stage I to III breast cancer with ITCs in SLNs after NAC from 62 centers in 18 countries. The primary end point was the 3-year rate of any axillary recurrence. The rate of any invasive recurrence was the secondary end point. RESULTS In total, 583 patients were included, of whom 182 (31%) had completion ALND and 401 (69%) did not. The median age was 48 years. Most patients (74%) were clinically node-positive at diagnosis and 41% had hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative tumors. The mean number of SLNs with ITCs was 1.2. Patients treated with ALND were more likely to present with cN2/3 disease (17% v 7%, P < .001), have ITCs detected on frozen section (62% v 8%, P < .001), have lymphovascular invasion (38% v 24%, P < .001), and receive adjuvant chest wall (89% v 78%, P = .024) and nodal radiation (82% v 75%, P = .038). Additional positive nodes were found at ALND in 30% of patients, but only 5% had macrometastases. The 3-year rates of any axillary and any invasive recurrence were 2% (95% CI, 0.95 to 3.6) and 11% (95% CI, 8 to 14), respectively, with no statistical difference by type of axillary surgery. CONCLUSION The nodal burden in patients with ypN0(i+) was low, and axillary recurrence after ALND omission was rare in patients selected for this approach. These results do not support routine ALND in all patients with ypN0(i+).

AbstractImmune checkpoint inhibitor therapies targeting PD‐1/PD‐L1 are now the standard of care in oncology across several hematologic and solid tumor types, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients with metastatic or locally advanced TNBC with PD‐L1 expression on immune cells occupying ≥1% of tumor area demonstrated survival benefit with the addition of atezolizumab to nab‐paclitaxel. However, concerns regarding variability between immunohistochemical PD‐L1 assay performance and inter‐reader reproducibility have been raised. High tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have also been associated with response to PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer (BC). TILs can be easily assessed on hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides and have shown reliable inter‐reader reproducibility. As an established prognostic factor in early stage TNBC, TILs are soon anticipated to be reported in daily practice in many pathology laboratories worldwide. Because TILs and PD‐L1 are parts of an immunological spectrum in BC, we propose the systematic implementation of combined PD‐L1 and TIL analyses as a more comprehensive immuno‐oncological biomarker for patient selection for PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibition‐based therapy in patients with BC. Although practical and regulatory considerations differ by jurisdiction, the pathology community has the responsibility to patients to implement assays that lead to optimal patient selection. We propose herewith a risk‐management framework that may help mitigate the risks of suboptimal patient selection for immuno‐therapeutic approaches in clinical trials and daily practice based on combined TILs/PD‐L1 assessment in BC. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AbstractHomologous recombination (HR) DNA repair‐deficient (HRD) breast cancers have been shown to be sensitive to DNA repair targeted therapies. Burgeoning evidence suggests that sporadic breast cancers, lacking germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, may also be HRD. We developed a functional ex vivo RAD51‐based test to identify HRD primary breast cancers. An integrated approach examining methylation, gene expression, and whole‐exome sequencing was employed to ascertain the aetiology of HRD. Functional HRD breast cancers displayed genomic features of lack of competent HR, including large‐scale state transitions and specific mutational signatures. Somatic and/or germline genetic alterations resulting in bi‐allelic loss‐of‐function of HR genes underpinned functional HRD in 89% of cases, and were observed in only one of the 15 HR‐proficient samples tested. These findings indicate the importance of a comprehensive genetic assessment of bi‐allelic alterations in the HR pathway to deliver a precision medicine‐based approach to select patients for therapies targeting tumour‐specific DNA repair defects. Copyright © 2017 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract Background: Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes lead to hereditary breast cancers that are defective in homologous recombination (HR) repair and sensitive to DNA damaging agents. HR deficiency (HRD) also occurs in sporadic breast cancers, but its incidence and etiology are unclear. Genomic signatures of HRD recently were employed as biomarkers in clinical trials with modest success. We posited that sporadic breast cancers displaying functional HR deficiency would harbor genetic alterations affecting HR DNA repair genes. To test this hypothesis, we applied a functional assay to define lack of competent HR DNA repair and sequenced the exomes of consecutive sporadic breast cancers. Methods: We developed an assay to assess the ability of cancer cells to localize RAD51 into sub nuclear foci in response to ex-vivo irradiation (IR) in fresh sporadic breast cancer tissue specimens from 60 patients. RAD51 focus formation was compared between mock and IR conditions to determine relative fold induction. Twenty-nine tumors with sufficient DNA underwent whole-exome sequencing. Structural genomic signatures of HRD (i.e. large state transitions (LST), telomeric imbalance (NtAI), loss-of-heterozygositiy (LOH)) and a previously reported mutational signature related to BRCA1/2 hereditary breast cancers were assessed. HR deficient tumors were defined as those with both RAD51 foci defects and a genomic signature of HR deficiency (LST&gt;15 or presence of a BRCA mutational signature). Somatic, germ-line, and copy number changes in HR genes were investigated. BRCA1 methylation status was determined. Results: Seventeen of 60 (28%) tumors displayed defective RAD51 recruitment following ex-vivo IR (RAD51-DEF). RAD51-DEF was seen in all breast cancer subtypes , including 7 of 33 (21%) ER+/HER2-, 4 of 14 (29%) HER2+, and 6 of 13 (48%) triple-negative cases. Of the 29 sequenced tumors, 13 (45%) were RAD51-DEF and 16 (55%) were competent for inducing RAD51 foci. LST was elevated in 10 tumors (LST &gt;15) and associated with RAD51-DEF (p=0.02), whereas NtAI (p=0.10) and LOH (p=0.052) did not show a significant association with RAD51-DEF. The BRCA1/2 mutational signature was evident in 4 tumors, all were RAD51-DEF (p=0.03) and 2 were BRCA2 mutated. Nine of 29 (31%) sequenced tumors were determined to have HRD by the RAD51 assay and presence of a genomic scar. Eight of these 9 (88%) cases with HRD had a genetic alteration of both alleles of a bona fide HR gene due to a pathogenic mutation (somatic or germline) coupled with loss of heterozygosity or a homozygous deletion compared to 1 (5%) tumor without HRD (p&lt;0.001). Both alleles of a gene were affected for BRCA2 (n=4), FAAP100 (n=2), CHEK2 (n=1), TP53BP1 (n=1) and BRCA1 (n=1). BRCA1 gene promoter methylation was found not to be significantly associated with HRD. Conclusion: Combined functional and genomic analyses of breast tumors demonstrated that genetic loss of an HR gene may underpin HRD in sporadic breast cancers. Our findings warrant further comprehensive genetic assessment (somatic, germline, and copy number) of HR genes as potential biomarker for HR-directed therapies. Citation Format: Powell SN, Riaz N, Mutter RW, Ng CKY, Delsite R, Piscuoglio S, King TA, Martelotto L, Sakr R, Brogi E, Edelweiss M, Lim R, Higginson D, Weigelt B, Lee W, Reis-Filho JS. A functional assay for homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair and whole exome sequencing reveal that HR-defective sporadic breast cancers are enriched for genetic alterations in DNA repair genes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S4-03.