Zardavas, Dimitrios

AbstractImmune checkpoint inhibitor therapies targeting PD‐1/PD‐L1 are now the standard of care in oncology across several hematologic and solid tumor types, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients with metastatic or locally advanced TNBC with PD‐L1 expression on immune cells occupying ≥1% of tumor area demonstrated survival benefit with the addition of atezolizumab to nab‐paclitaxel. However, concerns regarding variability between immunohistochemical PD‐L1 assay performance and inter‐reader reproducibility have been raised. High tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have also been associated with response to PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer (BC). TILs can be easily assessed on hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides and have shown reliable inter‐reader reproducibility. As an established prognostic factor in early stage TNBC, TILs are soon anticipated to be reported in daily practice in many pathology laboratories worldwide. Because TILs and PD‐L1 are parts of an immunological spectrum in BC, we propose the systematic implementation of combined PD‐L1 and TIL analyses as a more comprehensive immuno‐oncological biomarker for patient selection for PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibition‐based therapy in patients with BC. Although practical and regulatory considerations differ by jurisdiction, the pathology community has the responsibility to patients to implement assays that lead to optimal patient selection. We propose herewith a risk‐management framework that may help mitigate the risks of suboptimal patient selection for immuno‐therapeutic approaches in clinical trials and daily practice based on combined TILs/PD‐L1 assessment in BC. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract Background:Anti-HER2 agents are associated with an increased risk of cardiotoxicity, occurring mostly during treatment and being generally reversible. To date, no cardiac biomarkers have been validated as predictive markers of cardiotoxicity in patients (pts) receiving anti-HER2 therapies. We evaluated high sensitivity (HS) troponin T (TnT) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in pts treated with neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapies to evaluate if early elevation of cardiac biomarkers predicts early or late cardiac events. Material and Methods: 455 pts were randomized to receive either lapatinib (154 pts), trastuzumab weekly (149 pts), or lapatinib with trastuzumab for a total of 6 weeks (152 pts). After this biological window, pts continued on the same targeted therapy plus 12-weekly paclitaxel until definitive surgery. After surgery, patients received adjuvant FEC (3x) followed by the same HER2 therapy as in the neoadjuvant phase for further 34 weeks (to complete 52 weeks in total). Eligible pts had an LVEF ≥50%. Cardiac biomarkers were centrally tested in plasma samples collected at baseline, week 2 (W2) and at surgery. Elevated biomarker was defined as either TNT >0.015 μg/L or NT-proBNP >125 pg/mL. The small number of pts and rarity of marker elevations allowed only descriptive analyses. Results: At a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 280 pts had cardiac biomarkers tested at baseline (61.5%) and NT-proBNP was elevated in 39 pts (13.9%) while TNT was elevated in only 1 pt (0.35%). From those 39 pts with NT-proBNP elevated at baseline, only 1 pt experienced a cardiac event. Also, hypertension was presented in 14 pts (24.5%) with elevated NT-proBNP. Serial measurements were available in 173 pts (61.7%) and NT-proBNP was elevated in 25, 10 and 21 pts at baseline, W2 and at surgery, respectively, while among 171 pts (61%) TNT was elevated in 1, 1 and 5 pts, respectively. There were 13 cardiac events in 11 pts in the entire trial. Five of these pts had a measurement of cardiac biomarkers at baseline (non-elevated NT-prBNP and TNT were observed in 4 and 5 pts), 9 of them had a measurement at week 2 (non-elevated NT-prBNP and TNT were observed in 8 and 9 pts) and 3 of them at surgery (non-elevated NT-prBNP and TNT were observed in 3 and 3 pts), respectively. The following table show the low specificity of the cardiac biomarkers. Patients without cardiac event (N)Patients with cardiac event (N)Patients with elevated markerElevated NT-proBNP Baseline38139Week 229130Surgery40040Elevated TNT Baseline101Week 2101Surgery606 During adjuvant phase, 13 pts experienced LVEF drop to <50% and none had either NT-proBNP elevated or TNT at surgery. Conclusions: Despite the small sample size, we demonstrated that cardiac biomarkers are rarely elevated in pts receiving anti-HER2 therapies, which is probably due to the absence of myocyte necrosis with respect to TNT, and the lack of chamber dilation in the case of NT-proBNP after exposure to these drugs. In addition, few cardiac events were present in this population not previously exposed to anthracycline-based chemotherapy; therefore the use of cardiac biomarkers in this population may be unnecessary. Citation Format: de Azambuja E, Bradbury I, Ewer M, Campbell C, Zardavas D, Ameels H, Baselga J, Huober J, Izquierdo M, Bozovic-Spasojevic I, Maetens M, Harbeck N, Pusztai L, Piccart M, Rodeheffer R, Sutter T. Cardiac biomarkers for early detection and prediction of trastuzumab and/or lapatinib-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with HER2 positive early breast cancer (BIG 1-06) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-21-09.

Purpose We compared efficacy of trastuzumab versus no trastuzumab in patients with small (≤ 2 cm) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive breast cancer treated in randomized trials. Methods A meta-analysis was conducted using data from five of the six adjuvant trastuzumab trials. Efficacy end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Separate analyses were prospectively planned for hormone receptor (HR) –positive and HR-negative cohorts. Random effect models and Yusuf-Peto fixed effects models assessed the impact of heterogeneity on baseline hazards and treatment effects across studies. Peto-Pike cumulative incidence estimates were stratified by study and nodal status. Results Median follow-up time was 8 years. For 2,263 patients with HR-positive disease, 8-year cumulative incidence rates comparing trastuzumab versus no trastuzumab were 17.3% versus 24.3% (P < .001) for DFS and 7.8% versus 11.6% (P = .005) for OS, respectively; for 1,092 HR-positive patients with zero or one positive lymph nodes, results were 12.7% versus 19.4% (P = .005) for DFS and 5.3% versus 7.4% (P = .12) for OS, respectively. For 1,957 patients with HR-negative disease, 8-year cumulative incidence rates were 24.0% versus 33.4% (P < .001) for DFS and 12.4% versus 21.2% (P < .001) for OS, respectively; for 1,040 HR-negative patients with zero or one positive lymph nodes, results were 20.4% versus 26.3% (P = .05) for DFS and 8.2% versus 12.2% (P = .084) for OS, respectively. Conclusion Women with HER2-positive tumors ≤ 2 cm in the randomized trastuzumab trials derived substantial DFS and OS benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab. Trastuzumab-treated patients with HR-positive disease and ≤ one positive lymph node may be candidates for trials assessing less aggressive treatment approaches.