Leath, Charles A

Abstract Purpose: Our goal was to determine if the HRDefine biomarker combining methylation and mutation assessment of key homologous recombination repair genes identifies BRCA wildtype (BRCAwt) ovarian cancer (OC) with outcomes similar to BRCA mutated (BRCAm) OC within the context of a frontline PARP inhibitor trial for advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: We performed an exploratory biomarker analysis of blood and neoplastic samples from the VELIA trial, a phase 3 study evaluating the PARP inhibitor veliparib as frontline maintenance therapy in OC. We developed a highly sensitive droplet digital PCR assay for quantitative BRCA1 and RAD51C promoter methylation and assessed germline/somatic mutations using the BROCA next generation sequencing platform. Cases were grouped into: BRCAm, HRDefine positive (BRCAwt HRDefine+), and HRDefine negative (BRCAwt HRDefine-). Carcinomas were considered HRDefine+ if quantitative BRCA1 or RAD51C promoter methylation was >/= 60% or if a germline or somatic pathogenic variant (PV) was identified in the following non-BRCA HRR repair genes: RAD51C, RAD51D, PALB2, BARD1. For this analysis, the control group included the two study arms with placebo maintenance compared to the investigational arm of veliparib with chemotherapy and continued as maintenance (veliparib throughout group). HRDefine was compared to the Myriad genomic instability score (GIS) used as HRD assessment in the trial. Progression free survival (PFS) was compared using log rank tests. Results: Among 1140 VELIA participants, biomarker analysis could be performed for 487 cases. Of these, 255 (52%) were BRCAm, 60 (12%) were BRCAwt HRDefine+, and 172 (35%) were BRCAwt HRDefine-. BRCAwt HRDefine+ was driven by promoter methylation (57%), germline (40%), or somatic (3%) PVs. Median PFS (months, all arms combined) was 26 months (BRCAm), 27 months (BRCAwt HRDefine+), and 15 months (BRCAwt HRDefine-), with corresponding hazard ratios (HR) of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.39-0.65) and 0.50 (0.34-0.73) versus HRDefine-. All HRDefine+ molecular subgroups were associated with longer PFS, including RAD51C/D mutations (HR 0.44, 0.25-0.77) and promoter methylation (HR 0.60, 0.36-0.97). HRDefine positivity was significantly associated with improved PFS compared to HRDefine-/GIS low (n=60 vs n=111, median PFS 27 versus 14 months, HR 0.44, 0.30-0.65), while the HRDefine- cases with high GIS demonstrated a trend toward an intermediate PFS (n=56, median 18 months, HR 0.67, 0.45-1.01). When compared by treatment arm, median PFS was significantly longer in the veliparib throughout arm compared to control only for the BRCAm group (32 months vs 23 months, HR 0.61, 0.42-0.87), though the analysis was underpowered for the BRCAwt HRDefine+ sub-group (30 months vs 25 months, HR 0.79, 0.4-1.57). Conclusions: HRDefine identifies BRCAwt OC associated with a PFS that is like that of BRCAm cases and may improve stratification for PARP inhibitor therapy beyond current HRD assays. GIS may have some, albeit reduced, prognostic implication that is independent of HRDefine. Citation Format: Isabel V. Rodriguez, Marc Radke, Ronit Katz, Persephone Miller, Paula Ladd, Nithisha Khasnavis, Jennifer Ochoa, Melanie Dillon, Heather Lankes, Peter Ansell, Carol Aghajanian, Gini Fleming, Michael Birrer, Scott Kaufmann, Charles Leath, Kathleen Moore, Theresa Werner, Linda Van Le, Robert L. Coleman, Elizabeth M. Swisher. Application of HRDefine: a biomarker for identifying root causes of homologous recombination deficiency to a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of veliparib in front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (VELIA/GOG-3005) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2025 Sep 19-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl):Abstract nr A044.

The NCCN Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer/Fallopian Tube Cancer/Primary Peritoneal Cancer provide multidisciplinary diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment recommendations for this disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights detail how the evolution of the use of PARP inhibitors as maintenance and single-agent regimens for the treatment of ovarian cancer informed panel recommendations in the guidelines.

PURPOSE To assess efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin (C) and gemcitabine (G) with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer not amenable to surgery. METHODS Patients enrolled in a single-arm phase II study. Pretreatment inguinal-femoral nodal assessment was performed. Sixty-four Gy IMRT was prescribed to the vulva, with 50-64 Gy delivered to the groins/low pelvis. Radiation therapy (RT) plans were quality-reviewed pretreatment. C 40 mg/m2 and G 50 mg/m2 were administered once per week throughout IMRT. Complete pathologic response (CPR) was the primary end point. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and adverse events were assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients enrolled, of which 52 were evaluable. The median age was 58 years (range, 25-58), and 94% were White. Forty (77%) had stage II or III disease, and all had squamous histology. A median of six chemotherapy cycles (range, 1-8) were received. Eighty-five percent of RT plans were quality-reviewed with 100% compliance to protocol. Seven patients came off trial because of toxicity or patient withdrawal. Of 52 patients available for pathologic assessment, 38 (73% [90% CI, 61 to 83]) achieved CPR. No pelvic exenterations were performed. With a median follow-up of 51 months, the 12-month PFS was 74% (90% CI, 62.2 to 82.7) and the 24-month OS was 70% (90% CI, 57 to 79). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hematologic toxicity and radiation dermatitis. There was one grade 5 event unlikely related to treatment. CONCLUSION Weekly C and G concurrent with IMRT sufficiently improved CPR in women with locally advanced vulvar squamous cell carcinoma not amenable to surgical resection.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States, with less than half of patients living >5 years following diagnosis. The NCCN Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines, including revised guidance on alternative chemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced age and/or comorbidities, a new algorithm for recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma based on developing research and novel therapeutic agents, and updated language regarding tumor molecular analysis applications in ovarian cancer.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States and is the country’s fifth most common cause of cancer mortality in women. A major challenge in treating ovarian cancer is that most patients have advanced disease at initial diagnosis. These NCCN Guidelines discuss cancers originating in the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum, as these are all managed in a similar manner. Most of the recommendations are based on data from patients with the most common subtypes─high-grade serous and grade 2/3 endometrioid. The NCCN Guidelines also include recommendations specifically for patients with less common ovarian cancers, which in the guidelines include the following: carcinosarcoma, clear cell carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, low-grade serous, grade 1 endometrioid, borderline epithelial, malignant sex cord-stromal, and malignant germ cell tumors. This manuscript focuses on certain aspects of primary treatment, including primary surgery, adjuvant therapy, and maintenance therapy options (including PARP inhibitors) after completion of first-line chemotherapy.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States, with less than half of patients living >5 years from diagnosis. A major challenge in treating ovarian cancer is that most patients have advanced disease at initial diagnosis. The best outcomes are observed in patients whose primary treatment includes complete resection of all visible disease plus combination platinum-based chemotherapy. Research efforts are focused on primary neoadjuvant treatments that may improve resectability, as well as systemic therapies providing improved long-term survival. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy recommendations, including the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and the role of PARP inhibitors and bevacizumab as maintenance therapy options in select patients who have completed primary chemotherapy.