Nitschmann, Caroline C.

Abstract Despite long-standing interest in combining topoisomerase I (TOP1) poisons with PARP inhibitors (PARPis), the mechanistic basis for the variable and often unpredictable response to this strategy remains unclear. Early preclinical studies suggested that PARP inhibition amplifies TOP1 poison-induced DNA damage, implying broad therapeutic potential; however, emerging translational and clinical data—particularly in ovarian cancer—indicate that synergy is context-dependent and governed by tumor-intrinsic features that have not been fully defined.Here we assessed determinants of response in five HR proficient ovarian cancer (OC) patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) previously treated with the SN-38 prodrug etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) in combination with the PARPi rucaparib (C. Nitschmann, Clin. Cancer Res. 22(2) Suppl. B50, 2016). Although all models were refractory to single-agent rucaparib, 50% exhibited enhancement of NKTR-102-induced tumor regression with the addition of rucaparib. Neither PARP1 abundance nor extent of rucaparib-mediated poly(ADP-ribose) suppression correlated with therapeutic benefit. Instead, sensitization was restricted to PDXs intrinsically responsive to NKTR-102 and was strongly associated with high levels of NKTR-102-induced TOP1-DNA covalent complexes. In further analysis, 2 of 3 resistant PDXs exhibited high levels of the ABC transporter ABCG2 despite lack of previous therapy, revealing a previously underappreciated mechanism of de novo resistance that limits effective TOP1 inhibitor activity independent of homologous recombination status. Notably, NKTR-102 response did not track with platinum/taxane sensitivity, highlighting the distinct molecular circuitry governing TOP1 poison susceptibility.Collectively, these findings demonstrate that rucaparib can potentiate NKTR-102-induced regression in tumors capable of forming abundant TOP1-DNA covalent complexes. This work identifies TOP1-DNA complex trapping and lack of ABCG2 expression as mechanistic predictors of benefit, providing an updated framework for selecting patients most likely to respond to TOP1 poison/PARPi combinations and challenging the long-standing assumption that PARP inhibition can universally resensitize tumors to TOP1 poisons. Citation Format: Annapoorna Venkatachalam, Caroline C. Nitschmann, Karen S. Flatten, Rachel Hurley, Xiaonan Hou, Cristina Correia, Paula A. Schenider, Krista Goergen, Matthew Maurer, Ethan P. Heinzen, Ann L. Oberg, S John Weroha, Paul Haluska, Scott H. Kaufmann, Elizabeth M. Swisher. TOP1-DNA protein complex as a predictive biomarker for NKTR-102/Rucaparib combination therapy in PARP-inhibitor resistant ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB364.

Abstract Background: At the time of ovarian cancer platinum resistance, standard therapies have limited activity. New anti-cancer drug combinations may lead to improved clinical outcomes. Activity of topoisomerase I (Top I) inhibitors or poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been reported in ovarian cancer and have demonstrated potentiation in other models. Objective: To investigate the efficacy of the Top I inhibitor etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) and the PARP inhibitor rucaparib (CO-338) as single agents and in combination in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of ovarian cancer. Methods: Five ovarian cancer PDX models in SCID mice were treated for 28 days with NKTR-102 (10 mg/kg/q7d IV), rucaparib (150 mg/kg/qd PO), or combination NKTR-102 plus rucaparib at the same doses and schedules. Of the five PDX models, four were platinum resistant and one was a platinum-sensitive positive control. Each treatment arm had a total of 10 mice and animals were observed daily for body weight and general condition. Tumor size was assessed weekly by ultrasound. The primary endpoint was change in tumor cross-sectional area (cm2) from pretreatment baseline to final tumor burden. Western blot was performed to investigate potential biomarkers of response. Results: Compared to vehicle-treated controls, statistically significant improvement (p<0.05) was observed in 3 of 5 models in single agent rucaparib treated tumors and in 5 of 5 models in single agent NKTR-102 treated tumors. The combination of NKTR-102 plus rucaparib also demonstrated statistically significant improvement compared to vehicle-treated controls in 5 of 5 models. The combination of NKTR-102 plus rucaparib induced maximal tumor regression in 2 of 5 tumors with a trend towards smaller tumors compared to single agent treatment arms. This was not found to be statistically significant in the 28 day study period under which the experiment was performed. Exploratory analysis to assess candidate drug response determinants (e.g.Top I, PAPR I, and PARP polymer formation levels) was investigated. Conclusion: NKTR-102 and rucaparib are well tolerated in mice and demonstrate activity in platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer PDX models. Combination therapy demonstrated a trend towards decreased tumor size when compared to single agent activity during treatment. Current efforts are focused on extending the time on study for the PDX models evaluated to determine if statistical superiority of the NKTR-102/rucaparib combination can be established. Citation Format: Caroline C. Nitschmann, Rachel M. Hurley, Marc A. Becker, Xiaonan Hou, Ute Hoch, Thomas C. Harding, Deborah H. Charych, Scott H. Kaufmann, Paul Haluska, Saravut J. Weroha. Antineoplastic activity of Top I inhibitor etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) and PARP inhibitor rucaparib (CO-388) in platinum-resistant high-grade serous BRCA WT ovarian cancer PDX models. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: Exploiting Vulnerabilities; Oct 17-20, 2015; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B50.