Back to Authors

Levine, Douglas A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-8232

Mayo Clinic

Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States)

Citations 25

Patient-Centered Approach to Surgical Prevention of Ovarian Cancer
Lu, Karen H., Chisholm, Gary B. , Peterson, C., Roche, Kara Long , Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie, Feltmate, Colleen, Kim, Sarah, Hagemann, Andrea R. , Carter, Jeanne , Hickey, Martha, Crase, Jamie , Gavin, K, Polinsky, Deborah , D'Andrea, AD, Lu, Karen H. , Norquist, Barbara M. , Bakkum‐Gamez, Jamie N. , Romero, Iris L. , Feltmate, Colleen M. , Levine, Douglas A. , Hickey, Martha , Gavin, Kathleen , D’Andrea, Alan D. , Nebgen, Denise R. , Swisher, Elizabeth M.

JAMA Network Open | July 7, 2026 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e2622026

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.22026 Get It

Importance Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is an effective option to prevent ovarian cancer in high-risk individuals, but adverse effects from premature menopause are a barrier to uptake. Interval salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (ISDO) may be an effective alternative. Objective To evaluate the association of ISDO vs RRSO and sexual function and menopausal symptoms. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized (patient preference) clinical trial was performed among Women Choosing Surgical Prevention participants with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant conferring an increased risk for ovarian cancer. Patients from 9 US centers were enrolled from June 2, 2016, to October 28, 2020; chose ISDO or RRSO; and were followed up for 24 months. The analysis was performed on November 13, 2024. Interventions Participant-selected RRSO or ISDO. Main Outcomes and Measures Changes in sexual function and menopausal symptoms from baseline to 6, 12, and 24 months. Inverse probability weighting was applied to achieve covariate balance across groups. Results The analytic sample included 334 female participants (mean [95% CI] age at consent, 39.2 [38.7-.9.7] years) who underwent RRSO (n = 165) or ISDO (n = 169) and completed 6-month questionnaires. Significantly more participants experienced clinically meaningful worsening of sexual function at 6 months compared with baseline after RRSO vs ISDO (33.1% [39 of 118] vs 16.8% [17 of 101], respectively; odds ratio, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.20-3.35]) and at 12 months (39.2% [38 of 97] vs 18.3% [17 of 93], respectively; odds ratio, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.09-2.63]). This finding was no longer significant at 24 months. When restricted to the RRSO group who took hormone replacement therapy, there was no significant worsening of total sexual function scores or menopausal symptoms compared with baseline. No interval ovarian cancers were reported. Conclusions and Relevance This nonrandomized clinical trial comparing RRSO with ISDO found that ISDO was less likely to impair sexual function, which addresses an important barrier to surgical prevention in high-risk patients in premenopause. After RRSO, use of hormone replacement therapy mitigated menopausal symptoms and prevented decline in sexual function. More information is needed about the safety of ISDO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02760849
Remotely Delivered Cancer Genetic Testing in the Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) Trial
Swisher, Elizabeth M. , Rayes, Nadine , Peterson, Christine B. , Norquist, Barbara M. , Coffin, Tara B. , Gavin, Kathleen , Polinsky, Deborah , Crase, Jamie , Blank, Stephanie V. , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Law, Sherman , D’Andrea, Alan D. , Lu, Karen H. , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Swisher, Elizabeth M , Peterson, Christine , Norquist, Barbara , D'Andrea, Alan , Bowen, Deborah J. , Bakkum‐Gamez, Jamie N. , Munsell, Mark F. , Nebgen, Denise R. , Fleming, Gini F. , Zhou, Alicia Yiran , Levine, Douglas A.

JAMA Oncology | September 14, 2023 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1547

10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3748 Get It

Importance Requiring personalized genetic counseling may introduce barriers to cancer risk assessment, but it is unknown whether omitting counseling could increase distress. Objective To assess whether omitting pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling would increase distress during remote testing. Design, Setting, and Participants Making Genetic Testing Accessible (MAGENTA) was a 4-arm, randomized noninferiority trial testing the effects of individualized pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling on participant distress 3 and 12 months posttest. Participants were recruited via social and traditional media, and enrollment occurred between April 27, 2017, and September 29, 2020. Participants were women aged 30 years or older, English-speaking, US residents, and had access to the internet and a health care professional. Previous cancer genetic testing or counseling was exclusionary. In the family history cohort, participants had a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer. In the familial pathogenic variant (PV) cohort, participants reported 1 biological relative with a PV in an actionable cancer susceptibility gene. Data analysis was performed between December 13, 2020, and May 31, 2023. Intervention Participants completed baseline questionnaires, watched an educational video, and were randomized to 1 of 4 arms: the control arm with pretest and/or posttest genetic counseling, or 1 of 3 study arms without pretest and posttest counseling. Genetic counseling was provided by phone appointments and testing was done using home-delivered saliva kits. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was participant distress measured by the Impact of Event Scale 3 months after receiving the results. Secondary outcomes included completion of testing, anxiety, depression, and decisional regret. Results A total of 3839 women (median age, 44 years [range 22-91 years]), most of whom were non-Hispanic White and college educated, were randomized, 3125 in the family history and 714 in the familial PV cohorts. In the primary analysis in the family history cohort, all experimental arms were noninferior for distress at 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences in anxiety, depression, or decisional regret at 3 months. The highest completion rates were seen in the 2 arms without pretest counseling. Conclusions and Relevance In the MAGENTA clinical trial, omitting individualized pretest counseling for all participants and posttest counseling for those without PV during remote genetic testing was not inferior with regard to posttest distress, providing an alternative care model for genetic risk assessment. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02993068
Population-based targeted sequencing of 54 candidate genes identifies PALB2 as a susceptibility gene for high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Song, Honglin , Dicks, Ed , Intermaggio, Maria P., Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Bowtell, David D.L. , Traficante, Nadia , Group, AOCS, Hosking, Karen, Piskorz, Anna , Oudenhove, Elke Van , Doherty, J.A. , Rossing, Mary Anne, Duerst, Matthias, Dörk, Thilo , Bogdanova, Natalia , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Odunsi, Kunle , Ness, Roberta B., Lester, Jenny, Pujara, Miguel Angel, Cunningham, Julie M. , Hildebrandt, Michelle, Huff, Chad , Li, Donghui , Wu, Xifeng , Yu, Yao , Levine, Douglas A. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Riggan, Marjorie J. , Webb, Penelope M. , Group, OPAL Study, Jakubowska, Anna , Alsop, Jennifer , Harrington, Patricia, Chan, Isaac H Y , Menon, Usha , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Wu, Anna H. , Fazio, Anna de , Kennedy, Catherine J. , Goode, Ellen L. , Ramus, Susan J. , Gayther, Simon A. , DeFazio, Anna , Cunningham, Julie, Vierkant, Robert, Huff, Chad , Cybulski, Cezary , Pharoah, Paul D P , Dörk, Thilo , Ramus, Susan J , Webb, Penelope M , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten , Kennedy, Catherine J , Jakubowska, Anna , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Traficante, Nadia , Bowtell, David D , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Group, AOCS, Brenton, James D. , Goranova, Teodora , Harris, Holly R. , Modugno, Francesmary , Karlan, Beth Y. , Jensen, Allan , Kjær, Susanne K. , Høgdall, Estrid , Campbell, Ian , Lázaro, Conxi , Vierkant, Robert A. , Winham, Stacey J. , Permuth, Jennifer B. , Berchuck, Andrew , Cybulski, Cezary , Gronwald, Jacek , Lubiński, Jan , Pharoah, Paul D.P.

Journal of Medical Genetics | June 16, 2020 | Volume: 58 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 305-313

10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106739 Get It

Purpose The known epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) susceptibility genes account for less than 50% of the heritable risk of ovarian cancer suggesting that other susceptibility genes exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution to ovarian cancer susceptibility of rare deleterious germline variants in a set of candidate genes. Methods We sequenced the coding region of 54 candidate genes in 6385 invasive EOC cases and 6115 controls of broad European ancestry. Genes with an increased frequency of putative deleterious variants in cases versus controls were further examined in an independent set of 14 135 EOC cases and 28 655 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium and the UK Biobank. For each gene, we estimated the EOC risks and evaluated associations between germline variant status and clinical characteristics. Results The ORs associated for high-grade serous ovarian cancer were 3.01 for PALB2 (95% CI 1.59 to 5.68; p=0.00068), 1.99 for POLK (95% CI 1.15 to 3.43; p=0.014) and 4.07 for SLX4 (95% CI 1.34 to 12.4; p=0.013). Deleterious mutations in FBXO10 were associated with a reduced risk of disease (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.00, p=0.049). However, based on the Bayes false discovery probability, only the association for PALB2 in high-grade serous ovarian cancer is likely to represent a true positive. Conclusions We have found strong evidence that carriers of PALB2 deleterious mutations are at increased risk of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Whether the magnitude of risk is sufficiently high to warrant the inclusion of PALB2 in cancer gene panels for ovarian cancer risk testing is unclear; much larger sample sizes will be needed to provide sufficiently precise estimates for clinical counselling.
Results from MAGENTA: A national randomized four-arm noninferiority trial evaluating pre- and post-test genetic counseling during online testing for breast and ovarian cancer genetic risk.
Rayes, Nadine , Peterson, Christine B. , Coffin, Tara B. , Gavin, Kathleen , Polinsky, Deborah , Crase, Jamie , Blank, Stephanie V. , Pradeep, Harsha M, Law, Sherman , Peterson, Christine , Swisher, Elizabeth M. , Bowen, Deborah J. , Norquist, Barbara M. , Bakkum‐Gamez, Jamie N. , Munsell, Mark F. , Nebgen, Denise R. , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Zhou, Alicia Yiran , Levine, Douglas A. , D’Andrea, Alan D. , Lu, Karen H.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 25, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 1506-1506

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.1506 Get It

1506 Background: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is preventable when genetic risk is identified. We aimed to test whether pre and/or post-test genetic counseling is needed to optimally deliver online accessible genetic testing. Methods: MAGENTA (Making GENetic Testing Accessible) is a four-arm non-inferiority trial evaluating electronic genetic education and results delivery alone or combined with pre-test only, or post-test only telephone genetic counseling compared to mandatory pre- and post-test counseling (control arm) in women at risk of HBOC (NCT02993068). Regardless of assigned arm, all subjects with a pathogenic mutation received post-test telephone counseling. All subjects were enrolled electronically as part of either a family history cohort (FHC) or a cascade cohort (CC, known familial mutation). The primary outcome was cancer risk distress at 3 months and the trial was powered for the FHC. Secondary outcomes included completion of testing (i.e., received results), anxiety, depression, quality of life, and decisional regret, all measured by standardized scales. Results: Enrollment is complete and a total of 3,822 participants were randomized, 3,111 in FHC and 711 in CC. Participants were enrolled from all 50 states, but most were white/non-Hispanic (88%). Among participants that completed genetic testing, 173 (7.2%) had a mutation in a breast or ovarian cancer gene, with 114 (5.7%) of FHC and 59 (14.2%) of CC. In the primary intention-to-treat analysis of FHC, each of the three experimental arms was non-inferior to the control arm for distress at 3 months (p < 0.025/3 = 0.0083). In the CC, no and pre-test only counseling were also non-inferior (p < 0.025/3 = 0.0083). Distress was lowest in the arm with neither pre nor post-test counseling. Overall, 318 (18%) participants had very high distress at three month follow-up, and this rate was not significantly different across arms. Anxiety, depression and decisional regret did not have statistically significant differences across arms at follow-up. Test completion was highest in the no counseling arm (86.4%) and lowest in the control arm (60.6%). Conclusions: Electronic genetic education and results release without genetic counseling was non-inferior with regard to patient distress and was associated with higher test completion and lower distress. These results support use of a genetic testing paradigm providing individualized genetic counseling only for patients with positive test results. Clinical trial information: NCT02993068.
Evaluation of vitamin D biosynthesis and pathway target genes reveals UGT2A1/2 and EGFR polymorphisms associated with epithelial ovarian cancer in African American Women
Grant, Delores J. , Alberg, Anthony J. , Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill S. , Bondy, Melissa L. , Funkhouser, Ellen, Moorman, Patricia G. , Peres, Lauren C. , Peters, Edward , Schwartz, Ann G. , Terry, Paul , Wang, Xin‐Qun, Hoyo, Cathrine , Sandler, Dale P. , Taylor, Jack A. , Edwards, Todd L., Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia, Wentzensen, Nicolas , Pearce, Celeste Leigh , Wu, Anna H. , Whittemore, Alice S. , McGuire, Valerie , Sieh, Weiva , Rothstein, Joseph H. , Ness, Roberta B., Moysich, Kirsten B. , Rossing, Mary Anne, Sellers, Thomas A. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Levine, Douglas A. , Haiman, Christopher A. , Menon, Usha , Ramus, Susan J. , Gayther, Simon A. , Terry, Kathryn L. , Goode, Ellen L. , Cannioto, Rikki , Odunsi, Kunle , Etter, John Lewis , Huang, Ruea‐Yea , Bernardini, Marcus Q. , Tone, Alicia , May, Taymaa, Goodman, Marc T. , Thompson, Pamela J., Carney, Michael E. , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Lambrechts, Diether , Vergote, Ignace , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Salvensen, Helga B., Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Bruegl, Amanda , Moffitt, Melissa , Le, Nhu D. , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Kelemen, Linda E. , Song, Honglin , Eccles, Diana , DeFazio, Anna , Kennedy, Catherine J. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Lambrechts, Diether , Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S , Moysich, Kirsten , Permuth, Jennifer B , Cramer, Daniel W , Fazio, Anna de , Lambrechts, Diether , Ramus, Susan J , Sandler, Dale P , Tworoger, Shelley S , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Brooks-Wilson, Angela R , Kennedy, Catherine J , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Taylor, Jack A , Goodman, Marc T , Manichaikul, Ani , Bandera, Elisa V. , Coté, Michele L. , Keku, Temitope O , Berchuck, Andrew , O’Brien, Katie M. , Edwards, Digna R. Velez , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia , Modugno, Francesmary , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Permuth, Jennifer B. , Setiawan, Veronica Wendy , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Karlan, Beth Y. , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Cramer, Daniel W. , Larson, Melissa C. , Kaufmann, Scott H. , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Vanderstichele, Adriaan , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Ziogas, Argyrios , Brenton, James D. , Bjørge, Line , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Cook, Linda S. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Campbell, Ian

Cancer Medicine | April 19, 2019 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 2503-2513

10.1002/cam4.1996 Get It

AbstractAn association between genetic variants in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) was previously reported in women of African ancestry (AA). We sought to examine associations between genetic variants in VDR and additional genes from vitamin D biosynthesis and pathway targets (EGFR, UGT1A, UGT2A1/2, UGT2B, CYP3A4/5, CYP2R1, CYP27B1, CYP24A1, CYP11A1, and GC). Genotyping was performed using the custom‐designed 533,631 SNP Illumina OncoArray with imputation to the 1,000 Genomes Phase 3 v5 reference set in 755 EOC cases, including 537 high‐grade serous (HGSOC), and 1,235 controls. All subjects are of African ancestry (AA). Logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We further evaluated statistical significance of selected SNPs using the Bayesian False Discovery Probability (BFDP). A significant association with EOC was identified in the UGT2A1/2 region for the SNP rs10017134 (per allele OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2‐1.7, P = 1.2 × 10−6, BFDP = 0.02); and an association with HGSOC was identified in the EGFR region for the SNP rs114972508 (per allele OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.6‐3.4, P = 1.6 × 10−5, BFDP = 0.29) and in the UGT2A1/2 region again for rs1017134 (per allele OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2‐1.7, P = 2.3 × 10−5, BFDP = 0.23). Genetic variants in the EGFR and UGT2A1/2 may increase susceptibility of EOC in AA women. Future studies to validate these findings are warranted. Alterations in EGFR and UGT2A1/2 could perturb enzyme efficacy, proliferation in ovaries, impact and mark susceptibility to EOC.
Genetic Data from Nearly 63,000 Women of European Descent Predicts DNA Methylation Biomarkers and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk
Yang, Yaohua , Wu, Lang , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Lu, Yingchang , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia, Li, Bingshan , Ye, Fei , Banerjee, Susana , Benı́tez, Javier , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Chen, Kexin , DeFazio, Anna , Dörk, Thilo , Eccles, Diana M., Edwards, Digna Velez, Fasching, Peter A. , Fortner, Renée T. , Gayther, Simon A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Heitz, Florian , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus , Huntsman, David G. , Kar, Siddhartha , Kelemen, Linda E. , Koushik, Anita , Lambrechts, Diether , Le, Nhu D. , Levine, Douglas A. , Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Matsuo, Keitaro , May, Taymaa, McNeish, Iain A. , Menon, Usha , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Moorman, Patricia G. , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Ness, Roberta B., Olsson, Håkan , Onland‐Moret, N. Charlotte , Park, Sue K. , Paul, James , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Phelan, Catherine M., Pike, Malcolm C. , Ramus, Susan J. , Ríboli, Elio , Rodríguez‐Antona, Cristina , Romieu, Isabelle, Sandler, Dale P. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Shan, Kang, Sieh, Weiva , Stampfer, Meir J. , Sutphen, Rebecca , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Szafron, Lukasz M. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Webb, Penelope M. , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Woo, Yin Ling , Wu, Anna H. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Sellers, Thomas A. , Long, Jirong , Eccles, Diana , Lambrechts, Diether , Chen, Kexin , Shu, Xiao-Ou , Brenton, James D , Chang-Claude, Jenny , Fazio, Anna de , Dennis, Joe , Fasching, Peter A , Fortner, Renée T , Giles, Graham G , Harris, Holly R , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , Kjaer, Susanne K , Koushik, Anita , McNeish, Iain A , Menon, Usha , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Nevanlinna, H , Park, Sue K , Paul, James , Ramus, Susan J , Rodríguez-Antona, Cristina , Sandler, Dale P , Szafron, Lukasz M , Teo, Soo H , Tworoger, Shelley S , Webb, Penelope M , Wolk, Alicja , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Eccles, Diana , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Moysich, Kirsten , Matsuo, Keitaro , Heitz, Florian , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Benitez, Javier , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Kar, Siddhartha , Riboli, Elio , Goodman, Marc T , Cai, Qiuyin , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia , Berchuck, Andrew , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Bjørge, Line , Brenton, James D. , Bützow, Ralf C. , Campbell, Ian , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Edwards, Digna R. Velez , Giles, Graham G. , Glasspool, Rosalind , Gronwald, Jacek , Harris, Holly R. , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Karlan, Beth Y. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Modugno, Francesmary , Nevanlinna, Heli , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Setiawan, Veronica Wendy , Shan, Kang, Siddiqui, Nadeem , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , White, Emily , Willett, Walter C. , Wolk, Alicja , Li, Yan , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Zheng, Wei , Yang, Yaohua

Cancer Research | December 17, 2018 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 505-517

10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2726 Get It

Abstract DNA methylation is instrumental for gene regulation. Global changes in the epigenetic landscape have been recognized as a hallmark of cancer. However, the role of DNA methylation in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. In this study, high-density genetic and DNA methylation data in white blood cells from the Framingham Heart Study (N = 1,595) were used to build genetic models to predict DNA methylation levels. These prediction models were then applied to the summary statistics of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ovarian cancer including 22,406 EOC cases and 40,941 controls to investigate genetically predicted DNA methylation levels in association with EOC risk. Among 62,938 CpG sites investigated, genetically predicted methylation levels at 89 CpG were significantly associated with EOC risk at a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P &lt; 7.94 × 10−7. Of them, 87 were located at GWAS-identified EOC susceptibility regions and two resided in a genomic region not previously reported to be associated with EOC risk. Integrative analyses of genetic, methylation, and gene expression data identified consistent directions of associations across 12 CpG, five genes, and EOC risk, suggesting that methylation at these 12 CpG may influence EOC risk by regulating expression of these five genes, namely MAPT, HOXB3, ABHD8, ARHGAP27, and SKAP1. We identified novel DNA methylation markers associated with EOC risk and propose that methylation at multiple CpG may affect EOC risk via regulation of gene expression. Significance: Identification of novel DNA methylation markers associated with EOC risk suggests that methylation at multiple CpG may affect EOC risk through regulation of gene expression.
rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 Region and Risk of Ovarian Carcinoma of Mucinous Histology
Kelemen, Linda E. , Earp, Madalene A. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Group, On behalf of Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Fasching, Peter A. , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Ekici, Arif B. , Hein, Alexander , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Sandrina, Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Vergote, Ignace , Rossing, Mary Anne, Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Moysich, Kirsten, Cannioto, Rikki , Lele, Shashikant , Odunsi, Kunle , Goodman, Marc T. , Shvetsov, Yurii B. , Thompson, Pamela J., Dörk, Thilo , Antonenkova, Natalia, Bogdanova, Natalia , Hillemanns, Peter , Runnebaum, Ingo B. , Harter, Philipp , Heitz, Florian , Schwaab, Ira, Edwards, Robert P., Kelley, Joseph L., Ness, Roberta B., Lester, Jenny, Oršulić, Sandra , Walsh, Christine M. , Jensen, Allan , Cunningham, Julie M. , Vierkant, Robert A. , Bruinsma, Fiona , Hildebrandt, Michelle, Liang, Dong , Lu, Karen H., Wu, Xifeng , Sellers, Thomas A. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Iversen, Edwin S., Terry, Kathryn L. , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Thomsen, Liv Vestrheim, Krakstad, Camilla , Tangen, Ingvild L. , Aben, Katja K.H. , Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Altena, Anne M. van , Bean, Yukie T., Kellar, Melissa, Le, Nhu D. , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Jakubowska, Anna , Lubiński, Jan , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Brinton, Louise A. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Høgdall, Estrid , Engelholm, Svend Aage, Høgdall, Claus , Lundvall, Lene, Nedergaard, Lotte , Dicks, Ed , Song, Honglin , McNeish, Iain A. , Carty, Karen , Eccles, Diana , Whittemore, Alice S. , McGuire, Valerie , Rothstein, Joseph H. , Sieh, Weiva , Narod, Steven A., Phelan, Catherine, McLaughlin, John, Ziogas, Argyrios, Menon, Usha , Gayther, Simon A. , Ramus, Susan J. , Wu, Anna H. , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Lee, Alice W. , Pike, Malcolm C. , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Podgórska, Agnieszka , Plisiecka-Hałasa, Joanna, Sawicki, Włodzimierz , Goode, Ellen L. , Berchuck, Andrew, Lu, Karen H. , Lambrechts, Diether , Earp, Madalene, Hein, Alexander , Behrens, Sabine , Hillemanns, Peter , Nevanlinna, H , Kjaer, Susanne K , Jensen, Allan , Cunningham, Julie M , Vierkant, Robert A , Bjorge, Line , Gronwald, Jacek , Brinton, Louise A , Pharoah, Paul D P , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , McNeish, Iain A , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Ramus, Susan J , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Tworoger, Shelley S , Moysich, Kirsten , Lissowska, Jolanta , Brooks-Wilson, Angela R , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Ekici, Arif B , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Lubinski, Jan , Goodman, Marc T , Fridley, Brooke L. , Group, On behalf of Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Doherty, Jennifer A. , Behrens, Sabine , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Bois, Andreas du , Bützow, Ralf C. , Pelttari, Liisa M. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Modugno, Francesmary , Karlan, Beth Y. , Walsh, Christine, Kjær, Susanne K. , Giles, Graham G. , Southey, Melissa C. , Levine, Douglas A. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Bandera, Elisa V. , Olson, Sara H. , Orlow, Irene , Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim , Bjørge, Line , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Cook, Linda S. , Gronwald, Jacek , Cybulski, Cezary , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Glasspool, Rosalind , Paul, James , Campbell, Ian , McLaughlin, John, Risch, Harvey A. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra

International Journal of Molecular Sciences | August 21, 2018 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2473

10.3390/ijms19092473 Get It

Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is a crucial enzyme for DNA synthesis. TYMS expression is regulated by its antisense mRNA, ENOSF1. Disrupted regulation may promote uncontrolled DNA synthesis and tumor growth. We sought to replicate our previously reported association between rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 3′ gene region and increased risk of mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) in an independent sample. Genotypes from 24,351 controls to 15,000 women with invasive OC, including 665 MOC, were available. We estimated per-allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using unconditional logistic regression, and meta-analysis when combining these data with our previous report. The association between rs495139 and MOC was not significant in the independent sample (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.97–1.22; p = 0.15; N = 665 cases). Meta-analysis suggested a weak association (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.03–1.24; p = 0.01; N = 1019 cases). No significant association with risk of other OC histologic types was observed (p = 0.05 for tumor heterogeneity). In expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis, the rs495139 allele was positively associated with ENOSF1 mRNA expression in normal tissues of the gastrointestinal system, particularly esophageal mucosa (r = 0.51, p = 1.7 × 10−28), and nonsignificantly in five MOC tumors. The association results, along with inconclusive tumor eQTL findings, suggest that a true effect of rs495139 might be small.
A Transcriptome-Wide Association Study Among 97,898 Women to Identify Candidate Susceptibility Genes for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk
Lu, Yingchang , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia, Wu, Lang , Li, Bingshan , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Im, Hae Kyung , Chen, Y. Ann , Permuth, Jennifer B. , Reid, Brett M. , Teer, Jamie K. , Moysich, Kirsten B., Andrulis, Irene L. , Barkardóttir, Rósa B. , Benı́tez, Javier , Caldés, Trinidad , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Claes, Kathleen , Daly, Mary B., DeFazio, Anna , Dörk, Thilo , Easton, Douglas F. , Eccles, Diana M., Fasching, Peter A. , Fortner, Renée T. , Fountzilas, George , Friedman, Eitan , Ganz, Patricia A. , Goldgar, David E., Goodman, Marc T. , Greene, Mark H. , Hamann, Ute, Heitz, Florian , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Høgdall, Claus , Hulick, Peter J. , Huntsman, David G. , Imyanitov, Evgeny N., Jakubowska, Anna , James, Paul A. , Kelemen, Linda E., Kwong, Ava , Le, Nhu D., Lesueur, Fabienne , May, Taymaa, McGuffog, Lesley, McNeish, Iain A. , Merritt, Melissa A. , Montagna, Marco , Ņikitina-Zaķe, Liene , Offit, Kenneth, Oláh, Edith , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Olsson, Håkan , Osório, Ana , Park, Sue K. , Peeters, Petra H.M. , Peterlongo, Paolo , Phelan, Catherine M., Pujana, Miguel Ángel , Ramus, Susan J. , Rennert, Gad , Rodriguez, Gustavo C. , Rodríguez‐Antona, Cristina , Romieu, Isabelle , Rookus, Matti A. , Rossing, Mary Anne, Rzepecka, Iwona K. , Schmutzler, Rita K., Sieh, Weiva , Simard, Jacques , Song, Honglin , Sutphen, Rebecca , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Thomassen, Mads , Trichopoulou, Antonia , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Rensburg, Elizabeth J. van , Vega, Ana , Edwards, Digna Velez, Webb, Penelope M. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Wu, Anna H. , Zorn, Kristin K. , Gayther, Simon A. , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Goode, Ellen L. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Sellers, Thomas A. , Long, Jirong , Durocher, Francine , Eccles, Diana , Permuth, Jennifer B , Teer, Jamie K , Barnes, Daniel R , Caldes, Trinidad , Caligo, Maria A , Chang-Claude, Jenny , Fazio, Anna de , Dennis, Joe , Fasching, Peter A , Fortner, Renée T , Garber, J. E. , Giles, Graham G , Greene, Mark H , Hulick, Peter J , Isaacs, Claudine , James, Paul , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , Kjaer, Susanne K , Leslie, Goska , Lesueur, Fabienne , McNeish, Iain A , Nevanlinna, H , Nussbaum, Robert , Park, Sue K , Parsons, Michael T , Peterlongo, Paolo , Pujana, Miquel Angel , Ramus, Susan J , Rennert, Gad , Rodríguez-Antona, Cristina , Sandler, Dale P , Spurdle, Amanda B , Teixeira, Manuel R , Teo, Soo H , Tworoger, Shelley S , van Rensburg, Elizabeth J , Vanderstichele, Adriaan , Webb, Penelope M , Wolk, Alicja , Dörk, Thilo , Eccles, Diana , Swerdlow, Anthony J , Moysich, Kirsten , Vega, Ana , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Claes, Kathleen B M , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Sieh, Weiva , Benitez, Javier , Montagna, Marco , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Høgdall, Claus K , Goodman, Marc T , Beeghly‐Fadiel, Alicia , Guo, Xingyi , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Arun, Banu , Bandera, Elisa V. , Barnes, Daniel R. , Bjørge, Line , Brenton, James D. , Bützow, Ralf C. , Caligo, Maria A. , Campbell, Ian , Couch, Fergus J. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Dı́ez, Orland , Domchek, Susan M. , Garber, Judy E. , Giles, Graham G. , Godwin, Andrew K. , Gronwald, Jacek , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Isaacs, Claudine , Karlan, Beth Y. , Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Leslie, Goska , Levine, Douglas A. , Mattiello, Amalia , Modugno, Francesmary , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Nielsen, Finn Cilius , Nussbaum, Robert L. , Olson, Sara H. , Parsons, Michael T. , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Risch, Harvey A. , Sandler, Dale P. , Setiawan, Veronica Wendy , Sharma, Priyanka , Singer, Christian F. , Southey, Melissa C. , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Tung, Nadine , Vanderstichele, Adriaan , Edwards, Digna R. Velez , White, Emily , Wolk, Alicja , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Berchuck, Andrew , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Zheng, Wei , Kwong, Ava , Im, H K

Cancer Research | July 27, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 5419-5430

10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-0951 Get It

Abstract Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified approximately 35 loci associated with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. The majority of GWAS-identified disease susceptibility variants are located in noncoding regions, and causal genes underlying these associations remain largely unknown. Here, we performed a transcriptome-wide association study to search for novel genetic loci and plausible causal genes at known GWAS loci. We used RNA sequencing data (68 normal ovarian tissue samples from 68 individuals and 6,124 cross-tissue samples from 369 individuals) and high-density genotyping data from European descendants of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx V6) project to build ovarian and cross-tissue models of genetically regulated expression using elastic net methods. We evaluated 17,121 genes for their cis-predicted gene expression in relation to EOC risk using summary statistics data from GWAS of 97,898 women, including 29,396 EOC cases. With a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of P &lt; 2.2 × 10−6, we identified 35 genes, including FZD4 at 11q14.2 (Z = 5.08, P = 3.83 × 10−7, the cross-tissue model; 1 Mb away from any GWAS-identified EOC risk variant), a potential novel locus for EOC risk. All other 34 significantly associated genes were located within 1 Mb of known GWAS-identified loci, including 23 genes at 6 loci not previously linked to EOC risk. Upon conditioning on nearby known EOC GWAS-identified variants, the associations for 31 genes disappeared and three genes remained (P &lt; 1.47 × 10−3). These data identify one novel locus (FZD4) and 34 genes at 13 known EOC risk loci associated with EOC risk, providing new insights into EOC carcinogenesis. Significance: Transcriptomic analysis of a large cohort confirms earlier GWAS loci and reveals FZD4 as a novel locus associated with EOC risk. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5419–30. ©2018 AACR.
No Evidence That Genetic Variation in the Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Pathway Influences Ovarian Cancer Survival
Sucheston‐Campbell, Lara, Cannioto, Rikki , Clay‐Gilmour, Alyssa , Etter, John Lewis , Eng, Kevin H., Liu, Song , Battaglia, Sebastiano , Szender, J. Brian, Minlikeeva, Albina N. , Joseph, Janine M. , Mayor, Paul , Abrams, Scott I. , Wallace, Paul K. , Soh, Kah Teong , Zsíros, Emese , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bruegl, Amanda , Campbell, Ian , Campbell, Shawn, Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Diergaarde, Brenda , Doerk, Thilo, Eccles, Diana , Engelholm, Svend Aage, Fasching, Peter A. , Gayther, Simon A. , Goodman, Marc T. , Harter, Philipp , Hein, Alexander , Heitz, Florian , Hillemmanns, Peter, Høgdall, Claus , Høgdall, Estrid , Huzarski, Tomasz , Jensen, Allan , Johnatty, Sharon E. , Jung, Audrey , Klapdor, Reudiger, Kluz, Tomasz , Konopka, Bożena , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan , Levine, Douglas A. , Lundvall, Lene, McGuire, Valerie , McNeish, Iain A. , Menon, Usha , Ness, Roberta B., Oršulić, Sandra , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Ramus, Susan J. , Rothstein, Joseph H. , Rossing, Mary Anne, Rübner, Matthias, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Schmalfeldt, Barbara , Schwaab, Ira, Sieh, Weiva , Sobiczewski, Piotr , Song, Honglin , Terry, Kathryn L. , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Vanderstichele, Adriaan , Vergote, Ignace , Walsh, Christine , Webb, Penelope M. , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Whittemore, Alice S. , Wu, Anna H. , Odunsi, Kunle , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Goode, Ellen L. , Moysich, Kirsten B. , Dörk, Thilo , Bowtell, David D.L. , Lambrechts, Diether , Clay, Alyssa I, Hu, Qiang , Segal, Brahm H. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Bandera, Elisa V. , Berchuck, Andrew , Bjørge, Line , Cramer, Daniel W. , Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Dao, Fanny , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Bois, Andreas du , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Glasspool, Rosalind , Gronwald, Jacek , Karlan, Beth Y. , Kjær, Susanne K. , Modugno, Francesmary , Paul, James , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Ziogas, Argyrios , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , McNeish, Iain A , Ramus, Susan J , Vanderstichele, Adriaan , Webb, Penelope M , Hein, Alexander , Jensen, Allan , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten , Campbell, Ian G , Heitz, Florian , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Huzarski, Tomasz , Jung, Audrey Y , Bowtell, David D , Diergaarde, Brenda , Lubinski, Jan , Kluz, Tomasz , Goodman, Marc T

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | September 28, 2016 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 420-424

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0631 Get It

Abstract Background: The precise mechanism by which the immune system is adversely affected in cancer patients remains poorly understood, but the accumulation of immunosuppressive/protumorigenic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) is thought to be a prominent mechanism contributing to immunologic tolerance of malignant cells in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). To this end, we hypothesized genetic variation in MDSC pathway genes would be associated with survival after EOC diagnoses. Methods: We measured the hazard of death due to EOC within 10 years of diagnosis, overall and by invasive subtype, attributable to SNPs in 24 genes relevant in the MDSC pathway in 10,751 women diagnosed with invasive EOC. Versatile Gene-based Association Study and the admixture likelihood method were used to test gene and pathway associations with survival. Results: We did not identify individual SNPs that were significantly associated with survival after correction for multiple testing (P &lt; 3.5 × 10−5), nor did we identify significant associations between the MDSC pathway overall, or the 24 individual genes and EOC survival. Conclusions: In this well-powered analysis, we observed no evidence that inherited variations in MDSC-associated SNPs, individual genes, or the collective genetic pathway contributed to EOC survival outcomes. Impact: Common inherited variation in genes relevant to MDSCs was not associated with survival in women diagnosed with invasive EOC. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(3); 420–4. ©2016 AACR.