Romero, Iris L.

Importance Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is an effective option to prevent ovarian cancer in high-risk individuals, but adverse effects from premature menopause are a barrier to uptake. Interval salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (ISDO) may be an effective alternative. Objective To evaluate the association of ISDO vs RRSO and sexual function and menopausal symptoms. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized (patient preference) clinical trial was performed among Women Choosing Surgical Prevention participants with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variant conferring an increased risk for ovarian cancer. Patients from 9 US centers were enrolled from June 2, 2016, to October 28, 2020; chose ISDO or RRSO; and were followed up for 24 months. The analysis was performed on November 13, 2024. Interventions Participant-selected RRSO or ISDO. Main Outcomes and Measures Changes in sexual function and menopausal symptoms from baseline to 6, 12, and 24 months. Inverse probability weighting was applied to achieve covariate balance across groups. Results The analytic sample included 334 female participants (mean [95% CI] age at consent, 39.2 [38.7-.9.7] years) who underwent RRSO (n = 165) or ISDO (n = 169) and completed 6-month questionnaires. Significantly more participants experienced clinically meaningful worsening of sexual function at 6 months compared with baseline after RRSO vs ISDO (33.1% [39 of 118] vs 16.8% [17 of 101], respectively; odds ratio, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.20-3.35]) and at 12 months (39.2% [38 of 97] vs 18.3% [17 of 93], respectively; odds ratio, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.09-2.63]). This finding was no longer significant at 24 months. When restricted to the RRSO group who took hormone replacement therapy, there was no significant worsening of total sexual function scores or menopausal symptoms compared with baseline. No interval ovarian cancers were reported. Conclusions and Relevance This nonrandomized clinical trial comparing RRSO with ISDO found that ISDO was less likely to impair sexual function, which addresses an important barrier to surgical prevention in high-risk patients in premenopause. After RRSO, use of hormone replacement therapy mitigated menopausal symptoms and prevented decline in sexual function. More information is needed about the safety of ISDO. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02760849

Abstract Background: The influence of prenatal diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure on cancer incidence among middle-aged men has not been well-characterized. We investigated whether exposure to DES before birth impacts overall cancer risk, and risk of site-specific cancers. Methods: Men (mean age in 2016 = 62.0 years) who were or were not prenatally DES exposed were identified between 1953 and 1994 and followed for cancer primarily via questionnaire approximately every 5 years between 1994 and 2016. The overall and site-specific cancer rates of the two groups were compared using Poisson regression and proportional hazards modeling with adjustment for age. Results: DES exposure was not associated with either overall cancer [hazard ratio (HR), 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77–1.15] or total prostate cancer rates (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.68–1.33), but was inversely associated with urinary tract cancer incidence (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.23–1.00). Conclusions: There was no increase in either overall or prostate cancer rates among men prenatally DES exposed relative to those unexposed. An unexpected risk reduction was observed for urinary system cancers among the exposed relative to those unexposed. These findings suggest that prenatal DES exposure is unlikely to be an important contributor to cancer development in middle-aged men. Impact: The results of this study could lend reassurance to middle-aged men who were prenatally DES exposed that their exposure does not adversely influence their overall cancer risk.