Decker, Brennan

ABSTRACT Reversion mutations (REVs) restore homologous recombination repair (HRR) and confer resistance to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in HR-deficient cancers. Yet, their prevalence, mechanisms, and biological constraints remain undefined. We analyzed genomic profiling of 609,464 tissue and liquid biopsy samples across multiple cancer types to delineate the pan-cancer landscape of REVs. REVs were identified in eight HRR genes, most frequently BRCA2 and BRCA1 and notably never in ATM or CHEK2 . REVs exclusively impacted truncating pathogenic variants, predominantly through large in-frame and exon-level deletions, associated with repetitive sequences. Conserved functional domains are relatively depleted of REVs. Structural modeling and functional studies support that exon-level deletions preserve critical domain architecture and confer PARPi resistance. The study establishes HRR reversion as a structurally permissive, yet evolutionarily constrained, resistance mechanism with implications on response, monitoring, and therapeutic strategy. One Sentence Summary Homologous recombination reversion evolves through structurally tolerated, microhomology-driven alterations that restore DNA repair under therapeutic selection across cancers.

PURPOSE We sought to characterize outcome associations of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in patients with ovarian cancer (OVCA) whose cancers contain homozygous loss (deletions) of homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway genes, an alteration class not uniformly reported on clinical testing and not susceptible to acquired resistance via secondary reversion mutations. METHODS This study used US-based deidentified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine OVCA Clinico-Genomic Database. Patients with advanced OVCA and genomic profiling by Foundation Medicine were assembled into cohorts evaluating PARPi monotherapy use, and separately, PARPi maintenance therapy use, with outcomes associated with HRR gene alterations: BRCA1 / 2 , PALB2 , RAD51B/C/D , BARD1 , and BRIP1 . RESULTS 1.5% (82/5,404) had HRR gene homozygous loss, with BRCA1 and BRCA2 loss being most common. Among all OVCAs with BRCA1/2 alterations, 7.5% (63/836) were homozygous losses. Most BRCA1 (34/38, 89%) and BRCA2 (18/25, 72%) homozygous losses were intragenic, with breakpoints not spanning entire gene. Maintenance cohort: 22 patients had HRR gene homozygous loss, with strongly improved progression-free survival (PFS) for PARPi versus no PARPi use (HR, 0.06, 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.37). Monotherapy cohort: patients without HRR alterations (n = 198), HRR mutations or rearrangements (n = 93), and HRR homozygous loss (n = 8) had median PFS of 4.9, 10.6, and 25.4 months, and median overall survival of 18.5, 22.5, and 51.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSION We observe durable PARPi effectiveness for patients with OVCA and HRR gene homozygous loss in routine practice. We demonstrate the importance of detecting and reporting homozygous loss in HRR genes, an aspect not standard to all sequencing assays.

PURPOSE Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (hereafter mutation) in the BRCA1/ 2 genes (g BRCA); however, clinical benefit has also been demonstrated in mBC with somatic BRCA1/ 2 mutations (s BRCA) or germline PALB2 mutations (g PALB2). This study aims to describe the genomic landscape of homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations in mBC and assess PARPi treatment outcomes for patients with g BRCA compared with other HRR genes and by status of a novel homologous recombination deficiency signature (HRDsig). METHODS A real-world (RW) clinico-genomic database (CGDB) of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) linked to deidentified, electronic health record–derived clinical data was used. CGP was analyzed for HRR genes and HRDsig. The CGDB enabled cohort characterization and outcomes analyses of 177 patients exposed to PARPi. RW progression-free survival (rwPFS) and RW overall survival (rwOS) were compared. RESULTS Of 28,920 patients with mBC, g BRCA was detected in 3.4%, whereas the population with any BRCA alteration or g PALB2 increased to 9.5%. HRDsig+ represented 21% of patients with mBC. BRCA and g PALB2 had higher levels of biallelic loss and HRDsig+ than other HRR alterations. Outcomes on PARPi were assessed for 177 patients, and g BRCA and s BRCA/ gPALB2 cohorts were similar: g BRCA versus s BRCA/g PALB2 rwPFS was 6.3 versus 5.4 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37 [0.77-2.43]); rwOS was 16.2 versus 21.2 months (HR, 1.45 [0.74-2.86]). Additionally, patients with HRDsig+ versus HRDsig– had longer rwPFS (6.3 v 2.8 months; HR, 0.62 [0.42-0.92]) and numerically longer rwOS (17.8 v 13.0 months; HR, 0.72 [0.46-1.14]). CONCLUSION Patients with s BRCA and g PALB2 derive similar benefit from PARPi as those with g BRCA alterations. In combination, HRDsig+, s BRCA, and g PALB2 represent an additional 19% of mBC that can potentially benefit from PARPi. Randomized trials exploring a more inclusive biomarker such as HRDsig are warranted.

PURPOSETo estimate age-specific relative and absolute cancer risks of breast cancer and to estimate risks of ovarian, pancreatic, male breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers associated with germline PALB2 pathogenic variants (PVs) because these risks have not been extensively characterized.METHODSWe analyzed data from 524 families with PALB2 PVs from 21 countries. Complex segregation analysis was used to estimate relative risks (RRs; relative to country-specific population incidences) and absolute risks of cancers. The models allowed for residual familial aggregation of breast and ovarian cancer and were adjusted for the family-specific ascertainment schemes.RESULTSWe found associations between PALB2 PVs and risk of female breast cancer (RR, 7.18; 95% CI, 5.82 to 8.85; P = 6.5 × 10−76), ovarian cancer (RR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.40 to 6.04; P = 4.1 × 10−3), pancreatic cancer (RR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.24 to 4.50; P = 8.7 × 10−3), and male breast cancer (RR, 7.34; 95% CI, 1.28 to 42.18; P = 2.6 × 10−2). There was no evidence for increased risks of prostate or colorectal cancer. The breast cancer RRs declined with age ( P for trend = 2.0 × 10−3). After adjusting for family ascertainment, breast cancer risk estimates on the basis of multiple case families were similar to the estimates from families ascertained through population-based studies ( P for difference = .41). On the basis of the combined data, the estimated risks to age 80 years were 53% (95% CI, 44% to 63%) for female breast cancer, 5% (95% CI, 2% to 10%) for ovarian cancer, 2%-3% (95% CI females, 1% to 4%; 95% CI males, 2% to 5%) for pancreatic cancer, and 1% (95% CI, 0.2% to 5%) for male breast cancer.CONCLUSIONThese results confirm PALB2 as a major breast cancer susceptibility gene and establish substantial associations between germline PALB2 PVs and ovarian, pancreatic, and male breast cancers. These findings will facilitate incorporation of PALB2 into risk prediction models and optimize the clinical cancer risk management of PALB2 PV carriers.

Background BRCA1 interacting protein C-terminal helicase 1 (BRIP1) is one of the Fanconi Anaemia Complementation (FANC) group family of DNA repair proteins. Biallelic mutations in BRIP1 are responsible for FANC group J, and previous studies have also suggested that rare protein truncating variants in BRIP1 are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. These studies have led to inclusion of BRIP1 on targeted sequencing panels for breast cancer risk prediction. Methods We evaluated a truncating variant, p.Arg798Ter (rs137852986), and 10 missense variants of BRIP1, in 48 144 cases and 43 607 controls of European origin, drawn from 41 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Additionally, we sequenced the coding regions of BRIP1 in 13 213 cases and 5242 controls from the UK, 1313 cases and 1123 controls from three population-based studies as part of the Breast Cancer Family Registry, and 1853 familial cases and 2001 controls from Australia. Results The rare truncating allele of rs137852986 was observed in 23 cases and 18 controls in Europeans in BCAC (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.03, p=0.79). Truncating variants were found in the sequencing studies in 34 cases (0.21%) and 19 controls (0.23%) (combined OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.70, p=0.75). Conclusions These results suggest that truncating variants in BRIP1, and in particular p.Arg798Ter, are not associated with a substantial increase in breast cancer risk. Such observations have important implications for the reporting of results from breast cancer screening panels.

Abstract Prostate cancer (PCa) will impact one in six American men and many low-risk men endure therapy, while other men die of PCa. Optimal treatment selection depends on distinguishing indolent tumors from those that will cause prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM). To date, sequencing of prostate tumor DNA has highlighted the fact that prostate tumors develop differently than other cancers. Instead of recurrent protein-altering mutations, many prostate tumors harbor “closed chain” structural rearrangements that may mediate tumor evolution. However, we do not yet understand which somatic mutations are involved in aggressive disease and PCSM. To address this crucial question, we are using whole genome sequencing to pinpoint somatic genetic features in tumor/normal paired samples from four PCSM and six non-PCSM patients with treatment-naïve, Gleason 8+ tumors. Tumor and normal DNA were sequenced to a mean coverage of 95.3X and 48.3X, respectively. Tumor DNA purity ranged from 49%-79% and tumor ploidy ranged from 1.96 to 2.22. To define the genomic landscape of aggressive PCa, we will compare our findings with published studies and genotype high-priority candidates in at least 50 additional low- and high-grade tumors. We will also compare somatic mutations in PCSM versus non-PCSM cases and use network analysis to identify pathways that may be involved in progression and metastasis. Finally, we will characterize the clonal evolution of PCa tumors using deep digital sequencing to distinguish mutations that were present in the original tumor clone from subclonal mutations that arose after oncogenesis. In this way, we aim to identify potential oncogenic drivers and candidate mediators of progression and metastasis. Ultimately, we aim to 1) Uncover somatic mutations that are specific to aggressive tumors 2) Determine whether PCSM tumors have unique genetic features, and 3) Understand the role of clonal evolution in oncogenesis and progression. As more tumors are sequenced, this approach may yield valuable markers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment selection. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Brennan J. Decker, Danielle M. Karyadi, Eric Karlins, Brian W. Davis, Lori S. Tillmans, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Elaine A. Ostrander. Whole genome sequencing of high-grade treatment-naïve prostate tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 1536. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-1536