Santangeli, Pasquale

Background: Leadless pacemaker has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional transvenous pacemaker (PM) among elderly patients who are at high risk of complications. Objective: This study aims to assess and compare 5-year clinical outcomes of leadless PM versus transvenous single-chamber PM in elderly patients using a multi-national dataset. Methods: Using the TriNetX Analytics Research Network, we included patients aged ≥65 years who underwent leadless versus transvenous single-chamber PM implantation between 1/1/2014 and 1/1/2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed by using patient’s demographic, LVEF, cardiac comorbidities, and medications. The study outcomes included all-cause mortality and adverse cardiovascular events over a 5-year follow-up period. Results: After PSM, 7,501 patients in each group were analyzed. Leadless PM was associated with a significantly lower odds of 5-year all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.534; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.497-0.575), heart failure exacerbation (OR: 0.779, 95% CI: 0.721-0.841), major bleeding (OR: 0.666, 95% CI: 0.604-0.734), cardiac arrest (OR: 0.747, 95% CI: 0.646-0.864) and stroke (OR: 0.825, 95% CI: 0.750-0.908) compared to transvenous single-chamber PM. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in all-cause hospitalization (OR: 1.006, 95%CI: 0.938-1.079), cardiac thrombus (OR: 1.077, 95%CI: 0.791-1.465) or venous thromboembolism (OR: 1.028, 95%CI: 0.916-1.153). Conclusion: Leadless PM was associated with significantly improved mortality and cardiovascular outcomes compared to transvenous single-chamber PM in elderly patients. These findings support the strong consideration of leadless pacing as a strategy to reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes in this high-risk population.

BACKGROUND: Patients with arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse syndrome are at increased risk for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, but studies have been limited by small sample sizes. We sought to assemble an international arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse syndrome registry to delineate the clinical, imaging, and treatment characteristics of patients with arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse syndrome who survived sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) or had sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation. METHODS: In this descriptive registry, we characterized patients with arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse syndrome who survived SCA, sustained VT, or ventricular fibrillation. Deidentified data were abstracted locally and combined centrally. RESULTS: We included 148 patients who had SCA or VT/ventricular fibrillation. Patients had a mean age of 43.7±15.4 years; 68% were women, 73% had bileaflet prolapse, 65% had mitral annular disjunction, 67% had nonsustained VT, and 59% had inferolateral T-wave inversions. Syncope (n=54, 48%) and anterolateral T-wave inversion (n=26, 22%) were relatively common. Catheter ablation was performed in 50 (35%) patients for premature ventricular complexes and in 18 (17.7%) patients for VT. Sites of origin for arrhythmias were commonly in the papillary muscles, fascicles, mitral annulus, and inferior/inferolateral left ventricle. CONCLUSIONS: In this international descriptive registry of patients with arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse syndrome and SCA, patients were young, women, and had bileaflet mitral valve prolapse, mitral annular disjunction, inferolateral T-wave inversions, and nonsustained VT. A history of syncope and anterolateral T-wave inversions was relatively common in patients who survived SCA or sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation.

Background: Non-ischemic cardiomyopathies can be primary (p-NICM) which involves mainly the heart muscle or caused by systemic disease with heart muscle involvement as it is seen in systemic infiltrative diseases (i-NICM). There is limited data on the safety and in-hospital outcomes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in i-NICM. Methods: We identified patients who underwent VT ablation between 2018-2021 using the National Inpatient Sample Database. i-NICM include amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, or sarcoidosis. In-hospital complications include mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute heart failure (AHF), bleeding, vasopressor use, blood transfusion and cardiac tamponade. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results : There were 7,420 VT ablations, 7,235 had P-NICM and 185 had i-NICM. A multivariable analysis did not reveal any difference in mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.32-1.98; p=0.62), AHF aOR: 0.88 (0.41-1.81; p=0.69, AKI aOR:1.17 (0.83-1.65); p=0.36, blood transfusion aOR: 0.63 (0.25-1.59); p=0.33, vasopressor aOR: 0.86( 0.51-1.49); p=0.61 or pericardial effusion/ tamponade aOR: 1.16 (0.67-2.1); p=0.58 Figure Conclusion: Patients with i-NICM had similar in-hospital complications compared to P-NICM further supporting the safety of VT ablation in managing recurrent VT in patients with i-NICM.

BACKGROUND: Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in cardiac amyloidosis is uncommon, and the substrate and outcomes of catheter ablation are not defined. METHODS: We included 22 consecutive patients (mean age, 68±10 years; male sex, 91%) with cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR [transthyretin], n=16; light chain, n=6) undergoing catheter ablation for VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) between 2013 and 2023 in a retrospective, observational, international study. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VT/VF during follow-up, while the primary safety end point included major procedure-related adverse events. RESULTS: The indication for ablation was drug-refractory VT in 17 patients (77%), and premature ventricular complex–initiated polymorphic VT/VF in 5 patients (23%). Catheter ablation was performed using endocardial (n=17.77%) or endo-epicardial approaches (n=5.23%). Complete endocardial electroanatomical voltage maps of the left and right ventricles were obtained in 17 (77%) and 10 (45%) patients, respectively. Each patient had evidence of low-voltage areas, most commonly involving the interventricular septum (n=16); late potentials were recorded in 16 patients (73%). A median of 1 (1–2) VT was inducible per patient; 12 of the 26 mappable VTs (46%) originated from the interventricular septum. Complete procedural success was achieved in 16 patients (73%), with 4 (18%) major procedure-related adverse events. After a median follow-up of 32 (14–42) months, sustained VT/VF recurrence was observed in 9 patients (41%); survival free from VT/VF recurrence was 56% (95% CI, 36%–86%) at 36-month follow-up, and most patients remained on antiarrhythmic drugs. A significant reduction in per patient implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies was noted in the 6-month period after ablation (before: 6 [4–9] versus after: 0 [0–0]; P <0.001). In multivariable analysis, complete procedural success was associated with reduced risk of recurrent VT/VF (hazard ratio, 0.002; P =0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation can achieve control of recurrent VT/VF in more than half of patients with cardiac amyloidosis, and the reduction in VT/VF burden post-ablation may be relevant for quality of life. Septal substrate and risk of procedure-related complications challenge successful management of patients with cardiac amyloidosis and VT/VF.

Abstract Background the electrophysiological substrate underpinning ventricular tachycardia (VT) in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains elusive, and outcomes of catheter ablation in this peculiar population are currently unknown. Purpose we sought to describe the electrophysiological substrate and clinical outcomes of VT ablation in a cohort of patients with CA. Methods we included 19 consecutive patients (mean age, 69±10 years; male sex, 89%) with CA (ATTR, n=13; AL, n=6) undergoing catheter ablation for VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) between 2013 and 2023 in a retrospective, observational, international study, involving 7 referral European and North American electrophysiology units. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VT/VF during follow-up, while the primary safety outcome included major procedure-related adverse events. Results the indication for ablation was drug-refractory VT in 16 patients (84%), and PVC-initiated polymorphic VT/VF in 3 (16%). Catheter ablation was performed using endocardial (n=14, 74%) or endo-epicardial approaches (n=5, 26%). Complete endocardial electroanatomical voltage maps of the left and right ventricles were obtained in 14 (74%) and 6 (32%) patients, respectively. Each patient had evidence of low-voltage areas, most commonly involving the interventricular septum (n=12); late potentials were recorded in 13 patients (68%). A median of 1 (1-2) VTs were inducible per patient; in 10 subjects (43% of mappable VTs), activation mapping was consistent with septal VT origin. Complete procedural success was obtained in 13 patients (68%), at the expense of 4 (21%) major procedure-related adverse events. After a median follow-up of 36 (18-54) months, sustained VT/VF recurrence was observed in 9 patients (47%); survival free from VT/VF recurrence was 74% (95%CI, 56-96%) at 12 months, and 53% (95%CI, 34-94%) at 36-month follow-up; the majority of patients remained on antiarrhythmic drugs (Figure). Low-voltage QRS (HR,21.96; p=0.022) and complete procedural success (HR,0.08; p=0.029) were associated with recurrent VT/VF at multivariable analysis (Figure). Conclusions catheter ablation of VT/VF is associated with favorable acute and mid-term arrhythmia control, yet with substantial risk of procedure-related complications and long-term recurrences. Septal substrate and frailty challenge successful management of patients with CA and VT/VF.Multimodality evaluation of LV substrateMain Study Outcomes

Background: Despite the optimal efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT), recurrence of VT can occur post-procedurally. However, data on the high-risk population for VT recurrence and the in-hospital outcomes remain scarce. Objective: This study aimed to determine the predictors of 30-day readmission for recurrent VT after catheter ablation of VT and assess the in-hospital outcomes. Method: Using the all-payer, nationally representative Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified the patients aged ≥18 years who underwent catheter ablation for VT and were readmitted within 30 days because of recurrent VT from 2017 to 2020. We performed unweighted univariable and multivariable analyses to determine the outcomes and to identify the patient and hospital variables that were predictive of 30-day readmissions for recurrent VT. A p-value of <0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: In our analysis, a total of 4,102 patients were discharged alive after VT ablation, of which 278 (6.8%) were readmitted within 30 days for recurrent VT. Recurrent VT was also the most common cause of 30-day readmission (47.7%, n=278/583). Compared to non-recurrent VT readmission, readmission due to recurrent VT had higher mortality during rehospitalization (7.55% vs 3.72%, p<0.01) and higher cumulative hospitalization cost ($57584 vs $37846, p<0.01). Via multivariable analysis, congestive heart failure (aOR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.07-3.17; P=0.03) and non-elective index admissions (aOR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.32-2.68; P<0.01) were the independent predictors of 30-day readmission for recurrent VT. Conclusion: Recurrent VT was the most common cause of 30-day readmission following VT ablation. Congestive heart failure and non-elective index admissions were the independent predictors of 30-day readmissions for recurrent VT. These highlight the importance of further research in ablation strategies to improve the efficacy of VT ablation.

Background Inequitable access to high‐technology therapeutics may perpetuate inequities in care. We examined the characteristics of US hospitals that did and did not establish left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) programs, the patient populations those hospitals served, and the associations between zip code–level racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic composition and rates of LAAO among Medicare beneficiaries living within large metropolitan areas with LAAO programs. Methods and Results We conducted cross‐sectional analyses of Medicare fee‐for‐service claims for beneficiaries aged 66 years or older between 2016 and 2019. We identified hospitals establishing LAAO programs during the study period. We used generalized linear mixed models to measure the association between zip code–level racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic composition and age‐adjusted rates of LAAO in the most populous 25 metropolitan areas with LAAO sites. During the study period, 507 candidate hospitals started LAAO programs, and 745 candidate hospitals did not. Most new LAAO programs opened in metropolitan areas (97.4%). Compared with non‐LAAO centers, LAAO centers treated patients with higher median household incomes (difference of $913 [95% CI, $197–$1629], P =0.01). Zip code–level rates of LAAO procedures per 100 000 Medicare beneficiaries in large metropolitan areas were 0.34% (95% CI, 0.33%–0.35%) lower for each $1000 zip code–level decrease in median household income. After adjustment for socioeconomic markers, age, and clinical comorbidities, LAAO rates were lower in zip codes with higher proportions of Black or Hispanic patients. Conclusions Growth in LAAO programs in the United States had been concentrated in metropolitan areas. LAAO centers treated wealthier patient populations in hospitals without LAAO programs. Within major metropolitan areas with LAAO programs, zip codes with higher proportions of Black and Hispanic patients and more patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage had lower age‐adjusted rates of LAAO. Thus, geographic proximity alone may not ensure equitable access to LAAO. Unequal access to LAAO may reflect disparities in referral patterns, rates of diagnosis, and preferences for using novel therapies experienced by racial and ethnic minority groups and patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.