El‐Masry, Hicham

Background. Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at heightened risk for cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related complications, particularly infection, because of chronic immunosuppression and comorbidities. Although leadless pacemakers (LPs) reduce infection risk by eliminating transvenous leads and generator pockets, adoption in SOTRs has remained limited, largely because earlier systems were restricted to single-chamber ventricular pacing and lacked physiologic atrioventricular synchrony. The helix-fixation Aveir LP platform enables atrial, ventricular, and dual-chamber leadless pacing, but clinical experience in transplant recipients remains limited. Methods. We conducted a retrospective, multisite analysis across an integrated health system, identifying all adult SOTRs who underwent Aveir LP implantation between January 2022 and October 2025. Clinical characteristics, transplant details, pacing indications, device configuration, procedural outcomes, and follow-up data were collected. Primary outcomes included procedural success, complications, and device-related infection. Secondary outcomes included pacing performance, need for system revision or upgrade, and early device durability. Results. Thirteen SOTRs (mean age 64 ± 15 y; 15% female) underwent Aveir LP implantation, including atrial (n = 4), ventricular (n = 5), and dual-chamber (n = 4) systems. Transplanted organs included heart (46%), lung (31%), kidney (38%), and liver (15%), with 31% having multiple organ transplants. Over half of patients were critically ill at implantation, and 46% were dialysis-dependent, representing a high-risk cohort. All procedures were acutely successful with no intraprocedural complications. During a median follow-up of 258 d (interquartile range, 216–641 d), no device-related infections occurred. Electrical performance remained stable, with 1 atrial device replacement at 2.5 y for elevated capture thresholds. Conclusions. In a high-risk population of SOTRs, atrial and atrioventricular synchronous leadless pacing using the Aveir platform was feasible, achieved high acute procedural success, and demonstrated favorable early safety signals, including absence of device-related infection over available follow-up. Larger studies with longer-term follow-up are needed to define durability and long-term outcomes.

ABSTRACTBackgroundThe factors contributing to sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) >30 days after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation are not well‐established.ObjectivesThis study aimed to predict the factors associated with late sustained VAs after LVAD implantation and develop a predictive score to identify patients with an increased risk of late sustained VAs after the procedure.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study on a training cohort of 623 patients and a validation cohort of 157 patients who underwent LVAD implantation at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville) from January 1, 2000, to December 30, 2020. Late sustained VAs were defined as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurring >30 days after the LVAD procedure. Detailed chart reviews of the electronic health records within the Mayo Clinic and outside medical records were performed.ResultsA total of 780 patients were included in our study. Late sustained VAs occurred in 30% (n = 232) of the patients. The significant factors associated with late sustained VAs after LVAD were the history of VAs prior to LVAD (34.1% vs. 23.0%, p < 0.01), implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) (87.9% vs. 77.6%, p < 0.01) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in situ (43.5% vs. 33.6%, p = 0.008), VT ablation prior to LVAD (5.2% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.010), use of amiodarone (49.1% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.007), use of mexiletine (15.5% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.01), and higher left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD) on echocardiography prior to LVAD implantation (71.4 vs. 68.7 mm, p = 0.002). During follow‐up, the patients who developed late sustained VAs after LVAD had lower survival than those who did not (HR = 1.96, 95% CI:156–2.4, p < 0.001). The average time from LVAD to orthotopic heart transplant was longer among late sustained VAs patients (23 vs. 14 months, p < 0.01). The “VIN” risk score was created to identify four risk groups: low (scores 0), intermediate (score 1), high (score 2), and very high (score 3). The rates of late VA's in the training cohort at 1 year were 9.5%, 14%, 18%, and 25% which was almost similar to the risk of late VA's at validation cohort 10%, 12%, 20%, and 63%, respectively.ConclusionsLate sustained VAs occurred in 30% of the patients who received LVAD and were associated with lower survival. The VIN risk score was developed and validated to stratify patients into low, intermediate, high, and very high risk of late sustained VAs.