Lee, Justin Z.

Abstract Background Recurrence of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation (CA) is not uncommon. However, real-world long-term data on clinical outcomes of rhythm control strategies in patients with recurrent AF after CA remain limited. Methods Using the TriNetX database, we identified adult patients (≥18 years) with recurrent AF after index CA. A 3-month blanking period was applied, during which no rhythm-control therapy was received. Patients were classified into two groups: repeat CA or initiation of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, heart failure (HF) exacerbation, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding over 5 years. Results Among 4,056 patients with recurrent AF post-CA, 17.2% underwent repeat CA. After PSM, 697 patients in the repeat CA group (mean age 68.9 ± 9.6 years; 35.7% female) and 697 in the AAD group (mean age 68.4 ± 10.0 years; 37.6% female) were analyzed. Repeat CA was associated with lower all-cause mortality (3.3% vs 8.2%; HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27–0.72; P < 0.01), all-cause hospitalization (42.8% vs 56.4%; HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61–0.82; P < 0.01) and HF exacerbation (12.5% vs 24.8%; HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.39–0.64; P < 0.01). No differences were observed in ischemic stroke (5.3% vs 4.7%; HR 1.22; 95% CI, 0.77–1.96; P = 0.40) or major bleeding (4.6% vs 6.2%; HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.52–1.29; P = 0.39). Conclusions Repeat CA was associated with lower mortality, hospitalization, and HF exacerbation over 5 years.

Abstract Introduction/Background Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a debilitating disease that leads to progressive cardiac dysfunction. Tafamidis is the gold standard therapy for ATTR cardiomyopathy. In recent observational studies, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in ATTR cardiomyopathy, but their role in ATTR cardiomyopathy as combination therapy with tafamidis remains unclear. Purpose To investigate the impact of combination therapy with tafamidis and SGLT2-Is versus just tafamidis in patients with known ATTR cardiomyopathy. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the TriNetX multinational database. Patients diagnosed with ATTR cardiomyopathy who received tafamidis were identified and stratified into two cohorts based on SGLT2-I use. Outcomes were assessed over three years, including all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalizations, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, ischemic stroke, atrial fibrillation/flutter, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or requirement for renal replacement therapy, and ventricular tachycardia. Propensity score matching was used to balance both cohorts based on clinical comorbidities, medication use, and laboratory data. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated by logistic regression models. Results After propensity score matching, 409 patients were included in each cohort with a follow-up duration of 722 days (SD 320.87) for the SGLT2-I cohort and and 755.90 days (SD 363.26) for the non-SGLT2-I cohort. SGLT2-Is were associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause hospitalizations (41.1% vs. 50.9%; OR 0.67 [p = 0.005]) and AMI (6.6% vs. 13.9%, OR 0.44 [p = 0.001]), which persisted by three years (all-cause hospitalizations: 52.1% vs. 61.4%, OR 0.67 [p = 0.006] and myocardial infarction: 11.2% vs. 18.3%, OR 0.56 [p = 0.004]). No significant differences among the two cohorts were observed for all-cause mortality, acute HF hospitalizations, ischemic stroke, atrial fibrillation/flutter, ventricular tachycardia, or ESRD/need for renal replacement therapy. Conclusions SGLT2-Is, in combination with tafamidis, are associated with decreased all-cause hospitalizations and AMI in ATTR cardiomyopathy. While a mortality benefit was not demonstrated, these results depict the magnitude of clinical benefit derived from combination therapy with tafamidis and SGLT2-Is as opposed to prior observational studies which investigated SGLT2-I single therapy

Abstract Background The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among young adults has been increasing over the past few decades. There are limited data on contemporary national cardiovascular mortality rates in young adults with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods We queried the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide‐Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database for patients aged 15 to 44 years from 1999 to 2019 in the primary analysis. A secondary analysis included data from 2020 to 2022 to examine the effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic. We analysed patients in whom cardiovascular diseases (CVD) were listed as the main cause of death and DM as a contributing cause of death. In calculating age‐adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100 000 individuals, we used CVD mortality in young adults with comorbid diabetes as the numerator and the overall population as the denominator. We determined temporal trends by estimating the average annual percent change (AAPC) using the Joinpoint regression program. Results Among 3 309 079 individuals aged 15–44 years who died, 30 978 deaths were due to CVD with comorbid DM listed as a contributing cause. The overall AAMR increased from 1.08 per 100 000 individuals in 1999 to 1.23 per 100 000 individuals in 2019, with an average APC of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.31–1.20). Compared with 1999, the percentage increase in CVD deaths in 2019 among young adults with comorbid DM was +6.2%, whereas a decrease of 19.9% was observed among those without comorbid DM. Males had a higher AAMR than females (1.60 vs. 0.97). Non‐Hispanic Black individuals and non‐Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native individuals had the highest AAMRs of 2.99 and 2.89, respectively. The AAMR was higher in rural regions compared to urban areas (1.63 vs. 1.23). The overall AAMR increased markedly from 1.23 in 2019 to 1.60 in 2022, with a similar pattern observed across demographic subgroups. Conclusion Our study reveals a rising trend in CVD mortality in young adults with DM as a contributing cause. Males, non‐Hispanic Black individuals, and individuals from rural regions had higher AAMR than their counterparts. This warrants the development of specific healthcare policies aimed at these at‐risk populations. Lay summary Our study shows that cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths are increasing in young adults with diabetes mellitus listed as a contributing cause.

ABSTRACT Introduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, data on its efficacy in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF are limited. Methods Using the TriNetX network, we identified patients with sarcoidosis, heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35%, and either left bundle branch block (LBBB) or prolonged QRS duration ( > 150 ms) between 2014 and 2019. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: (1) those who received CRT and (2) those who received an ICD‐only implant. Five‐year outcomes included all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%. Results Out of 245 eligible patients, we identified a cohort of 87 patients (mean age 62.6 ± 9.5 years) who received CRT and 87 patients (mean age 62.1 ± 11.1 years) who received ICD‐only implant, with similar propensity scores, and included them in a comparative analysis. At 5‐year follow‐up, the CRT group demonstrated outcomes comparable to the ICD‐only implant group for all‐cause mortality (14.9% vs. 20.7%; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.31–1.28; p = 0.19), all‐cause hospitalization (83.9% vs. 77.0%; HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.89–1.73; p = 0.19), and heart failure exacerbation (28.7% vs. 28.7%; HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.52–1.57; p = 0.72). The proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50% was also similar in both groups (LVEF > 40%, 43.7% vs. 33.3%; HR 1.30; 95% CI 0.80–2.10; p = 0.29; LVEF > 50%, 31.0% vs. 17.2%; HR 1.72; 95% CI 0.92–3.24; p = 0.09). Conclusion CRT implantation had similar long‐term outcomes compared to ICD‐only implantation in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF, particularly all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%.

Abstract Aims We evaluated clinical outcomes with GLP-1 RA use post-TAVI in patients with T2D. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) lower cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D), but their impact in patients with valvular heart disease, including those undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI), remained unexplored. Methods and results We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network, including 25 184 adults (≥18 years) with T2D who underwent TAVI (2015–2023). Patients were stratified based on GLP1-RA initiation within 14 days post-TAVI. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory data were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for events from one-month post-TAVI until the most recent follow-up. PSM yielded 1101 patients per group, with a mean age of 73 years and 39% female. Mean follow-up duration was 2.2 ± 1.1 and 2.6 ± 1.8 years for GLP1-RA users and non-users, respectively. GLP1-RA use was also associated higher survival probability (HR: 0.708 [95% CI: 0.583–0.859]), and lower rates of all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.790 [95% CI, 0.706–0.885]), major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.849 [95% CI: 0.749–0.963]), and acute heart failure exacerbation (HR: 0.785 [95% CI: 0.677–0.909]), acute kidney injury (HR: 0.843 [95% CI: 0.719–0.988]), and major kidney events (HR: 0.665 [95% CI: 0.510–0.866]). No differences were observed in acute myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, or cardiac arrest. Conclusion In patients with T2D undergoing TAVI, GLP1-RA use is associated with significant survival benefits and improved cardiorenal outcomes. However, these findings are limited by the observational design, high comorbidity burden, lack of data on medication compliance, and specific cause of death. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these benefits.

ABSTRACT Background Early catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) improves outcomes, but the optimal timing, especially in heart failure (HF) subtypes, remains unclear. Objective To evaluate the impact of ablation timing on outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods We used the TriNetX database (2010–2024) to identify HF patients with AF who underwent ablation. Patients were classified as early ablation (≤ 1 year of first AF diagnosis) or delayed ablation (1–3 years), with propensity score matching (PSM) applied to balance the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was AF recurrence, defined by repeat ablation, direct current cardioversion (DCCV), or antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use after a 3‐month blanking period. Secondary outcomes included stroke, hospitalization, and mortality over 5 years. Results After PSM, delayed ablation was associated with higher AF recurrence in both HFrEF (HR = 1.28, p < 0.001) and HFpEF (HR = 1.21, p = 0.02), as seen in multivariate analysis. In HFrEF, delayed ablation was associated with higher incidence of re‐do ablation, AAD use, and DCCV, while in HFpEF, higher recurrence with delayed ablation was associated with increased AAD use. Both cohorts had similar stroke and mortality rates between early and delayed ablation. Conclusions Delayed ablation in HFrEF and HFpEF was linked to higher AF recurrence, driven by increased redo ablations, DCCV, AAD use in HFrEF, and higher AAD use in HFpEF. Stroke, HF hospitalization and mortality rates were similar, suggesting earlier ablation may enhance rhythm control over other outcomes.

Background: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a major contributor to death among ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluate the efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis by searching the electronic database up to April 2025. Seven studies, including 1192 patients, were identified. A random-effect model was used to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Trial sequential analysis was conducted to assess sample size adequacy. Results: Among Ischemic heart disease patients with ICDs, VT ablation was associated with a significant reduction in ICD shocks (RR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.34–0.74]), a trend toward reduced VT storm (RR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.40–1.04], p = 0.07), and lower rates of cardiovascular hospitalization (RR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.53–1.01], p = 0.06) compared to ICD alone. However, no significant differences were observed when compared to patients receiving ICD plus antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Additionally, VT ablation showed no significant impact on mortality or VT/VF recurrence compared to either ICD alone or ICD with AADs. Trial Sequential Analysis provided conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence outcomes, while further data are required for other outcomes. Conclusion: Among ischemic heart disease patients with ICD, VT ablation reduces ICD shocks, VT storm, and cardiovascular hospitalizations compared to ICD-only, but offers no significant advantage over ICD combined with antiarrhythmic drugs. VT ablation does not impact mortality or the recurrence of VT/VF. Trial Sequential Analysis confirmed conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence, while additional data is needed for other outcomes.