Ong, Tze Ern

ABSTRACT Introduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, data on its efficacy in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF are limited. Methods Using the TriNetX network, we identified patients with sarcoidosis, heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35%, and either left bundle branch block (LBBB) or prolonged QRS duration ( > 150 ms) between 2014 and 2019. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: (1) those who received CRT and (2) those who received an ICD‐only implant. Five‐year outcomes included all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%. Results Out of 245 eligible patients, we identified a cohort of 87 patients (mean age 62.6 ± 9.5 years) who received CRT and 87 patients (mean age 62.1 ± 11.1 years) who received ICD‐only implant, with similar propensity scores, and included them in a comparative analysis. At 5‐year follow‐up, the CRT group demonstrated outcomes comparable to the ICD‐only implant group for all‐cause mortality (14.9% vs. 20.7%; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.31–1.28; p = 0.19), all‐cause hospitalization (83.9% vs. 77.0%; HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.89–1.73; p = 0.19), and heart failure exacerbation (28.7% vs. 28.7%; HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.52–1.57; p = 0.72). The proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50% was also similar in both groups (LVEF > 40%, 43.7% vs. 33.3%; HR 1.30; 95% CI 0.80–2.10; p = 0.29; LVEF > 50%, 31.0% vs. 17.2%; HR 1.72; 95% CI 0.92–3.24; p = 0.09). Conclusion CRT implantation had similar long‐term outcomes compared to ICD‐only implantation in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF, particularly all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%.

Background: Effective risk factor modification, including management of obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM), is essential to mitigating cardiovascular complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Given the growing use of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), large-scale studies are needed to assess their cardiovascular impact in patients undergoing HSCT. Methods: Using the TriNetX network, we identified patients who underwent HSCT and had DM or obesity. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: those who received GLP-1 RAs and those who did not. Outcomes, including all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), atrial fibrillation (AF), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and heart failure (HF) exacerbation, were assessed at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years follow-up. Cohorts were propensity score-matched based on medical comorbidities, transplant diagnoses, and conditioning regimens. Results: Of the initial 17,475 patients with HSCT and DM/obesity, 876 (5.0%, 46.0% females, mean age 58.4 +/- 11.3 years old) received GLP-1 RA and 16,599 (95.0%, 40.8% females, mean age 55.6 +/- 14.3 years old) did not. After propensity score matching, 873 patients were divided equally into each cohort (Table). GLP-1 RA was associated with lower odds of all-cause mortality (1-year: odds ratio [OR]: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38–0.76; p<0.01; 3-year: OR: 0.52; CI: 0.40–0.69; p<0.01; 5-year: OR: 0.44; CI: 0.33–0.58; p<0.01), all-cause hospitalization (1-year: OR: 0.74; CI: 0.61–0.89; p<0.01; 3-year: OR: 0.66; CI: 0.55–0.79; p<0.01; 5-year: OR: 0.72; CI: 0.59–0.87; p<0.01), and HF exacerbation (1-year: OR: 0.65; CI: 0.44–0.96; p=0.03; 3-year: OR: 0.59; CI: 0.43–0.81; p<0.01; 5-year: OR: 0.53; CI: 0.38–0.74; p<0.01), compared to the non–GLP-1 RA group. At 5-year follow-up, GLP-1 RA use was also associated with lower odds of AF (OR: 0.71; CI: 0.53–0.94; p=0.02). No significant differences were noted in AMI or CVA at 1-, 3-, and 5-years of follow-up. Conclusion: After propensity score-matching in this retrospective cohort study, GLP-1 RA use was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and heart failure exacerbation at 1-, 3-, and 5-year of follow-up in patients with DM/obesity who underwent HSCT. At 5 years, use of GLP-1 RA was associated with lower odds of AF.

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have been shown to improve outcomes across various cardiovascular diseases. However, data regarding the effects of GLP-1 agonists in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the 5-year outcomes of GLP-1 agonists in patients with HCM. Methods: Using TriNetX Analytics Network, we identified patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy between 1/1/2014 and 1/1/2019. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with GLP-1 agonists for ≥ 1 year and those who were not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using demographics, cardiac medications, and comorbidities. The study outcomes were 5-year all-cause mortality and cardiac adverse events. Results: A total of 52,978 patients with HCM were identified, including 2,654 (5.0%) patients treated with GLP-1 agonists. After PSM, 2,588 patients in each group were analyzed. Patients on GLP-1 agonists were associated with lower odds of all-cause mortality (5.0% vs. 15.6%, p<0.01), all-cause hospitalization (46.3% vs. 67.8%, p<0.01), acute decompensated heart failure ((9.4% vs. 21.4%, p<0.01), cardiac arrest (3.6% vs. 5.4%, p<0.01), cerebrovascular accidents (9.5% vs. 14.1%, p<0.01), and cardiogenic shock (1.4% vs. 3.6%, p<0.01). Additionally, reduced rates of new ICD implantation (3.5% vs. 7.9%, p<0.01) and septal reduction therapy (1.7% vs. 3.5%, p<0.01) were observed in the GLP-1 agonists group. Conclusion: The use of GLP-1 agonists in HCM was associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Future clinical trials are needed to validate these potential benefits.