Vigneswaramoorthy, Nishanthi

ABSTRACT Introduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, data on its efficacy in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF are limited. Methods Using the TriNetX network, we identified patients with sarcoidosis, heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35%, and either left bundle branch block (LBBB) or prolonged QRS duration ( > 150 ms) between 2014 and 2019. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: (1) those who received CRT and (2) those who received an ICD‐only implant. Five‐year outcomes included all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%. Results Out of 245 eligible patients, we identified a cohort of 87 patients (mean age 62.6 ± 9.5 years) who received CRT and 87 patients (mean age 62.1 ± 11.1 years) who received ICD‐only implant, with similar propensity scores, and included them in a comparative analysis. At 5‐year follow‐up, the CRT group demonstrated outcomes comparable to the ICD‐only implant group for all‐cause mortality (14.9% vs. 20.7%; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.31–1.28; p = 0.19), all‐cause hospitalization (83.9% vs. 77.0%; HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.89–1.73; p = 0.19), and heart failure exacerbation (28.7% vs. 28.7%; HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.52–1.57; p = 0.72). The proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50% was also similar in both groups (LVEF > 40%, 43.7% vs. 33.3%; HR 1.30; 95% CI 0.80–2.10; p = 0.29; LVEF > 50%, 31.0% vs. 17.2%; HR 1.72; 95% CI 0.92–3.24; p = 0.09). Conclusion CRT implantation had similar long‐term outcomes compared to ICD‐only implantation in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF, particularly all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%.

e19538 Background: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) experience increased risks of morbidity and mortality. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) offer glycemic and cardiovascular benefits, but their impact on cancer-related outcomes is unclear. This study evaluates the association of GLP-1 RA therapy with clinical outcomes, MM-related biomarkers, and survival in MM patients with T2DM. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the TriNetX network, including data from 104 healthcare organizations (2014–2019). Two cohorts were defined: (1) MM patients with T2DM starting GLP-1 RA therapy within three months of MM diagnosis and continuing therapy for at least one year (n=1,606 before matching), and (2) MM patients with T2DM not receiving GLP-1 RAs (n=40,306 before matching). Patients included were aged 18 years and older. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) balanced systemic MM therapy, BMI, and diabetes medications (e.g., insulin, metformin), yielding 1,279 matched pairs. Outcomes included five-year mortality, ICU and non-ICU hospitalizations, and MM-related biomarkers (hemoglobin, creatinine, neutrophils, and calcium). Most recent lab values were compared in the two groups. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, hazard ratios (HR), risk differences, and T-Test statistics. Results: After PSM, baseline characteristics were well balanced. The mean age was ~ 66 years, white race was ~46%, females were ~ 40%, and hypertension was ~85%. Around 20% of MM patients received autologous transplants and ~27% received lenalidomide in the past. GLP-1 RA therapy was associated with less mortality (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.36–0.54, P < 0.01), ICU admissions (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.50–0.71, P < 0.01), and non-ICU hospitalizations (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.53–0.65, P < 0.01). Patients on GLP-1 RAs had higher hemoglobin levels (11.61 ± 2.30 g/dL vs. 10.75 ± 2.47 g/dL, P < 0.01), with no significant differences in serum creatinine (119.068 µmol/L vs 115.648 µmol/L, P = 0.720) or neutrophils (P = 0.226). Patients who received GLP-1 RAs had higher serum calcium levels (9.17 mg/dL vs. 8.96 mg/dL, P < 0.01). GLP-1 RA use also decreased the incidence of septic shock (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.44–0.64, P < 0.001) and pneumonia (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.49–0.70, P < 0.001). Conclusions: GLP-1 RA therapy improves survival, reduces ICU and non-ICU hospitalizations, and lowers complications in MM patients with T2DM. Biomarker trends over five years suggest potential anticancer effects. Further research should explore whether GLP-1 RAs impact other malignancies, broadening their role in cancer therapy.