Sabbag, Avi

Background Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) can be associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA), but little is known about the relationship between VA and exercise in these patients. The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence and severity of VA during exercise tests in patients with MVP, and to explore the association between VA during exercise and the occurrence of arrhythmic events during follow-up. Methods In this multicentre study, 375 patients with MVP (58 (48–69) years, 53% male) who underwent a clinically indicated exercise test were included. Severity of VA during exercise was defined as: (1) no VA, (2) minor VA (premature ventricular contractions ≥5% or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) <120 beats per minute) and (3) major VA (nsVTs ≥120 beats per minute). Results During exercise test, 242 (65%) patients showed no VA, 88 (24%) minor VA and 45 (12%) major VA. Patients with minor and major VAs showed more often bileaflet prolapse and mitral annular disjunction (MAD) than patients with no VA (p<0.001). Over a median follow-up of 101 months (IQR 58–138 months), 35 patients (9%) developed a severe arrhythmic event, defined as sustained VA or ventricular fibrillation, implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and VA ablation. At the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, patients with major VA showed the worst arrhythmic event-free survival (log-rank p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, MAD and VA severity during exercise were independently associated with this outcome. Conclusions In patients with MVP, the occurrence of VA during exercise is associated with more advanced mitral valve abnormalities, including MAD, and with higher rates of severe arrhythmic events during follow-up. Performing an exercise test, combined with the clinical and echocardiographic assessments, may therefore offer important complementary information useful for patient management.

Abstract Background and Aims Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (AMVP) is linked to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and young women are considered at high risk. Cases of AMVP in women with malignant VA during pregnancy have emerged, but the arrhythmic risk during pregnancy is unknown. The authors aimed to describe features of women with high-risk AMVP who developed malignant VA during the perinatal period and to assess if pregnancy and the postpartum period were associated with a higher risk of malignant VA. Methods This retrospective international multi-centre case series included high-risk women with AMVP who experienced malignant VA and at least one pregnancy. Malignant VA included ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or appropriate shock from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The authors compared the incidence of malignant VA in non-pregnant periods and perinatal period; the latter defined as occurring during pregnancy and within 6 months after delivery. Results The authors included 18 women with AMVP from 11 centres. During 7.5 (interquartile range 5.8–16.6) years of follow-up, 37 malignant VAs occurred, of which 18 were pregnancy related occurring in 13 (72%) unique patients. Pregnancy and 6 months after delivery showed increased incidence rate of malignant VA compared to the non-pregnancy period (univariate incidence rate ratio 2.66, 95% confidence interval 1.23–5.76). Conclusions The perinatal period could impose increased risk of malignant VA in women with high-risk AMVP. The data may provide general guidance for pre-conception counselling and for nuanced shared decision-making between patients and clinicians.

Abstract Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most frequent valve condition but remains a conundrum in many aspects, particularly in regard to the existence and frequency of an arrhythmic form (AMVP) and its link to sudden cardiac death. Furthermore, the presence, frequency, and significance of the anatomic functional feature called mitral annular disjunction (MAD) have remained widely disputed. Recent case series and cohorts have shattered the concept that MVP is most generally benign and have emphasized the various phenotypes associated with clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias, including AMVP. The definition, evaluation, follow-up, and management of AMVP represent the focus of the present review, strengthened by recent coherent studies defining an arrhythmic MVP phenotypic that would affect a small subset of patients with MVP at concentrated high risk. The role of MAD in this context is of particular importance, and this review highlights the characteristics of AMVP phenotypes and MAD, their clinical, multimodality imaging, and rhythmic evaluation. These seminal facts lead to proposing a risk stratification clinical pathway with consideration of medical, rhythmologic, and surgical management and have been objects of recent expert consensus statements and of proposals for new research directions.

Abstract Background The majority of patients with of Mitral-valve-prolapse (MVP) have a excellent prognosis. Until recently most cases of mortality were thought to be related to mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction. The concept of the arrhythmic MVP emerged to describe cases of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the presence of isolated MVP yet it’s phonotype remains incompletely and inconsistently defined. Purpose To analyze the prevalence, severity and characteristics of ventricular-arrhythmia (VA), to determine it’s phenotypical context and independent impact on outcome in patients with MVP. Methods A cohort of 595 (65 ± 16 years, 278 female) consecutive patients with MVP and comprehensive clinical, arrhythmia (24hour-Holter) and Doppler-echocardiographic characterization, was identified and long-term outcome analyzed. Results VA was frequent, present in 43% of patients with at least ventricular ectopy≥5%, but was most often moderate (ventricular-tachycardia—VT 120-179bpm) in 27% and rarely severe (VT≥180/min) in 8.6%. Presence of VA was associated with older age, male sex, bileaflet-prolapse, marked leaflet redundancy, mitral-annulus-disjunction (MAD), larger left-atrium and left ventricular end-systolic diameter, and T-wave-inversion/ST-depression (all P ≤ 0.001). Severe VA was independently associated with presence of MAD, leaflet-redundancy and T-wave-inversion/ST-depression (all P &lt; 0.0001) but not with mitral regurgitation severity or ejection-fraction. Outcome primary endpoint of overall survival after arrhythmia diagnosis (8-year 87 ± 2%) was strongly associated with arrhythmia-severity (8-year 90 ± 2% for no/trivial arrhythmia, 85 ± 3% for mild/moderate and 76 ± 7% for severe arrhythmia. P = 0.02, Figure). Excess-mortality was substantial for severe-arrhythmia (univariate-hazard-ratio 2.70[1.27-5.77], P = 0.01 vs. no/trivial arrhythmia), even adjusted comprehensively including for MVP-characteristics (adjusted-hazard-ratio 2.94[1.36-6.36], P = 0.006) ). Conclusions This large cohort of isolated consecutive MVP characterized with 24-hour-Holter monitoring, clinical and Echocardiographic assessment, demonstrates that VA are frequent with MVP but rarely severe. The arrhythmic MVP was independently and strongly associated with specific ECG and morphologic patterns, particularly ST-T changes, MAD presence and marked leaflet redundancy, suggestive of a specific arrhythmic MVP phenotype, independently of MR-severity. Arrhythmia, particularly severe, is associated with long-term excess-mortality, independently of any other characteristics, including MR severity and LVEF. These findings lay the foundation for novel risk-stratification of MVP for the conduct of prospective controlled studies evaluating the management of MVP high-risk patients. Figure – Impact on survival of ventricular arrhythmia Overall survival of MVP stratified by ventricular arrhythmia (Panel A) or ventricular arrhythmia severity (Panel B) throughout follow-up. Abstract Figure.

AbstractCardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are utilized in increasing number and in heterogeneous populations. With excellent training, checklists, and “muscle memory,” the implantation procedure is generally very safe and efficient. Nevertheless, significant and potentially life‐threatening complications can occur.