Basso, Cristina

BACKGROUND: No large registries of patients with acute eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) are available. However, EM is perceived as a cardiac disease with high mortality, affecting mainly young and middle-aged adults according to small series and case reports. Awareness of the clinical presentation, associated systemic conditions, treatments, and outcomes of this uncommon condition is an unmet need. METHODS: In this international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study, 53 centers screened 193 patients with histologically proven acute EM between 1992 and 2023. After the exclusion of patients with insufficient data (n=10), symptoms lasting >30 days (n=19), or histological diagnosis not confirmed after review (n=8), 156 patients were included. RESULTS: Median age at presentation was 48 years (first to third quartile, 34–59 years) with male predominance (67.3%), and only 2 were pediatric cases (≤16 years of age; 1.3%). The main signs and symptoms at presentation were dyspnea (75.6%), fever (61.3%), and chest pain (53.2%). Unexpectedly, peripheral eosinophilia was reported in only 57.4% of cases, with a median cell count of 630 eosinophils/μL. The median left ventricular ejection fraction at presentation was 32% (first to third quartile, 25%–48%). The disorders most frequently associated with EM were eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (22.4% of cases) and hypersensitivity forms (14.1%). Idiopathic/undefined forms accounted for 44.9% of cases, and miscellaneous causes accounted for 18.6%. In-hospital death or need for heart transplantation (HTx) occurred in 23 patients (14.7%; 22 deaths and 1 HTx), despite 43.6% being treated with temporary mechanical circulatory support and 92.9% being treated with immunosuppressive agents. Estimated rates of death or HTx at 1 and 3 years were 19.0% and 23.8%. Increased age, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction on admission, and no immunosuppressive therapy during hospitalization were independent predictors of death or HTx. A nonsignificant higher occurrence of deaths or HTx was observed in the hypersensitivity form (46.1%) compared with the eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis–associated form (13.1%) at 3 years ( P =0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Acute EM can often present without peripheral eosinophilia, and rates of in-hospital and midterm mortality or HTx are high. Endomyocardial biopsy is required to reach the final diagnosis of EM because relying on peripheral eosinophilia can lead to missing diagnosis. In-hospital immunosuppression is associated with HTx-free survival, although tailored immunosuppressive therapies are needed to improve outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT06447935.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Etiology identification and risk stratification represent major issues for patients presenting with undefined left ventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ULVACM). Purpose To investigate the role of genetics and histology for ULVACM classification, management, and risk assessment. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a multicenter cohort of patients (screened n=1037) with ULVACM defined by ventricular arrhythmia (VA) onset, nonischemic late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) limited to the LV, and no severe dilated cardiomyopathy (LVEF≥40%). We selected patients undergoing both next generation sequencing (NGS) screening and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) for etiology definition. When feasible, immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was used to target active myocardial inflammation (AMI). The study endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, heart transplantation and malignant VAs (VT, VF, appropriate ICD treatment). Results The study cohort is composed by 135 ULVACM patients (age 43±14 years, 63% males, LVEF 55±7 %). NGS identified pathogenic or likely-pathogenic variants (PVs/LPVs) consistent with ACM in 21 cases (16%), whereas EMB showed AMI in 78 patients (58%), including 13/21 PVs/LPVs+ (62%). After reclassification of 86 patients (64%), only 49 (36%) remained ULVACM. IST was started in 41/78 AMI patients (53%), including 9/13 PVs/LPVs+ (69%). Twenty patients (15%) met the study endpoint by 12 months, and 36 (27%) by the end of the study (60±27 months). Beyond malignant VT onset, AMI was the only predictor of events by 12 months (HR 5.0, 95%CI 1.4-18.1, p=0.007). No prognostic role was found for PVs/LPVs, except for the subgroup (n=77) with nonsustained VT onset. Among AMI patients, those treated by IST had a significantly lower occurrence of events, both by 12-months (1/41 vs. 16/37, p<0.001) and later (HR 0.05, 95%CI 0.01-0.21, p<0.001). Results were independently confirmed in PVs/LPVs+ and PVs/LPVs- cases. Excluding the IST population, the association of multiple factors among VT onset, PVs/LPVs, and AMI, resulted in an improved discrimination of arrhythmic risk profiles. Conclusion The combined genetic and histological workup allowed reclassification of up to 64% ULVACM patients, and substantially contributed into prognostic assessment. Furthermore, EMB identified suitable candidates for IST, who showed better outcomes irrespectively of their genotype.

Abstract Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an invasive procedure, globally most often used for the monitoring of heart transplant (HTx) rejection. In addition, EMB can have an important complementary role to the clinical assessment in establishing the diagnosis of diverse cardiac disorders, including myocarditis, cardiomyopathies, drug-related cardiotoxicity, amyloidosis, other infiltrative and storage disorders, and cardiac tumours. Improvements in EMB equipment and the development of new techniques for the analysis of EMB samples have significantly improved diagnostic precision of EMB. The present document is the result of the Trilateral Cooperation Project between the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Japanese Heart Failure Society. It represents an expert consensus aiming to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date perspective on EMB, with a focus on the following main issues: (i) an overview of the practical approach to EMB, (ii) an update on indications for EMB, (iii) a revised plan for HTx rejection surveillance, (iv) the impact of multimodality imaging on EMB, and (v) the current clinical practice in the worldwide use of EMB.

Abstract Cardiac amyloidosis is a serious and progressive infiltrative disease that is caused by the deposition of amyloid fibrils at the cardiac level. It can be due to rare genetic variants in the hereditary forms or as a consequence of acquired conditions. Thanks to advances in imaging techniques and the possibility of achieving a non-invasive diagnosis, we now know that cardiac amyloidosis is a more frequent disease than traditionally considered. In this position paper the Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Disease proposes an invasive and non-invasive definition of cardiac amyloidosis, addresses clinical scenarios and situations to suspect the condition and proposes a diagnostic algorithm to aid diagnosis. Furthermore, we also review how to monitor and treat cardiac amyloidosis, in an attempt to bridge the gap between the latest advances in the field and clinical practice.

Background: Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an inherited cardiac disease characterized by fibrofatty replacement of the right and left ventricle, often causing ventricular dysfunction and life-threatening arrhythmias. Variants in desmosomal genes account for up to 60% of cases. Our objective was to establish the prevalence and clinical features of ACM stemming from pathogenic variants in the nondesmosomal cadherin 2 (CDH2), a novel genetic substrate of ACM. Methods: A cohort of 500 unrelated patients with a definite diagnosis of ACM and no disease-causing variants in the main ACM genes was assembled. Genetic screening of CDH2 was performed through next-generation or Sanger sequencing. Whenever possible, cascade screening was initiated in the families of CDH2 -positive probands, and clinical evaluation was performed. Results: Genetic screening of CDH2 led to the identification of 7 rare variants: 5, identified in 6 probands, were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. The previously established p.D407N pathogenic variant was detected in 2 additional probands. Probands and family members with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in CDH2 were clinically evaluated, and along with previously published cases, altogether contributed to the identification of gene-specific features (13 cases from this cohort and 11 previously published, for a total of 9 probands and 15 family members). Ventricular arrhythmic events occurred in most CDH2 -positive subjects (20/24, 83%), while the occurrence of heart failure was rare (2/24, 8.3%). Among probands, sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death occurred in 5/9 (56%). Conclusions: In this worldwide cohort of previously genotype-negative ACM patients, the prevalence of probands with CDH2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants was 1.2% (6/500). Our data show that this cohort of CDH2 -ACM patients has a high incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, while evolution toward heart failure is rare.

Abstract Cardiac amyloidosis is a serious and progressive infiltrative disease that is caused by the deposition of amyloid fibrils at the cardiac level. It can be due to rare genetic variants in the hereditary forms or as a consequence of acquired conditions. Thanks to advances in imaging techniques and the possibility of achieving a non-invasive diagnosis, we now know that cardiac amyloidosis is a more frequent disease than traditionally considered. In this position paper the Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Disease proposes an invasive and non-invasive definition of cardiac amyloidosis, addresses clinical scenarios and situations to suspect the condition and proposes a diagnostic algorithm to aid diagnosis. Furthermore, we also review how to monitor and treat cardiac amyloidosis, in an attempt to bridge the gap between the latest advances in the field and clinical practice.

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart that may occur because of infections, immune system activation, or exposure to drugs. The diagnosis of myocarditis has changed due to the introduction of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. We present an expert consensus document aimed to summarize the common terminology related to myocarditis meanwhile highlighting some areas of controversies and uncertainties and the unmet clinical needs. In fact, controversies persist regarding mechanisms that determine the transition from the initial trigger to myocardial inflammation and from acute myocardial damage to chronic ventricular dysfunction. It is still uncertain which viruses (besides enteroviruses) cause direct tissue damage, act as triggers for immune-mediated damage, or both. Regarding terminology, myocarditis can be characterized according to etiology, phase, and severity of the disease, predominant symptoms, and pathological findings. Clinically, acute myocarditis (AM) implies a short time elapsed from the onset of symptoms and diagnosis (generally <1 month). In contrast, chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy indicates myocardial inflammation with established dilated cardiomyopathy or hypokinetic nondilated phenotype, which in the advanced stages evolves into fibrosis without detectable inflammation. Suggested diagnostic and treatment recommendations for AM and chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy are mainly based on expert opinion given the lack of well-designed contemporary clinical studies in the field. We will provide a shared and practical approach to patient diagnosis and management, underlying differences between the European and US scientific statements on this topic. We explain the role of histology that defines subtypes of myocarditis and its prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Abstract Aims Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been associated with cardiovascular features of myocardial involvement including elevated serum troponin levels and acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The cardiac pathological changes in these patients with COVID-19 have yet to be well described. Methods and results In an international multicentre study, cardiac tissue from the autopsies of 21 consecutive COVID-19 patients was assessed by cardiovascular pathologists. The presence of myocarditis, as defined by the presence of multiple foci of inflammation with associated myocyte injury, was determined, and the inflammatory cell composition analysed by immunohistochemistry. Other forms of acute myocyte injury and inflammation were also described, as well as coronary artery, endocardium, and pericardium involvement. Lymphocytic myocarditis was present in 3 (14%) of the cases. In two of these cases, the T lymphocytes were CD4 predominant and in one case the T lymphocytes were CD8 predominant. Increased interstitial macrophage infiltration was present in 18 (86%) of the cases. A mild pericarditis was present in four cases. Acute myocyte injury in the right ventricle, most probably due to strain/overload, was present in four cases. There was a non-significant trend toward higher serum troponin levels in the patients with myocarditis compared with those without myocarditis. Disrupted coronary artery plaques, coronary artery aneurysms, and large pulmonary emboli were not identified. Conclusions In SARS-CoV-2 there are increased interstitial macrophages in a majority of the cases and multifocal lymphocytic myocarditis in a small fraction of the cases. Other forms of myocardial injury are also present in these patients. The macrophage infiltration may reflect underlying diseases rather than COVID-19.