Schultheiß, Heinz‐Peter

Abstract Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis (iCS), defined by granulomatous inflammation limited to the myocardium, represents the most diagnostically challenging and prognostically adverse form of sarcoidosis. As it is fundamentally a diagnosis of exclusion, iCS diagnosis relies on the absence of extracardiac sarcoid and the integration of multimodality imaging, endomyocardial biopsy, and molecular testing, each with inherent limitations. Cardiac magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography provide complementary assessment of inflammation, fibrosis, and ventricular function, enhancing diagnostic confidence. Electroanatomic mapping-guided biopsy may improve histologic yield, whereas genetic testing helps exclude phenocopies such as arrhythmogenic, hypertrophic, or dilated cardiomyopathies. Circulating biomarkers remain non-specific but may complement imaging-based algorithms. Future research should focus on harmonized imaging protocols, non-FDG radiotracers, and molecular tissue profiling to refine activity assessment and guide therapy. Multimodal, probability-based frameworks represent the most promising approach for earlier, more accurate diagnosis and risk stratification in iCS.

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart that may occur because of infections, immune system activation, or exposure to drugs. The diagnosis of myocarditis has changed due to the introduction of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. We present an expert consensus document aimed to summarize the common terminology related to myocarditis meanwhile highlighting some areas of controversies and uncertainties and the unmet clinical needs. In fact, controversies persist regarding mechanisms that determine the transition from the initial trigger to myocardial inflammation and from acute myocardial damage to chronic ventricular dysfunction. It is still uncertain which viruses (besides enteroviruses) cause direct tissue damage, act as triggers for immune-mediated damage, or both. Regarding terminology, myocarditis can be characterized according to etiology, phase, and severity of the disease, predominant symptoms, and pathological findings. Clinically, acute myocarditis (AM) implies a short time elapsed from the onset of symptoms and diagnosis (generally <1 month). In contrast, chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy indicates myocardial inflammation with established dilated cardiomyopathy or hypokinetic nondilated phenotype, which in the advanced stages evolves into fibrosis without detectable inflammation. Suggested diagnostic and treatment recommendations for AM and chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy are mainly based on expert opinion given the lack of well-designed contemporary clinical studies in the field. We will provide a shared and practical approach to patient diagnosis and management, underlying differences between the European and US scientific statements on this topic. We explain the role of histology that defines subtypes of myocarditis and its prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Background Myocarditis is an important cause of acute and chronic heart failure. Men with myocarditis have worse recovery and an increased need for transplantation compared with women, but the reason for the sex difference remains unclear. Elevated sera soluble (s) ST 2 predicts mortality from acute and chronic heart failure, but has not been studied in myocarditis patients. Methods and Results Adults with a diagnosis of clinically suspected myocarditis (n=303, 78% male) were identified according to the 2013 European Society of Cardiology position statement. Sera sST 2 levels were examined by ELISA in humans and mice and correlated with heart function according to sex and age. Sera sST 2 levels were higher in healthy men ( P =8×10 −6 ) and men with myocarditis ( P =0.004) compared with women. sST 2 levels were elevated in patients with myocarditis and New York Heart Association class III ‐ IV heart failure ( P =0.002), predominantly in men ( P =0.0003). Sera sST 2 levels were associated with New York Heart Association class in men with myocarditis who were ≤50 years old ( r =0.231, P =0.0006), but not in women ( r =0.172, P =0.57). Sera sST 2 levels were also significantly higher in male mice with myocarditis ( P =0.005) where levels were associated with cardiac inflammation. Gonadectomy with hormone replacement showed that testosterone ( P <0.001), but not estradiol ( P =0.32), increased sera sST 2 levels in male mice with myocarditis. Conclusions We show in a well‐characterized subset of heart failure patients with clinically suspected and biopsy‐confirmed myocarditis that elevated sera sST 2 is associated with an increased risk of heart failure based on New York Heart Association class in men ≤50 years old.