Dobner, Stephan

Abstract Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis (iCS), defined by granulomatous inflammation limited to the myocardium, represents the most diagnostically challenging and prognostically adverse form of sarcoidosis. As it is fundamentally a diagnosis of exclusion, iCS diagnosis relies on the absence of extracardiac sarcoid and the integration of multimodality imaging, endomyocardial biopsy, and molecular testing, each with inherent limitations. Cardiac magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography provide complementary assessment of inflammation, fibrosis, and ventricular function, enhancing diagnostic confidence. Electroanatomic mapping-guided biopsy may improve histologic yield, whereas genetic testing helps exclude phenocopies such as arrhythmogenic, hypertrophic, or dilated cardiomyopathies. Circulating biomarkers remain non-specific but may complement imaging-based algorithms. Future research should focus on harmonized imaging protocols, non-FDG radiotracers, and molecular tissue profiling to refine activity assessment and guide therapy. Multimodal, probability-based frameworks represent the most promising approach for earlier, more accurate diagnosis and risk stratification in iCS.

Precision medicine, which among other aspects includes an individual's genomic data in diagnosis and management, has become the standard‐of‐care for Mendelian cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, early identification and management of asymptomatic patients with potentially lethal and manageable Mendelian CVD through screening, which is the promise of precision health, remains an unsolved challenge. The reduced costs of genomic sequencing have enabled the creation of biobanks containing in‐depth genetic and health information, which have facilitated the understanding of genetic variation, penetrance, and expressivity, moving us closer to the genotype‐first screening of asymptomatic individuals for Mendelian CVD. This approach could transform health care by diagnostic refinement and facilitating prevention or therapeutic interventions. Yet, potential benefits must be weighed against the potential risks, which include evolving variant pathogenicity assertion or identification of variants with low disease penetrance; costly, stressful, and inappropriate diagnostic evaluations; negative psychological impact; disqualification for employment or of competitive sports; and denial of insurance. Furthermore, the natural history of Mendelian CVD is often unpredictable, making identification of those who will benefit from preventive measures a priority. Currently, there is insufficient evidence that population‐based genetic screening for Mendelian CVD can reduce adverse outcomes at a reasonable cost to an extent that outweighs the harms of true‐positive and false‐positive results. Besides technical, clinical, and financial burdens, ethical and legal aspects pose unprecedented challenges. This review highlights key developments in the field of genotype‐first approaches to Mendelian CVD and summarizes challenges with potential solutions that can pave the way for implementing this approach for clinical care.

Even though it has been more than a decade since renal denervation (RDN) was first used to treat hypertension and an intense effort on researching this therapy has been made, it is still not clear how RDN fits into the antihypertensive arsenal. There is no question that RDN lowers blood pressure (BP), it does so to an extent at best corresponding to one antihypertensive drug. The procedure has an excellent safety record. However, it remains clinically impossible to predict whose BP responds to RDN and whose does not. Long-term efficacy data on BP reduction are still unconvincing despite the recent results in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial; experimental studies indicate that reinnervation is occurring after RDN. Although BP is an acceptable surrogate endpoint, there is complete lack of outcome data with RDN. Clear indications for RDN are lacking although patients with resistant hypertension, those with documented increase in activity of the sympathetic system and perhaps those who desire to take fewest medication may be considered.