Back to Authors

Staessen, Jan A

0000-0002-3026-1637

Mayo Clinic

KU Leuven

Citations 3

Mortality and Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: The First Decade
Jacobs, J. , L’Hoyes, Wouter , Lauwens, Lieselotte , Yu, Yu‐Ling , Brusselmans, Marius , Weltens, Caroline , Voigt, Jens‐Uwe , Wildiers, Hans , Neven, Patrick , Herrmann, Joerg , Janssens, Stefan , Aelst, Lucas Van , Jacobs, Johanna E J , Thijs, Lutgarde , Staessen, Jan A , Janssens, Stefan , Van Aelst, Lucas N L , Voigt, Jens-Uwe , Wildiers, Hans

Journal of the American Heart Association | April 7, 2023 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.122.027855 Get It

Background Treatment for breast cancer (BC) frequently involves radiotherapy. Guidelines recommend screening for cardiac adverse events starting 10 years after radiotherapy. The rationale for this interval is unclear. Methods and Results We aimed to study cardiovascular event rates in the first decade following curative radiotherapy for BC. We compared mortality and cardiovascular event rates with an age‐ and risk factor‐matched control population. We included 1095 patients with BC (mean age 56±12 years). Two hundred and eighteen (19.9%) women died. Cancer and cardiovascular mortality caused 107 (49.1%) and 22 (10.1%) deaths, respectively. A total of 904 cases were matched to female FLEMENGHO (Flemish Study on Environment, Genes and Health Outcomes) participants. Coronary artery disease incidence was similar (risk ratio [RR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.48–1.18]), yet heart failure (RR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.19–3.25]) and atrial fibrillation/flutter (RR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.07–3.08]) occurred more often in patients with BC. Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.033 [95% CI, 1.006–1.061], P =0.016), tumor grade (HR, 1.739 [95% CI, 1.166–2.591], P =0.007), and neoadjuvant treatment setting (HR, 2.782 [95% CI, 1.304–5.936], P =0.008) were risk factors for mortality. Risk factors for major adverse cardiac events were age (HR, 1.053 [95% CI, 1.013–1.093]; P =0.008), mean heart dose (HR, 1.093 [95% CI, 1.025–1.167]; P =0.007), history of cardiovascular disease (HR, 2.386 [95% CI, 1.096–6.197]; P =0.029) and Mayo Clinic Cardiotoxicity Risk Score (HR, 2.664 [95% CI, 1.625–4.367]; P <0.001). Conclusions Ten‐year mortality following curative treatment for unilateral BC was mainly cancer related, but heart failure and atrial fibrillation/flutter were already common in the first decade following irradiation. Mean heart dose, pre‐existing cardiovascular diseases, and Mayo Clinic Cardiotoxicity Risk Score were risk factors for cardiac adverse events. These results suggest a need for early dedicated cardio‐oncological follow‐up after radiotherapy.
Mortality and major adverse cardiac events in women with breast cancer receiving radiotherapy: a 10-year cohort study of patients and population controls
L’Hoyes, Wouter , Lauwens, Lieselotte , Weltens, Caroline , Neven, Patrick , Herrmann, J., Janssens, S., Jacobs, J. , Voigt, Jens‐Uwe , Wildiers, Hans , Herrmann, J, Thijs, Lutgarde , Staessen, Jan A , Aelst, Lucas Van

European Heart Journal | October 15, 2022 | Volume: 43 | Issue: Supplement_2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2575 Get It

Abstract Background Treatment for breast cancer (BC) frequently involves radiotherapy. Guidelines recommend screening for cardiac adverse events starting 10 years after radiotherapy. The rationale for recommending this interval is unclear and informed the objective of this study. Objectives Study cardiovascular event rates in the first decade following curative radiotherapy for breast cancer, the time frame before guidelines recommend screening. Methods We performed a monocentric, retrospective study enrolling all women with unilateral BC in 2007–2008, who received radiotherapy as part of their curative treatment. We compared event rates during 10 years follow-up with an age and risk factor-matched control population (FLEMENGHO population). Results We included 1095 BC patients (median age 55y, IQR: 47–66y). Two hundred and eighteen (19.9%) women died. Cancer and cardiovascular mortality accounted for 107 (49.1%) and 22 (10.1%) deaths, respectively. The incidence of coronary artery disease was similar compared to age and risk-matched women [risk ratio 0.75 (95% CI 0.48–1.18)], yet heart failure (HF) [risk ratio 1.97 (95% CI 1.19–3.25)] and atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) (risk ratio 1.82 (95% CI 1.07–3.08) occurred more often. Age [HR 1.040 (95% CI 1.012–1.069)], tumor grade [HR 1.646 (95% CI 1.103–2.458)], and neo-adjuvant treatment setting [HR 3.079 (95% CI 1.432–6.620)] were risk factors for mortality; hormonal therapy [HR 0.007 (95% CI 0.001–0.042)] proved protective. Risk factors for MACE were mean heart dose [HR 1.079 (95% CI 1.012–1.151], hormonal therapy, history of cardiovascular disease [HR 2.771 (95% CI 1.253–6.126)], and Mayo Clinic Cardiotoxicity Risk Score [HR 2.547 (95% CI 1.538–4.217)]. While mean heart dose [HR 1.141 (95% CI 1.017–1.282)] and cardiovascular history [HR 3.374 (95% CI 1.259–9.043] clearly associated with new onset HF, only a trend towards higher AF burden with increasing mean heart dose could be observed. Conclusions Ten-year mortality following curative treatment for unilateral BC was mainly cancer-related. HF and AF constituted significantly increased risks in the first decade following irradiation. Mean heart dose, pre-existing cardiovascular diseases, and Mayo Clinic Cardiotoxicity Risk Score were risk factors for early cardiac mortality and adverse events and should guide early dedicated cardio-oncological follow-up. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Renal denervation in the antihypertensive arsenal – knowns and known unknowns
Brguljan, Jana , Ferdinand, Keith C. , Laffer, Cheryl L. , Ram, C. Venkata S. , Shalaeva, E. , Textor, Stephen C., Vongpatanasin, Wanpen , Vogt, Liffert , Wang, Ji‐Guang , Williams, Bryan , Messerli, Franz H. , Bavishi, Chirag , Burnier, Michel , Dobner, Stephan , Elijovich, Fernando , Kjeldsen, Sverre Erik , Rexhaj, Emrush , Ruilope, Luis Miguel , Siontis, George C.M. , Staessen, Jan A , Volpe, Massimo

Journal of Hypertension | September 2, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1859-1875

10.1097/hjh.0000000000003171 Get It

Even though it has been more than a decade since renal denervation (RDN) was first used to treat hypertension and an intense effort on researching this therapy has been made, it is still not clear how RDN fits into the antihypertensive arsenal. There is no question that RDN lowers blood pressure (BP), it does so to an extent at best corresponding to one antihypertensive drug. The procedure has an excellent safety record. However, it remains clinically impossible to predict whose BP responds to RDN and whose does not. Long-term efficacy data on BP reduction are still unconvincing despite the recent results in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial; experimental studies indicate that reinnervation is occurring after RDN. Although BP is an acceptable surrogate endpoint, there is complete lack of outcome data with RDN. Clear indications for RDN are lacking although patients with resistant hypertension, those with documented increase in activity of the sympathetic system and perhaps those who desire to take fewest medication may be considered.