Rav, Moshe

Abstract Background and Aims Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (AMVP) is linked to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and young women are considered at high risk. Cases of AMVP in women with malignant VA during pregnancy have emerged, but the arrhythmic risk during pregnancy is unknown. The authors aimed to describe features of women with high-risk AMVP who developed malignant VA during the perinatal period and to assess if pregnancy and the postpartum period were associated with a higher risk of malignant VA. Methods This retrospective international multi-centre case series included high-risk women with AMVP who experienced malignant VA and at least one pregnancy. Malignant VA included ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or appropriate shock from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The authors compared the incidence of malignant VA in non-pregnant periods and perinatal period; the latter defined as occurring during pregnancy and within 6 months after delivery. Results The authors included 18 women with AMVP from 11 centres. During 7.5 (interquartile range 5.8–16.6) years of follow-up, 37 malignant VAs occurred, of which 18 were pregnancy related occurring in 13 (72%) unique patients. Pregnancy and 6 months after delivery showed increased incidence rate of malignant VA compared to the non-pregnancy period (univariate incidence rate ratio 2.66, 95% confidence interval 1.23–5.76). Conclusions The perinatal period could impose increased risk of malignant VA in women with high-risk AMVP. The data may provide general guidance for pre-conception counselling and for nuanced shared decision-making between patients and clinicians.

AbstractAimsIntraoperative defibrillation testing (DT) during implant or replacement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has been a matter of debate for many years. This debate was put to rest by the Simple and Nordic ICD trials, and the practice of testing during new implantations has essentially been almost abandoned. Old registries demonstrated an increased incidence of significant findings in DT during replacements. The aim of the present study was to evaluate frequency of significant findings and safety of DT in subjects undergoing device replacement.Methods and resultsA prospective observational multi-centre study included consecutive patients undergoing ICD generator replacement. The primary outcome was a failure to terminate induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) with a single shock 10 J below the maximal capacity of the device. Secondary outcomes included complications of DT. Patients were followed-up at 1- and 6-months post-procedure. A total of 92 patients were eligible, and consented to the study, of which 84 underwent DT during battery replacement. The median age was 68 years and 79.8% were males. Induction of VF was successful in 84 patients as was a successful conversion on the first attempt in all. There were no procedure-related complications. During follow up one patient had two appropriate ICD shock events. In four patients, ICD programming was changed. None suffered inappropriate shock. There was no evidence of lead malfunction. Two deaths occurred, none of which was related to arrhythmia.ConclusionThe present study found DT was not associated with complications in patients undergoing ICD generator replacement but produced no clinically important information.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Maurice Kahn Foundation via the Mayo- Sheba Collaboration Fund. Background The need for intraoperative defibrillation testing (DFT) during implant and/or replacement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has been a matter of debate for many years. This debate was put to rest by the Simple and the Nordic ICD trials, and the practice of testing during new implantations has practically been nearly abandoned. Nevertheless, induction of VF for testing purposes (VFT) may still have an important role in selective populations at risk for defibrillation failure, who were not included in the SIMPLE and Nordic trials. One such population includes those who undergo device replacements. Old registries demonstrated an increased incidence of significant findings in VFT during replacements. In the present study, we sought to test this observation. Objectives Evaluate frequency of significant findings and the safety of VFT in subjects undergoing device replacement. Methods A prospective observational multi-center study of VFT included consecutive patients undergoing ICD generator replacement in 5 centers in Israel, Europe, and the US. All centers followed the same VFT protocol. The primary outcome was defined as failure to terminate induced VF with a single shock at 10 Joules below the maximal capacity of the device. Secondary outcomes included complications of VFT. Patients were followed-up at 1 month and 6 months post-procedure. Data collection included documentation of any peri-operative complications and clinical endpoints (occurrence of appropriate shock, inappropriate shocks, lead failure, need for re-intervention, and infection). Results A total of 92 patients were eligible, and consented for the study, of which 84 underwent DFT during battery replacement. The median age was 68 years and 79.8% were male subjects. Induction of VF was successful in all 84 patients as well as VFT with a successful conversion on first attempt. During follow up one patient had two appropriate ICD shock events. In four patients, the ICD programming was changed. None suffered an inappropriate shock. There was no evidence of lead malfunction. A total of two deaths occurred, none of which were related to the device. Conclusion The present study found VFT was not associated with complications in patients undergoing ICD/CRTD generator replacement but produced no clinically important information.