Tandri, Harikrishna

BACKGROUND: Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in cardiac amyloidosis is uncommon, and the substrate and outcomes of catheter ablation are not defined. METHODS: We included 22 consecutive patients (mean age, 68±10 years; male sex, 91%) with cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR [transthyretin], n=16; light chain, n=6) undergoing catheter ablation for VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) between 2013 and 2023 in a retrospective, observational, international study. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VT/VF during follow-up, while the primary safety end point included major procedure-related adverse events. RESULTS: The indication for ablation was drug-refractory VT in 17 patients (77%), and premature ventricular complex–initiated polymorphic VT/VF in 5 patients (23%). Catheter ablation was performed using endocardial (n=17.77%) or endo-epicardial approaches (n=5.23%). Complete endocardial electroanatomical voltage maps of the left and right ventricles were obtained in 17 (77%) and 10 (45%) patients, respectively. Each patient had evidence of low-voltage areas, most commonly involving the interventricular septum (n=16); late potentials were recorded in 16 patients (73%). A median of 1 (1–2) VT was inducible per patient; 12 of the 26 mappable VTs (46%) originated from the interventricular septum. Complete procedural success was achieved in 16 patients (73%), with 4 (18%) major procedure-related adverse events. After a median follow-up of 32 (14–42) months, sustained VT/VF recurrence was observed in 9 patients (41%); survival free from VT/VF recurrence was 56% (95% CI, 36%–86%) at 36-month follow-up, and most patients remained on antiarrhythmic drugs. A significant reduction in per patient implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies was noted in the 6-month period after ablation (before: 6 [4–9] versus after: 0 [0–0]; P <0.001). In multivariable analysis, complete procedural success was associated with reduced risk of recurrent VT/VF (hazard ratio, 0.002; P =0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation can achieve control of recurrent VT/VF in more than half of patients with cardiac amyloidosis, and the reduction in VT/VF burden post-ablation may be relevant for quality of life. Septal substrate and risk of procedure-related complications challenge successful management of patients with cardiac amyloidosis and VT/VF.

Abstract Background the electrophysiological substrate underpinning ventricular tachycardia (VT) in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains elusive, and outcomes of catheter ablation in this peculiar population are currently unknown. Purpose we sought to describe the electrophysiological substrate and clinical outcomes of VT ablation in a cohort of patients with CA. Methods we included 19 consecutive patients (mean age, 69±10 years; male sex, 89%) with CA (ATTR, n=13; AL, n=6) undergoing catheter ablation for VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) between 2013 and 2023 in a retrospective, observational, international study, involving 7 referral European and North American electrophysiology units. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VT/VF during follow-up, while the primary safety outcome included major procedure-related adverse events. Results the indication for ablation was drug-refractory VT in 16 patients (84%), and PVC-initiated polymorphic VT/VF in 3 (16%). Catheter ablation was performed using endocardial (n=14, 74%) or endo-epicardial approaches (n=5, 26%). Complete endocardial electroanatomical voltage maps of the left and right ventricles were obtained in 14 (74%) and 6 (32%) patients, respectively. Each patient had evidence of low-voltage areas, most commonly involving the interventricular septum (n=12); late potentials were recorded in 13 patients (68%). A median of 1 (1-2) VTs were inducible per patient; in 10 subjects (43% of mappable VTs), activation mapping was consistent with septal VT origin. Complete procedural success was obtained in 13 patients (68%), at the expense of 4 (21%) major procedure-related adverse events. After a median follow-up of 36 (18-54) months, sustained VT/VF recurrence was observed in 9 patients (47%); survival free from VT/VF recurrence was 74% (95%CI, 56-96%) at 12 months, and 53% (95%CI, 34-94%) at 36-month follow-up; the majority of patients remained on antiarrhythmic drugs (Figure). Low-voltage QRS (HR,21.96; p=0.022) and complete procedural success (HR,0.08; p=0.029) were associated with recurrent VT/VF at multivariable analysis (Figure). Conclusions catheter ablation of VT/VF is associated with favorable acute and mid-term arrhythmia control, yet with substantial risk of procedure-related complications and long-term recurrences. Septal substrate and frailty challenge successful management of patients with CA and VT/VF.Multimodality evaluation of LV substrateMain Study Outcomes

Abstract Background and Aims Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are critical for preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). This study aims to identify cross-continental differences in utilization of primary prevention ICDs and survival free from sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in ARVC. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of ARVC patients without prior VA enrolled in clinical registries from 11 countries throughout Europe and North America. Patients were classified according to whether they received treatment in North America or Europe and were further stratified by baseline predicted VA risk into low- (&lt;10%/5 years), intermediate- (10%–25%/5 years), and high-risk (&gt;25%/5 years) groups. Differences in ICD implantation and survival free from sustained VA events (including appropriate ICD therapy) were assessed. Results One thousand ninety-eight patients were followed for a median of 5.1 years; 554 (50.5%) received a primary prevention ICD, and 286 (26.0%) experienced a first VA event. After adjusting for baseline risk factors, North Americans were more than three times as likely to receive ICDs {hazard ratio (HR) 3.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5, 3.8]} but had only mildly increased risk for incident sustained VA [HR 1.4 (95% CI 1.1, 1.8)]. North Americans without ICDs were at higher risk for incident sustained VA [HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.3, 3.4)] than Europeans. Conclusions North American ARVC patients were substantially more likely than Europeans to receive primary prevention ICDs across all arrhythmic risk strata. A lower rate of ICD implantation in Europe was not associated with a higher rate of VA events in those without ICDs.