Hussein, Ayman A.

Background: The outcomes of leadless pacemaker (LP) implantation after transvenous lead removal (TLR) of infected cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are not well-established. Objective: This study sought to describe the outcomes of LP implantation following TLR of infected CIED. Method: We conducted a literature search using PubMed and Embase for a combination of term including leadless pacemaker implantation, transvenous lead extraction, transvenous lead removal , transvenous lead explant , infected cardiac implantable electronic device . The inclusion criterion was LP implantation after TLR of infected CIED. The exclusion criterion was TLR for non-infectious reason. Study end-points were procedural complications and LP infection. Result: Of 132 publications reviewed, 13 studies with a total of 253 patients (74 ± 14 years of age, 69% males) were included. Amongst, 56.8% had systemic CIED infection and 43.2% had isolated pocket infection. Staphylococcus Aureus was the most common causative organism in 33% of the reported patients. Of 253 patients included, 105 patients (41.5%) underwent concomitant LP implantation during TLR procedure, and 36 patients (14.2%) had transvenous pacing as a bridge from TLR to LP implantation. During the LP implantation, 1 patient (0.4%) had an intra-procedural complication requiring sternotomy. Post-LP implantation, 2 patients (0.8%) developed groin hematoma, 2 patients (0.8%) developed femoral arteriovenous fistula, and 1 patient (0.4%) developed pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis. During a mean follow-up of 11.3 ±10.6 months, 3 patients (1.2%) developed pacemaker syndrome, 1 patient (0.4%) developed acute on chronic heart failure exacerbation, and only 1 patient (0.4%) developed LP-related infection requiring LP retrieval. Conclusion: This study suggests that LP implant is feasible and safe post-removal of infected CIED with cumulative adverse events at 4% and a reinfection rate of 0.4%.

Background: Despite the optimal efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT), recurrence of VT can occur post-procedurally. However, data on the high-risk population for VT recurrence and the in-hospital outcomes remain scarce. Objective: This study aimed to determine the predictors of 30-day readmission for recurrent VT after catheter ablation of VT and assess the in-hospital outcomes. Method: Using the all-payer, nationally representative Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified the patients aged ≥18 years who underwent catheter ablation for VT and were readmitted within 30 days because of recurrent VT from 2017 to 2020. We performed unweighted univariable and multivariable analyses to determine the outcomes and to identify the patient and hospital variables that were predictive of 30-day readmissions for recurrent VT. A p-value of <0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: In our analysis, a total of 4,102 patients were discharged alive after VT ablation, of which 278 (6.8%) were readmitted within 30 days for recurrent VT. Recurrent VT was also the most common cause of 30-day readmission (47.7%, n=278/583). Compared to non-recurrent VT readmission, readmission due to recurrent VT had higher mortality during rehospitalization (7.55% vs 3.72%, p<0.01) and higher cumulative hospitalization cost ($57584 vs $37846, p<0.01). Via multivariable analysis, congestive heart failure (aOR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.07-3.17; P=0.03) and non-elective index admissions (aOR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.32-2.68; P<0.01) were the independent predictors of 30-day readmission for recurrent VT. Conclusion: Recurrent VT was the most common cause of 30-day readmission following VT ablation. Congestive heart failure and non-elective index admissions were the independent predictors of 30-day readmissions for recurrent VT. These highlight the importance of further research in ablation strategies to improve the efficacy of VT ablation.

Introduction: Increasingly, catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been utilized for rhythm control and to improve quality of life (QoL). Data are limited on patient-centered ablation outcomes in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objective: To examine clinical outcomes and QoL following AF ablation in CKD patients from a large patient-reported outcomes (PRO) database. Methods: All patients undergoing AF ablation (2013-2016) at our center were enrolled and assessed for outcomes using automated PRO surveys (baseline, 3 and 6 months after ablation, every 6 months thereafter). This analysis captured data at 1- and 3-year follow-up. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min using the 2021 CKD-EPI equation. The atrial fibrillation symptom severity scale (AFSSS) was used as the main measure for QoL assessment. In addition, data were collected on clinical improvement by patient report, AF burden, and healthcare utilization. Results: A total of 488 patients were identified (66% male, mean age 68.5, 56.2% persistent AF). QoL was significantly improved from baseline median (IQR) AFSSS of 14 (6-19.5) to 3 (0-9) at 1-year and 4 (0-9.5) at 3-year; P≤0.0001 for both. About 90% of patients reported improvement in their overall AF-related symptoms both at 1- and 3-year follow up. The proportion of patients in AF at the time of completion of the baseline survey was 51.2%, and this decreased to 6.2% at 1-year and 9.7% at 3-year follow up (P<0.0001 for both). AF burden was significantly reduced at 1-year and 3-year including frequency and duration of episodes (P<0.05 for both), with associated decrease in ER visits and hospitalizations; P<0.0001 for all comparisons. The proportion of patients on antiarrhythmics decreased from 61.8% at baseline to 35.6% and 22.7% at 1-year and 3-year, respectively (P<0.0001 for both). Conclusions: In a large AF-specific PRO system, catheter ablation for AF was associated with a significant improvement of QoL in most patients with CKD; with a decrease in AF burden and healthcare utilization.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation targets improvement in quality of life (QoL). Data is scarce on predictors of QoL improvement following ablation. We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics underlying differential response in QoL after AF ablation (with or without arrhythmia recurrence). Methods: All patients undergoing AF ablation (2013–2016) at our center were prospectively enrolled in a fully automated patient-reported outcomes registry. A large number of variables were collected including AF symptom severity scale and AF burden (as indicated by AF frequency and duration scores). Patients were divided into 3 groups based on self-report of QoL improvement: remarkable (super responders), mild/moderate, and unchanged or worse (nonresponders). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models assessed clinical characteristics and QoL outcomes. Results: A total of 956 patients were included (25% females, mean age 63.9). Most patients (≈80%) were super responders (n=761), 138 (14.4%) had mild/moderate improvement, and 57 (5.9%) were nonresponders. The strongest predictors of remarkable QoL improvement were freedom of arrhythmia recurrence (OR, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.27–4.59], P =0.007) and lower AF burden at 12 months. Similarly, higher AF burden was significantly associated with clinical nonresponse. In patients with observed clinical recurrence-QoL mismatch, changes in AF burden at 12 months were the main predictors of QoL outcome, with lower burden predicting higher improvement in QoL and vice versa. Conclusions: Most patients derive significant QoL benefit from AF ablation. Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence and lower AF burden predict remarkable QoL improvement following ablation.