Turkmani, Mustafa

BACKGROUND: Current clinical guidelines emphasize the significance of rhythm control with catheter ablation but lack guidance on the timing of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation relative to the diagnosis time. We aim to investigate the latest evidence on the impact of diagnosis to ablation time (DAT) on clinical outcomes after AF ablation. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through August 2024. Pairwise, prognostic, and reconstructed time-to-event data meta-analyses were conducted using R V. 4.3.1. Our primary end point was time to first AF recurrence, with secondary end points of all-cause mortality, tamponade, stroke, and heart failure. RESULTS: Our cohort included 23 studies with 43 711 patients. Shorter DAT was significantly associated with reduced AF recurrence across both paroxysmal and persistent AF subgroups ( P <0.01). There was a significant decrease in benefit for paroxysmal AF over time and a slight decrease in benefit for persistent AF over time. However, the benefit remained significant in both over time. DAT per year was significantly associated with a 10% increased risk of AF recurrence. Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that DAT >1 year was significantly associated with a 70% increased risk of AF recurrence in paroxysmal AF and 30% in persistent AF. DAT ≤1 year was significantly associated with decreased all-cause mortality ( P <0.01) and showed a trend toward an association with a lower incidence of stroke ( P =0.08). However, there was no significant difference in heart failure between DAT ≤1 year and DAT >1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Early ablation is more beneficial in paroxysmal AF, with a notable decrease in benefit over time, while in persistent AF, the benefit remains significant but slightly decreases over time. Shorter DAT was significantly associated with decreased all-cause mortality and showed a trend toward an association with a lower incidence of stroke. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ; Unique identifier: CRD42024525542.

Abstract Background Pulsed‐field ablation (PFA) has emerged as an innovative alternative to radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation because it selectively targets myocardial tissue. Thus, we aim to estimate the efficacy and safety of PFA versus thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis were retrieved from PubMed, WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and CENTRAL through September 2023. We used RevMan V. 5.4 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42023480321 Results We included 17 studies with a total of 2255 patients. PFA was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of AF recurrence (RR: 0.66 with 95% CI [0.51, 0.87], p = .003). However, there was no significant difference between PFA and thermal ablation in arrhythmia recurrence (RR: 0.92 with 95% CI [0.74, 1.46], p = .42). PFA was significantly associated with decreased total procedure time (MD: −15.15 with 95% CI [−20.23, −10.07], p < .00001), decreased heart rate change (MD: −7.39 with 95% CI [−12.16, −2.62], p = .002), decreased phrenic nerve palsy (RR: 0.38 with 95% CI [0.15, 0.98], p = .05), and reduced esophageal lesions (RR: 0.09 with 95% CI [0.01, 0.69], p = .02). On the contrary, PFA was significantly associated with increased pericardial tamponade (RR: 6.14 with 95% CI [1.43, 26.33], p = .01). Conclusion PFA was significantly associated with decreased AF recurrence, total procedure time, heart rate change, phrenic nerve palsy, esophageal lesion, and increased incidence of pericardial tamponade compared with thermal ablation.

Introduction: Increasingly, catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been utilized for rhythm control and to improve quality of life (QoL). Data are limited on patient-centered ablation outcomes in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objective: To examine clinical outcomes and QoL following AF ablation in CKD patients from a large patient-reported outcomes (PRO) database. Methods: All patients undergoing AF ablation (2013-2016) at our center were enrolled and assessed for outcomes using automated PRO surveys (baseline, 3 and 6 months after ablation, every 6 months thereafter). This analysis captured data at 1- and 3-year follow-up. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min using the 2021 CKD-EPI equation. The atrial fibrillation symptom severity scale (AFSSS) was used as the main measure for QoL assessment. In addition, data were collected on clinical improvement by patient report, AF burden, and healthcare utilization. Results: A total of 488 patients were identified (66% male, mean age 68.5, 56.2% persistent AF). QoL was significantly improved from baseline median (IQR) AFSSS of 14 (6-19.5) to 3 (0-9) at 1-year and 4 (0-9.5) at 3-year; P≤0.0001 for both. About 90% of patients reported improvement in their overall AF-related symptoms both at 1- and 3-year follow up. The proportion of patients in AF at the time of completion of the baseline survey was 51.2%, and this decreased to 6.2% at 1-year and 9.7% at 3-year follow up (P<0.0001 for both). AF burden was significantly reduced at 1-year and 3-year including frequency and duration of episodes (P<0.05 for both), with associated decrease in ER visits and hospitalizations; P<0.0001 for all comparisons. The proportion of patients on antiarrhythmics decreased from 61.8% at baseline to 35.6% and 22.7% at 1-year and 3-year, respectively (P<0.0001 for both). Conclusions: In a large AF-specific PRO system, catheter ablation for AF was associated with a significant improvement of QoL in most patients with CKD; with a decrease in AF burden and healthcare utilization.