Khan, Ubaid

BACKGROUND: Current clinical guidelines emphasize the significance of rhythm control with catheter ablation but lack guidance on the timing of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation relative to the diagnosis time. We aim to investigate the latest evidence on the impact of diagnosis to ablation time (DAT) on clinical outcomes after AF ablation. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through August 2024. Pairwise, prognostic, and reconstructed time-to-event data meta-analyses were conducted using R V. 4.3.1. Our primary end point was time to first AF recurrence, with secondary end points of all-cause mortality, tamponade, stroke, and heart failure. RESULTS: Our cohort included 23 studies with 43 711 patients. Shorter DAT was significantly associated with reduced AF recurrence across both paroxysmal and persistent AF subgroups ( P <0.01). There was a significant decrease in benefit for paroxysmal AF over time and a slight decrease in benefit for persistent AF over time. However, the benefit remained significant in both over time. DAT per year was significantly associated with a 10% increased risk of AF recurrence. Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that DAT >1 year was significantly associated with a 70% increased risk of AF recurrence in paroxysmal AF and 30% in persistent AF. DAT ≤1 year was significantly associated with decreased all-cause mortality ( P <0.01) and showed a trend toward an association with a lower incidence of stroke ( P =0.08). However, there was no significant difference in heart failure between DAT ≤1 year and DAT >1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Early ablation is more beneficial in paroxysmal AF, with a notable decrease in benefit over time, while in persistent AF, the benefit remains significant but slightly decreases over time. Shorter DAT was significantly associated with decreased all-cause mortality and showed a trend toward an association with a lower incidence of stroke. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ; Unique identifier: CRD42024525542.

Background: Refractory angina severely affects patients' quality of life around the world. Among the new treatment methods, the coronary sinus reducer (CSR) is one of the most thoroughly researched. Purpose: We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of CSR for refractory angina. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane searches until May 2024. Dichotomous data were pooled using risk ratio (RR), and continuous data were pooled using mean difference (MD), both with a 95% confidence interval (CI), using (R version 4.3). Results: With the inclusion of three RCTs, our cohort comprised a total of 180 patients. Compared to the control group, after six months, CSR was significantly associated with decreased mean change of Canadian cardiovascular society (CCS) class (MD: -0.54 with 95% CI [-0.80, -0.27], P< 0.01), an increased number of patients in the CCS class I (RR: 2.29 with 95% CI [1.14, 4.61], P= 0.02), a decreased number of patients in the CCS class III (RR: 0.53 with 95% CI [0.32, 0.87], P= 0.01), and increased exercise time (MD: 50.46 with 95% CI [9.47, 91.45], P= 0.02). However, there was no significant difference between CSR and the control group in CCS class II, class IV, across all Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) domains, the incidence of any serious adverse events (RR: 3.44 with 95% CI [0.82, 14.42], P= 0.09), stroke (RR: 2.13 with 95% CI [0.20, 22.88], P= 0.53), and all-cause mortality (RR: 1.06 with 95% CI [0.07, 16.59], P= 0.97). Conclusion: CSR has been shown to reduce angina severity by lowering CCS class scores and increasing exercise time. Large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm its effectiveness in patients with refractory angina.

Background: Current clinical guidelines emphasize the significance of rhythm control with catheter ablation but lack guidance on the timing after diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF). Purpose: We aim to investigate the latest evidence on the impact of diagnosis to ablation time (DAT) on AF recurrence, all-cause mortality, stroke, and heart failure (HF) after AF catheter ablation. Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and CENTRAL through February 2024. We conducted a pair-wise and prognostic systematic review and meta-analysis with a reconstructed time-to-event data meta-analysis. All analyses were performed using R V. 4.3.1. PROSPERO ID: CRD42024525542. Results: With the inclusion of 22 studies, our cohort comprised a total of 42,101 patients. Regarding pair-wise meta-analysis, shorter DAT was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of AF recurrence across paroxysmal and persistent AF subgroups. Moreover, DAT ≤ one year was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.73 with 95% CI [0.59, 0.92], P< 0.01) with a trend toward lowering the risk of stroke (RR: 0.80 with 95% CI [0.62, 1.03], P= 0.08). However, there was no significant difference between DAT ≤ one year and DAT > one year in HF. Regarding adjusted prognostic meta-analysis, longer DAT was significantly associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence (P < 0.01). Our reconstructed Kaplan Meier showed that DAT > one year was significantly associated with a 50% increase in the risk of AF recurrence compared to DAT ≤ one year (HR: 1.50 with 95% CI [1.42, 1.58], P< 0.00001) over 60 months follow-up. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis strongly underscores the critical importance of a short DAT in significantly reducing AF recurrence and all-cause mortality, with a trend toward lowering stroke risk, though no significant impact on HF was observed. Early ablation proves beneficial not only for patients with paroxysmal AF but also for those with persistent AF. These findings suggest that minimizing DAT can markedly improve AF outcomes, warranting further investigation to optimize treatment strategies.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is associated with systemic inflammation and hypercatabolic syndrome, impacting body metabolism. The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) is a novel inflammatory and nutritional biomarker. Purpose: We aimed to investigate the prognostic role of ALI in patients with HF. Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and CENTRAL through March 2024. We conducted a pair-wise and prognostic systematic review and meta-analysis with a reconstructed time-to-event data meta-analysis. All analyses were performed using R V. 4.3.1. This meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024535227). Results: We included four studies with 2,247 patients. In the pair-wise meta-analysis, ALI ≤ 25 was significantly associated with an increased incidence of all-cause mortality compared with ALI > 25 (risk ratio [RR] 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-2.21, P< 0.01). On the adjusted prognostic meta-analysis, higher ALI (>25) was significantly associated with a reduction in the incidence of all-cause mortality (hazards ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.58, P< 0.01). The reconstructed Kaplan Meier showed that ALI > 25 was significantly associated with a 56% reduction in the incidence of all-cause mortality compared with ALI ≤ 25 (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.38-0.50, P< 0.000001). Conclusion: Among patients with HF, a low ALI was associated with a higher incidence of all-cause mortality rate than those with a high ALI. These findings suggest that ALI can be used for prognostic stratification and aid clinical decision-making in HF management.

Refractory angina affects patients’ quality of life around the world. Coronary sinus reducer (CSR) is a new therapeutic approach that has been investigated in recent years. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of CSR for refractory angina. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and CENTRAL searches until May 2024. Dichotomous data were pooled using risk ratio (RR), and continuous data were pooled using mean difference (MD), both with a 95% confidence interval (CI), using (R version 4.3). With the inclusion of three RCTs, our cohort comprised a total of 180 patients. Compared with the control group, after 6 months, CSR was significantly associated with a decreased mean change of Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class [MD: −0.54 with 95% CI (−0.80 to −0.27), P < 0.01], a decreased number of patients in the CCS class III/IV [RR: 0.56 with 95% CI (0.38–0.84), P < 0.01], and increased exercise time [MD: 50.46 with 95% CI (9.47–91.45), P = 0.02]. However, there was no significant difference between CSR and the control group in double products, all Seattle Angina Questionnaire domains, and safety outcomes. CSR has been shown to reduce angina severity by lowering CCS class scores and increasing exercise time. Large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm its effectiveness in patients with refractory angina.