Lee, Justin

Background: Early catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) improves outcomes, but the optimal timing, especially in heart failure (HF) subtypes, remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the impact of ablation timing on outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: We used the TriNetX database (2010–2024) to identify HF patients with AF who underwent ablation. Patients were classified as early ablation (≤1 year of first AF diagnosis) or delayed ablation (1–3 years), with propensity score matching (PSM) applied to balance the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was AF recurrence, defined by repeat ablation, direct current cardioversion (DCCV), or antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary outcomes included stroke, hospitalization, and mortality over 5 years. Results: After PSM, delayed ablation was associated with higher AF recurrence in both HFrEF (HR 1.25, p < 0.001) and HFpEF (HR 1.27, p = 0.01), as seen in multivariate analysis. In HFrEF, delayed ablation was associated with higher incidence of re-do ablation, AAD use, and DCCV, while in HFpEF, higher recurrence with delayed ablation was associated with increased AAD use. Both cohorts had similar stroke and mortality rates between early and delayed ablation. Conclusions: Delayed ablation in HFrEF and HFpEF was linked to higher AF recurrence, driven by increased redo ablations, DCCV, AAD use in HFrEF, and higher AAD use in HFpEF. Stroke and mortality rates were similar, suggesting earlier ablation may enhance rhythm control without affecting long-term survival.

11pt, fleqn, a4paper, ]LegrandOrangeBook Background: Early catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) improves outcomes, but the optimal timing, especially in heart failure (HF) subtypes, remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate the impact of ablation timing on outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: We used the TriNetX database (2010–2024) to identify HF patients with AF who underwent ablation. Patients were classified as early ablation (≤1 year of first AF diagnosis) or delayed ablation (1–3 years), with propensity score matching (PSM) applied to balance the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was AF recurrence, defined by repeat ablation, direct current cardioversion (DCCV), or antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary outcomes included stroke, hospitalization, and mortality over 5 years. Results: After PSM, delayed ablation was associated with higher AF recurrence in both HFrEF (HR 1.25, p < 0.001) and HFpEF (HR 1.27, p = 0.01), as seen in multivariate analysis. In HFrEF, delayed ablation was associated with higher incidence of re-do ablation, AAD use, and DCCV, while in HFpEF, higher recurrence with delayed ablation was associated with increased AAD use. Both cohorts had similar stroke and mortality rates between early and delayed ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed ablation in HFrEF and HFpEF was linked to higher AF recurrence, driven by increased redo ablations, DCCV, AAD use in HFrEF, and higher AAD use in HFpEF. Stroke and mortality rates were similar, suggesting earlier ablation may enhance rhythm control without affecting long-term survival. Condensed Abstract Delayed atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation was associated with higher (AF) recurrence in both HFrEF and HFpEF. In HFrEF, delayed ablation led to increased use of re-do ablation, cardioversion and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). In HFpEF, only AAD use was significantly higher with delayed ablation. Stroke and mortality rates were similar between early and delayed ablation groups.

Introduction: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common complication of right ventricle lead extraction (RVLE) in 5 to 10% of cases. This study aims to identify clinical outcomes such as predictors of heart failure hospitalization, need for tricuspid valve intervention, and death among patients with new severe TR after device lead removal (DLR). Methods: Patients who underwent DLR (pacemaker/ICD) between 3/1997 and 3/2024 were identified. Those who had an echocardiogram before and after RVLE with evidence of new severe TR were included. Cox univariable regression controlling for current age was used to assess association with death. Prentice Williams Peterson total time (PWPTT) Cox univariable regression was used to determine the rate of heart failure hospitalization up to three events per subject. Bivariable cox regression was used to control for ejection fraction for ICD and coil removal. Analysis was conducted using Stata IC16. Results: We identified 2,122 people who underwent RVLE, of whom 90 (4.24%) developed new severe TR and were included in the analysis. There were 68 hospitalizations among 38 people at a median of 2 years following lead extraction (IQR 0.57 to 4.5 years). The rate of hospitalization was 11.60 [9.14 to 14.71] per 100 person-years. Removal of an ICD was associated with increased hospitalization (HR 5.48 p<0.001) but not mortality (HR 1.21, p=0.707). Removal of a single coil ICD lead was associated with increased hospitalization rate (HR 3.01, p=0.031) but not mortality (HR =0.51, p=0.380). Removal of dual coil ICD lead was associated with more than a tenfold increase in hospitalization rate (HR 11.55, p=0.001) and four times the mortality rate (HR 4.05, p=0.031) (Figures 1&2). The presence of an abandoned (pacemaker/ICD) lead was associated with increased hospitalization (HR 5.75, p=0.004) and mortality (HR4.95, p=0.034). There was no change in hospitalization rate following tricuspid valve replacement (HR 1.33, p=0.716, n=18). Conclusion: Among people with new severe TR following DLR, the characteristics of the leads are strongly correlated with morbidity and mortality.

Background: The outcomes of leadless pacemaker (LP) implantation after transvenous lead removal (TLR) of infected cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are not well-established. Objective: This study sought to describe the outcomes of LP implantation following TLR of infected CIED. Method: We conducted a literature search using PubMed and Embase for a combination of term including leadless pacemaker implantation, transvenous lead extraction, transvenous lead removal , transvenous lead explant , infected cardiac implantable electronic device . The inclusion criterion was LP implantation after TLR of infected CIED. The exclusion criterion was TLR for non-infectious reason. Study end-points were procedural complications and LP infection. Result: Of 132 publications reviewed, 13 studies with a total of 253 patients (74 ± 14 years of age, 69% males) were included. Amongst, 56.8% had systemic CIED infection and 43.2% had isolated pocket infection. Staphylococcus Aureus was the most common causative organism in 33% of the reported patients. Of 253 patients included, 105 patients (41.5%) underwent concomitant LP implantation during TLR procedure, and 36 patients (14.2%) had transvenous pacing as a bridge from TLR to LP implantation. During the LP implantation, 1 patient (0.4%) had an intra-procedural complication requiring sternotomy. Post-LP implantation, 2 patients (0.8%) developed groin hematoma, 2 patients (0.8%) developed femoral arteriovenous fistula, and 1 patient (0.4%) developed pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis. During a mean follow-up of 11.3 ±10.6 months, 3 patients (1.2%) developed pacemaker syndrome, 1 patient (0.4%) developed acute on chronic heart failure exacerbation, and only 1 patient (0.4%) developed LP-related infection requiring LP retrieval. Conclusion: This study suggests that LP implant is feasible and safe post-removal of infected CIED with cumulative adverse events at 4% and a reinfection rate of 0.4%.

Background: While spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) patients can present with ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), the in-hospital outcomes among these patients are not well-established. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the in-hospital outcomes of patients with SCAD and concurrent VAs, and to determine the predictors of VAs occurrence in this population. Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged 18 years or older who had SCAD between 2017 and 2020. We categorized the cohort into two groups depending on the presence of VAs during hospitalization. The in-hospital outcomes were assessed between two groups. Through multivariable analysis, we further analyzed the predictors of VAs occurrence among SCAD patients. Results: Our study included 160 (13.45%) SCAD patients with concurrent VAs and 1,030 (86.55%) SCAD patients without concurrent VAs between 2017 and 2020. SCAD patients with concurrent VA were associated with higher rates of early mortality (11.88% vs. 2.04%, p<0.01), prolonged index hospital stay (≥7 days) (31.25% vs. 12.82%, p<0.01), and non-home discharge (21.88% vs. 6.50%, p<0.01). The length of hospital stay was longer in the SCAD with concurrent VAs group (6.93 days vs. 3.73 days, p<0.01), and the median cumulative cost of hospitalization was also higher in this group ($31,450 vs. $14,664, p<0.01). SCAD with concurrent VAs patients also had poorer in-hospital adverse events. In multivariable analysis, the independent predictors for VAs occurrence among SCAD patients were chronic liver disease (aOR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.15- 4.12, p=0.02) and heart failure (aOR: 3.40; 95%CI: 2.30- 5.02, p<0.01). Conclusion: Ventricular arrhythmias among SCAD patients were associated with poorer in-hospital outcomes. Heart failure and chronic liver disease were the predictors of VAs in SCAD patients. This highlights the importance of closely monitor and aggressive VAs management among these high-risk patients.

Background: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors are at increased risks of cardiovascular disease related death (CVD) compared to the general population. Objective: This study sought to determine the longitudinal trends in mortality attributed to CVD with comorbid NHL by race, sex, and geographic location. Methods: We queried the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database among patients aged 18 and above from 1999 to 2020. Patients were identified when the primary causes of death were ischemic heart diseases (ICD 10 I20-I25), cerebrovascular diseases (I60-I69), or hypertensive disease (I10-I15), and NHL (C82-C85) was a contributing cause of death. We calculated age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 1,000,000 individuals and determined the trends over time by estimating the annual percent change using the Joinpoint regression program. Results: In the 22-year study period, a total of 22,778 CVD with comorbid NHL were identified. Overall, there was a significant decrease in annual trends for the AAMRs of CVD from 6.91 per 1,000,000 individuals in 1999 to 4.12 per 1,000,000 individuals in 2020 (p<0.05), with an annual percent decrease of 3.3. Overall, men recorded a higher AAMRs compared to women (6.76 vs 3.45, p<0.05). When stratified by race, White individuals had the highest AAMRs (5.07), while the AAMRs for American African, Asian, American Indian individuals were 3.01, 2.77, and 2.48 per 1,000,000 individuals respectively. The AAMRs were higher in the rural region than in the urban region (4.97 vs 4.78, p<0.05). Among all consensus regions, South region had the highest AAMRs. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study revealed a significant decrease in cardiovascular disease related deaths with comorbid NHL over the past two decades. It provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of management of comorbid CVD or CVD risk factors in patients with NHL.

Background: While cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis could be significant, data assessing geographical disparities in cardiovascular deaths (CVDs) among patients with sarcoidosis are limited. Objective: This study aims to determine the mortality attributed to CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis in different geographic locations in the United States. Methods: We queried the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database and performed serial cross-sectional analyses of national death certificate data for CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis among patients aged 25 and above. Diseases of the circulatory system (ICD-10 I00-I99) were listed as the underlying cause of death, and sarcoidosis (ICD-10 D86) as contributing cause of death. We calculated age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 1,000,000 individuals and compared the mortality among census regions and states. Results: In the 22-year study period, 5,630 CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis in the United States were identified between 1999 and 2020. The South region had the highest AAMRs for CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis (1.32 [95% CI, 1.26-1.37] per 1,000,000 individuals), followed by Northeast region (1.25 [95% CI, 1.18-1.32] per 1,000,000 individuals), Midwest region (1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.30] per 1,000,000 individuals), and West Region (0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.98] per 1,000,000 individuals). The AAMRs for CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis were between 0.57 [95% CI, 0.43-0.75] per 1,000,000 individuals and 1.96 [95% CI, 1.73-2.19] per 1,000,000 individuals throughout the States, except Maryland and the District of Columbia, which recorded 2.79 [95% CI, 2.44-3.14] and 6.01 [95% CI, 4.44-7.94], respectively. Conclusion: The South region, particularly Maryland recorded the highest CVDs in sarcoidosis. Geographical disparities observed in CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis highlight the need to improve public health measures at state-level.

Background: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem inflammatory disease that could result in debilitating cardiac manifestations. Despites, data on the cardiovascular deaths (CVDs) among patients with sarcoidosis are limited. Objective: This study sought to determine the longitudinal trends in mortality attributed to CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis by age, sex, and race in the United States. Methods: We queried the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database and performed serial cross-sectional analyses of national death certificate data for CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis among patients aged 25 and above. Diseases of the circulatory system (ICD-10 I00-I99) were listed as the underlying cause of death, and sarcoidosis (ICD-10 D86) as contributing cause of death. We calculated age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 1,000,000 individuals and determined the trends over time by estimating the annual percent change using the Joinpoint Regression Program. Results: In the 22-year study period, 5,630 CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis in the United States were identified between 1999 and 2020. The AAMRs from CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis increased from 1.03 (95% CI, 0.88-1.17) in 1999 to 1.38 (95% CI, 1.24-1.52) in 2020. Overall, women recorded a higher AAMRs compared to men (1.25 [95% CI, 1.21-1.30] vs. 1.10 [95% CI, 1.06-1.15]). Black individuals had higher AAMRs than White individuals (5.17 [95% CI, 4.97-5.37] vs. 0.68 [95% CI, 0.66-0.71]). A higher percentage of CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis was seen in the age groups of 55-64 in men (24.68%) and 65-74 in women (22.62%). Conclusion: The CVDs in sarcoidosis have increased over the last two decades, with disparities seen in women and Black individuals. Most CVDs with comorbid sarcoidosis occurred at a younger age compared to general population. This highlights the importance of early screening for cardiovascular diseases in sarcoidosis individuals.

Background: Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) has been increasingly performed. While it is estimated that 42% of adults in the United States are obese, the impact of obesity on VT ablation procedures remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes and 30-day readmission among non-obese and obese patients who underwent catheter ablation of VT. Method: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged 18 years or older who underwent catheter ablation for VT between 2017 and 2020. The study cohort was stratified into non-obese (BMI < 30kg/m 2 ) and obese (BMI ≥ 30kg/m 2 ). The in-hospital procedural outcome and 30-day readmission were analyzed between these groups. Results: Our study included a total of 835 obese patients (19.7%) and 3393 non-obese patients (80.3%). Obese group had a higher rate of prolonged length of stay (>7 days) (37.6% vs 31.2%, p<0.01) and a higher cost of hospitalization ($39 983 vs $37 015, p<0.01). Overall, there were no significant differences in early mortality (4.5% vs 3.8%, p=0.45). Apart from increased vascular complications in the obese group (1.8% vs 0.9%, p=0.03), there were no significant differences in other procedural complications between both groups. There were no significant differences in 30-day readmission rates between obese and non-obese groups (15.5% vs 14.1%, p=0.38). Additional analysis performed in the obese group revealed a non-significant decreasing trend in early mortality rate post-procedurally (5.4% to 4.8%, P trend = 0.66). On multivariable analysis, heart failure was associated with a higher risk of 30-day readmission in obese patients (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.01-3.99; p=0.05). Conclusion: Our study suggests that catheter ablation for VT can be performed relatively safely in obese patients without significant differences in 30-day mortality and readmission outcomes. Patients should not be excluded from VT ablation on the basis of obesity.

Background: Despite the optimal efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT), recurrence of VT can occur post-procedurally. However, data on the high-risk population for VT recurrence and the in-hospital outcomes remain scarce. Objective: This study aimed to determine the predictors of 30-day readmission for recurrent VT after catheter ablation of VT and assess the in-hospital outcomes. Method: Using the all-payer, nationally representative Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified the patients aged ≥18 years who underwent catheter ablation for VT and were readmitted within 30 days because of recurrent VT from 2017 to 2020. We performed unweighted univariable and multivariable analyses to determine the outcomes and to identify the patient and hospital variables that were predictive of 30-day readmissions for recurrent VT. A p-value of <0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: In our analysis, a total of 4,102 patients were discharged alive after VT ablation, of which 278 (6.8%) were readmitted within 30 days for recurrent VT. Recurrent VT was also the most common cause of 30-day readmission (47.7%, n=278/583). Compared to non-recurrent VT readmission, readmission due to recurrent VT had higher mortality during rehospitalization (7.55% vs 3.72%, p<0.01) and higher cumulative hospitalization cost ($57584 vs $37846, p<0.01). Via multivariable analysis, congestive heart failure (aOR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.07-3.17; P=0.03) and non-elective index admissions (aOR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.32-2.68; P<0.01) were the independent predictors of 30-day readmission for recurrent VT. Conclusion: Recurrent VT was the most common cause of 30-day readmission following VT ablation. Congestive heart failure and non-elective index admissions were the independent predictors of 30-day readmissions for recurrent VT. These highlight the importance of further research in ablation strategies to improve the efficacy of VT ablation.