Yang, Eric

Background: While spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) patients can present with ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), the in-hospital outcomes among these patients are not well-established. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the in-hospital outcomes of patients with SCAD and concurrent VAs, and to determine the predictors of VAs occurrence in this population. Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged 18 years or older who had SCAD between 2017 and 2020. We categorized the cohort into two groups depending on the presence of VAs during hospitalization. The in-hospital outcomes were assessed between two groups. Through multivariable analysis, we further analyzed the predictors of VAs occurrence among SCAD patients. Results: Our study included 160 (13.45%) SCAD patients with concurrent VAs and 1,030 (86.55%) SCAD patients without concurrent VAs between 2017 and 2020. SCAD patients with concurrent VA were associated with higher rates of early mortality (11.88% vs. 2.04%, p<0.01), prolonged index hospital stay (≥7 days) (31.25% vs. 12.82%, p<0.01), and non-home discharge (21.88% vs. 6.50%, p<0.01). The length of hospital stay was longer in the SCAD with concurrent VAs group (6.93 days vs. 3.73 days, p<0.01), and the median cumulative cost of hospitalization was also higher in this group ($31,450 vs. $14,664, p<0.01). SCAD with concurrent VAs patients also had poorer in-hospital adverse events. In multivariable analysis, the independent predictors for VAs occurrence among SCAD patients were chronic liver disease (aOR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.15- 4.12, p=0.02) and heart failure (aOR: 3.40; 95%CI: 2.30- 5.02, p<0.01). Conclusion: Ventricular arrhythmias among SCAD patients were associated with poorer in-hospital outcomes. Heart failure and chronic liver disease were the predictors of VAs in SCAD patients. This highlights the importance of closely monitor and aggressive VAs management among these high-risk patients.

Abstract Background Guidelines suggest that the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI) is likely when high concentrations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) are present in the initial sample. These concentration thresholds are much higher than the 99th percentile and are said to provide a high positive predictive value (PPV) for acute MI1. Purpose Evaluate the PPV of recommended baseline hs-cTnT thresholds (&gt;52 and &gt;100 ng/L) for the diagnosis of acute MI from our multi-center United States (US) experience. Methods Retrospective, multicenter (n=22), observational biomarker study involving consecutive, adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) in whom at least 1 hs-cTnT measurement was obtained within 12 hours of presentation (CV DataMart Biomarker cohort). The primary endpoint was also evaluated in an adjudicated cohort of consecutive patients presenting to the ED with at least 1 hs-cTnT &gt;99th percentile (ACTION cohort). These cases were adjudicated based on the Fourth Universal Definition of MI by trained physicians. The primary efficacy endpoint was the PPV of acute MI (type 1 or 2), type 1 MI and type 2 MI during index hospitalization using baseline hs-cTnT thresholds of &gt;52 ng/L and &gt;100 ng/L. Results The CV DataMart Biomarker cohort consisted of 143,709 patients, amongst whom 3,003 (2.1%) were diagnosed with acute MI using ICD codes. In the CV DataMart Biomarker cohort, baseline hs-cTnT concentrations of &gt;52 ng/L and &gt;100 ng/L resulted in PPVs of 12% (95% CI: 11, 12) and 17% (95% CI: 17, 19) for acute MI, respectively. In patients with chest pain and baseline hs-cTnT concentrations &gt;52 ng/L, PPV for acute MI was 17% (95% CI: 15, 18), and in those with hs-cTnT concentrations &gt;100 ng/L, PPV was 22% (95% CI: 19, 25). The adjudicated ACTION cohort consisted of 2,107 patients, amongst whom 155 (7.4%) were diagnosed with acute MI including 64 (41%) with type 1 MI and 91 (59%) with type 2 MI. In the ACTION cohort, baseline hs-cTnT concentrations of &gt;52 ng/L and &gt;100 ng/L resulted in PPVs of 46% (95% CI: 40, 53) and 62% (95% CI: 53, 70) for acute MI, respectively. In patients with chest pain and baseline hs-cTnT concentrations &gt;52 ng/L, PPV was 67% (95% CI: 57, 76) for acute MI, 52% (95% CI: 41, 62) for type 1 MI and 15% (95% CI: 8.4, 24) for type 2 MI. In those with chest pain and baseline hs-cTnT concentrations &gt;100 ng/L, PPV was 77% (95% CI: 65, 87) for acute MI, 64% (95% CI: 51, 75) for type 1 MI and 14% (95% CI 6.4, 24) for type 2 MI (Figure). Conclusion Using previously recommended high-risk hs-cTnT thresholds of 52 and 100 ng/L in US patients provides reasonable performance to rule-in acute MI when used in patients with chest pain. When used more broadly across all-comers, the diagnostic performance is poor.

Background: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices have successfully provided an alternative therapeutic option in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk. However, patients with thrombocytopenia (TP) were underrepresented in the milestone trials, and the optimal strategy of postprocedural antithrombotic therapy in this group of patients remains unclear. Methods: Patients were identified from the National Cardiac Database Registry - LAAO database at all three Mayo Clinic sites in the period from 1/2016-10/2019. Patients were further divided into TP (platelet &lt; 150 x 10^9/L) and control (platelet &gt; 150 x 10^9 /L) groups for clinical outcome analysis. Outcome endpoints include composite of bleeding (GI bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, and other non-intracranial hemorrhage) and composite thrombotic events (device thrombus, ischemic stroke, TIA and undetermined stroke). Results: A total of 249 consecutive patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 76.7 ± 7.2 years, and 169 (67.9%) were male; 242 (97.2%) were white. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 5.3 ±1.5, and the HAS-BLED score was 3.0 ± 1.1. TP at baseline was present in 74 (29.7%) patients. The median follow-up time was 6.8 months. The use of post-procedural antithrombotic regimens was similar between the two groups (Table 1). When comparing the TP group to control, there was no significant difference in composite bleeding events (10.8% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.069) and thrombotic events (2.7% vs. 2.3%, P= 0.170). Conclusions: The presence of baseline TP does not significantly increase post-procedural bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter patients who underwent an LAAO occlusion procedure with the Watchman device (Boston Scientific). This group of patients can be treated with the same antithrombotic regimen as patients with normal platelet levels. Future studies are still warranted to determine the optimal antithrombotic regimen.