Citations

Background New antiamyloid therapies (AAT) for treating patients with early Alzheimer disease (AD) have become available in the past 3 years. Although AAT can be beneficial in slowing progression of AD, they also come with potentially serious side effects, particularly for patients requiring anticoagulation or thrombolysis for cardiovascular conditions. Given that most patients with AD are older and likely to have cardiovascular risk factors, there is urgent need for additional guidance for clinicians about potential risks and benefits associated with AAT for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, best practices for management of these patients, and special considerations with respect to emergency evaluation and treatment of patients on AAT who develop acute neurological symptoms. Methods The American Heart Association convened 75 multidisciplinary experts for the Amyloid‐Related Imaging Abnormalities Summit: Cardiovascular and Stroke Considerations for β‐Amyloid Immunotherapy in AD in July 2025. These experts were divided into 8 work groups to evaluate the current evidence related to AAT usage in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and conditions and develop consensus‐based guidance for clinicians. Results This statement outlines the outcomes of the Summit, including considerations for prescribers, primary care professionals, emergency personnel, and health care system stakeholders. These considerations are intended to improve identification of patients as appropriate candidates for AAT, management of patients with co‐occurring AD and cardiovascular conditions, and their emergency evaluation and treatment. The statement also includes guidance for shared decision‐making, implementation of system changes for improving dementia care, and recommendations for future research and data collection to add to the body of evidence for treating patients with concomitant AD and cardiovascular conditions. Conclusions Building on lessons learned from the establishment of stroke systems of care, the consensus‐based considerations outlined in this document can serve as a foundation for AD systems of care aimed at ensuring optimal use of these ground‐breaking therapies.

Abstract In response to a Cochrane review (published in April 2026) on the clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies targeting beta amyloid, this perspective outlines a number of critiques. The scientists, methodologists, subject‐matter experts, and clinicians on this perspective strongly recommend that the Cochrane editorial board consider a call for editorial response, correction of press materials, or commissioned reply to this review for four overarching reasons: (1) decision to pool antibodies that do and do not clear beta amyloid, (2) decision to include studies from a time when biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease were not available, (3) analytical and methodological limitations of the approach used, (4) conflating the distinct roles and methodological processes of systematic review and guideline methodologies, (5) contextualizing the present critique within the existing evidence‐synthesis literature, and (6) mechanistic inference beyond the scope of the presented analyses. Conclusions that may not accurately reflect treatment‐specific effects could cause significant downstream clinical and psychosocial harm to those currently undergoing treatment and their family members as well as individuals considering participation in Alzheimer's clinical trials.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Although cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers reflect neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD), it remains unclear whether these biomarkers track neurodegeneration in early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD). METHODS In 80 EOAD patients, we examined correlations between eight CSF biomarker levels and cortical thickness decreases within the EOAD cortical atrophy signature. Significant correlations were then entered into a multiple regression analysis. We also examined contributions of EOAD atrophy and CSF biomarkers to cognitive impairment. RESULTS The levels of four CSF biomarkers correlated to EOAD signature atrophy. Stepwise regression analyses revealed that CSF neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels best predicted EOAD signature atrophy. Multiple regression showed EOAD signature atrophy combined with CSF NfL levels explained more variance in cognitive impairment than either factor alone. DISCUSSION Within EOAD patients, CSF NfL levels relate to the magnitude of cortical atrophy, and a combination of EOAD signature atrophy and CSF NfL levels most robustly predict cognitive impairment.

Importance Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used in research and clinical settings to determine the etiology of cognitive decline and eligibility for amyloid-targeting therapies. To assist with amyloid PET evaluation and to guide clinical decision-making, images can be quantified in a standardized unit called Centiloid, the interpretation of which can vary according to the method and threshold used. Objective To collect Centiloid values from available studies and determine robust positivity cutoffs using data-driven methods and correspondence with visual reads. Data Sources PubMed search (October 2024) identified studies with Centiloid values. Corresponding authors were invited to share individual participant data. Additional data were obtained through access-controlled repositories and conference outreach (July 2024-July 2025). Study Selection Studies were included if they provided Centiloids, radiotracer, age, and sex. Data Extraction and Synthesis Each study was analyzed using a unified statistical pipeline; study estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to Centiloid values for each study. In studies with a bimodal distribution (per integrated completed likelihood), single cutoffs for positivity were set as mean plus 2 SDs of the lower gaussian component. Using GMMs, a double-cutoff approach defined a lower certainty range using a 90% posterior probability cutoff for assignment to the low (amyloid-negative) vs high (amyloid-positive) component. An alternative Centiloid cutoff was derived from maximizing the correspondence (Cohen κ) with the binary visual reads when available. Results This meta-analysis included cross-sectional amyloid PET scans acquired with 5 radiotracers from 49 227 participants across 53 studies from 15 countries (mean age, 71 years; 54% female, 62% cognitively impaired). The data-driven GMM approach identified a bimodal distribution in 51 studies (n = 48 786), resulting in a single cutoff for positivity of 18 Centiloids (95% CI,16-19; I 2 = 97%). The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I 2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I 2 = 95%). In analyses of correspondence with binary (positive or negative) visual reads of amyloid PET scans (n = 35 045; 36 studies), Centiloids were highly predictive of visual positivity (Cohen κ, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89; I 2 = 96%) with a cutoff of 27 Centiloids (95% CI, 24-30; I 2 = 80%). Conclusions and Relevance In this individual participant data meta-analysis, positivity cutoffs converged around 18 Centiloids (data-driven) and 27 Centiloids (visual reads). Findings from a double-cutoff analysis suggest that scans in the 11 to 26 Centiloid range should be interpreted with caution depending on the context of use.

Importance In vivo biomarkers for detecting neuropathologies from repetitive head impacts (RHI), including chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), are needed. Objective To evaluate the utility of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217), assess its performance as a beta-amyloid (Aβ) biomarker in participants with RHI exposure at risk for CTE, and explore concordance with CTE neuropathology in a postmortem subsample. Design, Setting, and Participants This longitudinal, multicenter, case-control study used data from the Diagnostics, Imaging, and Genetics Network for the Objective Study and Evaluation of CTE (DIAGNOSE CTE) Research Project, collected from September 2016 to October 2023. Participants were former American football players (case participants) and asymptomatic men unexposed to RHI (control participants). A subsample had available neuropathologic data. Exposures RHI, traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) diagnoses, and levels of CTE certainty. Main Outcomes and Measures Plasma p-tau217 (classified as positive [≥0.63 pg/mL], intermediate [0.40-0.62 pg/mL], and negative [<0.40 pg/mL]), Aβ–positron emission tomography (PET; 18 F-florbetapir; with Aβ-positive defined as a standardized uptake value ratio [SUVR] ≥1.10), and tau-PET ( 18 F-flortaucipir). TES diagnoses were assigned by multidisciplinary consensus conference. Analyses of postmortem brains controlled for age, race, and APOE ε4 status. Results Among 231 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.75 [8.25] years), 177 were former football players (117 professional and 60 college) and 54 were unexposed participants. Former football players had higher baseline mean (SD) p-tau217 concentrations than unexposed participants (0.35 [0.26] pg/mL vs 0.27 [0.14] pg/mL; P = .008), although this was driven by a higher proportion of Aβ-PET–positive participants among former players. Plasma p-tau217 increased over time across the sample (B = 0.207 [95% CI, 0.117-0.298]; P < .001), with no significant time × exposure group interactions. Among football players, p-tau217 showed no time × group interactions with TES diagnosis, TES-CTE certainty, or RHI metrics. Higher p-tau217 concentration correlated with higher global Aβ-PET SUVR (B = 0.058 [95% CI, 0.053-3.501; P = .01), with a few discordant cases (5 participants were p-tau217–negative and Aβ-PET–positive; 7 participants were p-tau217–positive and Aβ-PET–negative). P-tau217 had similar areas under the curve for projecting Aβ-PET positivity as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau181/Aβ42 and CSF Aβ40/42 measures (p-tau217: AUC, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.80-0.96]; CSF p-tau181/Aβ42: AUC, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-1.00]; CSF Aβ40/42: AUC, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.72-0.98]). Among 9 brain donors, 6 had CTE (stages II-IV; none with Alzheimer disease). Seven had negative or intermediate p-tau217, concordant with Aβ-PET. Two p-tau217 outliers with stage III CTE had normal concentrations upon additional testing. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that plasma p-tau217 concentration is unlikely to be useful for the detection of CTE, but it does show utility for ruling out Aβ pathology in participants at risk for CTE.

Background Motor disturbances are common in neurologic and neurodegenerative syndromes. A standard motor speed and dexterity measure is the finger tapping test (FTT). The FTT has traditionally been administered in clinic using a mechanical FTT, limiting accessibility and early motor change quantification. This study assessed the validity of a smartphone app-based FTT, which may expand access and enable more frequent testing. Methods The cohort was diagnostically diverse, including participants with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome, primary progressive aphasia, multiple sclerosis, and clinically unimpaired controls. Participants completed a 20-second ALLFTD Mobile App (mApp)-FTT with each hand. Tapping speed metrics were extracted. Participants completed the gold-standard mechanical FTT, a neurologist-administered finger tapping exam, the PSP Rating Scale (PSPRS) and the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). Correlations assessed mApp-FTT and mechanical FTT relationships; regressions evaluated associations with neurologist-rated finger tapping impairment, PSPRS and UPDRS, adjusting for age and sex. Results The mApp-FTT showed moderate-to-strong correlations with the mechanical FTT (dominant: r=0.63, p<0.001; non-dominant: r=0.55, p<0.001). Taps per second were associated with PSPRS motor severity (dominant hand: std. β=-0.59, 95% CI [-0.91, -0.27], p<0.001) and the UPDRS (dominant hand: std. β=-0.41, 95% CI [-0.82, 0.00], p=0.049). Flight time was modestly associated with neurologist-rated finger tapping impairment (dominant hand: std. β=0.15, 95% CI [0.00, 0.29], p=0.044). Conclusion These findings support mApp-FTT validity as a measure of motor function across neurodegenerative conditions. Validation in longitudinal and unsupervised remote settings is warranted to understand scalability and evaluate change over time.

Abstract The standard approach to quantify amyloid (Aβ) PET averages uptake within a single cortical mask that assumes no clinically relevant spatial heterogeneity in uptake patterns. Here, in a sample of 12,379 clinically impaired participants taken from four phenotypically diverse cohorts we use data-driven approaches to discover heterogeneous patterns of Aβ-PET binding, uncovering a reproducible and clinically relevant pattern of posterior predominant Aβ-PET binding. In particular, Aβ-PET positive participants who have posterior predominant binding are less likely to be APOE -ε4 carriers, more severely impaired, have thinner cortex in posterior regions, and greater posterior tau PET burden. Furthermore, in a subsample of participants with neuropathological assessment, participants with posterior predominant Aβ binding have a higher likelihood of having cerebral amyloid angiopathy at autopsy. These findings suggest that Aβ-PET accumulates along two orthogonal axes with biological and clinical relevance, indicating that the standard approach to assess Aβ-PET is insufficient to capture meaningful signal from Aβ-PET imaging. This work has implications for the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and extends our understanding of the mechanisms governing variable Aβ-PET distribution and its downstream effects.

Abstract Patients with atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease (AD) often present at a younger age with predominantly non‐amnestic impairments and a more aggressive disease course. Historically, individuals with atypical presentations have not been included in large‐scale clinical trials, which typically focus on late‐onset, sporadic amnestic‐predominant AD. Consequently, treatment options and research efforts specific to atypical AD remain limited. The emergence of amyloid‐targeting therapies that slow disease progression underscores these challenges, as evidence supporting their efficacy in early‐onset amnestic and non‐amnestic AD variants is scarce. This perspective article argues that atypical AD represents an excellent disease model for clinical trials and proposes strategies to address critical gaps in clinical trial design for this population. Key considerations include optimizing participant selection approaches, establishing syndrome‐specific or surrogate biological and clinical endpoints, and fostering advocacy to enhance early and accurate diagnosis, equitable representation, and outcomes for these populations.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Research into cognitive dispersion – a cognitive process score measuring the intra‐individual variability (IIV) across a single testing session – suggests utility in neurodegenerative populations. Given widespread deficits observed in sporadic early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD), however, it is unclear if examining cognitive dispersion shows benefit in this condition. METHODS A total of 309 participants (188 amyloid‐positive EOAD, 43 amyloid‐negative early‐onset dementia [EOnonAD], 78 cognitively normal [CN]) completed neuropsychological testing twice over 12 months. Dispersion‐related differences among groups were assessed, as was cognitive dispersion's capacity to predict domain‐specific cognitive trajectories, and its convergence with imaging biomarkers. RESULTS EOAD participants displayed higher cognitive dispersion than EOnonAD participants, and associations with EOAD‐specific biomarkers. Additionally, cognitive dispersion was associated with 12‐month reliable change across several cognitive domains. DISCUSSION These preliminary results examine cognitive dispersion in sporadic EOAD. When used with baseline cognitive performance, cognitive dispersion measures may enrich future clinical trials in EOAD by enhancing treatment monitoring over time.