Back to Authors

Whitwell, J R

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Citations 2

Diffusion MRI Is More Sensitive Than Tau PET and Regional Volume Loss in Corticobasal Syndrome
Tian, Yuqi , Lowe, Val J. , Josephs, Keith A, Whitwell, J R, Satoh, Ryota , Josephs, Keith A. , Whitwell, Jennifer L.

No container title available | July 27, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.07.24.26358494 Get It

Abstract Background Corticobasal syndrome (CBS) is a neurodegenerative syndrome that often results from a 4-repeat tauopathy. Abnormalities on tau PET, structural MRI, and diffusion MRI (dMRI) have been observed in CBS, although no prior work has systematically compared the relative sensitivity of these modalities. In addition, the relationships between tau uptake, volume loss, and white matter degeneration remain incompletely understood. Objective To compare the sensitivity of tau PET, structural volume, and dMRI metrics to differentiate CBS from controls, and to characterize relationships between regional tau uptake, volume loss, and white matter tract abnormalities. Methods Thirty-two participants meeting criteria for possible or probable CBS and 35 healthy controls underwent standardized 3T dMRI, 18 F-flortaucipir tau PET, and detailed neurologic assessment. Diffusion data were processed using complementary diffusion tensor, free-water, and Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) pipelines, with tract-level metrics extracted using the Johns Hopkins University-Eve (JHU EVE) White Matter atlas. Regional gray matter volumes and flortaucipir standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were calculated. Global tau PET uptake, represented by the first principal component (PC1), was removed in a secondary tau analysis. Modality-level discrimination was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) analyses. Cross-modality relationships were evaluated using regional correlations and covariate-adjusted models comparing volume- and tau-related predictors of white matter abnormalities. Results Relative to controls, CBS showed widespread higher mean diffusivity (MD) and lower intracellular volume fraction (ICVF), especially in sensorimotor and projection white matter pathways. Structural volume reductions were most prominent in precentral cortex and subcortical regions including putamen, thalamus, and pallidum, whereas tau PET abnormalities were weaker and less spatially extensive. MD showed the strongest overall discrimination between CBS and controls, followed by ICVF, structural volume, PC1-removed tau PET, and original tau PET. In targeted sensorimotor analyses, higher DTI-MD was most strongly associated with lower gray matter volume. PC1-removed sensorimotor tau uptake was also associated with higher sensorimotor DTI-MD, whereas original tau uptake and broader cortical or subcortical tau measures were not significant predictors. Conclusions White matter microstructural disruption is a dominant imaging signature of CBS and is more closely linked to gray matter volume loss than to measurable uptake on tau PET. dMRI, particularly MD and ICVF, may provide greatest sensitivity for detecting disease-related changes in CBS.
Improving the clinical trial landscape for patients with atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease: a call to action
Graff‐Radford, Jonathan, Boon, Baayla D. C., Westman, Eric, Groot, Colin, Jones, David T., Grinberg, Lea T., Rabinovici, Gil D., Whitwell, J R, Apostolova, L G, Mj, Murray, Hammers, Dustin B., Schindler, Suzanne E., Atonsdottir, Inga, Schott, J J, Illán‐Gala, Ignacio, Chukwuanugo, Ogbuagu, Guerra, Jorge J. Llibre, Peters, Ruth, Abner, Erin L., Abdelnour, Carla , A, Cortes Llado, Joie, Renaud La, Souza, Leonardo Cruz de, Shir, Dror , Pijenburg, Yolande A. L., Carrillo, Maria C., Dickerson, Bradford C, Aisen, P, Ossenkoppele, Rik, Raman, Rema, Joie, Renaud La , Corriveau-Lecavalier, Nick , La Joie, Renaud , Shir, Dror , Corriveau‐Lecavalier, Nick , Falgàs, Neus , Putcha, Deepti , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Yong, Keir , Boon, Baayla D.C. , Mohanty, Rosaleena , Westman, Eric , Groot, Colin , Jones, David T. , Grinberg, Lea T. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Hammers, Dustin B , Schindler, Suzanne E. , Rhodus, Elizabeth K. , Illán‐Gala, Ignacio , OGBUAGU, CHUKWUANUGO, Abner, Erin L. , Souza, Leonardo Cruz de , Rezaii, Neguine , Carrillo, María C. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Aisen, Paul , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Raman, Rema

Alzheimer's & Dementia | June 23, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71521 Get It

Abstract Patients with atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease (AD) often present at a younger age with predominantly non‐amnestic impairments and a more aggressive disease course. Historically, individuals with atypical presentations have not been included in large‐scale clinical trials, which typically focus on late‐onset, sporadic amnestic‐predominant AD. Consequently, treatment options and research efforts specific to atypical AD remain limited. The emergence of amyloid‐targeting therapies that slow disease progression underscores these challenges, as evidence supporting their efficacy in early‐onset amnestic and non‐amnestic AD variants is scarce. This perspective article argues that atypical AD represents an excellent disease model for clinical trials and proposes strategies to address critical gaps in clinical trial design for this population. Key considerations include optimizing participant selection approaches, establishing syndrome‐specific or surrogate biological and clinical endpoints, and fostering advocacy to enhance early and accurate diagnosis, equitable representation, and outcomes for these populations.