Rezaii, Neguine

Introduction: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a devastating disease that commonly results in early onset dementia, yet its rarity and heterogeneity limit large-scale research and clinical trials. Remote monitoring via low-burden digital health tools may overcome these barriers. We evaluated clinical utility of passive smartphone monitoring in FTLD using a multi-domain mobile assessment platform. Methods: Participants were 567 adults (53% clinically normal, 21% prodromal FTLD, 26% symptomatic FTLD) who completed an in-person study visit and downloaded the ALLFTD Mobile App on their personal smartphones. The app delivered unsupervised cognitive tests and passively collected continuous data on battery percentage (proxy for smartphone use) and step count. Longitudinal follow-up included smartphone monitoring and annual in-person study visits. Primary analyses examined associations between passive smartphone features and markers of disease severity at baseline and longitudinally, and tested whether passive features added incremental value beyond app-based cognitive testing. Results: Passive smartphone features were feasible to collect and showed excellent reliability with <2 weeks of monitoring (ICCs>0.9). Features capturing smartphone use and movement demonstrated sensitivity to gold-standard clinical measures of disease severity both at baseline and longitudinally. A classification model combining passive features, the app-based cognitive composite score, and demographics detected longitudinal functional decline (AUC=0.89); passive features alone (AUC=0.84) performed comparably to a cognitive screener (AUC=0.85). Discussion: Passive smartphone monitoring is a valid, zero-burden measure of disease severity and progression in FTLD that adds modest incremental value beyond app-based cognitive testing. Findings support its use as a scalable digital endpoint in longitudinal FTLD research.

Abstract Patients with atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease (AD) often present at a younger age with predominantly non‐amnestic impairments and a more aggressive disease course. Historically, individuals with atypical presentations have not been included in large‐scale clinical trials, which typically focus on late‐onset, sporadic amnestic‐predominant AD. Consequently, treatment options and research efforts specific to atypical AD remain limited. The emergence of amyloid‐targeting therapies that slow disease progression underscores these challenges, as evidence supporting their efficacy in early‐onset amnestic and non‐amnestic AD variants is scarce. This perspective article argues that atypical AD represents an excellent disease model for clinical trials and proposes strategies to address critical gaps in clinical trial design for this population. Key considerations include optimizing participant selection approaches, establishing syndrome‐specific or surrogate biological and clinical endpoints, and fostering advocacy to enhance early and accurate diagnosis, equitable representation, and outcomes for these populations.

Aim Cognitive and behavioral phenomena define behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), but neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) outside the core criteria are common throughout the illness. Identifying how NPS cluster in bvFTD may guide development of future therapies. Methods Participants ( n = 354) with sporadic and genetic bvFTD were enrolled in the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Consortium. Dementia stage was defined as early (CDR® plus NACC FTLD ≤1) or advanced (CDR® plus NACC FTLD ≥1). Baseline and annual follow‐up visit data were analyzed to compare NPS across stages of bvFTD. Psychiatric states were captured using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory‐Questionnaire and Clinician Judgment of Symptoms. Polychoric cluster analysis was used to describe NPS clusters. Results NPS were highly prevalent (≥90%) in early and late bvFTD. Four NPS clusters were identified based on magnitude of factor loadings: affective, disinhibited, compulsive, and psychosis. Neuropsychiatric symptoms fluctuated across visits. In the affective cluster, depression showed the least visit‐to‐visit stability. In the disinhibited cluster, elation showed the least stability. Symptoms in the psychosis and compulsive clusters (hallucinations, delusions, obsessions/compulsions, and hyperorality) were largely stable, persisting from visit‐to‐visit in more than 50% of cases. Symptoms in the affective and disinhibited cluster were associated with the highest caregiver burden, while symptoms in the obsessive cluster were associated with the most functional impairment. Conclusion NPS in bvFTD are frequent and cluster into four discrete groups. The fluctuating nature of some NPS in bvFTD suggests that they may not be reliable markers of disease progression or stage.