Pezzoli, Stefania

Abstract The standard approach to quantify amyloid (Aβ) PET averages uptake within a single cortical mask that assumes no clinically relevant spatial heterogeneity in uptake patterns. Here, in a sample of 12,379 clinically impaired participants taken from four phenotypically diverse cohorts we use data-driven approaches to discover heterogeneous patterns of Aβ-PET binding, uncovering a reproducible and clinically relevant pattern of posterior predominant Aβ-PET binding. In particular, Aβ-PET positive participants who have posterior predominant binding are less likely to be APOE -ε4 carriers, more severely impaired, have thinner cortex in posterior regions, and greater posterior tau PET burden. Furthermore, in a subsample of participants with neuropathological assessment, participants with posterior predominant Aβ binding have a higher likelihood of having cerebral amyloid angiopathy at autopsy. These findings suggest that Aβ-PET accumulates along two orthogonal axes with biological and clinical relevance, indicating that the standard approach to assess Aβ-PET is insufficient to capture meaningful signal from Aβ-PET imaging. This work has implications for the diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and extends our understanding of the mechanisms governing variable Aβ-PET distribution and its downstream effects.

Abstract INTRODUCTION In multicenter Alzheimer's disease studies, amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) visual reads are typically performed centrally by a few experts. Incorporating a broader reader network enhances scalability and generalizability. METHODS Ten neuroimaging experts from eight Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs) visually read 180 amyloid PET scans (30 scans and 15 duplicate scans for each of four tracers, imaged across a wide variety of scanners), using preferred reading software without anatomical imaging or quantitation. Scans were classified as elevated or non‐elevated per tracer‐specific criteria. Inter‐ and intra‐rater agreement was assessed. RESULTS Inter‐rater agreement was substantial (Fleiss’ κ = 0.78), with full consensus on 69% of scans. Inter‐rater reliability was substantial to perfect across tracers (Fleiss’ κ = 0.70–0.87). Intra‐rater agreement was substantial to perfect (Cohen's κ = 0.79‐1). Scans with intermediate (10–40 Centiloid) quantitation had lower reader agreement. DISCUSSION A multicenter expert network achieved substantial agreement classifying amyloid PET scans. These scans provide a standard for reader training and reliability assurance in future studies. Highlights Calibration methods ensure reliable amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) visual reads across multiple raters. Substantial agreement is possible across readers using their preferred tools. Agreement is also substantial regardless of the amyloid PET tracer used. Scans with intermediate (10–40 Centiloid) quantitation have lower reader agreement. The calibration set will become a training tool for amyloid PET visual read studies.

AbstractBackgroundThe association between [18F]Flortaucipir (FTP) and [18F]MK6240, two commonly used tau‐PET tracers in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), varies due to distinct binding properties and off‐target signal regions. Our study aims to elucidate the biological factors influencing this association and evaluate the applicability of a common equation across different on‐target regions.Method113 individuals from the HEAD dataset (11 young, 58 cognitively unimpaired elderly, and 44 cognitively impaired) underwent [18F]MK6240, [18F]FTP and Aβ‐PET scans. Images were processed using the inferior cerebellar grey (CG) as the reference region, with subjects categorized by Aβ status. Stepwise linear fitting identified off‐target (OFF) regions impacting tracer associations within the whole cortex, Braak and temporal‐meta regions of interest (ROIs). OFF regions included were a composite mask (pallidum, putamen, caudate ‐ PPC) to address collinearity in subcortical nuclei, as well as the region with the greatest partial volume effects (PVE) on the ROI (meninges, choroid plexus, and the hotspot medial to entorhinal cortices (EC)). Akaike information criteria (AIC) analyses tested linear models with various off‐target regions.ResultPPC and PVE regions influenced tracer association in on‐target regions. PPC binding is associated with age. PPC and meninges retention, along with Aβ status interaction, demonstrated the best model fit for the whole cortex (Figure 1). Weighting factors derived from the whole cortex model were applied to Braak regions and temporal meta‐ROI. Braak III‐VI and temporal‐meta ROI showed optimal models including OFF regions and Aβ status interaction (Figure 2). Forcing the whole equation gave optimal results. For Braak I (EC), adding the OFF covariates only was the best model. For Braak II (hippocampus), the best model included OFF regions and the interaction with Aβ status (Figure 2). Forcing the whole cortex equation onto Braak I and Braak II yielded suboptimal fits.ConclusionHarmonizing tau‐PET tracers involves considering significant covariates. Integrating meningeal and age‐related off‐target regions enhances [18F]MK6240 and [18F]FTP association in on‐target regions, further improved by Aβ status inclusion. While the whole cortex model may not suit early ROI, it proves effective for Braak III and beyond. Creating an equation for tracer translation necessitates incorporating meningeal and subnuclei off‐target retention.

AbstractBackgroundThe association between [18F]Flortaucipir (FTP) and [18F]MK6240, two commonly used tau‐PET tracers in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), varies due to distinct binding properties and off‐target signal regions. Our study aims to elucidate the biological factors influencing this association and evaluate the applicability of a common equation across different on‐target regions.Method113 individuals from the HEAD dataset (11 young, 58 cognitively unimpaired elderly, and 44 cognitively impaired) underwent [18F]MK6240, [18F]FTP and Aß‐PET scans. Images were processed using the inferior cerebellar grey (CG) as the reference region, with subjects categorized by Aß status. Stepwise linear fitting identified off‐target (OFF) regions impacting tracer associations within the whole cortex, Braak and temporal‐meta regions of interest (ROIs). OFF regions included were a composite mask (pallidum, putamen, caudate ‐ PPC) to address collinearity in subcortical nuclei, as well as the region with the greatest partial volume effects (PVE) on the ROI (meninges, choroid plexus, and the hotspot medial to entorhinal cortices (EC)). Akaike information criteria (AIC) analyses tested linear models with various off‐target regions.ResultPPC and PVE regions influenced tracer association in on‐target regions. PPC binding is associated with age. PPC and meninges retention, along with Aß status interaction, demonstrated the best model fit for the whole cortex (Figure 1). Weighting factors derived from the whole cortex model were applied to Braak regions and temporal meta‐ROI. Braak III‐VI and temporal‐meta ROI showed optimal models including OFF regions and Aß status interaction (Figure 2). Forcing the whole equation gave optimal results. For Braak I (EC), adding the OFF covariates only was the best model. For Braak II (hippocampus), the best model included OFF regions and the interaction with Aß status (Figure 2). Forcing the whole cortex equation onto Braak I and Braak II yielded suboptimal fits.ConclusionHarmonizing tau‐PET tracers involves considering significant covariates. Integrating meningeal and age‐related off‐target regions enhances [18F]MK6240 and [18F]FTP association in on‐target regions, further improved by Aß status inclusion. While the whole cortex model may not suit early ROI, it proves effective for Braak III and beyond. Creating an equation for tracer translation necessitates incorporating meningeal and subnuclei off‐target retention.