Ziontz, Jacob

Abstract Background Tau‐PET tracers are essential for visualizing pathology in Alzheimer's (AD). High detectability to tau is crucial for early detection and monitoring of tau deposition. This study compares the noise to dynamic range ratio (NRR) of [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]MK6240, [ 18 F]PI2620, and [ 18 F]RO948, cross‐sectionally and longitudinally. Methods 460 individuals from the HEAD study (23 cognitively unimpaired (CU) young, 249 CU old and 188 cognitively impaired) underwent [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 tau‐PET scans; 94 additionally received [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948. A subset of 28 individuals (15 CU and 13 CI) underwent [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 follow‐up scans (1.5 ± 0.1 years later). Annual change was measured as [(followup‐baseline)/time between scans]. Noise was calculated as the standard deviation (SD) of CU Aβ‐ participants aged ≤65 (SD CUAβ‐≤65 ). The dynamic range was calculated as the SD across all subjects (SD range ). A lower the NRR (=SD CUAβ‐≤65 /SD range ) indicates more detectability. Analyses were performed at both region‐of‐interest and voxel‐wise levels. Results Across the whole cohort, [ 18 F]MK6240 exhibited lower NRR than [ 18 F]FTP in all regions. Voxel‐wise, differences were most pronounced in the frontal medial temporal regions (Figure 1). Within the four‐tracers subset, [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]FTP showed the highest NRR in Braak II, followed by [ 18 F]RO948 and [ 18 F]MK6240. In Braak IV‐VI, [ 18 F]MK6240 consistently demonstrated the lowest values, followed by [ 18 F]PI2620, [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]RO948. Similarly, in metatemporal‐ROI and Braak III, [ 18 F]MK6240 remained the lowest, however followed by [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948 (Figure 2). Lower [ 18 F]MK6240 NRR was due to larger SD range , while [ 18 F]FTP's lower values stemmed from smaller SD CUAβ‐≤65 . Conversely, high [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948 values are driven by larger SD CUAβ‐≤65 . Longitudinal analyses further confirmed that [ 18 F]MK6240 exhibited the lowest NRR across the entire brain, including AD‐related regions, with voxel‐wise differences mainly in the temporal and parietal lobes. Conclusion Tau‐PET tracers exhibit significant variability in detectability. [ 18 F]MK6240 consistently demonstrated lower NRR, implying better detectability across all regions, cross‐sectionally and longitudinally. Despite differences in NRR, [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]RO948 and [ 18 F]PI2620 followed similar pattern. These results provide insights into the differential tracer detectability, helping guide their optimal use in detecting and tracking tau pathology. Ongoing follow‐up scans will further clarify longitudinal tracer detectability and its implications for tau progression in AD.

Abstract Background Tau‐PET tracers are essential for visualizing pathology in Alzheimer’s (AD). High detectability to tau is crucial for early detection and monitoring of tau deposition. This study compares the noise to dynamic range ratio (NRR) of [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]MK6240, [ 18 F]PI2620, and [ 18 F]RO948, cross‐sectionally and longitudinally. Methods 460 individuals from the HEAD study (23 cognitively unimpaired (CU) young, 249 CU old and 188 cognitively impaired) underwent [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 tau‐PET scans; 94 additionally received [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948. A subset of 28 individuals (15 CU and 13 CI) underwent [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]MK6240 follow‐up scans (1.5 ± 0.1 years later). Annual change was measured as [(followup‐baseline)/time between scans]. Noise was calculated as the standard deviation (SD) of CU Aβ‐ participants aged ≤65 (SD CUAβ‐≤65 ). The dynamic range was calculated as the SD across all subjects (SD range ). A lower the NRR (=SD CUAβ‐≤65 /SD range ) indicates more detectability. Analyses were performed at both region‐of‐interest and voxel‐wise levels. Results Across the whole cohort, [ 18 F]MK6240 exhibited lower NRR than [ 18 F]FTP in all regions. Voxel‐wise, differences were most pronounced in the frontal medial temporal regions (Figure 1). Within the four‐tracers subset, [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]FTP showed the highest NRR in Braak II, followed by [ 18 F]RO948 and [ 18 F]MK6240. In Braak IV‐VI, [ 18 F]MK6240 consistently demonstrated the lowest values, followed by [ 18 F]PI2620, [ 18 F]FTP and [ 18 F]RO948. Similarly, in metatemporal‐ROI and Braak III, [ 18 F]MK6240 remained the lowest, however followed by [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948 (Figure 2). Lower [ 18 F]MK6240 NRR was due to larger SD range , while [ 18 F]FTP's lower values stemmed from smaller SD CUAβ‐≤65 . Conversely, high [ 18 F]PI2620 and [ 18 F]RO948 values are driven by larger SD CUAβ‐≤65 . Longitudinal analyses further confirmed that [ 18 F]MK6240 exhibited the lowest NRR across the entire brain, including AD‐related regions, with voxel‐wise differences mainly in the temporal and parietal lobes. Conclusion Tau‐PET tracers exhibit significant variability in detectability. [ 18 F]MK6240 consistently demonstrated lower NRR, implying better detectability across all regions, cross‐sectionally and longitudinally. Despite differences in NRR, [ 18 F]FTP, [ 18 F]RO948 and [ 18 F]PI2620 followed similar pattern. These results provide insights into the differential tracer detectability, helping guide their optimal use in detecting and tracking tau pathology. Ongoing follow‐up scans will further clarify longitudinal tracer detectability and its implications for tau progression in AD.

AbstractBackgroundThe association between [18F]Flortaucipir (FTP) and [18F]MK6240, two commonly used tau‐PET tracers in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), varies due to distinct binding properties and off‐target signal regions. Our study aims to elucidate the biological factors influencing this association and evaluate the applicability of a common equation across different on‐target regions.Method113 individuals from the HEAD dataset (11 young, 58 cognitively unimpaired elderly, and 44 cognitively impaired) underwent [18F]MK6240, [18F]FTP and Aβ‐PET scans. Images were processed using the inferior cerebellar grey (CG) as the reference region, with subjects categorized by Aβ status. Stepwise linear fitting identified off‐target (OFF) regions impacting tracer associations within the whole cortex, Braak and temporal‐meta regions of interest (ROIs). OFF regions included were a composite mask (pallidum, putamen, caudate ‐ PPC) to address collinearity in subcortical nuclei, as well as the region with the greatest partial volume effects (PVE) on the ROI (meninges, choroid plexus, and the hotspot medial to entorhinal cortices (EC)). Akaike information criteria (AIC) analyses tested linear models with various off‐target regions.ResultPPC and PVE regions influenced tracer association in on‐target regions. PPC binding is associated with age. PPC and meninges retention, along with Aβ status interaction, demonstrated the best model fit for the whole cortex (Figure 1). Weighting factors derived from the whole cortex model were applied to Braak regions and temporal meta‐ROI. Braak III‐VI and temporal‐meta ROI showed optimal models including OFF regions and Aβ status interaction (Figure 2). Forcing the whole equation gave optimal results. For Braak I (EC), adding the OFF covariates only was the best model. For Braak II (hippocampus), the best model included OFF regions and the interaction with Aβ status (Figure 2). Forcing the whole cortex equation onto Braak I and Braak II yielded suboptimal fits.ConclusionHarmonizing tau‐PET tracers involves considering significant covariates. Integrating meningeal and age‐related off‐target regions enhances [18F]MK6240 and [18F]FTP association in on‐target regions, further improved by Aβ status inclusion. While the whole cortex model may not suit early ROI, it proves effective for Braak III and beyond. Creating an equation for tracer translation necessitates incorporating meningeal and subnuclei off‐target retention.

AbstractBackgroundThe association between [18F]Flortaucipir (FTP) and [18F]MK6240, two commonly used tau‐PET tracers in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), varies due to distinct binding properties and off‐target signal regions. Our study aims to elucidate the biological factors influencing this association and evaluate the applicability of a common equation across different on‐target regions.Method113 individuals from the HEAD dataset (11 young, 58 cognitively unimpaired elderly, and 44 cognitively impaired) underwent [18F]MK6240, [18F]FTP and Aß‐PET scans. Images were processed using the inferior cerebellar grey (CG) as the reference region, with subjects categorized by Aß status. Stepwise linear fitting identified off‐target (OFF) regions impacting tracer associations within the whole cortex, Braak and temporal‐meta regions of interest (ROIs). OFF regions included were a composite mask (pallidum, putamen, caudate ‐ PPC) to address collinearity in subcortical nuclei, as well as the region with the greatest partial volume effects (PVE) on the ROI (meninges, choroid plexus, and the hotspot medial to entorhinal cortices (EC)). Akaike information criteria (AIC) analyses tested linear models with various off‐target regions.ResultPPC and PVE regions influenced tracer association in on‐target regions. PPC binding is associated with age. PPC and meninges retention, along with Aß status interaction, demonstrated the best model fit for the whole cortex (Figure 1). Weighting factors derived from the whole cortex model were applied to Braak regions and temporal meta‐ROI. Braak III‐VI and temporal‐meta ROI showed optimal models including OFF regions and Aß status interaction (Figure 2). Forcing the whole equation gave optimal results. For Braak I (EC), adding the OFF covariates only was the best model. For Braak II (hippocampus), the best model included OFF regions and the interaction with Aß status (Figure 2). Forcing the whole cortex equation onto Braak I and Braak II yielded suboptimal fits.ConclusionHarmonizing tau‐PET tracers involves considering significant covariates. Integrating meningeal and age‐related off‐target regions enhances [18F]MK6240 and [18F]FTP association in on‐target regions, further improved by Aß status inclusion. While the whole cortex model may not suit early ROI, it proves effective for Braak III and beyond. Creating an equation for tracer translation necessitates incorporating meningeal and subnuclei off‐target retention.