Grinberg, Lea Tenenholz

Abstract In response to a Cochrane review (published in April 2026) on the clinical trials of monoclonal antibodies targeting beta amyloid, this perspective outlines a number of critiques. The scientists, methodologists, subject‐matter experts, and clinicians on this perspective strongly recommend that the Cochrane editorial board consider a call for editorial response, correction of press materials, or commissioned reply to this review for four overarching reasons: (1) decision to pool antibodies that do and do not clear beta amyloid, (2) decision to include studies from a time when biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease were not available, (3) analytical and methodological limitations of the approach used, (4) conflating the distinct roles and methodological processes of systematic review and guideline methodologies, (5) contextualizing the present critique within the existing evidence‐synthesis literature, and (6) mechanistic inference beyond the scope of the presented analyses. Conclusions that may not accurately reflect treatment‐specific effects could cause significant downstream clinical and psychosocial harm to those currently undergoing treatment and their family members as well as individuals considering participation in Alzheimer's clinical trials.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Sex differences in dementia‐related neuropathology are understudied in diverse populations. METHODS We analyzed sex differences in neuropathological and cognitive data from the Brazilian Biobank for Aging Studies. Cognitive performance was evaluated with the Clinical Dementia Rating–Sum of Boxes (CDR‐SOB). Linear and logistic regression models were conducted, including interaction terms for age, race, and education. RESULTS In 2229 participants (50.7% female, mean age ± SD 75.4 ± 12.3 years, 62.1% White), female sex was associated with a higher odds of AD pathology (Braak: odds ratio [OR] = 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17–1.72; Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD): OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.27–1.98), and trans‐activation response (TAR) DNA‐binding protein 43 (TDP‐43) (OR = 1.77, IC 95% = 1.22–2.59), and lower odds of Lewy body disease (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.51–0.95). Female participant had worse cognitive performance ( β = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.03–2.10). Sex modified associations of Braak, CERAD, TDP‐43, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy with cognition. Age also interacted with sex and pathology on CDR‐SOB. DISCUSSION Sex differences in the associations between sex and neuropathology suggest the need for sex‐informed dementia research.

Abstract Neuromodulatory subcortical systems (NSSs) are uniquely susceptible to dementia‐related pathology, leading to frequent molecular and behavioral impairments associated with altered function of these nuclei. Some of these systems display clear sex‐specific cytoarchitecture and signaling leading to distinct physiology and behavioral outputs in males and females, while other regions display nominal sex differences. However, the relevance of sex differences in modulating dysfunction of NSSs in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias is not well understood. This review is a joint effort by the Neuromodulatory Subcortical Systems and Sex and Gender Differences in Alzheimer's Disease Professional Interest Areas of the Alzheimer's Association. We review sex differences in NSSs, both in non‐disease states and in AD models and patients. We highlight the possible role of NSSs in driving sex‐specific AD susceptibility and potential footholds for sex‐based interventions targeting these systems. We conclude by outlining immediate and long‐term actions to address the intersection of NSSs, sex, and AD.