Trujillo‐Rodriguez, Diana

Importance In vivo biomarkers for detecting neuropathologies from repetitive head impacts (RHI), including chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), are needed. Objective To evaluate the utility of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217), assess its performance as a beta-amyloid (Aβ) biomarker in participants with RHI exposure at risk for CTE, and explore concordance with CTE neuropathology in a postmortem subsample. Design, Setting, and Participants This longitudinal, multicenter, case-control study used data from the Diagnostics, Imaging, and Genetics Network for the Objective Study and Evaluation of CTE (DIAGNOSE CTE) Research Project, collected from September 2016 to October 2023. Participants were former American football players (case participants) and asymptomatic men unexposed to RHI (control participants). A subsample had available neuropathologic data. Exposures RHI, traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) diagnoses, and levels of CTE certainty. Main Outcomes and Measures Plasma p-tau217 (classified as positive [≥0.63 pg/mL], intermediate [0.40-0.62 pg/mL], and negative [<0.40 pg/mL]), Aβ–positron emission tomography (PET; 18 F-florbetapir; with Aβ-positive defined as a standardized uptake value ratio [SUVR] ≥1.10), and tau-PET ( 18 F-flortaucipir). TES diagnoses were assigned by multidisciplinary consensus conference. Analyses of postmortem brains controlled for age, race, and APOE ε4 status. Results Among 231 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.75 [8.25] years), 177 were former football players (117 professional and 60 college) and 54 were unexposed participants. Former football players had higher baseline mean (SD) p-tau217 concentrations than unexposed participants (0.35 [0.26] pg/mL vs 0.27 [0.14] pg/mL; P = .008), although this was driven by a higher proportion of Aβ-PET–positive participants among former players. Plasma p-tau217 increased over time across the sample (B = 0.207 [95% CI, 0.117-0.298]; P < .001), with no significant time × exposure group interactions. Among football players, p-tau217 showed no time × group interactions with TES diagnosis, TES-CTE certainty, or RHI metrics. Higher p-tau217 concentration correlated with higher global Aβ-PET SUVR (B = 0.058 [95% CI, 0.053-3.501; P = .01), with a few discordant cases (5 participants were p-tau217–negative and Aβ-PET–positive; 7 participants were p-tau217–positive and Aβ-PET–negative). P-tau217 had similar areas under the curve for projecting Aβ-PET positivity as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau181/Aβ42 and CSF Aβ40/42 measures (p-tau217: AUC, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.80-0.96]; CSF p-tau181/Aβ42: AUC, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-1.00]; CSF Aβ40/42: AUC, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.72-0.98]). Among 9 brain donors, 6 had CTE (stages II-IV; none with Alzheimer disease). Seven had negative or intermediate p-tau217, concordant with Aβ-PET. Two p-tau217 outliers with stage III CTE had normal concentrations upon additional testing. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that plasma p-tau217 concentration is unlikely to be useful for the detection of CTE, but it does show utility for ruling out Aβ pathology in participants at risk for CTE.

AbstractBackgroundRepetitive head impact (RHI) exposure from the routine play of American football increases the risk of later‐life cognitive impairment and dementia from the neurodegenerative disease, chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). Although neuropathological studies of CTE have found comorbid neurodegenerative and other pathologies, neuritic Aβ plaques are infrequent, particularly in early stages. However, amyloid PET imaging has not been fully characterized in cognitively impaired former American football players.MethodIn this cross‐sectional, observational cohort study from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project, florbetapir PET mean cortical standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) and positivity (defined by average SUVR >1.10, indicative of moderate‐to‐frequent neuritic Aβ plaques), were analyzed in 119 former professional (PRO) National Football League players, 60 former college football players (COL), and 58 men unexposed (UE) to RHI who were cognitively asymptomatic. Former players were categorized into one of four diagnostic groups: cognitively normal (CN), subjective memory complaints (SMC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia (DEM). All participants were 45‐74 yo. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were conducted, with race, education, age, and APOE4 genotype included as covariates. A priori power calculations demonstrated adequate power to detect significant findingsResultNo differences between the three exposure groups in average florbetapir SUVR or proportion of elevated florbetapir uptake were found. Pairwise group comparisons resulted in no differences in average SUVR between PRO and COL (‐0.01, 95% CI [‐0.033, 0.025], p = 0.95), PRO and UE (0.02, 95% CI [‐0.010, 0.029], p = 0.41), and COL and UE (0.02, 95% CI [0.0004, 0.039], p = 0.36). Analysis of covariance resulted in no differences among diagnostic groups (F = 0.94, p = 0.43). Neither years of playing football nor measures of cognition and daily functioning showed significant associations with florbetapir SUVR.ConclusionFormer professional and college American football players with cognitive impairment and dementia did not have elevated florbetapir amyloid PET compared to a group of men without RHI exposure. Their rates of florbetapir positivity in the football players were lower than expected for a group of men this age. These findings suggest that cognitive impairment in former elite football players may not be due to Alzheimer’s disease pathology.