Citations

ABSTRACT Background Higher time in sedentary behavior and insufficient physical activity are very common in bipolar disorder (BD). Whereas physical activity and exercise offer significant benefits across mental health, brain health, and heart health in BD. The International Society for Bipolar Disorders Nutrition and Exercise Task Force (NExT) synthesized evidence to evaluate the impacts of sedentary behavior, physical activity, and exercise on illness course, physical health, and treatment outcomes. Methods A best‐evidence synthesis was conducted using a question‐and‐answer format. We searched PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to March 1st, 2026, supplemented by reference lists and existing guidelines. Search terms included combinations of physical activity, exercise, sedentary behavior, and bipolar disorder‐related terms. Results Observational studies show that individuals with BD exhibit significantly higher sedentary behavior and lower physical activity compared to the general population, with notable discrepancies between self‐reported and objective measurements. Evidence on physical activity's protective role against BD onset is mixed, with some prospective and Mendelian randomization studies suggesting reduced risk, while others report bidirectional or null associations. Preliminary findings from clinical trials indicate that exercise improves overall functioning, reduces mood episode frequency and hospitalizations, and alleviates depressive symptoms, with one pilot study showing an 82% antidepressant response rate. Exercise also shows potential to reduce anxiety and improve sleep, though robust data are limited. Conclusions Despite limited high‐quality evidence, physical activity and exercise demonstrate promising physical and mental health benefits for individuals with BD. Future research should prioritize multicenter randomized controlled trials, enhanced assessment tools, and accessible, tailored programs to integrate physical activity into routine BD management.

Urinary urea is a key biomarker for tracking protein oxidation and nitrogen balance. A persistent analytical limitation is that conventional total-nitrogen assays do not deconvolute urinary urea from urinary ammonia, and direct measurement still requires capital-intensive clinical analyzers. Here, we implement and independently validate two cost-effective methods that resolve urinary urea by pairing the presence and absence of urease: Method 1 is a urease-coupled potentiometric assay using an ammonium ion-selective electrode (ISE method); Method 2 is a microplate Berthelot–salicylate colorimetric assay employing a repurposed consumer-grade aquarium ammonia test kit (API®) (API method). Each method was validated against the Roche Cobas C311 clinical analyzer (ISE for urinary ammonia and API for urinary urea) in healthy adult volunteers (n = 10 each), and API–ISE were then compared head-to-head for urinary urea. ISE vs. Cobas yielded R2 = 0.967, slope 95% CI [0.867, 1.173], and Bland–Altman bias of −1.02 mM (95% LoA [−7.40, +5.36] mM). API vs. Cobas yielded R2 = 0.973, slope 95% CI [0.790, 1.039], and bias of −1.55 mM (95% LoA [−11.56, +8.46] mM). API–ISE urinary urea comparison confirmed mutual agreement (R2 = 0.9976, slope 95% CI [0.946, 1.024]; bias of +3.47 mM; 95% LoA [−14.60, +21.53] mM), with mean recoveries near 100% (API: 100.7 ± 2.9%; ISE: 100.6 ± 5.4%; 20–350 mM). Both methods agreed with the clinical analyzer, supporting their potential for decentralized, resource-limited testing; clinical and point-of-care validations are needed.

Importance Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of premature death worldwide. Assessing the LDL-C–related burden is critical for guiding prevention and treatment strategies. Objectives To estimate the global, regional, and national burden of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke attributable to elevated LDL-C (relative to 35-54 mg/dL) from 1990 to 2023 and to quantify the contributions of population growth, aging, risk-deleted burden, and exposure changes to burden trends. Design, Setting, and Population This comparative risk assessment, part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023, estimated population-level LDL-C exposure and associated health loss in 204 countries and territories. Mean LDL-C levels were estimated using spatiotemporal gaussian process regression based on 806 studies across 161 countries. Relative risks were derived from meta-analyses of 38 randomized clinical trials. Population-attributable fractions for deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were estimated by age and sex for adults aged 25 years or older from 1990 to 2023, with 95% uncertainty intervals. Exposure Population-level LDL-C concentrations. Main Outcomes and Measures Population-attributable fractions, counts, and rates (all ages and age standardized per 100 000) of LDL-C–attributable deaths and DALYs from ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke, with uncertainty intervals. Results In 2023, elevated LDL-C accounted for 3.6 million deaths (95% uncertainty interval, 2.2-5.4 million; 6.0% of global mortality) and 90.7 million DALYs (95% uncertainty interval, 58.9-123.3 million; 3.2% of DALYs). Although global all-ages rates remained stable, age-standardized death and DALY rates decreased by 45.6% and 39.5%, respectively, since 1990. In 2023, age-standardized LDL-C–attributable DALY rates were highest in Eastern Europe and lowest in high-income Asia-Pacific. One-third of the global LDL-C burden occurred in India and China. Population growth and aging drove the increasing burden, with notable regional disparities in LDL-C exposure and risk-deleted DALY rates shifting toward middle-sociodemographic settings. Conclusions and Relevance Despite declining age-standardized rates, the absolute LDL-C burden has increased since 1990 due to demographic changes and has shifted toward middle-sociodemographic countries. Measurement and surveillance gaps persist. Strengthened prevention, diagnosis, and treatment access strategies are essential to mitigate the health burden of LDL-C.

ABSTRACT Objective(s) Fetal pleural effusion is a rare condition that may significantly impact fetal and neonatal outcomes. Currently, no universal standardized approach exists for diagnosing and managing primary fetal pleural effusions. This study aimed to develop structured, expert‐based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, monitoring, management, and follow‐up care of primary fetal pleural effusion. Methods A Delphi method was employed to achieve consensus among an international panel of experts in fetal medicine. Experts were selected based on their clinical expertise, affiliations, and relevant publications. A three‐round anonymous electronic survey was sent to the full panel. In the initial two rounds, participants rated each statement on a Likert scale (1–5) and provided suggestions for modifications. Statements with a median score of five and no suggested changes were accepted as consensus. Statements with a median score below four were rejected. Statements scoring a median of four were revised according to suggestions and reconsidered in the subsequent round. In the final round, participants indicated their agreement or disagreement with the remaining statements. Consensus was defined as agreement from more than 70% of participants with no suggestions for further changes. Results A total of 101 expert clinicians accepted the invitation and completed the first round with 73 (72%) completing all three rounds. Consensus statements were achieved on aspects of diagnosis, monitoring, intervention, post‐intervention management, and delivery. Key recommendations concerning the diagnosis of primary fetal pleural effusion include the use of ultrasound as the primary modality for identifying fetal pleural effusion and excluding secondary causes through detailed genetic, infectious, and metabolic evaluations. Management strategies emphasized thoracoamniotic shunting as the preferred intervention in hydropic fetuses with primary pleural effusion. Experts reached consensus that shunt placement could be offered as early as 16 weeks. No consensus was reached for isolated effusion without hydrops, as management was considered case‐dependent. The importance of ultrasonographic monitoring of fetal status at least weekly post‐intervention was strongly endorsed. Conclusion(s) The Delphi method facilitated the development of a consensus‐based protocol for diagnosing and managing primary fetal pleural effusion. These standardized guidelines are intended to enhance clinical practice across various settings, improve perinatal outcomes, and serve as a foundation for future research for this high‐risk fetal condition.

Abstract Rationale Legionella species can cause severe community-acquired pneumonia requiring targeted antimicrobial therapy. The impact of time to effective Legionella-directed therapy on mortality is not well defined. Objectives To evaluate the association between time to effective Legionella-directed therapy and mortality in hospitalized patients with community-acquired Legionella pneumonia and to determine whether differences in treatment timing contribute to the excess mortality observed among immunocompromised patients. Methods A retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed community-acquired Legionella pneumonia (2019–2025) was performed. Time from presentation to effective therapy (macrolide, fluoroquinolone, or doxycycline) was recorded. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for age, SOFA-2 score (first 6 hours), and immunocompromised status. Secondary analyses included a 24-hour landmark Cox model for 90-day survival and multivariable logistic regression for 30-day mortality. Results Among 310 patients (median age 66.9 years, 44.8% immunocompromised), 90-day mortality was 17.4%. Every 6-hour delay in effective therapy was independently associated with increased 90-day mortality (adjusted OR per 6 hours: 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06–1.17; P < 0.001). Delays >24 hours were associated with worse 90-day survival (adjusted HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.65–4.77; P < 0.001). Time to effective therapy was also independently associated with increased odds of 30 day mortality (adjusted OR per 6 hours: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11, p = 0.024). Immunocompromised patients experienced longer delays (median, 7.1 versus 3.3 hours; P < 0.001) and higher unadjusted 90-day mortality (22.3% versus 13.5%; P = 0.041), but immunocompromised status was not independently associated with mortality after adjusting for severity and treatment timing. Conclusion Longer time to effective Legionella-directed therapy was independently associated with increased mortality in a graded fashion. Delays were more common among immunocompromised patients, partially accounting for excess mortality in this group, suggesting that timely pathogen-directed therapy may represent a clinically important and potentially modifiable contributor to risk.

ABSTRACT Objective To provide expert recommendations for the development of a specialty bipolar clinic that promotes best clinical practices for the delivery of safe and effective care. Methods Members of the National Network of Depression Centers (NNDC) Bipolar Clinics Work Group met in a series of 1‐h monthly video calls over 18 months to discuss all aspects of their respective institution's bipolar clinics, including services provided, administrative processes, staffing models, characteristics of patients treated, patient volumes, finances, and research. The group also invited psychiatrists from outside of the NNDC who ran large bipolar clinics to contribute their thoughts and experiences on the subject. In addition, the NNDC sent a 20‐question survey to all 27 sites asking clinic directors specific questions about their bipolar clinics, if applicable. Further meetings and discussions incorporating results from the survey took place to produce a comprehensive set of recommendations. Results Twenty‐one of 27 NNDC sites (81%) responded to the survey. Twelve of 21 (57%) sites had a specific bipolar clinic, and another 4 (19%) were looking to start one. Clinics were based in university settings. The meetings, clinic survey, and discussions resulted in 10 recommendations describing services and operations for bipolar specialty clinics. Conclusions Given the complexity of bipolar disorder, specialty clinics are important to enhance care. Clinics with a wide array of services that include consultation, medication management, bipolar‐specific psychotherapies, and patient/family psychoeducation provide the most comprehensive care. Challenges to these clinics include maintaining ongoing patient access as well as ensuring long‐term financial stability.

Importance Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) aim to increase trial access for underrepresented populations (URP) and ensure study outcomes, conclusions, and policy-related decisions are applicable to diverse populations. Objective To assess trends in the percentage of accrued participants from more than 120 miles from the research site upon DCT program implementation. Design, Setting, and Participants This descriptive quality improvement study was conducted from January 2024 to March 2025 at Mayo Clinic, a US multiregional, academic medical center (AMC) comprising 3 sites and an affiliated, community-based health care system. All individuals who consented and/or accrued to an institutional review board–approved clinical trial were included. Exposure DCTs are defined as trials with at least 1 decentralized capability beyond remote consent. DCT program development began July 2022. By January 2024, remote consent, video telehealth visits, remote phlebotomy, and device services were implemented across all sites and departments. Remote monitoring and oral medication delivery were available on a limited basis. Prospective automated program and DCT participant data collection and quarterly reporting began in January 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures Percentage of all DCT accrued participants with a residential zip code more than 120 miles from 1 of 3 AMC sites. Results There were 7469 participants (median [IQR] age, 62 [51-70] years; 3594 [48.1%] female; 241 [3.2%] Asian, 391 [5.2%] Black or African American, and 6347 [85.0%] White individuals) accrued to 765 DCTs. During the study period, the percentage of DCT participants residing more than 120 miles from an AMC site ranged from 18.9% in the first quarter (Q1) of 2024 (383 of 2032 participants) to 29.6% in Q1 of 2025 (346 of 1170 participants). Of those accrued, 1147 (15.4%) were of a racial or ethnic URP, ranging from 12.5% in Q1 of 2024 (253 participants) to 17.4% in Q1 of 2025 (204 participants). There were 1554 (20.8%) participants from a rural location, ranging from 16.6% in Q1 of 2024 (338 participants) to 24.9% in Q1 of 2025 (291 participants). Additionally, by geospatial distance from an AMC site, the male-to-female ratio was nearly 50:50, and the age distribution appeared similar. Conclusions and Relevance In this quality improvement study of a DCT program implementation, DCT accruals trended favorably among those residing more than 120 miles from an AMC site and those of rural or URP populations. While these findings cannot be directly attributed to program implementation, they are reassuring that this strategy may address some barriers to clinical trial access. Future studies should assess the sustained effectiveness and scalability of DCT models in improving equitable trial access.

Abstract Rationale Chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) is characterized by persistent pulmonary vascular obstruction due to unresolved thromboemboli despite at least three months of anticoagulation. Although resting hemodynamics often remain normal, affected patients frequently develop functional limitation due to exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension, ventilatory inefficiency, limited stroke volume augmentation, or preload insufficiency. Such exercise-induced pathophysiological dysregulation can significantly impair quality of life and contribute to poor long-term outcomes. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is an established treatment for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH), offering significant improvements in hemodynamics and survival. Its role in CTED, however, remains unclear. While CTED has traditionally been managed with anticoagulation and supportive therapy, emerging evidence suggests PEA may provide symptomatic and functional benefit in selected CTED patients. Given the ongoing uncertainty regarding the role of PEA in CTED, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to define its safety profile and clinical efficacy in this patient subset. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar was conducted from database inception to March 1, 2025. Of 2,244 records screened, 34 full-text articles were assessed, and seven met the inclusion criteria. Results Across the included studies, the pooled baseline mean values were 20.48 ± 3.03 mm Hg for mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), 2.83 ± 1.11 Wood units for pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and 397 ± 100.08 m for the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). Pulmonary Endarterectomy (PEA) was consistently associated with significant improvements in hemodynamic and functional outcomes; PEA reduced mPAP by 3.58 mmHg (pooled Standardized Mean Change (SMC)=-1.03; 95% CI, -1.23 to -0.83; P < .05), PVR by 0.86 Woods units (pooled SMC=-0.86; 95% CI, -1.05 to -0.67; P < .05), while, conversely, increased 6MWD by 37.49 m (pooled SMC, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.67; P < .05). Study-level effect sizes for 6MWD ranged from 0.21 to 1.47 (Figure 1A). This clinical improvement is further reflected in the enhancement of the NYHA functional class, as illustrated in Figure 1B. Conclusion PEA was associated with significant reductions in mPAP and PVR, as well as a considerable improvement in functional capacity in patients with CTED, with robust results across multiple tests for bias, influence, and sensitivity analyses. These findings support PEA as a viable therapeutic option for selected patients with CTED, although further research is warranted. This abstract is funded by: None

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer include recommendations for staging and risk assessment after a prostate cancer diagnosis and for the care of patients with localized, regional, recurrent, and metastatic disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s discussions on select 2026 updates to the guidelines regarding nonmetastatic disease: the elimination of the very-low-risk group, updates to the Principles of Active Surveillance, and caution in the use of focal therapy in newly diagnosed patients.