Papanna, Ramesha

ABSTRACT Objective(s) Fetal pleural effusion is a rare condition that may significantly impact fetal and neonatal outcomes. Currently, no universal standardized approach exists for diagnosing and managing primary fetal pleural effusions. This study aimed to develop structured, expert‐based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, monitoring, management, and follow‐up care of primary fetal pleural effusion. Methods A Delphi method was employed to achieve consensus among an international panel of experts in fetal medicine. Experts were selected based on their clinical expertise, affiliations, and relevant publications. A three‐round anonymous electronic survey was sent to the full panel. In the initial two rounds, participants rated each statement on a Likert scale (1–5) and provided suggestions for modifications. Statements with a median score of five and no suggested changes were accepted as consensus. Statements with a median score below four were rejected. Statements scoring a median of four were revised according to suggestions and reconsidered in the subsequent round. In the final round, participants indicated their agreement or disagreement with the remaining statements. Consensus was defined as agreement from more than 70% of participants with no suggestions for further changes. Results A total of 101 expert clinicians accepted the invitation and completed the first round with 73 (72%) completing all three rounds. Consensus statements were achieved on aspects of diagnosis, monitoring, intervention, post‐intervention management, and delivery. Key recommendations concerning the diagnosis of primary fetal pleural effusion include the use of ultrasound as the primary modality for identifying fetal pleural effusion and excluding secondary causes through detailed genetic, infectious, and metabolic evaluations. Management strategies emphasized thoracoamniotic shunting as the preferred intervention in hydropic fetuses with primary pleural effusion. Experts reached consensus that shunt placement could be offered as early as 16 weeks. No consensus was reached for isolated effusion without hydrops, as management was considered case‐dependent. The importance of ultrasonographic monitoring of fetal status at least weekly post‐intervention was strongly endorsed. Conclusion(s) The Delphi method facilitated the development of a consensus‐based protocol for diagnosing and managing primary fetal pleural effusion. These standardized guidelines are intended to enhance clinical practice across various settings, improve perinatal outcomes, and serve as a foundation for future research for this high‐risk fetal condition.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) may be a remediable contributor to abnormal cognitive outcomes for children with myelomeningocele. We investigated the frequency of SDB among neonates with fetal vs postnatal myelomeningocele repair. METHODS In this nine-center, prospective, observational study, neonates with myelomeningocele born at more than 30 weeks gestational age underwent a 10-hour bedside polysomnogram at at least 35 weeks postmenstrual age, before hospital discharge. The primary outcome was SDB severity, reflected by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; number of respiratory events per hour of sleep). Decisions regarding surgical timing (fetal vs postnatal), technique (open fetal vs fetoscopic approach), and SDB treatment were made by the clinical teams. RESULTS Among 173 infants, 92/173 (53%) had SDB (median AHI 22.5, IQR 12.2–44.2). In unadjusted analysis, AHI was higher among the 90 neonates with fetal repair vs 83 with postnatal surgery (median 29, IQR 14–49, vs 19, IQR 10–36, P = .008). In propensity-adjusted multivariable models, prematurity was independently associated with AHI, whereas surgical timing (fetal vs postnatal) was not. Hindbrain herniation, myelomeningocele level, and clinical need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt did not predict AHI in adjusted models. Supplemental oxygen was commonly prescribed, for 44% of fetal vs 39% of postnatal myelomeningocele repair infants (P = .5). CONCLUSIONS SDB affects more than half of neonates with myelomeningocele. The higher AHI after fetal surgery could stem from the elevated incidence of prematurity in this group. As SDB is treatable and has a potential impact on neurodevelopment, routine screening could become an integral part of a strategy to optimize long-term medical and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate inter‐rater agreement for sonographic classification of stomach position (as a surrogate for liver herniation) in fetal left congenital diaphragmatic hernia (LCDH) among: (i) fetal medicine specialists from the North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet) centers within and without the fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) consortium and in comparison to an expert external reviewer (ER1); and (iii) among two expert ERs (ER1 and ER2).MethodsForty‐eight physicians from 26 NAFTNet centers and 2 ERs were asked to assess 13 sonographic clips of isolated LCDH and classify stomach position as “intra‐abdominal,” “anterior left chest,” “mid to posterior left chest,” or “retro‐cardiac" based on the classification published by Basta et al.8 Interrater agreement was assessed by determining proportion of stomach position ratings concordant amongst NAFTNet participants and ER1. Agreement for stomach position between ERs was calculated using kappa statistics.ResultsAgreement for stomach position was 69% (39%–85%; n = 19) and 54% (23%–92%; n = 29) among FETO and non‐FETO NAFTNet participants, respectively, when compared to ER1. Most disagreement in stomach position was related to a discrepancy of one position. ERs were in agreement for stomach position in 5 of 13 cases (38.5%) and inter‐rater agreement was highest for “anterior” stomach position.ConclusionInterrater agreement for stomach position assessment in CDH was poor across NAFTNet and indeed amongst expert reviewers.

AbstractIntroductionPrenatal work‐up for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is important for risk stratification, standardization, counseling, and optimal therapeutic choice. To determine current practice patterns regarding prenatal CDH work‐up, including prenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use, and to identify areas for standardization of such evaluation between fetal centers.MethodsA survey regarding prenatal CDH work‐up was sent to each member center of the North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet) (n = 36).ResultsAll responded. Sonographic measurement of lung‐to‐head ratio (LHR) was determined by all, 89% (32/36) of which routinely calculate observed‐to‐expected LHR. The method for measuring LHR varied: 58% (21/36) used a “trace” method, 25% (9/36) used “longest axis,” and 17% (6/36) used an “antero‐posterior” method. Fetal MRI was routinely used in 78% (28/36) of centers, but there was significant variability in fetal lung volume measurement. Whereas all generated a total fetal lung volume, the planes, methodology and references values varied significantly. All evaluated liver position, 71% (20/28) evaluated stomach position and 54% (15/28) quantified the degree of liver herniation. More consistency in workup was seen between centers offering fetal intervention.ConclusionPrenatal CDH work‐up and management differs considerably among North American fetal diagnostic centers, highlighting a need for its standardization.

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate variability in antenatal sonographic prognostication of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) within the North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet).MethodsNAFTNet centre were invited to complete a questionnaire and participate in videoconference calls, during which participants were observed while measuring lung area by ultrasound using the anteroposterior (AP) method, longest method, and trace method. Each center identified 1–2 experienced fetal medicine specialist(s) or medical imaging specialists locally to participate in the study. Practices were compared among NAFTNet centre within and without the fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) consortium.ResultsNineteen participants from 9 FETO center and 30 participants from 17 non‐FETO center completed the survey and 31 participants were interviewed and observed while measuring sonographic lung area. All Centres measured observed‐to‐expected lung‐to‐head ratio (o/e LHR) or LHR for CDH prognostication. Image selection criteria for lung area measurement were consistent, including an axial section of the chest with clear lung borders and a 4‐chamber cardiac view. Lung area measurement methods varied across NAFTNet, with most centre using longest (4/9 FETO vs. 13/29 non‐FETO) or trace (3/9 FETO vs. 11/29 non‐FETO) method. Centres differed in expected reference ranges for o/e LHR determination and whether the lowest, highest or average o/e LHR was utilized.ConclusionVariability in antenatal sonographic prognostication of CDH was identified across NAFTNet, indicating a need for consensus‐based standardization.

AbstractObjectiveTo determine the antenatal sonographic lung area measurement method in left congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) with the highest interrater agreement among North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet) centers within and outside the fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) consortium and in comparison with a European “expert” reviewer (ER).MethodsNineteen members from nine FETO consortium centers and 29 reviewers from 17 non‐FETO centers reviewed ultrasound clips of the chest from 13 fetuses with isolated left CDH and were asked to select a static plane for lung area measurement using anteroposterior (AP), longest, and trace methods. Interrater agreement in lung area measurements was determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland‐Altman analysis was used to evaluate mean difference (bias) between NAFTNet reviewers and ER.ResultsAmong FETO centers, agreement was highest using trace (ICC 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83‐0.98), followed by longest (ICC 0.89; 95% CI, 0.75‐0.97) and lowest for A‐P (ICC 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67‐0.94). Similar trends were noted in non‐FETO centers. When compared with ER, bias was lowest for trace: 14 ± 38 mm2 and 19 ± 36 mm2 for FETO and non‐FETO centers, respectively.ConclusionThe trace method demonstrated the highest interrater agreement and lowest bias for lung area estimation in left CDH across NAFTNet.