Van Mieghem, Tim

ABSTRACT Objective(s) Fetal pleural effusion is a rare condition that may significantly impact fetal and neonatal outcomes. Currently, no universal standardized approach exists for diagnosing and managing primary fetal pleural effusions. This study aimed to develop structured, expert‐based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, monitoring, management, and follow‐up care of primary fetal pleural effusion. Methods A Delphi method was employed to achieve consensus among an international panel of experts in fetal medicine. Experts were selected based on their clinical expertise, affiliations, and relevant publications. A three‐round anonymous electronic survey was sent to the full panel. In the initial two rounds, participants rated each statement on a Likert scale (1–5) and provided suggestions for modifications. Statements with a median score of five and no suggested changes were accepted as consensus. Statements with a median score below four were rejected. Statements scoring a median of four were revised according to suggestions and reconsidered in the subsequent round. In the final round, participants indicated their agreement or disagreement with the remaining statements. Consensus was defined as agreement from more than 70% of participants with no suggestions for further changes. Results A total of 101 expert clinicians accepted the invitation and completed the first round with 73 (72%) completing all three rounds. Consensus statements were achieved on aspects of diagnosis, monitoring, intervention, post‐intervention management, and delivery. Key recommendations concerning the diagnosis of primary fetal pleural effusion include the use of ultrasound as the primary modality for identifying fetal pleural effusion and excluding secondary causes through detailed genetic, infectious, and metabolic evaluations. Management strategies emphasized thoracoamniotic shunting as the preferred intervention in hydropic fetuses with primary pleural effusion. Experts reached consensus that shunt placement could be offered as early as 16 weeks. No consensus was reached for isolated effusion without hydrops, as management was considered case‐dependent. The importance of ultrasonographic monitoring of fetal status at least weekly post‐intervention was strongly endorsed. Conclusion(s) The Delphi method facilitated the development of a consensus‐based protocol for diagnosing and managing primary fetal pleural effusion. These standardized guidelines are intended to enhance clinical practice across various settings, improve perinatal outcomes, and serve as a foundation for future research for this high‐risk fetal condition.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Myelomeningocele is defined by the presence of a fluid-filled sac that contains the neural placode and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at the level of the spinal defect. Alternatively, the term myeloschisis is used when the neural placode is not contained within a CSF-filled sac. While both are eligible for prenatal closure, few studies have characterized the impact of the type of lesion on postnatal outcomes. This study compares the outcomes of these 2 types of open spinal dysraphism using data from the Fetal Myelomeningocele Consortium registry sponsored by the North American Fetal Therapy Network. METHODS: The prospective observational Fetal Myelomeningocele Consortium registry was used to extract deidentified data corresponding to patients who underwent fetal closure of myelomeningocele vs myeloschisis. Demographics, operative characteristics, perioperative complications, and postnatal outcomes were collected. RESULTS: A total of 1327 patients were identified, including 991 (74.7%) with myelomeningocele and 336 (25.3%) with myeloschisis. Compared with myelomeningocele, myeloschisis was associated with lower rates of prenatal talipes (11% vs 24%, P < .001) and higher rates of favorable prenatal movement (94% vs 86%, P < .001). Postnatally, myeloschisis conferred higher rates of leg movement (97% vs 90%, P = .002) and an increased likelihood of ambulation in the household (10.4% vs 4.1%, P = .009) and outside (7.2% vs 1.9%, P = .004) at 1 year. However, myeloschisis was also linked to greater use of skin patches during closure (49% vs 27%, P < .001), higher CSF leak rates among those with wound dehiscence (26% vs 8%, P = .014), and more frequent CSF diversion and tethered cord surgeries at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Myeloschisis and myelomeningocele demonstrate distinct clinical profiles. Although patients with myeloschisis may have favorable motor outcomes, they are also characterized by higher rates of CSF leakage, CSF diversion, and tethered cord surgery. These findings highlight the need for lesion-specific prognostication and may inform surgical planning and parental counseling in the context of prenatal spina bifida closure.

Abstract Objective In utero fetal spina bifida repair decreases the risk for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion including ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement, reverses hindbrain herniation, and improves motor function with a higher likelihood of independent ambulation. Unfortunately, in utero surgery can be complicated by preterm delivery. The goal of this study was to compare pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between individuals who delivered very preterm, and those who delivered later in gestation following in utero spina bifida repair. Methods Data from the North American Fetal Therapy Network Fetal Myelomeningocele Consortium Registry collected from 2011 to 2024 were analyzed. Three cohorts of patients were categorized by gestational age at delivery and compared: <30 weeks, 30–34 weeks, and >34 weeks. Comparisons between groups for maternal and delivery outcomes were completed for the entire cohort and then analyzed for those with available CSF diversion data up to 1 year of life. Chi‐square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to determine if there are significant differences between the distributions of the three groups. A p ‐value <0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 1213 patients were analyzed (<30 weeks, n = 111 [9.2%]; 30–34 weeks, n = 323 [26.6%]; >34 weeks, n = 779 [64.2%]). Overall fetal and neonatal mortality was 2.2%, 85% of which occurred in the <30‐week cohort, where perinatal mortality was 21%. Latency from fetal surgery to delivery averaged 2.1 weeks for the <30‐week group. Rates of abruption, chorioamnionitis, and spontaneous labor were higher in the <30‐week group compared to later gestational age cohorts. Neonatal morbidity was also significantly higher in the <30‐week cohort for sepsis, apnea, respiratory distress, patent ductus arteriosus, intraventricular hemorrhage, and periventricular leukomalacia in the <30‐week cohort. CSF diversion data were available for 677 neonates (<30 weeks, n = 53; 30–34 weeks, n = 186; >34 weeks, n = 438). There was no significant difference in VP shunt placement between the different gestational age groups. Conclusion Very preterm birth following in utero spina bifida repair results in significant perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity. Delivery prior to 30 weeks of gestation occurs in 9% of patients after in utero spina bifida repair, resulting in a 21% perinatal mortality rate. However, even among those who delivered very preterm, a reduction in VP shunt rates, a benefit of in utero repair, appears to be preserved. Further data are warranted to assess the impact of prematurity following in utero surgery on ambulation and developmental outcomes.