Mossayebi, Matthew H.

ABSTRACT Objective(s) Fetal pleural effusion is a rare condition that may significantly impact fetal and neonatal outcomes. Currently, no universal standardized approach exists for diagnosing and managing primary fetal pleural effusions. This study aimed to develop structured, expert‐based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, monitoring, management, and follow‐up care of primary fetal pleural effusion. Methods A Delphi method was employed to achieve consensus among an international panel of experts in fetal medicine. Experts were selected based on their clinical expertise, affiliations, and relevant publications. A three‐round anonymous electronic survey was sent to the full panel. In the initial two rounds, participants rated each statement on a Likert scale (1–5) and provided suggestions for modifications. Statements with a median score of five and no suggested changes were accepted as consensus. Statements with a median score below four were rejected. Statements scoring a median of four were revised according to suggestions and reconsidered in the subsequent round. In the final round, participants indicated their agreement or disagreement with the remaining statements. Consensus was defined as agreement from more than 70% of participants with no suggestions for further changes. Results A total of 101 expert clinicians accepted the invitation and completed the first round with 73 (72%) completing all three rounds. Consensus statements were achieved on aspects of diagnosis, monitoring, intervention, post‐intervention management, and delivery. Key recommendations concerning the diagnosis of primary fetal pleural effusion include the use of ultrasound as the primary modality for identifying fetal pleural effusion and excluding secondary causes through detailed genetic, infectious, and metabolic evaluations. Management strategies emphasized thoracoamniotic shunting as the preferred intervention in hydropic fetuses with primary pleural effusion. Experts reached consensus that shunt placement could be offered as early as 16 weeks. No consensus was reached for isolated effusion without hydrops, as management was considered case‐dependent. The importance of ultrasonographic monitoring of fetal status at least weekly post‐intervention was strongly endorsed. Conclusion(s) The Delphi method facilitated the development of a consensus‐based protocol for diagnosing and managing primary fetal pleural effusion. These standardized guidelines are intended to enhance clinical practice across various settings, improve perinatal outcomes, and serve as a foundation for future research for this high‐risk fetal condition.

Abstract Background Subglottic stenosis (SS) is a type of laryngotracheal stenosis defined by a location of less than 1.5 cm below the glottis or the vocal cords. Approximately 20% of cases are idiopathic. Objective We performed a systematic literature review of idiopathic subglottic stenosis (ISS) complicating pregnancy. Search Strategy PubMed, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were queried from inception through August 10, 2023 with the following terms: idiopathic subglottic tracheal stenosis, subglottic stenosis, subglottic stenoses, tracheal stenosis, tracheal stenoses, and pregnancy. This systematic review was conducted according to the methods described in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting systematic reviews. Selection Criteria Studies detailing cases of ISS affecting pregnancy were included and studies reporting SS in pregnancy from a known etiology were excluded. Data Collection and Analysis Our search identified 31 peer‐reviewed published cases of ISS complicating pregnancy that met the inclusion criteria. We also included two additional cases from our institution. Publication bias was checked by the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed using Excel. Main Results A majority of patients (26/33, 79%) were diagnosed with ISS during the reported pregnancy. Prior to pregnancy, 20/33 (61%) patients had a working diagnosis or reported symptoms of airway obstruction. Of these patients, 9/20 (45%) carried a diagnosis of asthma, and 6/20 (30%) carried a diagnosis of ISS. Specific symptoms prior to pregnancy were reported in 10/33 (30%) patients. The most common symptoms in these patients were dyspnea (10/10, 100%) and stridor (4/10, 40%). During pregnancy, all patients experienced worsening respiratory symptoms, with dyspnea (31/33, 94%), stridor (18/33, 55%), cough (13/33, 39%), hoarseness (7/33, 21%), and wheeze (5/33, 15%) being the most common symptoms. A total of 22/33 (67%) patients required medical and/or surgical management with dilation and/or excision during pregnancy. Postpartum outcomes were reported in 27/33 (82%) patients, and 1/27 (3.7%) required a tracheostomy immediately postpartum. The majority (18/27, 67%) of these patients required intervention postpartum, while 9/27 (33.3%) were asymptomatic. Conclusion ISS should be considered in pregnant patients with worsening respiratory symptoms despite medical management of asthma. If high clinical suspicion for upper airway obstruction exists, an otolaryngology referral for evaluation with bronchoscopy is recommended.