Morgan, Tara A.

Objectives Evaluate the value of ultrasound specialist assessment of ovarian masses over 50 mm with sonograms interpreted as possible hemorrhagic ovarian cysts (HOC). Methods Retrospective review of consecutive endovaginal pelvic US reports of premenopausal women at one organization identified adnexal masses over 50 mm maximum diameter designated as possibly being HOC (large HOC). Four ultrasound specialists reviewed studies, scoring two assessments as true or false: 1) US features are most consistent with either an ovarian hemorrhagic cyst (HOC) or endometrioma; 2) If assessment 1 was true, the mass meets O‐RADS criteria of classic HOC except for size. Results A total of 457 of 51,305 women (0.9%) had reports indicating possible large HOC. For 366 patients with established outcomes, 225 (61.5%) had a large HOC (87.1% ≤ 70 mm). Assessment 1 was true for 318 patients; outcomes showed 224 (70.4%) HOC, 89 (28.0%) endometriomas, 4 (1.3%) TOAs, and 1 (0.3%) cystadenoma. Assessment 1 was false for 48 patients; outcomes showed 1 (2.1%) HOC, 1 (2.1%) endometrioma, 6 (12.5%) other non‐neoplastic cysts, 33 (68.8%) benign neoplasms, 5 (10.4%) borderline tumors, and 2 (4.2%) high‐grade malignancies. The decrease in neoplasms and malignancies with true assessment 1 was significant ( p < .001). Assessment 2 was true for 190 patients (180 [94.7%] HOC, 9 [4.7%] endometrioma, 1 [0.5%] cystadenoma), false for 128 patients (44 [34.4%] HOC, 80 [62.5%] endometrioma, and 4 [3.1%] TOA) ( p < .001), and not applicable for 48 patients. Conclusions Ultrasound specialist review of adnexal masses designated as a possible large HOC adds value since over 10% are neoplasms (nearly 2% malignant). Ultrasound specialist assessment can expedite additional imaging or intervention when necessary and obviate follow‐up when HOC features are typical.

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate variability in antenatal sonographic prognostication of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) within the North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet).MethodsNAFTNet centre were invited to complete a questionnaire and participate in videoconference calls, during which participants were observed while measuring lung area by ultrasound using the anteroposterior (AP) method, longest method, and trace method. Each center identified 1–2 experienced fetal medicine specialist(s) or medical imaging specialists locally to participate in the study. Practices were compared among NAFTNet centre within and without the fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) consortium.ResultsNineteen participants from 9 FETO center and 30 participants from 17 non‐FETO center completed the survey and 31 participants were interviewed and observed while measuring sonographic lung area. All Centres measured observed‐to‐expected lung‐to‐head ratio (o/e LHR) or LHR for CDH prognostication. Image selection criteria for lung area measurement were consistent, including an axial section of the chest with clear lung borders and a 4‐chamber cardiac view. Lung area measurement methods varied across NAFTNet, with most centre using longest (4/9 FETO vs. 13/29 non‐FETO) or trace (3/9 FETO vs. 11/29 non‐FETO) method. Centres differed in expected reference ranges for o/e LHR determination and whether the lowest, highest or average o/e LHR was utilized.ConclusionVariability in antenatal sonographic prognostication of CDH was identified across NAFTNet, indicating a need for consensus‐based standardization.