Young, Scott W

Objectives Evaluate the value of ultrasound specialist assessment of ovarian masses over 50 mm with sonograms interpreted as possible hemorrhagic ovarian cysts (HOC). Methods Retrospective review of consecutive endovaginal pelvic US reports of premenopausal women at one organization identified adnexal masses over 50 mm maximum diameter designated as possibly being HOC (large HOC). Four ultrasound specialists reviewed studies, scoring two assessments as true or false: 1) US features are most consistent with either an ovarian hemorrhagic cyst (HOC) or endometrioma; 2) If assessment 1 was true, the mass meets O‐RADS criteria of classic HOC except for size. Results A total of 457 of 51,305 women (0.9%) had reports indicating possible large HOC. For 366 patients with established outcomes, 225 (61.5%) had a large HOC (87.1% ≤ 70 mm). Assessment 1 was true for 318 patients; outcomes showed 224 (70.4%) HOC, 89 (28.0%) endometriomas, 4 (1.3%) TOAs, and 1 (0.3%) cystadenoma. Assessment 1 was false for 48 patients; outcomes showed 1 (2.1%) HOC, 1 (2.1%) endometrioma, 6 (12.5%) other non‐neoplastic cysts, 33 (68.8%) benign neoplasms, 5 (10.4%) borderline tumors, and 2 (4.2%) high‐grade malignancies. The decrease in neoplasms and malignancies with true assessment 1 was significant ( p < .001). Assessment 2 was true for 190 patients (180 [94.7%] HOC, 9 [4.7%] endometrioma, 1 [0.5%] cystadenoma), false for 128 patients (44 [34.4%] HOC, 80 [62.5%] endometrioma, and 4 [3.1%] TOA) ( p < .001), and not applicable for 48 patients. Conclusions Ultrasound specialist review of adnexal masses designated as a possible large HOC adds value since over 10% are neoplasms (nearly 2% malignant). Ultrasound specialist assessment can expedite additional imaging or intervention when necessary and obviate follow‐up when HOC features are typical.

ObjectivesTo combine sonographic Murphy sign (SMS) with clinical parameters to effectively stratify patients into risk groups for acute cholecystitis.MethodsConsecutive emergency department patients from April 1, 2019 to August 31, 2022 with possible acute cholecystitis were grouped using patient age, sex, and white blood cell count to determine the rate of acute cholecystitis found in subgroups. Three distinct clinical risk groups were established and then regrouped by prospective assessment of SMS into three non‐imaging risk groups. Differences in the rate of acute cholecystitis for clinical parameters, clinical risk groups, and non‐imaging risk groups were statistically analyzed.ResultsOf 1231 patients (mean [SD] age, 51.2 [19.5]; 476 [38.7%] male), 156 had acute cholecystitis (mean [SD] age, 62.0 [15.4]; 85 [54.5%] male). Rates differed based on sex (9.4% female vs 17.9% male, P < .001), age group (1.8% for patients <30 years, 9.0% for patients 30–59 years, 22.3% for patients ≥60 years; P < .001), and white blood cell count (23.1% elevated vs 6.6% not elevated; P < .001). The low, average, and high non‐imaging risk groups had acute cholecystitis rates of 1.8%, 14.0%, and 43.1%, respectively. Relative risk (95% CI) for the low non‐imaging group compared with others was 0.07 (0.04, 0.12; P < .001); relative risk for the high non‐imaging risk group compared with others was 7.05 (5.32, 9.43; P < .001).ConclusionsSonographic Murphy sign assessment combined with patient age, sex, and white blood cell count effectively stratifies acute care patients into distinct acute cholecystitis risk groups.

Linked article: This Correspondence comments on Deslandes and Leonardi. Click here to view the article.

Peripheral arterial and venous examinations are performed regularly in vascular labs and interpreted by physicians of different specialities. Many vascular examinations have nonvascular pathology that is either inadvertently imaged by the sonographer or imaged with intent as it relates to patient's symptoms. It is prudent for every reader of vascular studies to be acquainted with the sonographic appearance of these non‐vascular lesions to enable appropriate and optimal interpretation that has a direct bearing on patient's clinical care. Our review includes a discussion of the nonvascular pathologies like lymph nodes, soft tissue edema, soft tissue fluid collections, musculotendinous injuries, soft tissue masses, and joint and bursal pathologies that may be encountered during interpretation of vascular exams. The pictorial essay includes a discussion of their sonographic appearances and pitfalls in interpretation. Multiple illustrative examples and sonographic images of the non‐vascular pathologies found during interpretation of vascular studies have been utilized to highlight their appearances.

ObjectiveWe evaluated the performance of ACR TI‐RADS when points for lobulated margins are applied only when the margins meet a quantified measure of margin microlobulation and not applied when nodules only demonstrate macrolobulation.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed ultrasound and pathology records (May 01, 2018 to July 31, 2020) to find all thyroid nodules at one institution characterized as having lobulated margins using the ACR TI‐RADS lexicon and subsequently undergoing fine needle aspiration (FNA). Nodule margins were evaluated to note the presence or absence of microlobulation, quantitatively defined as a protrusion with a base <2.5 mm in length. The impact to detection of malignant nodules and avoidance of benign FNA when margin points for lobulation were added only when microlobulated was analyzed.Results58 of 516 thyroid nodules undergoing US‐guided FNA were classified as lobulated, comprising the study population. 21 (36.2%) had microlobulated margins, with 12 of the 21 (57.1%) being malignant. Comparatively, of the 37 nodules showing only macrolobulated margins without microlobulation, only 2 (5.4%) were malignant (P < .0001). For 53 nodules ≥10 mm, 15 (28.3%) benign nodules would not have met size criteria for FNA had points for margins not been applied when only showing macrolobulation, whereas all 10 malignant nodules would still have been sampled.ConclusionAdding two points to the ACR TI‐RADS score for lobulated thyroid nodules should only apply when microlobulations are present.

Objectives We analyzed growth rates of benign ovarian serous cystadenomas and cystadenofibromas to understand what percentage would show a volume doubling time (DT) of less than 3 years, between 3 and 5 years, or greater than 5 years. Methods We retrospectively reviewed pathology records (January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019) to find all surgically excised ovarian serous cystadenomas and cystadenofibromas. Imaging records were then reviewed to identify those that had been confidently identified with ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, or computed tomography at least twice before surgical removal, with at least a 60‐day interval between studies. Three orthogonal measurements were recorded on the first and last imaging studies on which the mass was detected, with volume calculations by the prolate formula (product of 3 measurements multiplied by 0.52). The volume DT was calculated and grouped into 1 of 5 categories: (1) DT of less than 1 year; (2) DT of 1 to 3 years; (3) DT of 3 to 5 years; (4) DT of 5 to 10 years; and (5) no growth (any mass with a DT >10 years or showing a decrease in volume). Results A total of 102 of 536 cystadenomas and 44 of 227 cystadenofibromas met inclusion criteria. Of the 146 tumors, 40 (27.4%) had a DT of less than 1 year; 38 (26.0%) had a DT of 1 to 3 years; 22 (15.1%) had a DT of 3 to 5 years; 10 (6.8%) had a DT of 5 to 10 years; and 36 (24.7%) showed no growth. Conclusions A total of 53.4% of ovarian serous cystadenomas/cystadenofibromas have a DT of less than 3 years; 15.1% have a DT between 3 and 5 years; and 31.5% have a DT of greater than 5 years or show no growth.

ObjectivesTo determine whether renal transplant diagnoses substantially change when 2 biopsy sites are chosen and whether contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has value for targeting the second site.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 40 patients undergoing ultrasound‐guided renal transplant biopsy within 2 years of transplant: 20, surveillance; and 20, for cause. A CEUS examination was performed to identify cortical regions with subjectively altered flow. One biopsy was performed at the operator‐preferred (primary) site regardless of CEUS findings. Another biopsy was done at a second location, either targeted to an area in which CEUS perfusion findings differed from the primary site (targeted) or at a random location (secondary) if no other area differed. Specimens were randomly labeled A or B; pathologists were blinded to the CEUS result and biopsy location. Location‐specific CEUS assessments were recorded. Pathologic results were compared, including acute and chronic Banff scores and any new findings from the targeted or secondary biopsy.ResultsForty patients were enrolled between January 2016 and December 2018. No location‐specific pathologic differences correlated with differences in CEUS assessments. The second biopsy provided additional information that changed management in 4 of 40 patients (10.0% [95% confidence interval, 2.8%–23.7%]). Major bleeding complications occurred in 3 of 40 (7.5%) patients.ConclusionsContrast‐enhanced ultrasound targeting was not useful. Major bleeding complications were higher than expected, possibly due to the additional biopsy away from the operator‐preferred location. Obtaining a second renal transplant biopsy from a substantially different area than the initial operator‐preferred location provided additional clinically useful information in 10% of patients.