Shellhaas, Renée A.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) may be a remediable contributor to abnormal cognitive outcomes for children with myelomeningocele. We investigated the frequency of SDB among neonates with fetal vs postnatal myelomeningocele repair. METHODS In this nine-center, prospective, observational study, neonates with myelomeningocele born at more than 30 weeks gestational age underwent a 10-hour bedside polysomnogram at at least 35 weeks postmenstrual age, before hospital discharge. The primary outcome was SDB severity, reflected by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; number of respiratory events per hour of sleep). Decisions regarding surgical timing (fetal vs postnatal), technique (open fetal vs fetoscopic approach), and SDB treatment were made by the clinical teams. RESULTS Among 173 infants, 92/173 (53%) had SDB (median AHI 22.5, IQR 12.2–44.2). In unadjusted analysis, AHI was higher among the 90 neonates with fetal repair vs 83 with postnatal surgery (median 29, IQR 14–49, vs 19, IQR 10–36, P = .008). In propensity-adjusted multivariable models, prematurity was independently associated with AHI, whereas surgical timing (fetal vs postnatal) was not. Hindbrain herniation, myelomeningocele level, and clinical need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt did not predict AHI in adjusted models. Supplemental oxygen was commonly prescribed, for 44% of fetal vs 39% of postnatal myelomeningocele repair infants (P = .5). CONCLUSIONS SDB affects more than half of neonates with myelomeningocele. The higher AHI after fetal surgery could stem from the elevated incidence of prematurity in this group. As SDB is treatable and has a potential impact on neurodevelopment, routine screening could become an integral part of a strategy to optimize long-term medical and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Abstract Objective The objective of this study is to characterize contemporary surgical management practices and factors influencing surgical decision‐making in the management of Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) across pediatric epilepsy centers in the United States. Methods A 45‐item cross‐sectional survey was developed and distributed to Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium centers. Domains included institutional demographics, surgical evaluation timing and goals, presurgical workup, procedural utilization and outcomes, and barriers to surgery. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were performed. Results Thirty‐two pediatric epilepsy centers participated (38% response), the majority comprising pediatric epileptologists at Level 4 National Association of Epilepsy Centers. Most centers (66%) considered surgery after failure of 3–4 antiseizure medications. Presurgical workup typically included brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), long‐term electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, and neuropsychological assessment, while use of functional imaging, magnetoencephalography, and intracranial EEG varied considerably. All centers offered vagus nerve stimulation and corpus callosotomy; 80%–90% offered resection, hemispherectomy, responsive neurostimulation (RNS); 60%–65% offered deep brain stimulation (DBS) and laser ablation. Among centers offering RNS, half targeted thalamic structures exclusively, and the remainder targeted cortical or combined cortical‐thalamic structures; the centromedian nucleus was the preferred thalamic target for RNS and DBS. Surgical decision‐making was influenced by patient characteristics, procedural considerations, and systemic factors. Seizure frequency, family preference, and multidisciplinary input were highly rated across all interventions. Etiology was critical for resection and hemispherectomy, while financial constraints, insurance barriers, and the need for future neuroimaging impacted neuromodulation selection. Scenario‐specific trends included less frequent consideration of DBS and RNS in children under five years, less use of hemispherectomy in older children, preference for corpus callosotomy in children with predominantly drop seizures, and procedural selection based on MRI findings. Significance Substantial variability exists in the surgical management of LGS. These findings highlight critical opportunities to harmonize practices, reduce disparities, and guide comparative effectiveness research to optimize outcomes. Plain Language Summary Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is a severe form of epilepsy that may require surgery when medications are not effective. This study found that surgical care for LGS varies widely across pediatric epilepsy centers in the United States, including when surgery is recommended, how patients are evaluated, and which procedures are available. Newer approaches such as brain stimulation are being used more often, although access remains inconsistent. These findings highlight the need for clearer treatment pathways to ensure that children with LGS have equitable access to the best possible care.

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the response to second treatments for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS). Methods Infants aged 2–24 months with IESS were prospectively enrolled in the National Infantile Spasms Cohort study at 21 pediatric epilepsy centers in the United States from 2012 to 2018. We analyzed data from infants who initially received standard treatment (hormonal therapy [adrenocorticotropic hormone, high‐dose prednisolone] or vigabatrin), had continued or recurring epileptic spasms, and received a second treatment. We excluded those with tuberous sclerosis. Treatment groups included hormonal therapy followed by vigabatrin (reference), hormonal‐to‐hormonal, hormonal‐to‐nonstandard, vigabatrin‐to‐hormonal, and vigabatrin‐to‐nonstandard. Nonstandard treatments included other antiseizure medications and dietary therapy. Treatment groups were tested for differences in 3‐month clinical remission using a binary logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs). Results There were 153 infants with IESS who received second treatments. The highest rates of 3‐month remission were among infants in the hormonal‐to‐vigabatrin (22/65, 34%) and vigabatrin‐to‐hormonal (9/26, 35%) groups, followed by vigabatrin‐to‐nonstandard (3/10, 30%), hormonal‐to‐hormonal (4/22, 18%), and hormonal‐to‐nonstandard (1/30, 3.3%). Compared to the hormonal‐to‐vigabatrin group (reference), fewer infants had remission in the hormonal‐to‐nonstandard group (OR = .07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .01–.53), and there was a trend toward fewer infants in the hormonal‐to‐hormonal group (OR = .43, 95% CI = .13–1.4, p = .17). Following initial hormonal treatment, the number needed to treat was three infants for one additional infant to have remission when treated with vigabatrin compared to nonstandard therapy as the second treatment. Significance This updated analysis with an expanded sample size provided power for additional subgroup analysis. Overall response rates were low, and at best only one third had remission after second treatment. Results support a clinical strategy of switching mechanism of action when selecting a second medication for epileptic spasms (i.e., use vigabatrin after hormonal therapy, or hormonal therapy after vigabatrin). Our findings also support the use of standard over nonstandard therapies.

Numerous factors including social determinants of health, knowledge gaps, economic challenges, workforce limitations, and health system deficiencies are associated with significant disparities in access to health care services and health outcomes for people with epilepsy (PWE). The American Epilepsy Society (AES) and the International League Against Epilepsy—North America (ILAE-NA) established a joint task force to explore and develop recommendations to address health care disparities experienced by PWE. The task force gathered foundational knowledge through meetings, public and patient organization comments and discussions to develop consensus recommendations. We enumerate the recommendations and discuss the rationale behind them to reduce disparities in epilepsy care through comprehensive research, inclusive clinical practices, robust advocacy, and targeted educational initiatives. While our recommendations are focused on the United States, we acknowledge that similar barriers and limitations exist for PWE globally and that these also need to be addressed within their local domains and with attention to unique factors therewithin.

Abstract Introduction A prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study was designed to test the hypothesis that sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is ubiquitous among newborns with myelomeningocele (MMC). We evaluated variability in polysomnography (PSG) scoring and interpretation. Methods Nine US pediatric centers participated. Neonates with MMC born at >30 weeks gestation underwent bedside PSG at ≥35 weeks postmenstrual age, before hospital discharge. PSGs were scored by registered technologists (RPSGTs) at each site using AASM Scoring Manual infant criteria and interpreted by a board-certified sleep medicine physician (BCSMP). A single, central RPSGT blinded to clinical outcomes then re-scored all PSGs. One of two pediatric BCSMPs reviewed each study; the two BCSMPs jointly determined diagnoses for consensus central reports. Differences in scoring and overall PSG interpretation were evaluated with kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results For 110 neonates with MMC, the median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 26.5 [11.3-43.3] as reported by sites, and 23.0 [IQR 13.0-44.8] as reported centrally (к 0.81). The central apnea index (CAI) was also scored similarly by sites (3.3 [0.9-7.0]) and centrally (2.6 [0.6-7.3]; к 0.88), as were hypopneas (15.2 [7.5;26.9]) and 14.1 [6.4;27.9]; к 0.82). However, the obstructive apnea index (OAI) was reported to be much higher by sites (10.0 [1.9-29.1]) than centrally (1.5 [0.5 – 4.1]; к 0.29). Moreover, overall PSG interpretation differed between sites and central reviewers. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was reported as a diagnosis by sites for 57.6% of neonates, vs. 10.9% by central review (ICC 0.06); central sleep apnea was reported by sites for 26.6% of neonates, vs. 14.5% by central review (ICC 0.50). When hypopneas were the most prevalent respiratory events, central review favored a less specific diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing. Conclusion Considerable variability in scoring of obstructive apneas, and in polysomnography-based diagnoses, may exist for neonates. Sites may have designated hypopneas as obstructive, driving the diagnosis of OSA, while central review noted equivocal features of neonatal hypopneas, leading to a less specific diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing. Further work to develop infant respiratory scoring rules, and diagnostic criteria, and to evaluate their clinical use may be warranted. Support (if any) This study is supported by NIH (R01 HL147261).

With more than 6000 attendees between in-person and virtual offerings, the American Epilepsy Society Meeting 2022 in Nashville, felt as busy as in prepandemic times. An ever-growing number of physicians, scientists, and allied health professionals gathered to learn a variety of topics about epilepsy. The program was carefully tailored to meet the needs of professionals with different interests and career stages. This article summarizes the different symposia presented at the meeting. Basic science lectures addressed the primary elements of seizure generation and pathophysiology of epilepsy in different disease states. Scientists congregated to learn about anti-seizure medications, mechanisms of action, and new tools to treat epilepsy including surgery and neurostimulation. Some symposia were also dedicated to discuss epilepsy comorbidities and practical issues regarding epilepsy care. An increasing number of patient advocates discussing their stories were intertwined within scientific activities. Many smaller group sessions targeted more specific topics to encourage member participation, including Special Interest Groups, Investigator, and Skills Workshops. Special lectures included the renown Hoyer and Lombroso, an ILAE/IBE joint session, a spotlight on the impact of Dobbs v. Jackson on reproductive health in epilepsy, and a joint session with the NAEC on coding and reimbursement policies. The hot topics symposium was focused on traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic epilepsy. A balanced collaboration with the industry allowed presentations of the latest pharmaceutical and engineering advances in satellite symposia.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine whether selection of treatment for children with infantile spasms (IS) varies by race/ethnicity.MethodsThe prospective US National Infantile Spasms Consortium database includes children with IS treated from 2012 to 2018. We examined the relationship between race/ethnicity and receipt of standard IS therapy (prednisolone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, vigabatrin), adjusting for demographic and clinical variables using logistic regression. Our primary outcome was treatment course, which considered therapy prescribed for the first and, when needed, the second IS treatment together.ResultsOf 555 children, 324 (58%) were non‐Hispanic white, 55 (10%) non‐Hispanic Black, 24 (4%) non‐Hispanic Asian, 80 (14%) Hispanic, and 72 (13%) other/unknown. Most (398, 72%) received a standard treatment course. Insurance type, geographic location, history of prematurity, prior seizures, developmental delay or regression, abnormal head circumference, hypsarrhythmia, and IS etiologies were associated with standard therapy. In adjusted models, non‐Hispanic Black children had lower odds of receiving a standard treatment course compared with non‐Hispanic white children (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.89; p = 0.02). Adjusted models also showed that children with public (vs. private) insurance had lower odds of receiving standard therapy for treatment 1 (OR, 0.42; CI, 0.21–0.84; p = 0.01).InterpretationNon‐Hispanic Black children were more often treated with non‐standard IS therapies than non‐Hispanic white children. Likewise, children with public (vs. private) insurance were less likely to receive standard therapies. Investigating drivers of inequities, and understanding the impact of racism on treatment decisions, are critical next steps to improve care for patients with IS. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:32–44

Objective: In a randomized trial, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cosyntropin injectable suspension, 1 mg/mL, compared to vigabatrin for infantile spasms syndrome. An additional arm was included to assess the efficacy of combination therapy (cosyntropin and vigabatrin) compared with cosyntropin monotherapy. Methods: Children (2 months to 2 years) with new-onset infantile spasms syndrome and hypsarhythmia were randomized into 3 arms: cosyntropin, vigabatrin, and cosyntropin and vigabatrin combined. Daily seizures and adverse events were recorded, and EEG was repeated at day 14 to assess for resolution of hypsarhythmia. The primary outcome measure was the composite of resolution of hypsarhythmia and absence of clinical spasms at day 14. Fisher exact test was used to compare outcomes. Results: 37 children were enrolled and 34 were included in the final efficacy analysis (1 withdrew prior to treatment and 2 did not return seizure diaries). Resolution of both hypsarhythmia and clinical spasms was achieved in in 9 of 12 participants (75%) treated with cosyntropin, 1/9 (11%) vigabatrin, and 5/13 (38%) cosyntropin and vigabatrin combined. The primary comparison of cosyntropin versus vigabatrin was significant (64% [95% confidence interval 21, 82], P < .01). Adverse events were reported in all 3 treatment arms: 31 (86%) had an adverse event, 7 (19%) had a serious adverse event, and 15 (42%) had an adverse event of special interest with no difference between treatment arms. Significance: This randomized trial was underpowered because of incomplete enrollment, yet it demonstrated that cosyntropin was more effective for short-term outcomes than vigabatrin as initial treatment for infantile spasms.

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate benzodiazepine (BZD) administration patterns before transitioning to non‐BZD antiseizure medication (ASM) in pediatric patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE). Methods This retrospective multicenter study in the United States and Canada used prospectively collected observational data from children admitted with rSE between 2011 and 2020. Outcome variables were the number of BZDs given before the first non‐BZD ASM, and the number of BZDs administered after 30 and 45 min from seizure onset and before escalating to non‐BZD ASM. Results We included 293 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 3.8 (1.3–9.3) years. Thirty‐six percent received more than two BZDs before escalating, and the later the treatment initiation was after seizure onset, the less likely patients were to receive multiple BZD doses before transitioning (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .998, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .997–.999 per minute, p = .01). Patients received BZDs beyond 30 and 45 min in 57.3% and 44.0% of cases, respectively. Patients with out‐of‐hospital seizure onset were more likely to receive more doses of BZDs beyond 30 min (IRR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.73–3.46, p < .0001) and beyond 45 min (IRR = 3.75, 95% CI = 2.40–6.03, p < .0001) compared to patients with in‐hospital seizure onset. Intermittent SE was a risk factor for more BZDs administered beyond 45 min compared to continuous SE (IRR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.01–2.06, p = .04). Forty‐seven percent of patients ( n = 94) with out‐of‐hospital onset did not receive treatment before hospital arrival. Among patients with out‐of‐hospital onset who received at least two BZDs before hospital arrival ( n = 54), 48.1% received additional BZDs at hospital arrival. Significance Failure to escalate from BZDs to non‐BZD ASMs occurs mainly in out‐of‐hospital rSE onset. Delays in the implementation of medical guidelines may be reduced by initiating treatment before hospital arrival and facilitating a transition to non‐BZD ASMs after two BZD doses during handoffs between prehospital and in‐hospital settings.