Wainwright, Mark S.

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to examine acute and chronic electroencephalographic (EEG) and seizure characteristics in new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). Methods Multicenter inpatient and follow‐up clinical and EEG data were analyzed using International League Against Epilepsy definitions and American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) EEG terminology. Results Forty‐four patients were included from the Yale NORSE/FIRES Biorepository (median age = 29 years, 33 female, 38 cryptogenic). Nine hundred twenty inpatient EEG days were reviewed (median = 13.5 days/patient). Presenting status epilepticus (SE) types included 24 convulsive SE (CSE), five focal–motor (FMSE), and 15 nonconvulsive (NCSE). Of 39 patients with post discharge follow‐up (median = 14.7 months), 61.5% ( n = 24) had seizures and required more antiseizure medications than seizure‐free patients (median = 4 vs. 1, p < .001). Inpatient EEG captured epileptiform discharges in all and periodic discharges in 38 patients. Seizures were captured in 38 patients: 33 electrographic (11 only electrographic) and 27 electroclinical. Total seizure burden ranged 6.5–29 615.0 min (median = 50.7). Seizures fulfilling ACNS EEG criteria for SE were captured in 20 patients; two had CSE and the remainder NCSE with coma, nine of whom also had FMSE. Inpatient seizure days (median = 50.0 vs. 15.5%, p = .004) and seizure burden (median = 42.9 vs. 0 min, p = .009) were higher in the first half of monitored days. Interictal findings were equally present and did not predict postdischarge seizures, whereas electroclinical seizures (90.9% vs. 45.5%, p = .037), seizure burden (median = 116.8 vs. 32.5 min, p = .045), and proportion of seizure days (36.3% vs. 20.0%, p = .037) did. Among 12 patients with follow‐up EEGs (median = 19.6 months post onset), posterior‐dominant rhythm (PDR) returned in nine; five had periodic discharges, and three had seizure captured. Significance Seizures are most commonly convulsive upon presentation and nonconvulsive or clinically subtle throughout the inpatient course in NORSE. Inpatient seizures, but not interictal abnormalities, occur earlier in the inpatient course and presence of electroclinical seizures, seizure burden, and proportion of seizure days but not interictal findings are associated with postdischarge seizures. Although return of PDR reflects neurological recovery, seizure persistence and EEG abnormalities post‐NORSE are common.

Importance Seizure-induced brain injury is central to the treatment urgency of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). Identifying biomarkers that reflect ongoing neuronal damage could inform therapeutic timing and improve outcomes. Objective To quantify acute brain injury in patients with cryptogenic NORSE (cNORSE), etiology-defined status epilepticus (eSE), and chronic epilepsy. Design, Setting, and Participants This was an international cross-sectional study conducted between 2013 and 2025. Patients were enrolled at 36 hospitals in the US, 2 in Canada, and 1 in Italy, France, and Belgium. Patients with cNORSE and eSE for which biological samples were obtained during ongoing seizure activity were enrolled in the study. Comparison groups without status epilepticus comprised individuals with chronic epilepsy and healthy participants. None were excluded. Exposures Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and S100-beta (S100B) protein concentrations in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Main Outcomes and Measures Degree of neuronal and glial damage, indexed by NfL and S100B levels, and their association with short-term functional outcomes. Results A total of 78 patients with cNORSE (mean [95% CI] age, 37 [30-41] years; 44 female [56%]) and 2 independent cohorts of 211 patients (mean [95% CI] age, 69 [66-71] years; 128 female [61%]) and 73 patients (mean [95% CI] age, 56 [45-65] years; 39 male [53%]) with eSE were included. NfL concentrations were markedly elevated in cNORSE—approximately 10-fold higher in CSF and 4-fold higher in serum—compared with the eSE cohorts (CSF: median [IQR], 6408 [1503-22 963] pg/mL compared with 694 [219-2389] pg/mL; serum: median [IQR], 231 [99-855] pg/mL compared with 55 [20-135] pg/mL; P &amp;lt;.001). Serum NfL levels were nearly 20-fold higher in cNORSE than in the cohort with epilepsy and in healthy controls (median [IQR], 11 [7-19 ] and 7 [5-14 ] pg/mL, respectively). Serum and CSF NfL levels were strongly correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.75; P &amp;lt; .001) and rose sharply between week 1 (median [IQR], 101 [51-137] pg/mL), week 2 (median [IQR], 197 [117-324] pg/mL), and week 3 (median [IQR], 598 [163-1000] pg/mL) after onset ( P &amp;lt; .001). In contrast, S100B concentrations did not differ between groups and showed no consistent temporal pattern. NfL discriminated cNORSE from eSE (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90) and from cohorts without status epilepticus (AUROC, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.78-1.00). Higher serum NfL was independently associated with poor functional outcome at discharge (Glasgow Outcome Scale extended score, 1-4; odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that acute neuroaxonal injury, as reflected by elevated NfL levels, was substantially greater in cNORSE than in the cohorts with eSE and in controls without status epilepticus. The rapid early rise in NfL highlights a narrow therapeutic window, emphasizing the need for prompt, effective, and potentially neuroprotective interventions in cNORSE.

Abstract Objective This study aims to better characterize the long‐term neurological quality of life (QOL) outcomes (using the Neuro‐QOL scale) in survivors of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), and provide guidance for psychological and social support strategies. Methods Utilizing data from a multicenter prospective study of NORSE/FIRES led by Yale University, we enrolled patients who completed the validated, patient‐reported Neuro‐QOL scale at least once at 3–6 months ( n = 37), 12 months ( n = 29), 24 months ( n = 23), or ≥36 months ( n = 9) following discharge. The Neuro‐QOL scale assesses physical, mental, and social health in patients with neurological disorders. QOL impairment (QOL‐I) scores were calculated, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. T ‐scores enabled comparisons with reference populations. Results In adults, median QOL‐I improved from 44.1% at 3–6 months to 37.6% at 36+ months. Paired analysis showed significant improvement in QOL‐I between 3–6 and 24 months ( p = .016), with specific improvements in communication, satisfaction with social roles, fatigue, and mobility. Greater improvement was also observed for participation in social roles (5.5‐point T ‐score gain) compared to the reference population, suggesting meaningful change. A gradual improvement in overall QOL‐I scores was also observed in pediatric participants, despite a modest sample size ( n = 5 with data at 3–6 and 12 months). Measures of fatigue and anxiety persisted in adults, and cognitive difficulties persisted in both adults and children. In adults, longer status epilepticus duration and intensive care unit stay were associated with poorer QOL. Additionally, a higher number of antiseizure medications was associated with more depression, cognitive impairments, and perceived stigma. Significance These findings highlight the potential for recovery following an acute episode of NORSE, although many patients continue to face challenges requiring ongoing support, and the clinical meaning of the reported QOL improvement remains unclear. Furthermore, the findings underscore the importance of strategic multidisciplinary support systems in the years following discharge.

Importance Neurological manifestations during acute SARS-CoV-2–related multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) are common in hospitalized patients younger than 18 years and may increase risk of new neurocognitive or functional morbidity. Objective To assess the association of severe neurological manifestations during a SARS-CoV-2–related hospital admission with new neurocognitive or functional morbidities at discharge. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study from 46 centers in 10 countries included patients younger than 18 years who were hospitalized for acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C between January 2, 2020, and July 31, 2021. Exposure Severe neurological manifestations, which included acute encephalopathy, seizures or status epilepticus, meningitis or encephalitis, sympathetic storming or dysautonomia, cardiac arrest, coma, delirium, and stroke. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was new neurocognitive (based on the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category scale) and/or functional (based on the Functional Status Scale) morbidity at hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association of severe neurological manifestations with new morbidity in each SARS-CoV-2–related condition. Results Overall, 3568 patients younger than 18 years (median age, 8 years [IQR, 1-14 years]; 54.3% male) were included in this study. Most (2980 [83.5%]) had acute SARS-CoV-2; the remainder (588 [16.5%]) had MIS-C. Among the patients with acute SARS-CoV-2, 536 (18.0%) had a severe neurological manifestation during hospitalization, as did 146 patients with MIS-C (24.8%). Among survivors with acute SARS-CoV-2, those with severe neurological manifestations were more likely to have new neurocognitive or functional morbidity at hospital discharge compared with those without severe neurological manifestations (27.7% [n = 142] vs 14.6% [n = 356]; P &amp;lt; .001). For survivors with MIS-C, 28.0% (n = 39) with severe neurological manifestations had new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge compared with 15.5% (n = 68) of those without severe neurological manifestations ( P = .002). When adjusting for risk factors in those with severe neurological manifestations, both patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 (odds ratio, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.27-2.70]; P = .001) and those with MIS-C (odds ratio, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.22-3.89]; P = .009) had higher odds of having new neurocognitive and/or functional morbidity at hospital discharge. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this study suggest that children and adolescents with acute SARS-CoV-2 or MIS-C and severe neurological manifestations may be at high risk for long-term impairment and may benefit from screening and early intervention to assist recovery.

AbstractIn response to the evolving treatment landscape for new‐onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and the publication of consensus recommendations in 2022, we conducted a comparative analysis of NORSE management over time. Seventy‐seven patients were enrolled by 32 centers, from July 2016 to August 2023, in the NORSE/FIRES biorepository at Yale. Immunotherapy was administered to 88% of patients after a median of 3 days, with 52% receiving second‐line immunotherapy after a median of 12 days (anakinra 29%, rituximab 25%, and tocilizumab 19%). There was an increase in the use of second‐line immunotherapies (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1–1.8) and ketogenic diet (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3–2.6) over time. Specifically, patients from 2022 to 2023 more frequently received second‐line immunotherapy (69% vs 40%; OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3–8.9)—particularly anakinra (50% vs 13%; OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 2.3–21.0), and the ketogenic diet (OR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.5–20.1)—than those before 2022. Among the 27 patients who received anakinra and/or tocilizumab, earlier administration after status epilepticus onset correlated with a shorter duration of status epilepticus (ρ = .519, p = .005). Our findings indicate an evolution in NORSE management, emphasizing the increasing use of second‐line immunotherapies and the ketogenic diet. Future research will clarify the impact of these treatments and their timing on patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES To review, analyze, and synthesize the literature on endothelial dysfunction in critically ill children with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and to develop a consensus biomarker-based definition and diagnostic criteria. DATA SOURCES Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted from January 1992 to January 2020, using a combination of medical subject heading terms and key words to define concepts of endothelial dysfunction, pediatric critical illness, and outcomes. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they evaluated critically ill children with endothelial dysfunction, evaluated performance characteristics of assessment/scoring tools to screen for endothelial dysfunction, and assessed outcomes related to mortality, functional status, organ-specific outcomes, or other patient-centered outcomes. Studies of adults or premature infants (≤36 weeks gestational age), animal studies, reviews or commentaries, case series with sample size ≤10, and non-English language studies with the inability to determine eligibility criteria were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted from each eligible study into a standard data extraction form along with risk of bias assessment. DATA SYNTHESIS We identified 62 studies involving 84 assessments of endothelial derived biomarkers indirectly linked to endothelial functions including leukocyte recruitment, inflammation, coagulation, and permeability. Nearly all biomarkers studied lacked specificity for vascular segment and organ systems. Quality assessment scores for the collected literature were low. CONCLUSIONS The Endothelial Subgroup concludes that there exists no single or combination of biomarkers to diagnose endothelial dysfunction in pediatric multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Future research should focus on biomarkers more directly linked to endothelial functions and with specificity for vascular segment and organ systems.

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate benzodiazepine (BZD) administration patterns before transitioning to non‐BZD antiseizure medication (ASM) in pediatric patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE). Methods This retrospective multicenter study in the United States and Canada used prospectively collected observational data from children admitted with rSE between 2011 and 2020. Outcome variables were the number of BZDs given before the first non‐BZD ASM, and the number of BZDs administered after 30 and 45 min from seizure onset and before escalating to non‐BZD ASM. Results We included 293 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 3.8 (1.3–9.3) years. Thirty‐six percent received more than two BZDs before escalating, and the later the treatment initiation was after seizure onset, the less likely patients were to receive multiple BZD doses before transitioning (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .998, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .997–.999 per minute, p = .01). Patients received BZDs beyond 30 and 45 min in 57.3% and 44.0% of cases, respectively. Patients with out‐of‐hospital seizure onset were more likely to receive more doses of BZDs beyond 30 min (IRR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.73–3.46, p < .0001) and beyond 45 min (IRR = 3.75, 95% CI = 2.40–6.03, p < .0001) compared to patients with in‐hospital seizure onset. Intermittent SE was a risk factor for more BZDs administered beyond 45 min compared to continuous SE (IRR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.01–2.06, p = .04). Forty‐seven percent of patients ( n = 94) with out‐of‐hospital onset did not receive treatment before hospital arrival. Among patients with out‐of‐hospital onset who received at least two BZDs before hospital arrival ( n = 54), 48.1% received additional BZDs at hospital arrival. Significance Failure to escalate from BZDs to non‐BZD ASMs occurs mainly in out‐of‐hospital rSE onset. Delays in the implementation of medical guidelines may be reduced by initiating treatment before hospital arrival and facilitating a transition to non‐BZD ASMs after two BZD doses during handoffs between prehospital and in‐hospital settings.

AbstractObjectiveThis study was undertaken to describe long‐term clinical and developmental outcomes in pediatric refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and identify factors associated with new neurological deficits after RSE.MethodsWe performed retrospective analyses of prospectively collected observational data from June 2011 to March 2020 on pediatric patients with RSE. We analyzed clinical outcomes from at least 30 days after RSE and, in a subanalysis, we assessed developmental outcomes and evaluated risk factors in previously normally developed patients.ResultsFollow‐up data on outcomes were available in 276 patients (56.5% males). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow‐up duration was 1.6 (.9–2.7) years. The in‐hospital mortality rate was 4% (16/403 patients), and 15 (5.4%) patients had died after hospital discharge. One hundred sixty‐six (62.9%) patients had subsequent unprovoked seizures, and 44 (16.9%) patients had a repeated RSE episode. Among 116 patients with normal development before RSE, 42 of 107 (39.3%) patients with available data had new neurological deficits (cognitive, behavioral, or motor). Patients with new deficits had longer median (IQR) electroclinical RSE duration than patients without new deficits (10.3 [2.1–134.5] h vs. 4 [1.6–16] h, p = .011, adjusted odds ratio = 1.003, 95% confidence interval = 1.0008–1.0069, p = .027). The proportion of patients with an unfavorable functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale‐Extended score ≥ 4) was 22 of 90 (24.4%), and they were more likely to have received a continuous infusion.SignificanceAbout one third of patients without prior epilepsy developed recurrent unprovoked seizures after the RSE episode. In previously normally developing patients, 39% presented with new deficits during follow‐up, with longer electroclinical RSE duration as a predictor.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the pediatric super-refractory status epilepticus population by describing treatment variability in super-refractory status epilepticus patients and comparing relevant clinical characteristics, including outcomes, between super-refractory status epilepticus, and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data between June 2011 and January 2019. SETTING: Seventeen academic hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: We included patients 1 month to 21 years old presenting with convulsive refractory status epilepticus. We defined super-refractory status epilepticus as continuous or intermittent seizures lasting greater than or equal to 24 hours following initiation of continuous infusion and divided the cohort into super-refractory status epilepticus and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus groups. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 281 patients (157 males) with a median age of 4.1 years (1.3–9.5 yr), including 31 super-refractory status epilepticus patients. Compared with nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus group, super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of first nonbenzodiazepine-antiseizure medication (149 min [55–491.5 min] vs 62 min [33.3–120.8 min]; p = 0.030) and of continuous infusion (495 min [177.5–1,255 min] vs 150 min [90–318.5 min]; p = 0.003); prolonged seizure duration (120 hr [58–368 hr] vs 3 hr [1.4–5.9 hr]; p < 0.001) and length of ICU stay (17 d [9.5–40 d] vs [1.8–8.8 d]; p < 0.001); more medical complications (18/31 [58.1%] vs 55/250 [22.2%] patients; p < 0.001); lower return to baseline function (7/31 [22.6%] vs 182/250 [73.4%] patients; p < 0.001); and higher mortality (4/31 [12.9%] vs 5/250 [2%]; p = 0.010). Within the super-refractory status epilepticus group, status epilepticus resolution was attained with a single continuous infusion in 15 of 31 patients (48.4%), two in 10 of 31 (32.3%), and three or more in six of 31 (19.4%). Most super-refractory status epilepticus patients (30/31, 96.8%) received midazolam as first choice. About 17 of 31 patients (54.8%) received additional treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of nonbenzodiazepine antiseizure medication treatment, higher number of medical complications and mortality, and lower return to neurologic baseline than nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients, although these associations were not adjusted for potential confounders. Treatment approaches following the first continuous infusion were heterogeneous, reflecting limited information to guide clinical decision-making in super-refractory status epilepticus.