Yoo, Ji Yeoun

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to examine acute and chronic electroencephalographic (EEG) and seizure characteristics in new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). Methods Multicenter inpatient and follow‐up clinical and EEG data were analyzed using International League Against Epilepsy definitions and American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) EEG terminology. Results Forty‐four patients were included from the Yale NORSE/FIRES Biorepository (median age = 29 years, 33 female, 38 cryptogenic). Nine hundred twenty inpatient EEG days were reviewed (median = 13.5 days/patient). Presenting status epilepticus (SE) types included 24 convulsive SE (CSE), five focal–motor (FMSE), and 15 nonconvulsive (NCSE). Of 39 patients with post discharge follow‐up (median = 14.7 months), 61.5% ( n = 24) had seizures and required more antiseizure medications than seizure‐free patients (median = 4 vs. 1, p < .001). Inpatient EEG captured epileptiform discharges in all and periodic discharges in 38 patients. Seizures were captured in 38 patients: 33 electrographic (11 only electrographic) and 27 electroclinical. Total seizure burden ranged 6.5–29 615.0 min (median = 50.7). Seizures fulfilling ACNS EEG criteria for SE were captured in 20 patients; two had CSE and the remainder NCSE with coma, nine of whom also had FMSE. Inpatient seizure days (median = 50.0 vs. 15.5%, p = .004) and seizure burden (median = 42.9 vs. 0 min, p = .009) were higher in the first half of monitored days. Interictal findings were equally present and did not predict postdischarge seizures, whereas electroclinical seizures (90.9% vs. 45.5%, p = .037), seizure burden (median = 116.8 vs. 32.5 min, p = .045), and proportion of seizure days (36.3% vs. 20.0%, p = .037) did. Among 12 patients with follow‐up EEGs (median = 19.6 months post onset), posterior‐dominant rhythm (PDR) returned in nine; five had periodic discharges, and three had seizure captured. Significance Seizures are most commonly convulsive upon presentation and nonconvulsive or clinically subtle throughout the inpatient course in NORSE. Inpatient seizures, but not interictal abnormalities, occur earlier in the inpatient course and presence of electroclinical seizures, seizure burden, and proportion of seizure days but not interictal findings are associated with postdischarge seizures. Although return of PDR reflects neurological recovery, seizure persistence and EEG abnormalities post‐NORSE are common.

Abstract Objective Ceribell Inc.'s point‐of‐care electroencephalographic (EEG) system and artificial intelligence‐based Automated Seizure Burden Estimator (ASBE; ClarityPro) have US Food and Drug Administration clearance for diagnosing electrographic status epilepticus (ESE). The AccuRASE study using ASBE version 6 (V6) showed high negative predictive value (NPV) but limited sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) at certain thresholds. Version 8 (V8) is the updated algorithm trained with additional EEG samples. Methods We tested V8 on the previously used rapid‐response EEG test dataset (not used to train V8). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were compared against blinded expert annotations. ESE, ESE and possible ESE (ESE/pESE), electrographic seizures (ESz), and Esz with highly epileptiform patterns (Esz/HEPs) at burden thresholds of >1%, >10%, >20%, >50%, and >90% were analyzed. Additionally, we evaluated the built‐in ESE and ESE/pESE alerts (≥90% over 5 min, ≥20% over 1 h, or ≥10 continuous minutes of seizure). Results V8 showed 100% sensitivity at lower thresholds (>10%–20%) for ESE (V6 .86), without a specificity loss (V8 .9 vs. V6 .85), and retained NPV (V8 1.0 vs. V6 .99). Sensitivity at 50% threshold was .86 for ESE (V6 .71), and specificity was .94 (V6 .91); PPV for ESE was 30% for ESE and 80% for ESE/pESE. The specificity for ESE remained high for 90% burden (V8 .96, V6 .97) but the sensitivity dropped (.29 vs. V6 .43). Sensitivity was lower for ESz/HEPs (.54 → .44 at >10% threshold), although the algorithm is not designed to detect HEPs. Built‐in alert analysis showed significantly improved sensitivity for ESE (.57 → .86); specificity and NPV remained high (>.94). Significance ASBE V8 showed meaningful improvements in sensitivity, continued excellent NPV, and improved built‐in alert accuracy for ESE and ESE/pESE. The best seizure burden threshold for ruling out ESE now is 20% (vs. 10% with V6) and that for ruling in ESE/pESE with reasonable certainty is 50% (vs. 90% with V6).

Abstract Objectives Pivotal trials have established the effectiveness of the Responsive Neurostimulation System (RNS® System) in treating focal epilepsy. In clinical trials, depth leads were primarily used to treat mesial temporal seizure onsets while cortical strip leads were used to treat neocortical seizure onsets. Here, we systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG)‐guided depth leads to provide responsive stimulation to neocortical gray matter. Methods Patients were stratified as strong responders (>median cohort seizure reduction %), weak responders (>0% and ≤median cohort seizure reduction %), and anti‐responders (≤0%) based on percent seizure reduction at 1 year post‐implant (1‐Y). Pre‐operative T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging and post‐operative computed tomography images were merged, and the Euclidean distance between the sEEG epileptic focus (sEEG‐EF) and the nearest RNS System depth lead contacts was calculated. Results A total of 87 depth leads were implanted in 55 patients across neocortical brain regions. The median reduction in clinical seizures improved from 66.7% at 1‐Y to 77.5% at long‐term follow‐up (LTFU: 2.35 ± 0.95 years), with 10 patients (18.2%) achieving complete seizure freedom. Seven patients (12.7%) experienced six serious adverse events. At 1‐Y, shorter Euclidean distance between the sEEG‐EF and RNS System depth leads predicted improved seizure outcome in strong responders ( β = −0.84, p = 0.008) but not in weak responders ( β = 0.21, p = 0.9) or anti‐responders ( β = −20.34, p = 0.11). At LTFU, there was no significant relationship between Euclidean distance and seizure reduction in strong responders ( β = 0.77, p = 0.18), weak responders ( β = 2.05, p = 0.54), or anti‐responders ( β = 0.24, p = 0.99). Exploratory analyses at 1‐Y showed nominal associations between older age ( ρ = 0.32), longer epilepsy duration ( ρ = 0.27), and non‐mesial temporal sEEG‐EFs and greater seizure reduction; however, none survived Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = 0.0027; all post‐correction p > 0.0027), and no associations were observed at LTFU. Significance In this series, neocortical depth leads for RNS therapy had favorable safety and efficacy and proximity to the sEEG‐EF drove initial outcomes for strong responders to RNS therapy. Plain Language Summary In this multi‐center study, patients with difficult‐to‐treat seizures received brain‐responsive stimulation using a device called responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which delivers small electrical pulses to reduce seizures. We focused on patients treated with electrodes placed in the brain's outer regions (the neocortex) and guided by a mapping procedure called sEEG. On average, patients had their seizures cut by two‐thirds after one year and by more than three‐quarters with longer follow‐up, with about one in five becoming seizure‐free. The treatment was safe, and closer electrode placement to the seizure source helped explain early—but not long‐term—improvements.

Abstract Objective This study aims to better characterize the long‐term neurological quality of life (QOL) outcomes (using the Neuro‐QOL scale) in survivors of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), and provide guidance for psychological and social support strategies. Methods Utilizing data from a multicenter prospective study of NORSE/FIRES led by Yale University, we enrolled patients who completed the validated, patient‐reported Neuro‐QOL scale at least once at 3–6 months ( n = 37), 12 months ( n = 29), 24 months ( n = 23), or ≥36 months ( n = 9) following discharge. The Neuro‐QOL scale assesses physical, mental, and social health in patients with neurological disorders. QOL impairment (QOL‐I) scores were calculated, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. T ‐scores enabled comparisons with reference populations. Results In adults, median QOL‐I improved from 44.1% at 3–6 months to 37.6% at 36+ months. Paired analysis showed significant improvement in QOL‐I between 3–6 and 24 months ( p = .016), with specific improvements in communication, satisfaction with social roles, fatigue, and mobility. Greater improvement was also observed for participation in social roles (5.5‐point T ‐score gain) compared to the reference population, suggesting meaningful change. A gradual improvement in overall QOL‐I scores was also observed in pediatric participants, despite a modest sample size ( n = 5 with data at 3–6 and 12 months). Measures of fatigue and anxiety persisted in adults, and cognitive difficulties persisted in both adults and children. In adults, longer status epilepticus duration and intensive care unit stay were associated with poorer QOL. Additionally, a higher number of antiseizure medications was associated with more depression, cognitive impairments, and perceived stigma. Significance These findings highlight the potential for recovery following an acute episode of NORSE, although many patients continue to face challenges requiring ongoing support, and the clinical meaning of the reported QOL improvement remains unclear. Furthermore, the findings underscore the importance of strategic multidisciplinary support systems in the years following discharge.

AbstractIn response to the evolving treatment landscape for new‐onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and the publication of consensus recommendations in 2022, we conducted a comparative analysis of NORSE management over time. Seventy‐seven patients were enrolled by 32 centers, from July 2016 to August 2023, in the NORSE/FIRES biorepository at Yale. Immunotherapy was administered to 88% of patients after a median of 3 days, with 52% receiving second‐line immunotherapy after a median of 12 days (anakinra 29%, rituximab 25%, and tocilizumab 19%). There was an increase in the use of second‐line immunotherapies (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1–1.8) and ketogenic diet (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3–2.6) over time. Specifically, patients from 2022 to 2023 more frequently received second‐line immunotherapy (69% vs 40%; OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3–8.9)—particularly anakinra (50% vs 13%; OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 2.3–21.0), and the ketogenic diet (OR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.5–20.1)—than those before 2022. Among the 27 patients who received anakinra and/or tocilizumab, earlier administration after status epilepticus onset correlated with a shorter duration of status epilepticus (ρ = .519, p = .005). Our findings indicate an evolution in NORSE management, emphasizing the increasing use of second‐line immunotherapies and the ketogenic diet. Future research will clarify the impact of these treatments and their timing on patient outcomes.

Abstract Febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a subset of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) that involves a febrile infection prior to the onset of the refractory status epilepticus. It is unclear whether FIRES and non‐FIRES NORSE are distinct conditions. Here, we compare 34 patients with FIRES to 30 patients with non‐FIRES NORSE for demographics, clinical features, neuroimaging, and outcomes. Because patients with FIRES were younger than patients with non‐FIRES NORSE (median = 28 vs. 48 years old, p = .048) and more likely cryptogenic (odds ratio = 6.89), we next ran a regression analysis using age or etiology as a covariate. Respiratory and gastrointestinal prodromes occurred more frequently in FIRES patients, but no difference was found for non‐infection‐related prodromes. Status epilepticus subtype, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and magnetic resonance imaging findings, and outcomes were similar. However, FIRES cases were more frequently cryptogenic; had higher CSF interleukin 6, CSF macrophage inflammatory protein‐1 alpha (MIP‐1a), and serum chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) levels; and received more antiseizure medications and immunotherapy. After controlling for age or etiology, no differences were observed in presenting symptoms and signs or inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting that FIRES and non‐FIRES NORSE are very similar conditions.