Ghatan, Saadi

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of responsive thalamic stimulation as adjunctive therapy for drug‐resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) with generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCSs). Methods NAUTILUS is a prospective, multicenter, single‐blind, randomized sham‐controlled pivotal trial. Patients were ≥12 years of age with drug‐resistant IGE and ≥2 GTCSs over a 3‐month baseline. Bilateral depth leads were targeted to the centromedian thalamus. One month later, patients were randomized to Active (responsive stimulation, n = 44) or Sham (no stimulation, n = 43). The effectiveness evaluation period (EEP) began 3 months postimplant through 1 year. After a second GTCS in the EEP, patients transitioned to open‐label active stimulation. The primary safety endpoint was the serious adverse device‐related event (SADE) rate at 84 days postimplant. The primary effectiveness endpoint was time‐to‐second‐GTCS during the EEP. Additional endpoints included median percent change in days with any generalized seizure, GTCS frequency, and responder rate (RR). Results Eighty‐seven patients were implanted across 23 US centers. The SADE rate was significantly below the performance goal (6.9%, p < .0001), with no adverse effects on cognition, mood, or sleep. The prespecified primary effectiveness endpoint was not significant. However, a post hoc mixed‐effects model considering all EEP days demonstrated greater GTCS reduction in the originally randomized Active group (61%) compared to patients originally randomized to Sham (49%, p = .030). Eighteen‐month outcomes included 76.8% median GTCS reduction, 62.5% RR, 40% GTCS‐free at that timepoint, and 77.8% median reduction in days with any generalized seizure. More than 90% of patients and 86% of physicians reported improvement on Global Impression of Change scales. Significance NAUTILUS is the first randomized controlled neuromodulation trial in IGE. Responsive thalamic stimulation provided a clinically meaningful and durable reduction in seizures with an acceptable safety profile, offering a much‐needed option for drug‐resistant IGE.

Abstract Objectives Pivotal trials have established the effectiveness of the Responsive Neurostimulation System (RNS® System) in treating focal epilepsy. In clinical trials, depth leads were primarily used to treat mesial temporal seizure onsets while cortical strip leads were used to treat neocortical seizure onsets. Here, we systematically analyze the safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG)‐guided depth leads to provide responsive stimulation to neocortical gray matter. Methods Patients were stratified as strong responders (>median cohort seizure reduction %), weak responders (>0% and ≤median cohort seizure reduction %), and anti‐responders (≤0%) based on percent seizure reduction at 1 year post‐implant (1‐Y). Pre‐operative T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging and post‐operative computed tomography images were merged, and the Euclidean distance between the sEEG epileptic focus (sEEG‐EF) and the nearest RNS System depth lead contacts was calculated. Results A total of 87 depth leads were implanted in 55 patients across neocortical brain regions. The median reduction in clinical seizures improved from 66.7% at 1‐Y to 77.5% at long‐term follow‐up (LTFU: 2.35 ± 0.95 years), with 10 patients (18.2%) achieving complete seizure freedom. Seven patients (12.7%) experienced six serious adverse events. At 1‐Y, shorter Euclidean distance between the sEEG‐EF and RNS System depth leads predicted improved seizure outcome in strong responders ( β = −0.84, p = 0.008) but not in weak responders ( β = 0.21, p = 0.9) or anti‐responders ( β = −20.34, p = 0.11). At LTFU, there was no significant relationship between Euclidean distance and seizure reduction in strong responders ( β = 0.77, p = 0.18), weak responders ( β = 2.05, p = 0.54), or anti‐responders ( β = 0.24, p = 0.99). Exploratory analyses at 1‐Y showed nominal associations between older age ( ρ = 0.32), longer epilepsy duration ( ρ = 0.27), and non‐mesial temporal sEEG‐EFs and greater seizure reduction; however, none survived Bonferroni correction (adjusted α = 0.0027; all post‐correction p > 0.0027), and no associations were observed at LTFU. Significance In this series, neocortical depth leads for RNS therapy had favorable safety and efficacy and proximity to the sEEG‐EF drove initial outcomes for strong responders to RNS therapy. Plain Language Summary In this multi‐center study, patients with difficult‐to‐treat seizures received brain‐responsive stimulation using a device called responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which delivers small electrical pulses to reduce seizures. We focused on patients treated with electrodes placed in the brain's outer regions (the neocortex) and guided by a mapping procedure called sEEG. On average, patients had their seizures cut by two‐thirds after one year and by more than three‐quarters with longer follow‐up, with about one in five becoming seizure‐free. The treatment was safe, and closer electrode placement to the seizure source helped explain early—but not long‐term—improvements.

Abstract Standard of care (SOC) for ndGBM begins with maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and maintenance temozolomide. IGV-001 is an autologous biologic-device combination immunotherapy for the treatment of ndGBM that consists of autologous GBM tumor cells and an antisense oligonucleotide against IGF-1R mRNA, irradiated and administered via biodiffusion chambers implanted in the abdomen. In a phase 1b study, IGV-001 was well tolerated without unexpected adverse events in subjects with ndGBM. Multiple efficacy signals were observed, including significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), radiographic evidence of tumor response, and changes in immune response biomarkers. Here, we present early safety data from the phase 2b randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT04485949) designed to assess efficacy and safety of IGV-001 in subjects with ndGBM across 20 sites in the United States. After surgical resection, subjects were randomized 2:1 and treated with IGV-001 or placebo followed by SOC. The primary outcome is PFS, defined as the time from randomization to first progression, as determined by blinded central radiology review, or death. Secondary outcomes include OS, defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, and safety. As of May 22, 2024, 99 subjects were randomized and 95 implanted with IGV-001 or placebo plus SOC. A total of 39/45 (86.7%) subjects had sufficient follow-up time after initiated treatment with concurrent radiation and temozolomide. Nine of 72 randomized (12.5%) discontinued treatment, including 7 who stopped during the SOC treatment period. None ceased treatment for adverse events, protocol deviations, or death. A total of 11/72 (15.3%) randomized subjects discontinued the study after randomization. A review of blinded safety data did not show any emerging risk and supports no change to the benefit-risk profile of IGV-001 versus placebo. Updated data will be presented.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. Standard of care (SOC) for suspected GBM begins with maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and maintenance temozolomide. Imvax has utilized its Goldspire™ platform to create IGV-001, an autologous biologic-device combination product for the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM). IGV-001 consists of autologous GBM tumor cells and an antisense oligonucleotide against IGF-1R mRNA (IMV-001), irradiated and administered via biodiffusion chambers implanted in the abdomen. Together, these components stimulate immunogenic cell death and antigen release. In a phase 1b study in patients with ndGBM, IGV-001 was well tolerated without unexpected adverse events. Multiple efficacy signals were also observed, including significant improvements in progression-free survival, overall survival, radiographic evidence of tumor response, and changes in immune response biomarkers. A phase 2b randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of IGV-001 in patients with ndGBM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04485949) is ongoing. Here, we present the first safety data from the study. MATERIAL AND METHODS After surgical resection, patients are treated with IGV-001 or placebo followed by SOC. The study will enroll approximately 93 patients at 20 sites in the United States, with a 2:1 randomization favoring IGV-001. The primary outcome is progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to first progression, as determined by blinded central radiology review, or death. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, and safety. RESULTS As of February 2, 2024, a total of 72 patients have been randomized and 69 have been implanted with IGV-001 or placebo plus SOC. The median age was 60.0 years (range, 24-70 years). Most randomized patients (76.4%) were 51-70 years of age, and the male:female ratio was 2.27. A total of 39/45 (86.7%) patients with enough follow-up time, initiated treatment with concurrent radiation and temozolomide. A total of 9/72 (12.5%) randomized patients discontinued treatment, including 7 patients who discontinued during the SOC treatment period. No patients discontinued treatment for adverse events, protocol deviations, or death. A total of 11/72 (15.3%) randomized patients discontinued the study after randomization. CONCLUSION To date, the review of blinded safety data did not show any emerging risk and supports that there is no change to the benefit-risk profile of treatment with IGV-001 versus placebo. The data will be updated before presentation.